NASDAQ:RGTI Rigetti Computing, Inc.

ISIN: US76655K1034
TechnologyQuantum ComputingSuperconducting QPUsPre-Revenue / SpeculativeSpeculative · Pre-Revenue · Beta 1.96
NASDAQ Capital Market · Berkeley, CA · ~137 employees · Full-stack superconducting quantum computing Analysis Status: Starting
$17.94
-3.96%
3 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Rigetti Computing, Inc.

Rigetti Computing is a full-stack quantum-computing company: it designs and builds superconducting quantum processors (QPUs) and the systems around them, and rents access to those machines over the internet through its Quantum Cloud Services platform. Its flagship 84-qubit Ankaa-3 system and its on-premises 9-qubit Novera QPU are aimed at researchers, governments and enterprises experimenting with quantum algorithms. What distinguishes Rigetti is that it owns its own chip-fabrication facility and pursues a chiplet-based, error-corrected superconducting roadmap in-house — a vertically integrated approach — whereas most rivals use trapped-ion, photonic or neutral-atom hardware, or lean on outside foundries. For a reader: this is a pre-commercial deep-tech research company selling a science-fair-hard product to a still-forming market, not yet a profitable business — closer to a clinical-stage biotech than to an established chipmaker.

🚫 DO NOT BUYDo-Not-Buy Trigger 2 (absolute arm a) is live: at ~$17.94 the shares carry an EV/Revenue of ~591× trailing / ~252× forward-2026 — roughly 8–20× above the 30× "deep-expensive" line for a pre-profit tech name — on tiny (~$10M TTM), lumpy revenue with no modelled path to profitability through 2030. The base signal is already SELL (weak Quality + expensive Valuation + a strong-downtrend tape); the extreme, un-earned multiple in a confirmed downtrend makes buying structurally negative expected-value here. This is a valuation-and-timing verdict, not a claim the technology is worthless.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)DO NOT BUY2250%Extreme valuation into a strong daily/weekly downtrend
Medium-term (6–12 mo)DO NOT BUY2650%~252x fwd EV/Rev, no profit path; SELL base, DNB overrides
Long-term (3–5 yr)DO NOT BUY3055%Quantum optionality is real, but the price already embeds flawless execution
Next update: 2026-07-17 — default +14d (no confirmed dated catalyst; Q2 earnings ~mid-Aug)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

30
weak (pre-revenue; fortress balance sheet the one bright spot)
conf 50%

Valuation Attractiveness

20
extreme / expensive
conf 55%

Entry/Exit Timing

25
bearish
conf 55%

Underlying Drivers

58
Neutral (no amplification)
conf 45%

Economic Alignment

52
Trend-Following
conf 50%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
⚠️
Financial Distress
Chronic operating burn (~$26M/qtr operating loss; op cash burn ~$58M in Q1'26) — but this is NOT a liquidity risk: $569M cash & investments, no debt, current ratio 6.98, multi-year runway. Caution for the ongoing dilution it forces, not distress.
Earnings Event Risk
No earnings inside 14 days (Q1'26 reported 11 May; Q2 ~mid-Aug). High historical post-print volatility, so timing confidence will be capped nearer the next print.
Valuation Ceiling
TRIGGERED — EV/Revenue ~591x trailing / ~252x forward-2026 is far above the 20x IT pre-profit guardrail line. Caps the signal at HOLD (moot — the base is already SELL).
Accounting / Dilution
TRIGGERED — diluted share count grew from ~185M (Q4'24) to ~332M (Q1'26), +~80% in five quarters (ATM + financings). Also: reported GAAP net income is inflated by non-operating warrant mark-to-market gains — score off operating results. Caps at HOLD (moot vs SELL).
Regulatory / Binary Event
No pending binary regulatory decision. Milestone/roadmap risk is continuous, not a single dated binary event.
Severe Driver Collapse
Driver (quantum commercialisation) scores ~58 Neutral — not collapsed. No Severe-Driver gate.
Net gate read: two gates TRIGGERED (Valuation Ceiling, Dilution/Accounting) each cap at HOLD — but a cap only lowers the ceiling; it cannot lift the SELL base. The Do-Not-Buy Trigger 2 (absolute-valuation arm) then overrides to a hard DO NOT BUY. The Financial-Distress gate is deliberately marked caution, not triggered: a company sitting on $569M of cash with no debt is not a liquidity risk, however large its burn.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
Pre-revenue, deeply unprofitable deep-tech research company. Negative gross margin, ~$100M+ annual operating burn, unproven moat versus far better-capitalised giants. The one genuine strength is a fortress balance sheet ($569M cash, no debt) — which lifts Quality off the floor but cannot make a pre-commercial business a good one yet.
30
conf 50% — pre-revenue names are inherently hard to score; FMP health rating C- (score 1) corroborates.

Lifecycle & sector: Technology — full-stack superconducting quantum computing. Classified Pre-Revenue / Speculative: TTM revenue ~$10.0M (Q1'26 $4.4M + Q4'25 $1.9M + Q3'25 $1.9M + Q2'25 $1.8M), lumpy system-sale-driven, with a negative gross margin and no path to profitability in analyst models through 2030. Per Step 0 we score this like a pre-commercial biotech: cash runway, milestone progress and moat durability matter; P/E, EBITDA and net margin are meaningless and are explicitly avoided.

Earnings-quality flag (Step 7b): Rigetti's headline GAAP "net income" is not a profit. Q1'26 reported net income from continuing operations of +$33.1M sits on top of an operating loss of -$26.0M — the gap is a +$59.1M non-operating gain from mark-to-market re-measurement of warrant/earn-out liabilities (the same swing runs -$180M in Q3'25, +$64M in Q1'25). Bottom-line net income was -$20.6M. We score Quality and Valuation on the operating reality (persistent ~$20-26M/qtr operating losses), never the warrant-distorted headline.

Sub-signalValueReadScore
Revenue trajectory~$10.0M TTM; Q1'26 $4.4M (vs $1.5M Q1'25)Tiny and lumpy; the Q1 pop is a system sale, not durable run-rate. Analyst 2026E ~$23.5M.40
ProfitabilityGross margin -20% TTM; operating margin deeply negativeCost of revenue exceeds revenue; R&D ~$20M/qtr. No operating leverage yet.12
Cash generationOperating cash burn ~$58M in Q1'26; FCF negativeStructural cash consumer; every year of runway is a year of dilution risk.18
Balance-sheet health$569M cash & investments, ~no debt, current ratio 6.98Fortress. Best-capitalised-survivor status among quantum pure-plays — passes the widely-cited "2028 cash test" comfortably.85

Industry benchmark (pre-revenue analog): Cash Runway + Milestone Progress

Runway: $569M vs ~$100-150M annual burn = multi-year (strong on survival). Milestones: Ankaa-3 (84 qubits, 99.5% median 2-qubit gate fidelity) shipped; 100+ qubit chiplet targeted; 150+ qubit / 99.7% guided for late-2026; 1,000+ qubit / 99.8% for end-2027. Real progress, but still R&D milestones, not revenue. Benchmark score: 50/100 — survival strong, commercial proof absent.

Competitive Moat Scorecard

Pricing Power

25
No commercial pull; cloud access is a price-taker vs free-tier incumbents.

Network Effects

40
Some developer ecosystem, but tiny vs IBM Qiskit / AWS Braket reach.

Switching Costs

30
Customers multi-home across clouds; little lock-in at pre-commercial scale (trimmed by the competitive read below).

Cost Advantage

30
Owns a fab (vertical integration) but sub-scale; IBM/Google fund R&D off vast balance sheets.

Intangibles

48
Genuine superconducting IP, fab, government relationships (DARPA, CHIPS LOI).

Moat score = average ≈ 34/100 (early / weak). Non-applicable dimensions are scored where they apply, not zeroed.

Competitive Environment (Step 7c)

Quantum computing is a capital- and talent-intensive race, and Rigetti is a sub-scale entrant against far better-funded rivals — a superconducting player up against both same-architecture giants and rival architectures. Google's Willow below-threshold error-correction result and IBM's 1,000+ qubit systems set the pace; Rigetti is behind on qubit count and error-correction proof. Share trajectory: losing / low. This is the direct input that trims Switching Costs (30) and Cost Advantage (30) above.
RivalArchitectureThreat / share trajectoryMoat-erosion vector
IBM QuantumSuperconductingLosing vs — 1,000+ qubit systems, Qiskit ecosystem, vast balance sheetScale, roadmap lead, developer lock-in
Google Quantum AISuperconductingLosing vs — Willow error-correction milestoneTechnology parity/lead on the hardest problem (QEC)
IonQTrapped-ionLosing vs — larger market cap, higher-fidelity narrative, more cash raisedCapital access, fidelity story
Quantinuum (Honeywell)Trapped-ionStable-behind — highest gate fidelities, strategic backerFidelity leadership, enterprise channel
PsiQuantum / Infleqtion / D-WavePhotonic / neutral-atom / annealingStable — architecture diversification riskAn alternative architecture could win the standard

Net effect on the moat: → Switching Costs trimmed to 30, Cost Advantage to 30. competitive_threat_level = high; share trajectory = losing. Propagates to the §11 Bear (a "rival wins error-correction / capital flees the also-rans" trigger) and §12 thesis-invalidation.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

ROIC is deeply negative (large invested capital, operating losses) — not scorable on a positive scale; effectively bottom-decile. Capital allocation is disciplined on survival (raised into strength, holds $569M, no debt) but by definition value-consuming while pre-revenue. Management skin-in-the-game is modest and diluted by heavy share issuance and SBC. Combined: low. FMP financial-health rating: C- (overall score 1/5) — DCF, ROE, ROA and P/E sub-scores all 1; only D/E scores well (4/5, i.e. no leverage) — consistent with our weak-Quality read.
4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Genuinely valuation-extreme. On the only meaningful lens for a pre-revenue name — EV/Revenue — the shares trade at ~591x trailing and ~252x forward-2026, many multiples above the 20x IT pre-profit guardrail and far above even other quantum pure-plays. No warranted-multiple anchor is computable (no clean earnings), so this is a genuine 'expensive' band, not a relative artefact. The lone bullish lens is the analyst consensus.
20
conf 55% — warranted-multiple anchor N/A (pre-revenue); confidence haircut applied. Analyst targets, grades and FMP ratings available.

Warranted-multiple anchor: N/A — Rigetti has no clean earnings, cash flow or book-value multiple that resolves, so the two-stage rate-and-growth anchor cannot be computed (Pillar 2 §6 graceful-degradation). We fall back to the pre-revenue lens (EV/Revenue) and apply a confidence haircut. The per-sector guardrail for a pre-profit IT name is EV/Revenue ≥ 20x = expensive on the floor alone; Rigetti is 12-30x above that floor.

MultipleValueGuardrail / readScore
EV/Revenue (TTM ~$10.0M)~591xvs 20x IT pre-profit line — ~30x over. Extreme.5
EV/Revenue (fwd 2026E ~$23.5M)~252xEven on aggressive 2026 growth, ~12x over the line.10
EV/Revenue (2030E ~$223M)~27xOnly reaches the neighbourhood of the guardrail five years out — and the company is still EBITDA-negative then.25
Price / Book10.2xRich; book is mostly the $569M cash pile.20

FCF Yield (universal anchor)

Negative — the business consumes cash (~$58M op-cash burn in Q1'26). No cash yield to anchor value; valuation rests entirely on future expectations.

Reverse-DCF / implied growth (narrative colour): at ~$6.0B enterprise value on ~$10M of revenue, the market is pricing Rigetti as if it will compound revenue for a decade at rates that reach hundreds of millions and convert to high-margin profit — an outcome no analyst model currently reaches by 2030 (2030E revenue ~$223M, still EBITDA-negative). The price embeds far more than the fundamentals, or even the bullish sell-side estimates, support.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside

An honest bull must acknowledge what the buyer does get: (1) a $569M cash war-chest with no debt — best-capitalised-survivor optionality if weaker quantum names fold (the 'last one standing' call); (2) a U.S. Dept. of Commerce CHIPS Act LOI for up to $100M over three years plus DARPA/government demand — a policy-tailwind option (note: the government would take a minority equity stake, i.e. some dilution); (3) genuine superconducting IP + owned fab that is a plausible acquisition target for a hyperscaler. These are real call-options — but they are option value on a ~$6B price, not a reason the current multiple is cheap. Net: the in-production business justifies a small fraction of the $17.94; the rest is paying up-front for options that may or may not pay off. You are buying the option, so size it like one.

Analyst Price-Target Consensus — the one bullish lens (and the contrarian caveat)

Consensus target $30.50 (median $31, high $40, low $20) implies ~+70% from $17.94. Grades: 6 Buy / 1 Hold, 0 Sell (consensus "Buy", ~86% bullish); recent actions all "maintain" (Rosenblatt, Mizuho, Needham, Benchmark). Taken alone this lens scores high (price >20% below consensus). But we deliberately discount it: these are momentum/story-driven targets on a pre-revenue name — the SKILL's own note that extreme consensus (>90% bullish territory) can be a contrarian signal applies, and the live strong-downtrend tape is already fading those targets. We name the divergence rather than average it away: the Street says +70%; the framework says the multiple prices in a flawless future the fundamentals don't yet earn.

FMP Ratings Cross-Reference

FMP overall C- (1/5): P/E, P/B, ROE, ROA and DCF sub-scores all 1/5; only D/E scores 4/5 (no leverage). This independent read corroborates weak Quality and expensive Valuation.

Valuation band: EXPENSIVE. Even weighting the bullish analyst lens at its full 15%, the ~252-591x EV/Rev and negative FCF dominate — score 20/100.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Quantum-computing commercialisation + government/DARPA demand + superconducting roadmap
58
Neutral — NOT amplification-eligible

Rigetti's fortunes sit above its own execution, driven by (1) the pace of quantum-computing commercialisation and whether error-correction crosses into practical utility, (2) government / DARPA / CHIPS demand for domestic quantum capability, and (3) the credibility of its superconducting qubit roadmap (Ankaa-3 → 100+ → 150+ qubit / 99.7% late-2026 → 1,000+ / 99.8% end-2027). This is a secular-growth, sentiment-heavy driver — not a commodity price, so the Step-2b commodity-trend overlay does not apply — but note the 'quantum stock' momentum factor is itself in a sharp downtrend (RGTI fell from $58 to ~$18), which caps the near-term read.

HorizonDriver readAssessmentScore
Historical (12-24m)Boom-then-bust sector sentiment; RGTI +>10x then -69% off peakViolently pro-cyclical, momentum-driven50
CurrentRoadmap on-track (Ankaa-3, 99.5% fidelity), CHIPS LOI signed — but commercial revenue still negligible; sector momentum negativeMixed: technical progress real, sentiment cooling52
Forward (6-12m)150+ qubit / 99.7% milestone late-2026; large TAM optionality; but competition from better-funded IBM/Google/IonQGenuine long-run tailwind, uncertain timing62

Driver score = 58 — Neutral. It is not ≥65 (tailwind) and not ≤35 (headwind), so it is ineligible to amplify the base signal in either direction. This is the correct outcome: the tape does not justify a STRONG SELL amplification, and the extreme valuation blocks any STRONG BUY. The base BUY/HOLD/SELL is unchanged by the driver. Thesis-invalidation floor: a decisive error-correction win by a rival (Google/IBM) or a broken roadmap milestone would flip this driver to a headwind and is the live risk the §11 Bear and §12 exit rules carry. Driver confidence 45% (indirect, sentiment-driven, timeline highly uncertain).

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind
52
conviction

Regime Contested — Soft Landing / Stagflation co-lead (30/30, Reaccel 27, DefBust 13), confidence Low-Med; UST10Y 4.48%, VIX 16.59 (risk-on), unemployment 4.2%. Quantum sits in the Technology sector (XLK), mapped Outperform / Outperform / Outperform — a mild Tailwind pressure, hence a Trend-Following stance. Conviction is tempered to 52 (from a higher sector read) because (a) RGTI's extreme valuation and tiny scale make it far more sensitive to an idiosyncratic sentiment/multiple de-rating than to the XLK tailwind, and (b) the regime is contested with only Low-Med confidence. Note on the armed 'S&P 500 concentration / AI unwind' tail: RGTI is a sub-scale quantum speculative name, NOT a mega-cap AI-cohort constituent, so it does NOT inherit that systemic tail — but it carries its own, larger idiosyncratic de-rating risk (modelled in the §11 Bear). Amplification effect: the Tailwind pressure would enable a BUY→STRONG BUY, but the base signal is SELL/DO-NOT-BUY, so it has no effect here; it does NOT enable STRONG SELL (that needs Headwind pressure).

Source: sector-map · Macro report 2026-07-03

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Bearish. Monthly is still an uptrend, but weekly is a downtrend and daily/hourly/15-min are all strong downtrends — overall confluence Strongly Bearish (MTF ~33). Price is below the 50- and 200-day averages, sits at just ~13% of its 52-week range, and has fallen ~69% from the $58 high. This is a falling knife, not a support bounce.
25
conf 55% — clean intraday data; no earnings within 14 days.

Risk-reward (daily focus): price $17.94 is below SMA50 (~$20.2) and SMA200 (~$23.9), MACD negative, daily flagged support_breakdown. Nearest support $15.30 then the 52-week low $12.08; the logical stop below $12 is ~2+ ATR away (daily ATR ~$2.0), i.e. a wide stop — unfavourable risk-reward for a long. No oversold-reversal signal (daily RSI 41, not <30 with a positive divergence).

Relative strength: deeply negative — RGTI is down ~69% from its 52-week high and sits at ~13% of its 52-week range while the broad tape is risk-on (VIX 16.6); it is a heavy laggard on 1- and 3-month horizons. Near-lows position on a beaten-down high-beta name = 'could be value or a falling knife'; the strong-downtrend confluence says the latter for now.

Position-risk: beta 1.96, daily ATR ~$2.0 (~11% of price) — a 5% position behaves like ~10% in risk terms. Volatility-adjusted stop distance is wide; entry here is poorly located.

Macro overlay (Technology = low macro sensitivity, 10% weight): risk-on tape (VIX 16.6) is a mild positive, but rate-sensitivity of a long-duration, zero-profit growth name to the 4.48% 10-Y is a standing headwind for the multiple.

Sentiment layer: analyst grades all 'maintain' Buy/Outperform (Rosenblatt, Mizuho, Needham, Benchmark) — neutral-to-positive Street tone, but no fresh upgrades. News tone (Motley Fool 'Quantum Stocks Face a 2028 Cash Test') is cautious on the cohort while noting RGTI's strong cash position. Net sentiment neutral.

Catalyst layer: no earnings within 14 days (Q2 ~mid-Aug); milestone news (150+ qubit late-2026) is the next real catalyst but undated. Catalyst-clustering calm (~60) — the risk here is trend, not event clustering.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
~2026-07-15US CPI (Jun)HighLowTech is low macro-sensitivity; matters only via the growth-multiple / rate channel
~2026-07-29FOMC Rate DecisionHighHold (mkt)Low-MedRate path drives long-duration growth multiples; RGTI is zero-profit so duration-sensitive

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-07-03Macro tape (context)UST10Y 4.48% · VIX 16.59 · Unemp 4.2%Risk-on, contested regimeNeutral for RGTI (idiosyncratic risks dominate)

Rigetti has LOW direct macro sensitivity — its price is driven by quantum-sector sentiment, dilution and roadmap milestones far more than by any single macro print. The one channel that matters is rates: as a pre-profit, long-duration growth name, a higher-for-longer 10-Y (4.48%) is a standing headwind to its multiple. No high-impact release inside the 3-day WAIT-override window. (Note: a full economic-calendar pull was not run this session; dates shown are the known cadence and are flagged low-relevance.)

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Neutral52.6+3.62 / sig 4.27 (hist -0.65, fading)S: $3.25 · R: $21.42 / $58.15Resistance breakout (stale)0.04x
WeeklyDowntrend ↓Bearish46.4-0.21, below signalS: $14.79 · R: $19.21 / $20.170.58x
DailyStrong downtrend ↓Bearish41.1-0.66, hist -0.39S: $15.30 / $15.46 · R: $22.57 / $23.57Support breakdown0.70x
HourlyStrong downtrend ↓Bearish41.2-0.27, hist -0.02S: $17.55 · R: $19.55Support breakdown0.02x
15-minStrong downtrend ↓Bearish50.5-0.02, turningS: $17.55 · R: $18.630.03x
Confluence: Strongly Bearish · MTF Score 33

The only bullish timeframe is the monthly — and its MACD histogram is already rolling over (the secular uptrend was built almost entirely by the 2025 spike to $58). Weekly has turned down and daily/hourly/15-min are all in strong downtrends with a fresh daily support breakdown. This is the textbook 'higher-timeframe rolling over into a lower-timeframe breakdown' pattern — sell-the-rip, not buy-the-dip. First real support is $15.30, then the 52-week low $12.08. A daily reclaim of the ~$20 SMA50 on volume is the earliest sign the downtrend is pausing.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

6-month daily close (Jan-Jul 2026). The February slide, an April-May spike toward $27, and the June-July fade back below the 200-day ($23.88) — price now sits near the lower support band, below both the 50- and 200-day averages.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $42 (25%)

Quantum re-rates: the 150+ qubit / 99.7% milestone lands late-2026, error-correction progress reads credibly, government/CHIPS contracts expand, and risk-on sentiment sends the high-beta cohort back toward analyst highs ($40). A short squeeze on this ~$18, beta-1.96 name amplifies the move. This is a real, sizeable option — but a low-probability lottery leg, and the reason the probability-weighted mean sits above the point-estimate base.

Base $16 (50%)

Valuation gravity vs story tug-of-war. Roadmap progresses but revenue stays tiny and dilution continues; the extreme multiple compresses modestly as momentum unwinds, while the $569M cash pile (~$1.7/sh book, ~$1.7/sh cash) provides a soft floor. Stock chops in a $12-20 band, drifting slightly below spot to ~$16. Point-estimate fair value ≈ base ≈ $15-16, i.e. modestly below today's price.

Bear $8 (25%)

Severe idiosyncratic de-rating (the modelled risk for a name that already fell 58→18). Triggers: a rival (Google/IBM) posts a decisive error-correction win and capital flees the sub-scale also-rans; a roadmap milestone slips; a risk-off leg hits high-beta story stocks; or a large dilutive raise. From 250-590x EV/Rev there is enormous room to fall — a halving to single digits toward the cash/book floor (~$1.7-2/sh is the hard floor far below) is entirely plausible. Competitive trigger carried from Step 7c.

Probability-weighted fair value ≈ 0.25×$42 + 0.50×$16 + 0.25×$8 ≈ $20.5 — which sits above spot ($17.94). Read this correctly: the weighted mean is dragged up by the low-probability bull lottery leg; the point-estimate (modal) fair value ≈ the base ≈ $15-16, below spot. The DO-NOT-BUY verdict is about paying an extreme, un-earned price for a very wide binary in a confirmed downtrend — not a claim that the average outcome is catastrophic.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Wait0 of 3 groups met — no entry path open

Fundamental — not MET

Price is ABOVE our point-estimate fair value, and the valuation band is Expensive — the fundamental path is not open.
⛔ Price $17.94 < point-estimate fair value ~$15
✅ No earnings within 7 days (Q2 ~mid-Aug)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (58)

Technical — not MET

Strong downtrend on daily/weekly; price below SMA50 & SMA200; no support bounce with a higher low yet.
⛔ Daily close > SMA50 (~$20.2) on >1.5x volume
⛔ OR a tested bounce off $15.30 / $12.08 support with a higher low
⛔ RSI 35-65 (41) and MACD turning up

Catalyst — not MET

No confirming event in the window.
· Post-earnings move >+5% with guidance raised, on >2x volume
· A dated, verified roadmap/error-correction milestone beat

Forecast: 0 of 3 entry paths open → Wait. Fundamental: unlikely without either a large price fall toward the cash-backed value zone (~$10, i.e. -44%) OR a step-change in revenue that is not in any 2026-2030 model — Unlikely in the near term. Technical: requires a daily reclaim of ~$20 SMA50 on volume, ~+13% against a strong downtrend — Unlikely in the next 2-4 weeks without a reversal catalyst; watch for a higher low off $15.30/$12.08 first. Catalyst: dependent on the undated 150+ qubit / 99.7% milestone (guided late-2026) or the Q2 print (~mid-Aug) — catalyst-dependent, not time-projectable. Net: no path is close; this is a Wait, consistent with the DO-NOT-BUY signal.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below $12 (beneath the 52-week low $12.08 / support)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ Competitive: a rival (Google/IBM) posts a decisive error-correction/utility win and capital rotates out of sub-scale quantum names
⛔ Roadmap milestone (150+ qubit / 99.7% late-2026) slips materially, OR cash runway shortens sharply via a large dilutive raise
⛔ Driver turns to a headwind (sector sentiment breaks down further)

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into the $30-31 median analyst target with RSI > 70 and no fundamental improvement

Forecast: For anyone already holding: Stop-Loss below $12 is ~33% away and not imminent at current trajectory, but the strong daily downtrend makes it a live risk on any negative milestone/risk-off leg. Thesis-invalidation is the one to watch — a rival error-correction win is a continuous, not dated, risk. Profit-target ($30+) is far away and would require a full sentiment re-rating. Exit action today: Hold (no trigger live) — but this is NOT a buy signal.

Imagine you act at the current price of $17.94 · as of 3 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

You'd be risking ~-33% to the $12 stop (bear $8 = -55%) to gain base ~-11% / bull +134% — a poor, wide binary.
  • Risking: downside to the $12 stop (-33%); bear case $8 (-55%). You'd be buying into a strong daily/weekly downtrend, above the support entry zone, at a ~252-591x EV/Rev multiple — every entry rule is UNMET (0 of 3).
  • Gaining: a real bull option to $42 (+134%) if quantum re-rates, plus the embedded optionality you'd own — a $569M cash war-chest / 'last-survivor' call and CHIPS/DARPA policy tailwind. But no income or FCF accrues while you wait (the company burns cash), and the modal outcome (base $16) is slightly below today's price.
  • Read: acting now pays an extreme price for a very wide binary with the tape against you. Waiting for either the cash-backed value zone (~$10) or a confirmed higher low + SMA50 reclaim materially improves the deal.

What if you sold now?

You'd be giving up the +134% bull lottery leg to protect against the $8 bear (-55%) and a wide downside.
  • Giving up: the bull re-rating to $42 and the embedded quantum/cash optionality; you'd be stepping aside slightly above point-estimate fair value (~$15-16), i.e. not leaving much modal upside on the table.
  • Protecting: capital against the bear case ($8) and the ongoing dilution drag; you sidestep a falling-knife tape. No exit rule is mechanically triggered right now (stop $12 not hit), so for a holder this is 'reduce into strength / don't add', not a forced sell.
  • Read: for a non-holder the mechanical answer is clear — stay out (DO NOT BUY). For a holder, no hard stop is live, but the risk-reward favours trimming rather than adding.
13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "RGTI",
  "exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:RGTI",
  "isin": "US76655K1034",
  "api_ticker": "RGTI",
  "finder_ticker": null,
  "finder_exchange": null,
  "date": "2026-07-03",
  "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "donatien-pick",
  "user_horizon": null,
  "user_allocation_pct": null,
  "portfolio_role": null,
  "price_at_rating": 17.94,
  "signal_short": "DO_NOT_BUY",
  "signal_medium": "DO_NOT_BUY",
  "signal_long": "DO_NOT_BUY",
  "primary_signal": "DO_NOT_BUY",
  "lifecycle_stage": "pre-revenue-speculative",
  "quality_score": 30,
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "Cash Runway + Milestone Progress (pre-revenue analog)",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "multi-year runway; Ankaa-3 84q @99.5% fidelity",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 50,
    "moat_score": 34,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 10,
    "capital_allocation": 40,
    "management_skin_in_game": 45
  },
  "valuation_score": 20,
  "valuation_detail": {
    "ev_revenue_ttm": 591,
    "ev_revenue_fwd_2026": 252,
    "ev_revenue_2030e": 27,
    "fcf_yield": "negative",
    "price_to_book": 10.2,
    "price_to_sales_ttm": 595,
    "implied_growth_rate": "n/a (pre-revenue)",
    "historical_valuation_decile": 8
  },
  "warranted_multiple": "na",
  "actual_multiple": 591,
  "val_multiple_basis": "EV/Revenue (TTM ~$10.0M); fwd-2026 ~252x",
  "discount_rate_r": "na",
  "risk_free_10y": 4.48,
  "g_near": "na",
  "g_term": "na",
  "warranted_ratio": "na",
  "val_band": "expensive",
  "timing_score": 25,
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": 33,
    "risk_reward_score": 25,
    "relative_strength_vs_spy": -60,
    "relative_strength_vs_sector": -55,
    "range_position_52w_pct": 13,
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 60,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.1
  },
  "driver_score": 58,
  "driver_label": "Neutral",
  "driver_commodity_trend": "n/a (not a commodity-leveraged name)",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 52,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-03",
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": "reported GAAP net income is >100% driven by non-operating warrant mark-to-market gains (Q1'26 op loss -$26.0M vs reported +$33.1M continuing-ops on +$59.1M other income; bottom-line -$20.6M)",
  "clean_pe": "n/a (operating loss)",
  "clean_peg": "n/a",
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "losing",
  "competitive_threat_level": "high",
  "overall_confidence": 50,
  "fair_value_est": 15,
  "stop_loss": 12,
  "target_price": 16,
  "scenario_base_target": 16,
  "scenario_bull_target": 42,
  "entry_groups_met": 0,
  "entry_conviction": "Wait",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "hard_gate_state": "donotbuy",
  "gates_triggered": [
    "Valuation Ceiling (EV/Rev ~252-591x >> 20x IT pre-profit line)",
    "Accounting/Dilution (share count +~80% in 5 quarters; warrant-inflated GAAP net income)"
  ],
  "gates_caution": [
    "Financial Distress \u2014 chronic burn, but NOT a liquidity risk ($569M cash, no debt, current ratio 6.98)"
  ],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [
    "Trigger 2, absolute arm (a): EV/Rev ~252x fwd / ~591x TTM >> 1.5x the 20x IT pre-profit guardrail (30x), with no proven durable growth and no modelled profit path through 2030"
  ],
  "analyst_consensus_target": 30.5,
  "analyst_target_high": 40,
  "analyst_target_low": 20,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 70,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Buy",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 86,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 7,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": 0,
  "recent_downgrades_30d": 0,
  "fmp_rating": "C-",
  "fmp_overall_score": 1,
  "cash_and_investments_musd": 569,
  "total_debt": "~none",
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-17",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (no confirmed dated catalyst; Q2 earnings ~mid-Aug)"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_company_profile sector, mcap $5.96B, beta 1.96, ISIN US76655K1034, 52wk 12.08-58.15
get_stock_snapshot prior-day bar only (today 0s pre-open); close $17.94 used
get_income_statement 6 quarters; surfaced the warrant mark-to-market distortion (Step 7b)
get_financial_ratios P/S 595x, P/B 10.2x, current ratio 6.98, EV $5.92B, negative margins
get_multi_timeframe_analysis all 5 timeframes; confluence strongly_bearish
get_price_target_consensus consensus $30.5, median $31, high $40, low $20
get_grades_consensus 6 Buy / 1 Hold / 0 Sell, consensus Buy
get_stock_grades recent actions all 'maintain' Buy/Outperform
get_analyst_estimates 2026E rev ~$23.5M; still net-loss / EBITDA-negative through 2030E
get_ratings_snapshot FMP C- (overall 1/5)
get_earnings_calendar returned empty — next earnings inferred ~mid-Aug (Q1 reported 11 May)
get_polygon_news 'Quantum Stocks Face a 2028 Cash Test' + sector coverage
get_stock_prices 124 daily bars for the 6-month chart
get_economic_calendar not pulled this session; §8 uses known macro cadence, flagged low-relevance
WebSearch $569M cash / multi-year runway; CHIPS Act LOI $100M; Ankaa-3 84q 99.5%; roadmap 150+q late-2026, 1,000+q end-2027
Impact on scores: High-confidence on price, financials, valuation multiples, technicals, analyst data (all MCP-OK). Confidence haircut applied for: no computable warranted-multiple anchor (pre-revenue), an empty earnings-calendar (next-update uses the +14d default), and an un-pulled economic calendar (§8 low-relevance for this low-macro-sensitivity name). Overall confidence 50%.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.