TSX:WPM Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.

ISIN: CA9628791027 · Dual-listed TSX:WPM / NYSE:WPM · reported in CAD (TSX listing)
Basic Materials Precious-Metals Streaming / Royalty Analysis Status: Starting
NYSE / TSX · HQ: Vancouver, BC · CEO: Haytham Hodaly · Mkt Cap: C$81.6B (US$58.2B) · 454.0M shares
C$179.72
+C$6.32 (+3.64%) · Jun 16, 2026
Signal v6 · 17:03 ET · US$128.24 (≈C$/US$ 1.401)
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo) WAIT-FOR-EVENT 60 60% FOMC tomorrow (Jun 17) — precious metals are real-yield sensitive; and the stock has already run +20% off the C$150 swing low in four sessions. Don't chase into the event.
Medium-term (6–12 mo) BUY 65 65% Best-in-class streamer — ~90% cash margins, debt-free, on a 21% pullback; strong gold+silver tailwind. Borderline base — accumulate on weakness (STRONG amplification declined on premium valuation).
Long-term (3–5 yr) STRONG BUY 71 65% Quality dominates; structural precious-metals bull (de-dollarisation, CB buying, fiscal dominance) with a diversified, low-risk streaming model and free development optionality. Base BUY amplified by driver + economy.
Next update: 2026-06-18 — FOMC 2026-06-17 +1 trading day (precious metals rate-sensitive, high-impact release inside the 3-day window).
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard 2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status 3Pillar Detail: Business Quality 4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness 5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers 6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment 7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing 8Economic Event Risk 9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis 10Price Chart (6-Month Daily) 11Scenario Summary 12Entry / Exit Rules 13Position Sizing Context 14Calibration Snapshot 15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — Business Quality, Valuation Attractiveness, Entry/Exit Timing, Underlying Drivers, and Economic Alignment — each 0–100 with confidence. The per-horizon base BUY/HOLD/SELL comes from the three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY when both corroborate. WPM is scored as a streaming / royalty company, not a producer — cash margin per ounce, portfolio breadth, FCF and near-zero debt/capex replace AISC and reserve-life. Quality figures use the US fundamental ticker (WPM, USD); price-based levels are converted to CAD at the TSX listing.

Business Quality

85
Elite streamer: ~88% EBITDA margin, fixed low purchase cost, debt-free, 36 diversified assets
Confidence: 80%

Valuation Attractiveness

53
Premium streamer multiples (23× EV/EBITDA, 6.3× P/B) vs strong target support — every analyst target above price
Confidence: 66%

Entry/Exit Timing

57
Monthly/weekly uptrend; daily reclaimed the 200-DMA but already +20% off the C$150 low into FOMC
Confidence: 65%

Underlying Drivers

87
Gold ~US$4,360 & silver ~US$70 vs fixed ~US$450/~US$4.50 cost — Strong Tailwind
Confidence: 70% · STRONG-eligible

Economic Alignment

82
Trend-Following · Tailwind
Confidence: 75% · Macro report 2026-06-13

The pillars conflict in the same instructive way they did across the precious-metals complex this week: a top-decile business (arguably the highest-margin model in mining) riding a top-decile driver and a friendly economy, but at a premium price and after a sharp 4-day bounce into a live Fed meeting. That is why the three horizons diverge — Quality/driver/economy dominate the long horizon (STRONG BUY), the premium valuation and an extended, unconfirmed bounce keep the medium horizon a disciplined BUY/accumulate, and a high-impact FOMC one day out overrides the short horizon to WAIT.

2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — liquidity, currency, accounting, debt, dilution, commodity floor, permitting, imminent-event blackout. Any triggered gate is a hard Do-Not-Buy regardless of the composite score; caution gates are notes for position sizing. For WPM all gates are clear — the streaming model is structurally low-risk (no operating cost base, near-zero debt). The only amber note is a near-term Fed event that drives the short-term WAIT (a timing caution, not a structural one).
Financial Distress — CLEAR
Net cash ~US$2.16B; total debt US$7.7M (D/E 0.08%); interest coverage 446×; current ratio 4.53. Among the cleanest balance sheets in the entire sector.
Earnings Event — CLEAR
Q1 reported May 7; next earnings est. ~early-Aug 2026 (>14 days out). ⚠️ date unverified (calendar API empty).
Valuation Ceiling — CLEAR
Price C$179.72 below every analyst target (low C$224.86); trailing P/E 32× is mid-upper, not a 5-yr extreme. Premium-but-not-ceiling.
Accounting / Dilution — CLEAR
Share count flat (~454M, <0.1% drift); negligible SBC; dividend payout only ~17%. No earnings-quality flags — streaming income is contractual.
Regulatory / Binary — CLEAR
No pending binary event. Diversified across 23 producing + 13 development streams and multiple jurisdictions — single-asset risk is structurally muted.
Severe Driver Collapse — CLEAR
Driver score 87 (metals far above fixed contractual cost). Nowhere near the ≤15 commodity-floor gate — a streamer's margin survives even deep corrections.

Do-Not-Buy triggers: none fired. Leverage+rising-rates (no debt) ✓ · Valuation extreme (P/E not top-decile) ✓ · Negative earnings revisions (estimates rising with metals) ✓ · Insider selling spike (none observed) ✓ · Structural threat (none) ✓. Hard-gate state: CLEAR (✓).

3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score for a streamer: cash operating margin per ounce, the fixed-cost contractual model, balance-sheet strength, portfolio breadth, ROE and capital allocation. Sector profile: Precious-metals streaming / royalty; lifecycle: Mature, cash-generative with an embedded growth pipeline. Metrics emphasise cash margin, EBITDA margin, FCF, net debt and diversification (AISC, reserve-life and production-volume growth are not the right lens — WPM owns no mines and bears no operating-cost inflation). The 44-employee headcount is normal for a streamer, not a red flag.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
Arguably the highest-quality business model in mining: ~88% EBITDA margin on metal it buys at a fixed, contractually-low price, a debt-free balance sheet, 21.5% ROE, and 36 diversified streams that mute single-asset risk. The cap is that it is a price-taker with no operational control and a financial-intermediary structure.
85
Confidence 80% · base 85 → adj 85

Lifecycle & Sector Classification

Sector: Precious-metals streaming / royalty (gold ~55–60% of revenue, silver ~35%, plus palladium & cobalt). Lifecycle: Mature cash generator — it provides upfront capital to miners in exchange for the right to buy future production at a fixed low price (~US$450/oz gold-equivalent, ~US$4.50/oz silver, with inflation escalators). Profitable and free-cash-generative, with a built-in growth pipeline of 13 development-stage streams. Scored on streamer-appropriate metrics (cash margin, EBITDA margin, FCF, balance sheet), not on the optically huge but price-driven +92% YoY revenue.

Sub-SignalValueSector BenchmarkScoreRationale
Cash operating margin (benchmark)~88% (realized price − fixed cost)>40% of price = exceptional96Buys gold at ~US$450 vs ~US$4,360 spot, silver at ~US$4.50 vs ~US$70 — a fixed-cost structure no producer can match.
Profitability vs peersEBITDA 87.5% · op 71.8% · net 65.5%Top of the entire mining sector93Margins structurally above producers (AEM ~72% EBITDA) because there is no operating-cost or capex inflation.
Cash generationOCF ~US$2.3B TTM (~84% of sales)FCF distorted by stream M&A — see below72Operating cash conversion elite; headline FCF (~US$1.0B) is depressed because cash is redeployed into new streams (growth).
Balance-sheet healthNet cash ~US$2.16B · D/E 0.08% · cur. 4.53×Net cash = strongest tier97Effectively debt-free; interest coverage 446×. Best-in-class survivability and dry powder for new deals.
Portfolio breadth / diversification23 producing + 13 development streamsMore assets = lower single-mine risk85A streamer's "reserve life" is portfolio breadth — operating risk sits with 30+ counterpart mines, not WPM.

INDUSTRY BENCHMARK: Cash Operating Margin per Ounce (streaming)

Gold ~US$4,360/oz & silver ~US$70/oz  |  Fixed contractual cost ~US$450 (gold-equiv) / ~US$4.50 (silver)  |  Cash margin ~88–94% of price
Rating: EXCEPTIONAL — margin far above the >40%-of-price "excellent" line. Benchmark Score: 96/100.
Context: this is the streamer's structural edge. WPM's cost is fixed by contract, so even a 40–50% metals correction widens its margin relative to a producer whose AISC keeps rising. There is no AISC, no fuel/labour inflation, and no sustaining-capex drag — the single most important reason to own a streamer over a miner.

Competitive Moat Scorecard

Pricing Power

50
Price-taker on output (neutral by default)

Network Effects

55
Scale/reputation draws deal flow — mild

Switching Costs

78
Streams are 40-yr+ life-of-mine contracts — locked

Cost Advantage

90
Fixed low purchase cost, no opex/capex inflation

Intangible Assets

75
Contract portfolio, capital-allocation IP, relationships

Moat average ≈ 70 — materially higher than a producer's, and the streamer's genuine edge. Its durable advantages are a structural fixed-cost moat (cost advantage 90), locked life-of-mine contracts (switching costs 78), and a compounding portfolio of intangible streaming agreements. Like any miner it cannot set the price of gold or silver, so pricing power is (correctly) neutral.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

Component (weight)ReadingScore
ROIC / returns (40%)ROE 21.5%, ROA 14.0%; FMP ROE & ROA sub-scores both 5/5. Top-quartile and rising as metals lift realized prices against a fixed cost.84
Capital-allocation discipline (30%)The whole business is capital allocation — accretive new streams funded from cash flow + a debt-free balance sheet (recent additions in gold/copper/cobalt). Dividend tied to a % of trailing operating cash flow (payout ~17%) — conservative, self-funding, room to grow.82
Management skin-in-the-game (30%)Experienced, well-regarded team; negligible SBC dilution; long record of disciplined deal-making rather than chasing volume. New CEO (Hodaly) is a long-tenured internal promotion — continuity.72

FMP financial-health rating: B+ (3/5) — DCF 4, ROE 5, ROA 5, D/E 3, with the only drags being the valuation sub-scores (P/E 1, P/B 1). The independent rating confirms our high Quality read and previews the Valuation tension below — high quality, full price.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

A deep dive into the Valuation score: streamer-appropriate multiples, the cash-yield anchor (with the streaming FCF nuance), reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality (free upside), analyst consensus targets, grades distribution and the FMP cross-reference. The central tension: streamers structurally trade at a premium to producers (23× EV/EBITDA, 6.3× P/B here), yet every published analyst target sits above the current price and PEG is low on exploding earnings — so the score lands in "Fair, premium-but-supported."
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Fair. The streamer premium is real — 23× EV/EBITDA and 6.3× P/B are rich in absolute terms and rest on peak-cycle metal prices. Against that, forward P/E ~23× sits on EPS that more than doubled YoY (PEG ~0.4), and every analyst target is above spot. A small embedded-optionality tilt nudges it up; it is supported, not cheap.
53
Confidence 66% · base 49 → +4 optionality → 53
MultipleCurrentReferenceRead
EV/EBITDA (primary, streamer)23.3×Streamers ~20–28×; producers ~8–12×Mid-pack for a streamer but a steep premium to producers — the structural quality/optionality tax.
P/NAV (streamer)~2.0–2.3× (est.)Streamers ~1.8–2.5×In the normal streamer band; not stretched within its own peer set, but high vs the broader sector.
Forward P/E~22.8×2026E EPS ~US$5.39 / 2027E ~US$5.66Optically reasonable for the model — but the "E" rides peak metals; EPS growth flattens after 2028.
Trailing P/E / P/B32.3× / 6.3×FMP P/E & P/B sub-scores 1/5Rich on trailing; the statistical-cheapness screens fail — typical for a high-quality streamer.
PEG (growth-adjusted)~0.43<1 = cheap relative to growthEPS +128% YoY (metals + new streams) makes the multiple look cheap against near-term growth.
Cash yield (anchor)OCF yield ~4.1% on EVFCF yield ~1.7% is misleading — see noteUse OCF: headline FCF is depressed by cash deployed into new streams (growth), not weakness.

The streaming FCF nuance — don't read the 1.7% as expensive

WPM's headline FCF yield is only ~1.7% (P/FCF 58.7×), which looks dear. But for a streamer that is an artefact of growth, not weakness: operating cash flow (~US$2.3B TTM, ~84% of sales) is elite, and the gap to free cash flow is cash invested into new streaming agreements — the equivalent of a producer's growth capex, except it buys decades of future high-margin ounces. The honest cash anchor here is the ~4.1% operating-cash-flow yield on EV. We therefore do not mark Valuation down on the 1.7% figure; we mark it on the rich EV/EBITDA and P/B.

Reverse DCF / Implied Growth

At C$179.72 with a net-cash balance sheet and ~US$2.3B TTM operating cash flow, the market is roughly capitalising current cash generation at a high-single-digit discount rate plus modest ongoing stream growth — i.e. it is pricing in sustained near-record gold and silver alongside continued accretive deal-making. Consensus agrees in the near term: EPS is modelled at ~US$5.39 (2026E) → US$5.66 (2027E) → US$5.79 (2028E), then flattening to ~US$5.18 (2029–30E) as analysts assume metals normalise. So the forward-P/E "reasonableness" leans on peak earnings; on mid-cycle metals the multiple is full. That — not any balance-sheet concern — is why Valuation is Fair rather than Attractive despite the strong target support below.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside

The in-production stream portfolio justifies the bulk of the ~C$180 price. On top, the buyer gets several options the market pays little for: Net: optionality is a +4 tilt (raising base 49 → 53) and a reason to keep accumulating on weakness — not a reason to call a premium multiple "cheap."

Analyst Price-Target Consensus

MetricCAD (TSX:WPM, primary)Upside vs C$179.72Cross-check (FMP, USD)
Consensus / meanC$263.03+46.4%US$170 (+32.6% on US$128.24)
MedianC$255.52+42.2%US$170
High / LowC$324.20 / C$224.86low still +25.1%US$180 / US$160
Coverage / rec.7 analysts (Yahoo) · "Strong Buy" (1.31)FMP grades: 16 Buy · 4 Hold · 0 Sell → 80% bullish.

The standout, source-agnostic signal: every published target is above the current price — even the lowest (≈C$225, +25%). The two feeds disagree on magnitude — Yahoo's CAD set (mean C$263, 7 analysts) is more bullish and fresher than FMP's more conservative US$170 consensus — so we lead with "all targets above spot, ~30–46% upside depending on source" rather than the headline +46%, and apply a confidence haircut for the source spread and thin Yahoo coverage. Grades consensus (FMP) 16 Buy · 4 Hold · 0 Sell → 80% bullish (Buy with ~20% holds → solid). Recent actions are mostly maintains with two upgrades inside six months (UBS Neutral→Buy 3/27; RBC Sector Perform→Outperform 12/10) — sentiment steady-to-improving, not euphoric. FMP health rating B+, dragged only by the P/E (1) and P/B (1) valuation sub-scores — independently corroborating "high quality, full price."

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force WPM is tethered to — the gold and silver price (with real interest rates as the contested secondary). A context pillar: it does not change the fundamental pillar scores, but a tailwind ≥65 makes the name eligible to amplify a base BUY to STRONG BUY. Because WPM's cost is fixed, its margin leverage to metal prices is even higher than a producer's. This section also names the thesis-invalidation floor.
Primary Driver: Gold + Silver Spot Price
Secondary (contested): 10-yr real yield (DFII10) at 2.15% — a textbook headwind that has decoupled as central-bank buying and de-dollarisation dominate. Silver adds higher beta (and higher volatility) to the gold tailwind.
87
Strong Tailwind
Horizon (weight)ReadingScore
Historical (25%)Gold ran from ~US$1,800 (2022) to ~US$4,360 (2026) and silver from ~US$22 to ~US$70 — a generational dual-metal bull; WPM net income roughly doubled YoY.95
Current state (50%)Spot gold ~US$4,360 / silver ~US$70 vs fixed contractual costs ~US$450 / ~US$4.50 → ~88–94% cash margin. As favourable as it gets, and structurally protected by the fixed cost base.93
Forward outlook (25%)Macro report rates GLD Strong Outperform across all horizons and SLV Outperform→Strong Outperform (de-dollar CB bid, stagflation hedge, Iran/Hormuz premium). Tempered by record price levels, silver's volatility, and a positive 2.15% real yield that could bite on a hawkish Fed.72

Driver score = 95·0.25 + 93·0.50 + 72·0.25 ≈ 87 → Strong Tailwind, amplification-eligible (≥65). It does not change the base BUY/HOLD/SELL or the three fundamental pillar scores — it only enables a base BUY to become STRONG BUY when the economy also pushes the same way (it does, §6). Thesis-invalidation floor: a sustained gold break below ~US$2,000/oz (and silver below ~US$20) would compress — but not erase — WPM's fixed-cost margin and invalidate the premium multiple; the Severe-Driver-Collapse gate would only arm at metal prices near the contractual cost, which is fanciful. Both are far from spot. Confidence 70% (−10 for metals' inherent forward volatility, sharpened by silver; current state crystal-clear).

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to WPM, read from the latest Macro-Economic report (2026-06-13, 3 days old — fresh). It classifies the macro pressure as Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with 0–100 conviction. The pressure is the second amplifier — a Tailwind enables STRONG BUY.
Economic Alignment — Stance & Conviction
Trend-Following · Pressure: Tailwind
82
Conviction

WPM is not a named line in the macro report's Economic Watchlist Forecast, so the read comes from the Driver-Sector Impact Matrix: WPM is Materials (XLB), and the report rates XLB Strong Outperform / Strong Outperform / Strong Outperform across Short/Medium/Long — the only sector that is SO on all three horizons — with capital flow IN / IN / IN. Both of WPM's metals line up: GLD is SO/SO/SO and SLV is O/SO/SO, so a gold+silver streamer is, if anything, even better aligned than a pure-gold name. The dominant regime is Stagflation (oil shock + hawkish Fed), in which precious metals are the report's highest-conviction multi-year beneficiaries (de-dollarisation, sovereign-debt/fiscal dominance, Iran/Hormuz, central-bank accumulation).

Anchoring on the Medium horizon, the pressure is a clear Tailwind; going long rides the economic trend (Trend-Following), conviction 82. The one near-term cross-current is the same one the Timing pillar flags: a hawkish Fed (Warsh's first FOMC, Jun 17) could lift real yields and produce a short, sharp metals pullback even as the structural tailwind persists. Amplification effect: the Tailwind did fire at the Long horizon — combined with the driver (87), it lifts the base BUY to STRONG BUY. At Medium the base is a borderline BUY and we deliberately decline the STRONG amplification on valuation grounds (premium streamer multiples + an extended, unconfirmed bounce); the Tailwind is noted but not applied. Source: sector-map; macro report 2026-06-13. Confidence 75%.

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

A deep dive into the Timing score: risk-reward anchored to the stop, relative strength vs the sector, macro overlay at High sector-weight (mining/materials), sentiment from grade actions and news tone, and the catalyst cluster. The picture is constructive-but-extended — a secular uptrend, a sharp 34% correction to a swing low, a powerful +20% four-day bounce that just reclaimed the 200-DMA, and a Fed event one day out.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Neutral-to-constructive. Monthly/weekly trends are up, the daily has just reclaimed its 200-DMA (~C$173) and the tool reads overall confluence "bullish" — better than peers this week. But price is already +20% off the C$150 swing low in four sessions (a poor, chasing entry) and a high-impact FOMC is one day out. Sub-signals net ~61; held to 57 for the extended risk-reward.
57
Confidence 65% · MTF 62 · macro 68 · catalyst 70
Sub-signal (weight)ReadingScore
MTF trend (30%)Monthly & weekly uptrend (monthly resistance breakout); daily "weakening" but has just reclaimed the 200-DMA (US$123.3 ≈ C$173) after a support breakdown; hourly uptrend. Tool confluence: "bullish."62
Risk-reward (20%)Price is ~+20% above the C$150 swing low after a 4-day surge; the logical stop (C$150) is ~3.5 daily ATR away (~C$8.6/day). Chasing here is unfavourable — much better to buy a pullback or the C$173 reclaim zone.48
Macro overlay (20%, High sensitivity)Materials in-favour (rotation IN); precious metals the regime's top trade; but a hawkish Fed is a near-term real-yield cross-current.68
Sentiment (15%)Grades mostly maintain with two upgrades inside 6mo (UBS→Buy, RBC→Outperform); Yahoo recommendation "Strong Buy" (1.31); news tone positive on the metals spike (Iran/Hormuz, silver to multi-decade highs).62
Catalysts (15%)No earnings within 14 days; no clustered company events. Calm — barring the macro FOMC overlay handled in §8.70

Relative strength & range: WPM has strongly outperformed SPY over 12 months on the metals bull, lagged during the recent pullback, and has now snapped back hard (52-week range position ~57%, i.e. mid-upper, −21% off the C$226.68 high). Position-risk: the C$149.99 swing low (Jun 10) is the line in the sand; price has reclaimed the ~C$173 200-DMA but the bounce is steep and unconfirmed above the C$185 (US$132) daily 50-DMA — a pullback toward C$165–173 would offer a far better entry than chasing C$180 into the Fed.

8

Economic Event Risk

The next ~14 days of high-impact US macro releases that can swing a rate-sensitive precious-metals streamer, plus last week's surprises. Mining/Materials is a High macro-sensitivity sector, so a high-impact release within 3 trading days triggers a WAIT-FOR-EVENT short-term override — which is exactly what the Jun 17 FOMC does here.
DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?
2026-06-17FOMC rate decision + projections + presser (Warsh's first)HighHold 3.75%3.75%✅ Critical — metals are real-yield sensitive; macro flags ~25% hike risk & removal of easing language
2026-06-17Retail Sales MoM (May)High+0.5%+0.5%⚠️ Indirect — growth/risk read
2026-06-25Core PCE MoM (May)High+0.2%+0.2%✅ Inflation → Fed path → real yields → metals
2026-06-30CB Consumer Confidence / JOLTsHigh93.1 / 7.62M⚠️ Medium
2026-07-01ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jun)High52.554.0⚠️ Medium — materials demand read
2026-07-02Non-Farm Payrolls / Unemployment (Jun)High+70K / 4.5%+172K / 4.3%✅ Labour softening → Fed path → metals

Recent surprises (last 7 days): a US–Iran draft ceasefire opening the Strait of Hormuz drove gold and silver sharply higher (silver to multi-decade highs ~US$70); CPI YoY (May) ~4.2% (sticky); PPI hot. The tape is stagflationary — supportive of precious metals as an inflation/debasement hedge, but also fuel for a hawkish Fed and higher real yields that can pressure metals short-term. Override: because mining/materials is High-sensitivity and a high-impact FOMC is <3 trading days out, the short-term signal is set to WAIT-FOR-EVENT regardless of composite, and the report's next-update is pinned to FOMC +1 day (2026-06-18).

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI, MACD and breakout status across monthly → 15-min (Polygon, US-listing prices in USD; CAD equivalents ≈ ×1.401), plus a confluence read. The textbook pattern here is "higher-timeframe uptrend + a sharp lower-timeframe correction now reversing" — with the daily having just reclaimed its 200-DMA on the bounce.
TimeframeTrendRSIMACDKey S/R (USD)BreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑62.7+, risingR 165.8Resistance breakout0.68×
WeeklyUptrend ↑50.3−, fallingS 113.4 · R 145.6 / 154.2Resistance breakout0.49×
DailyWeakening →49.2−, flatS 106.8 · MA200 123.3 / MA50 132.3Support breakdown1.53×
HourlyUptrend ↑63.6+, fadingS 117.3 · R 129.2Resistance breakout
15-minWeakening →39.2flat/−S 125.0 · R 127.7Resistance breakout
Confluence: bullish secular trend with a daily correction now reversing — weighted MTF score ≈ 62 (tool flag: "bullish," driven by the monthly breakout + 200-DMA reclaim).

Monthly and weekly structures remain in uptrends and the monthly is at a resistance breakout, while the daily fell below its 50- and 200-day moving averages in the correction but has just reclaimed the 200-DMA (US$123.3 ≈ C$173) on the bounce — the signature of a correction repairing within a larger bull. Price surged off the C$150 (US$107-area) swing low on elevated daily volume (1.53×). Net read: a constructive picture, but the four-day +20% spike is unconfirmed above the C$185 (US$132) daily 50-DMA and event-exposed — better to buy a pullback into C$165–173 than to chase the rip.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

Six months of daily closes (TSX:WPM, CAD) with a 50-day SMA and the key support/resistance levels marked. The visual companion to §9 — the run to the C$226.68 high (Mar 2), the −34% correction to the C$149.99 low (Jun 10), and the current rebound through the 200-DMA are all visible at a glance.
11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths (CAD) with triggers and probability weights. The base case is the probability-weighted centre of gravity; bull and bear hinge mostly on gold and silver prices and whether real yields spike. Analyst consensus (~C$263 mean) sits at the optimistic edge of our base/bull range.

Bull · 30% · C$255 (+42%)

Gold holds/extends above US$4,400 and silver above US$70; real yields ease on a dovish Fed pivot; a new accretive stream is announced. WPM retests the C$226.68 high and pushes to the analyst median (C$255.5). Driver + economy fire on all cylinders; the fixed-cost margin compounds.

Base · 45% · C$210 (+17%)

Gold/silver range-bound at a high level; WPM holds the 200-DMA reclaim and re-rates toward fair value (~C$200) and into the lower analyst band as cash flow and stream additions compound. Steady accumulation on dips pays.

Bear · 25% · C$150 (−17%)

Hawkish Fed lifts real yields; risk-off USD strength triggers a 15–25% metals correction (silver, higher-beta, leads down). WPM retests/breaks the C$150 swing low and the premium multiple de-rates. Margins stay vast (no distress) — a valuation reset, not a solvency event.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Mechanical conditions for entry and exit with specific CAD levels: five independent entry checks, a hard stop, thesis invalidation, and scaled profit-takes. Converts the scores into an action plan. At C$179.72, 2 of 5 entry criteria are met and 0 of 3 exit criteria are live — consistent with "like it, accumulate on weakness, don't chase the rip into the Fed."

Entry Rules — 2 of 5 met

1 (Valuation): price ≤ fair value C$200 → MET (C$179.72).
2 (Driver/clear-calendar): driver ≥50 AND no earnings within 7 days → MET (driver 87; next earnings ~early-Aug).
3 (Value/support entry): pull back into the C$165–173 (200-DMA) zone OR daily close back above the C$185 (US$132) 50-DMA on >1.5× volume → NOT MET (extended ~C$180, below the 50-DMA).
4 (Momentum): daily RSI 40–65 AND MACD histogram positive ≥2 days → NOT MET (RSI 49 ok, but daily MACD still negative).
5 (Event-clear): no high-impact macro/earnings event within 3 trading days → NOT MET (FOMC Jun 17).

Exit Rules — 0 of 3 live

1 (Hard stop): 2 consecutive daily closes below C$150 (under the C$149.99 swing low) → not triggered.
2 (Thesis invalidation): gold sustained below ~US$2,000/oz (silver below ~US$20) OR a major stream impaired OR a hard gate trips → not triggered.
3 (Profit-take): price reaches C$255–324 (analyst band) AND RSI >70 → trim → not triggered.

Key levels (CAD): Stop C$150 · Support C$173 (200-DMA) / C$165 / C$150 (swing low) · Fair value ~C$200 · Resistance C$185 (50-DMA) / C$200 / C$227 (high) · Analyst low C$225 · mean C$263 · median C$256.

Imagine you act at the current price C$179.72 · as of Jun 16, 2026 17:03 ET

What if you bought now?

You'd be risking ~C$30 / −17% to the hard stop to gain ~C$30 (+17%) to base / ~C$75 (+42%) to bull.
  • Risking: downside to stop C$150 (−17%); bear case C$150 (−17%); plus entry rules NOT yet met — chasing a +20% four-day spike, below the C$185 50-DMA, one day ahead of a high-impact FOMC.
  • Gaining: base C$210 (+17%) · bull C$255 (+42%); plus a ~0.6% dividend and ~4% operating-cash-flow yield compounding while you wait, and the free development-stream optionality you now own.
  • Net: risk-reward ≈ 1:1 to base, ~2.5:1 to bull. Acting now is defensible for medium/long capital, but waiting one day past the Fed (and for a pullback toward C$165–173) materially improves the entry — hence the short-term WAIT.

What if you sold now?

You'd be giving up +17% base-case upside to protect against a ~17% bear-case drawdown.
  • Giving up: upside to C$210 (+17%) / C$255 (+42%); income + cash-flow compounding; selling ~10% below fair value (C$200) and ~30% below the analyst mean.
  • Protecting: capital if the bear case (C$150) plays out on a hawkish Fed / metals correction. Exit rules currently triggered? None.
  • Net: no mechanical reason to sell — this is a hold/accumulate zone, not a distribution zone.
13

Position Sizing Context

A framework for translating conviction into allocation given risk per share and sector volatility. Illustrative only — not advice. No risk budget or portfolio role was supplied in this batch run, so an explicit % allocation is intentionally omitted.

Position sizing not computed — no portfolio allocation or role was specified for this batch analysis. Volatility context for when you do size: beta ~1.16 vs SPY (and high metals beta, amplified by the silver mix), daily ATR ~C$8.6 (~4.8% of price), and a demonstrated ~34% peak-to-trough drawdown in the last quarter. Catalyst clustering is calm (score ~70) apart from the FOMC overlay, so no clustering-based size cut applies. For medium/long horizons, a staggered 3-tranche entry — e.g. into a pullback at the C$165–173 200-DMA zone, on a daily reclaim of the C$185 50-DMA, and at a C$150 swing-low retest — would average in and avoid chasing the current rip into a live event.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, confidence, key level and signal override, saved alongside the HTML as calibration-WPM.TO-20260616-1703.json so the next run can compute deltas and the watchlist monitor can render the Hard-Gate / Entry / Exit cells without parsing HTML. This is the first report for WPM.TO — no prior calibration, so no "Changes Since Last Report" box.
{
  "ticker": "WPM.TO", "exchange_ticker": "TSX:WPM", "isin": "CA9628791027",
  "company": "Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.", "date": "2026-06-16", "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "on-going", "finder_ticker": "WPM", "finder_exchange": "🇨🇦 TSX · 🇺🇸 NYSE",
  "section": "Silver Miners", "lifecycle_stage": "mature",
  "price_at_rating_cad": 179.72, "price_at_rating_usd": 128.24, "fx_cad_per_usd": 1.401,
  "signal_short": "WAIT_FOR_EVENT", "signal_medium": "BUY", "signal_long": "STRONG_BUY",
  "composite_short": 60, "composite_medium": 65, "composite_long": 71,
  "quality_score": 85, "valuation_score": 53, "timing_score": 57,
  "driver_score": 87, "driver_label": "Strong Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following", "economic_alignment_conviction": 82,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind", "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-06-13",
  "quality_detail": {"industry_benchmark_name": "Cash Operating Margin per Ounce (streaming)", "industry_benchmark_value": 88,
    "industry_benchmark_score": 96, "moat_score": 70, "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 84,
    "capital_allocation": 82, "management_skin_in_game": 72, "fmp_rating": "B+", "fmp_overall_score": 3},
  "valuation_detail": {"ocf_yield_ev": 4.1, "fcf_yield": 1.7, "forward_pe": 22.8, "trailing_pe": 32.3, "ev_ebitda": 23.3, "pb": 6.3, "peg": 0.43,
    "analyst_consensus_target_cad": 263.03, "analyst_target_high_cad": 324.20, "analyst_target_low_cad": 224.86,
    "analyst_consensus_target_usd_fmp": 170, "analyst_target_upside_pct": 46.4, "analyst_grades_consensus": "Buy", "analyst_bullish_pct": 80,
    "analyst_coverage_count": 7, "recent_upgrades_30d": 0, "recent_downgrades_30d": 0},
  "timing_detail": {"mtf_confluence": 62, "risk_reward_score": 48, "catalyst_clustering_score": 70,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.20, "rel_strength_52w_pct": 57},
  "confidence": {"quality": 80, "valuation": 66, "timing": 65, "driver": 70, "economic": 75, "overall": 65},
  "hard_gate_state": "clear", "gates_triggered": [], "gates_caution": [], "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "amplification": {"short": "overridden_WAIT (FOMC <3d)", "medium": "BUY (STRONG declined, premium valuation + extended bounce)", "long": "BUY->STRONG_BUY (driver 87 + Tailwind)"},
  "fair_value_est_cad": 200, "stop_loss_cad": 150, "target_base_cad": 210, "target_bull_cad": 255, "target_bear_cad": 150,
  "entry_criteria_total": 5, "entry_criteria_met": 2, "exit_criteria_total": 3, "exit_criteria_met": 0,
  "focus_qualifies": false,
  "next_update_date": "2026-06-18", "next_check_date": "2026-06-18",
  "next_update_basis": "FOMC 2026-06-17 +1d (precious metals rate-sensitive, high-impact within 3-day window)"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Full audit trail of every data source used, with OK / partial / fail indicators and the confidence haircuts applied. Quality/valuation fundamentals were pulled on the US ticker (WPM, USD); all price-based levels are reported on the TSX listing (WPM.TO, CAD) — the data-basis rule for this dual-listed name. WPM is scored as a streamer, not a producer.
Data Source Status
get_yahoo_quote / get_yahoo_prices — WPM.TO CAD price, 125 daily bars, CAD targets
get_company_profile / get_financial_ratios — WPM (USD) fundamentals
get_income_statement — 8 quarters; share count verified (454.0M)
get_multi_timeframe_analysis — all 5 timeframes (Polygon)
get_price_target_consensus — FMP US$170 vs Yahoo CAD C$263; sources disagree
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades — 16 Buy/4 Hold; 12 grade actions
get_ratings_snapshot — FMP "B+" health rating
get_analyst_estimates — 2025–2030 EPS/revenue
get_economic_series / web search — DFII10 real yield 2.15%; gold/silver spot
get_stock_dividends — quarterly US$0.195, payout ~17%
Macro-Economic report — 2026-06-13 (XLB / GLD / SLV signals)
get_earnings_calendar — returned empty; next earnings est. ~early-Aug (unverified)
Impact on scores: Near-complete coverage. Valuation confidence was held to 66% mainly for the analyst-target source disagreement (FMP US$170 ≈ C$238 vs Yahoo C$263, thin 7-analyst Yahoo coverage) and the peak-cycle-earnings uncertainty — the report leads with the source-robust claim "every target is above spot." The earnings-calendar failure is immaterial to scheduling because the FOMC drives the next-update. Gold/silver spot are web-sourced (gold ~US$4,360, silver ~US$70) — note this differs from the AEM sister report's ~US$4,800 gold figure; the driver score is insensitive at either level given ~88–94% cash margins (Driver confidence 70%). Market cap independently verified (454.0M shares × C$179.72 = C$81.6B ≈ Yahoo's C$81.6B; US$58.2B ≈ FMP), so no stale-market-cap trap — a known risk for .TO small-caps that does not apply here.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.