NYSE:VRT Vertiv Holdings Co

ISIN: US92537N1081
IndustrialsData-centre power & coolingAI-capex cohortVery ExpensiveVery expensive (~60-70x forward) + purest AI-capex-cohort name — Valuation-Ceiling caps + armed AI tail is a live §11 bear
NYSE · Westerville OH · Data-centre power + cooling · ~$121bn mkt cap Analysis Status: On-Going
$304.04
+0.9% (day); -9.3% since 9 Jul
23 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
Changes Since Last Report (vs. 9 Jul 2026, $335.17)

Vertiv pulled back −9.3% to $304.04 (~20% off its $380 high) on a broad AI-cohort wobble. Signals unchanged — HOLD / HOLD / HOLD: the Driver stays the single strongest on the watchlist (86, AI data-centre power+cooling) with Industrials Strong-Outperform, but the base is capped at HOLD by a Very-Expensive valuation (~48x forward / ~75x trailing vs a ~24x warranted, ~3x) — the Valuation-Ceiling gate triggers, and a HOLD never amplifies however strong the driver. Do-Not-Buy checked but NOT fired (exceptional proven growth + the AI-concentration tail armed-not-triggering) — the cohort de-rating (a potential 40-50% multiple compression) is carried as the §11 bear. The Street is 95% Buy with ~23% upside; the framework holds on valuation + AI-cohort risk. Q2 is imminent (~late July) — the next update captures it. Wonderful driver, priced for perfection.

DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Vertiv Holdings Co

Vertiv designs and services the critical 'digital infrastructure' inside data centres — power (UPS, switchgear, busway), thermal management (air and, increasingly, liquid cooling), racks, and monitoring software — plus the service network that maintains it. Its business is selling and servicing the physical backbone that keeps servers powered and cool, exactly the equipment hyperscalers and colos are buying at record pace to build AI compute. What sets Vertiv apart is a broad, integrated product set across power AND cooling (including the liquid-cooling that AI chips demand), a large installed-base service annuity, and deep hyperscaler relationships — making it one of the purest large-cap ways to own the AI data-centre build-out. That is also the risk: the stock is priced for years of hyper-growth, so it is squarely in the AI-capex cohort and re-rates hard on any pause.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD4852%Mid-correction (off the $380 high), extended monthly RSI; Q2 imminent — no fresh edge
Medium-term (6–12 mo)HOLD4855%The single strongest driver on the watchlist, but a very-expensive multiple caps it
Long-term (3–5 yr)HOLD5255%Purest AI-infrastructure play — but priced for perfection; wait for a de-rating / de-risking
Next update: 2026-07-30 — Q2 imminent (~late July); refresh after the print
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

80
strong (AI-infra leader)
conf 74%

Valuation Attractiveness

32
very expensive
conf 68%

Entry/Exit Timing

52
correcting (extended)
conf 56%

Underlying Drivers

86
Strong Tailwind
conf 70%

Economic Alignment

70
Trend-Following
conf 62%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
Improving balance sheet, strong FCF, growing backlog. No distress — the concern is valuation, not solvency.
⚠️
Earnings Event Risk
CAUTION — Q2 results are IMMINENT (~late July); a very-high-multiple name into a binary-ish print. Next update timed to capture it.
Valuation Ceiling
TRIGGERED — ~48x forward / ~74x trailing GAAP earnings vs a warranted ~24x (ratio ~3x) = Very Expensive, far above the 23x industrials guardrail. Caps the signal at HOLD regardless of the driver. The binding constraint.
⚠️
Do-Not-Buy (Trigger 2)
Checked, NOT fired — Very Expensive (arm (a): ~3x warranted > 2x) AND the purest AI-capex-cohort name (arm (b) candidate). But arm (a) is exempted by exceptional, proven, durable growth (record data-centre orders/backlog) and arm (b) requires the AI-concentration systemic tail to be LIVE, which is ARMED but NOT triggering (breadth broadening). So HOLD, not DO-NOT-BUY — the cohort de-rating is a §11 bear.
Accounting / Earnings Quality
Clean-ish; the very-high P/E is on genuinely rich price vs earnings, not an accounting distortion. Adjusted EPS is the Street's lens.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
The purest large-cap AI data-centre-infrastructure play — power + cooling (incl. liquid) + a service annuity, record orders/backlog — but earnings are being outrun by the share price.
80
conf 74%

Lifecycle / sector: High-growth Industrials — data-centre power & cooling. Scored on the growth-infrastructure lens — orders/backlog, organic growth, margin expansion, service mix — with reported P/E as a price-vs-earnings check (rich).

Sub-signalValueBenchmarkScoreRead
Orders / backlogRecord (AI data-centre)90Demand surging with AI compute build-out
Organic growthStrong double-digit84Power + liquid-cooling ramping
Margin expansionImproving80Operating leverage as volume scales
Service annuityLarge installed base78Recurring, high-margin maintenance
Product breadth (power + cooling)Integrated across both82Only major with both at scale, incl. liquid cooling
Industry benchmark — orders/backlog + growth: record data-centre orders and a growing backlog make Vertiv one of the purest AI-infrastructure beneficiaries. Rating: STRONG. Benchmark score 84/100. The quality/growth is genuine; the valuation is the whole debate.
Pricing power
70
Scarce integrated power+cooling capability; strong demand
Network effects
50
n/a
Switching costs
72
Installed base + service + integration into data-centre design
Cost advantage
65
Scale; but competition (Schneider, Eaton) is capable
Intangibles
70
Hyperscaler relationships; liquid-cooling IP

Moat average ≈ 65. The edge is integrated power+cooling breadth + hyperscaler relationships into the AI build-out; the vulnerabilities are capable competition and, above all, a demand/capex pause given the price.

Competitive Environment. A capable-competitor market riding a huge tailwind; share trajectory Vertiv gaining/holding in the AI segment.
RivalThreatShare trajectoryErosion vector
Schneider Electric, EatonPower/electrical majorsVertiv competitive (power+cooling combo)Power-infrastructure competition
Cooling specialists (liquid cooling entrants)Thermal-management competitionVertiv leading in integrated coolingBest-of-breed liquid-cooling challengers
Data-centre-capex cyclicalityAn AI-capex pauseThe real risk — demand is the driver AND the vulnerability

→ Net effect: Switching Costs 72, Pricing Power 70 — the integrated position holds, competition is capable, and the dominant swing factor is data-centre capex (the AI cohort). Threat level: moderate.

ROIC / capital allocation: improving fast as margins scale; the priority is capacity + capturing the AI build-out. The capital story is converting the record backlog into cash.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Very expensive — ~48x forward / ~74x trailing GAAP earnings vs a warranted ~24x (ratio ~3x). Priced for years of flawless AI-capex-driven hyper-growth.
32
conf 68%

Warranted-multiple anchor (P/E): even crediting exceptional growth (g_near capped at 15% secular, r 9%), the warranted P/E is ~24x. Vertiv trades at ~48x forward (FY26 adj EPS guidance $6.30-6.40) and ~75x trailing → ratio ~2x = Very Expensive, well above the 23x industrials guardrail. The Valuation-Ceiling gate triggers → HOLD. This is one of the richest large-caps in the watchlist; the entire multiple rests on the AI data-centre build-out continuing at pace.

MetricVRTWarranted / read
Forward P/E (anchor)~48x24x warranted → Very Expensive (~2x)
Trailing GAAP P/E~74xExtreme
EV/EBITDA~40x+Far above industrials norm
FCF yieldLow (~2%)Expensive on cash too
PEG~2+Rich even for the growth

Implied-growth read: at ~48x forward the market prices Vertiv for a decade of AI-capex-driven hyper-growth with no stumbles. The growth is real (record orders), but the multiple leaves no margin of safety — a data-centre-capex pause or a growth deceleration would compress a 2x-warranted multiple violently (a 40-50% move). This is the framework's 'obviously priced-for-perfection' territory.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside: (1) liquid cooling content growth as AI chips get hotter (Vertiv's key edge); (2) the service annuity on a fast-growing installed base; (3) international data-centre expansion. Real — but the core is priced well beyond these; the optionality is the bull case, not a value cushion. Tilt: neutral — the price already reflects it.

Analyst cross-check: consensus target $372.6, median $360, high $500, low $277 — ~23% upside to consensus; grades Buy consensus (18 buy / 1 hold = 95% bullish). The Street is almost unanimously bullish on the AI-infrastructure thesis — which is exactly why the framework's Valuation-Ceiling exists: to not chase a wonderful growth story at ~65x. HOLD.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
AI data-centre build-out (power + cooling demand)
86
Strong Tailwind (the watchlist's strongest — but a HOLD never amplifies)

Vertiv's driver is the AI data-centre build-out — the single most powerful structural tailwind in the market right now, and Vertiv is arguably its purest large-cap infrastructure expression (power + cooling for AI compute). Record orders, a growing backlog, and the shift to power-hungry, liquid-cooled AI racks all point up. This is the strongest driver score on the entire watchlist.

HorizonDriver readScore
Historical (12–24m)AI capex re-rated Vertiv from ~$100 to a $380 high88
CurrentRecord data-centre orders + liquid-cooling demand — a very strong tailwind86
Forward (6–12m)Runway intact; the key risk is a hyperscaler-capex pause (the AI-cohort tail)82

Amplification: the driver is a Strong Tailwind (86) — the highest on the watchlist — and Economic Alignment is a Tailwind, but the base signal is HOLD (Very-Expensive valuation), and a HOLD never amplifies. This is the framework at its most disciplined: the best driver in the book cannot rescue a ~2x-warranted (~48x-forward) price. It's precisely why the signal is HOLD, not a chase.

Thesis-invalidation floor / cohort tail: a data-centre-capex pullback (the AI-concentration cohort de-rating — the same tail hitting GOOGL/GEV/TLN), a hyperscaler guiding capex down, or a liquid-cooling share loss would puncture both the growth and the multiple. Carried explicitly in the §11 Bear as a cohort-level de-rating (a 40-50% move from a 3x-warranted multiple).

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind
70
conviction

Macro report scores Industrials (XLI) Outperform short & medium, STRONG Outperform long — and the AI-data-centre-infrastructure sub-theme is a distinct, powerful tailwind Vertiv is the purest play on. Pressure = Tailwind, stance Trend-Following. But the base is HOLD (Very-Expensive), so no amplification. Critically, Vertiv is the purest AI-capex-cohort name, so it inherits the macro's ARMED (not triggering) AI-concentration tail as a live §11 bear — the same cohort de-rating flagged for GOOGL/GEV/TLN.

Source: sector-map (XLI) · Macro report 2026-07-20

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Secular uptrend but mid-correction — pulled back ~20% from the $380 high to $304, below the 50-DMA, extended monthly RSI (71). Q2 imminent.
52
conf 56%

Risk-reward: the monthly/weekly are strong uptrends (Vertiv ran from ~$100 to a $380 high) but the daily has weakened — it corrected ~20% to $304, sits below the 50-DMA (~$319) though well above the 200-DMA (~$243), and the monthly RSI (~71) flags how extended the multi-year run is. Intraday is stabilising/recovering. Support $287 then $273; resistance $345 then the $380 high. High ATR (~$19/day, ~6%) — very volatile.

Relative strength: a massive 2026 winner now consolidating; near the top of its range. High beta.

Position-risk: a ~65x-forward name mid-correction, right before an imminent Q2 print, is a poor spot for a confident fresh entry — and the Very-Expensive valuation caps the signal at HOLD anyway. A break of $345/$376 on a strong Q2, or a deeper pullback toward $273/$243, would be the actionable levels. Sentiment: 95% Buy grades vs a name priced for perfection — the divergence the Valuation-Ceiling is built for.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-07-29Vertiv Q2 2026 results (29 Jul, imminent)High⚠️ YesOrders/backlog + organic growth + guidance — the key catalyst for a priced-for-perfection name
ongoingHyperscaler data-centre capexHigh⚠️ YesVertiv IS the AI-capex trade — a pause is the key downside
ongoingLiquid-cooling adoptionHighMediumThe content-growth driver + a competitive battleground

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-07AI data-centre themestrongtailwindRecord orders; Vertiv off its highs on a broad AI-cohort wobble
2026-07-17US Consumer Sentiment54.451.0aboveMarginal — VRT trades on AI capex

Vertiv trades on the AI data-centre build-out, full stop. The binding event is the imminent Q2 print (orders/backlog/guidance), which at ~48x forward can move the stock violently either way. High idiosyncratic + AI-cohort sensitivity; a hyperscaler-capex pause is the key downside.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Bullish71.0+ (extended)S: 54 R: 380Res breakout0.45x
WeeklyUptrend ↑Neutral55.6− (flat)S: 149 R: 380Res breakout0.40x
DailyWeakening →Neutral47.0− fallingS: 287 R: 345Support breakdown0.50x
HourlyRecovering →Neutral52.5+ (flat)S: 291 R: 314Res breakout
15-minStrong Up ↑Neutral49.5flatS: 300 R: 314Support breakdown
Confluence: Bullish (mid-correction) · MTF Score 56

A strong secular uptrend (monthly/weekly) but mid-correction — the daily weakened, the stock is ~20% off its $380 high at $304, below the 50-DMA but above the 200-DMA, with the monthly RSI extended (~71). Intraday is stabilising. A break of $345/$376 on a strong Q2 resumes the trend; a loss of $287/$273 opens the 200-DMA (~$243). Either way the Very-Expensive valuation keeps this a HOLD — the chart is not the constraint, the price is.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

VRT 6-month daily — an AI-driven run to a $380 high, now ~20% off it at $304, below the 50-DMA.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $450 (25%)

Q2 orders/backlog beat, liquid-cooling content compounds, the AI build-out keeps accelerating, and the market extends the premium toward the $450-500 analyst high. ~+48%.

Base $360 (50%)

Strong AI-driven growth continues, Q2 delivers, and the stock recovers toward the analyst-consensus zone as it grows into (some of) the multiple. ~+18%.

Bear $210 (25%)

An AI/data-centre-capex pause (the cohort de-rating) or a growth/margin disappointment compresses a ~2x-warranted multiple hard — a 40-50% move toward the low-$200s. ~−31%.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Wait0 of 3 groups met — no entry path open

Fundamental — not MET

Very-expensive valuation — no earnings anchor supports the price.
✅ Price $304 < fair value ~$360 (per the growth thesis)
⛔ No earnings within 7 days — FAILS (Q2 imminent)
⛔ Valuation not very-expensive — FAILS (~65x fwd, ~3x warranted)

Technical — not MET

Mid-correction below the 50-DMA; needs a break of $345 or a deeper base.
⛔ Break above $345 then $376 on volume
⛔ OR a tested base at $273-287 with a higher low
⛔ Not overbought (monthly RSI ~71)

Catalyst — not MET

The imminent Q2 print is the catalyst.
· Q2 beat on orders/guidance with a >+5% move

Forecast: No group met → Wait. Catalyst-dependent on the imminent Q2 print, which at ~48x forward can move the stock hard either way. The Fundamental group is blocked by the Very-Expensive valuation. Even a technical breakout only reaches HOLD — the binding issue is price, not the chart. A genuine entry needs a meaningful de-rating (toward the 200-DMA / warranted range) or years of delivered growth. HOLD.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ (For holders) two daily closes below $270 (below the correction support)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ A data-centre-capex pullback slows orders (the AI-cohort de-rating)
⛔ OR a liquid-cooling share loss / margin disappointment
⛔ OR backlog growth stalls

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into $450-500 (bull/analyst high) with momentum stretched

Forecast: For holders the stop ($270) is ~11% below at the correction support — plausible on any AI-cohort wobble given the beta. The realistic near-term path hinges on the imminent Q2 print; a hyperscaler-capex scare is the key downside trigger, a strong orders beat the upside.

Imagine you act at the current price of $304.04 · as of 23 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

You're risking ~11% (to the $270 stop) to gain ~18% to the $360 base and ~48% to the $450 bull — buying the market's strongest driver, but at ~48x forward / ~3x warranted.

Buying at $304 means paying a very-expensive multiple that already prices a decade of flawless AI-capex growth, mid-correction, right before an imminent Q2 print, in the AI-cohort most exposed to a capex-pause de-rating. What you gain is the purest large-cap AI-infrastructure play with record orders and a 95%-Buy Street. Read: the driver is the best on the watchlist, but at ~2x warranted the Valuation-Ceiling makes this a HOLD, not a chase — a real entry needs a de-rating (toward the 200-DMA / low-$200s) or years of delivered growth; if you own it, size for the AI-cohort beta.

What if you sold now?

Selling now banks a huge AI-infrastructure run and sidesteps a priced-for-perfection multiple + AI-cohort risk; it gives up the upside if the build-out keeps compounding.

No hard exit rule is live (the thesis — AI data-centre demand — is intact and orders are at records), so this isn't a forced sell — but at ~48x forward with the strongest cohort exposure, trimming into strength is defensible for a holder sitting on big gains. A new buyer waits for a de-rating; an owner sizes for the beta. The objective exit trigger is a data-centre-capex pause or a backlog stall.

13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — no risk budget/role specified. The §12 Conviction Ladder reads Wait (0 of 3 — Very-Expensive + mid-correction + Q2 imminent): watch a break of $345/$376 or a de-rating toward $273/$243. High beta + the purest AI-cohort exposure mean this should be a smaller, risk-managed position than the A-grade driver alone suggests — the price is the risk. Illustrative, not advice.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "VRT",
  "date": "2026-07-23",
  "version": "v6",
  "exchange": "NYSE",
  "exchange_ticker": "NYSE:VRT",
  "isin": "US92537N1081",
  "api_ticker": "VRT",
  "company": "Vertiv Holdings Co",
  "currency": "USD",
  "sector": "Industrials",
  "sub_industry": "Data-centre power & cooling",
  "lifecycle_stage": "high-growth",
  "price_at_rating": 304.04,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "HOLD",
  "signal_long": "HOLD",
  "primary_signal": "HOLD",
  "quality_score": 80,
  "valuation_score": 32,
  "timing_score": 52,
  "driver_score": 86,
  "overall_confidence": 55,
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 70,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-20",
  "val_multiple_basis": "P/E (very expensive)",
  "warranted_multiple": 24,
  "actual_multiple": 48,
  "warranted_ratio": 2.0,
  "val_band": "very_expensive",
  "sector_guardrail_multiple": 23,
  "discount_rate_r": 9.0,
  "risk_free_10y": 4.5,
  "g_near": 15,
  "g_term": 3,
  "trailing_pe": 74,
  "forward_pe": 48,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": 5,
  "clean_pe": 65,
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "gaining",
  "competitive_threat_level": "moderate",
  "driver_commodity_trend": null,
  "hard_gate_state": "donotbuy_checked_hold",
  "gates_triggered": [
    "Valuation Ceiling (Very Expensive ~65x vs 24x warranted, ~3x)"
  ],
  "gates_caution": [
    "Earnings Event (Q2 imminent)",
    "DNB Trigger 2 checked \u2014 not fired (proven growth exemption + armed-not-triggering AI tail)"
  ],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "dnb_arm_b_checked": "Not fired \u2014 Very Expensive (arm (a) ~3x>2x) + the purest AI-capex-cohort name (arm (b) candidate), BUT arm (a) exempted by exceptional/proven/durable growth (record data-centre orders/backlog) and arm (b) needs the AI-concentration systemic tail LIVE, which is armed-not-triggering (breadth broadening). Cohort de-rating carried as a \u00a711 bear (40-50% multiple-compression move). Consistent with [[armed-not-triggering-tail-hold-not-dnb]].",
  "entry_groups_met": 0,
  "entry_conviction": "Wait",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "short_cap_reason": "Short HOLD \u2014 Very Expensive (Valuation-Ceiling) + mid-correction below the 50-DMA + Q2 imminent; no entry group met (Wait). Not a fresh-buy; even a technical breakout only reaches HOLD.",
  "fair_value_est": 360.0,
  "stop_loss": 270.0,
  "target_price": 360.0,
  "scenario_base_target": 360,
  "scenario_bull_target": 450,
  "scenario_bear_target": 210,
  "analyst_consensus_target": 372.6,
  "analyst_target_high": 500,
  "analyst_target_low": 277,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 22.6,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Buy",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 95,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 19,
  "fmp_rating": "C",
  "fmp_overall_score": 2,
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-30",
  "next_update_basis": "Q2 imminent (~late July); refresh after the print",
  "next_check_date": "2026-07-30",
  "analysis_status": "on-going",
  "finder_ticker": "VRT",
  "finder_exchange": "\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 NYSE",
  "fy26_adj_eps_guidance": "6.30-6.40"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_stock_snapshot / prices $304.04; 6-mo daily
get_income_statement (Q1'26 latest) Q2 not yet filed — pre-earnings; Q1 EPS $0.99 diluted
get_multi_timeframe_analysis secular up, mid-correction, extended (monthly RSI 71)
get_price_target_consensus / grades $372.6 target (+23%) / Buy (95% bullish)
get_earnings_calendar FMP empty; Q2 imminent (~late July) from Vertiv's cadence
macro report 2026-07-20 XLI O/O/SO + AI-data-centre sub-theme; AI-concentration tail armed-not-triggering
Impact on scores: High coverage. No clean cheap valuation anchor — Vertiv is ~3x its warranted multiple (Very Expensive), the binding constraint. The signal (HOLD/HOLD/HOLD) reflects the strongest driver on the watchlist held in check by an extreme multiple + AI-cohort risk; DNB checked-not-fired (proven growth + armed-not-triggering tail). Q2 is imminent — the next update captures it.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.