Strategic Portfolios

09 September 2026 · built from the Macro-Economic report of 9 September 2026
This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Energy-shock stagflation, intensified — Stagflation 48 per cent · Soft Landing 22 per cent · Deflationary Bust 20 per cent · Reacceleration 10 per cent
1

Macro Read & Portfolio Strategy

The regime these portfolios are built for, and why growth here is real assets rather than broad equities.
Regime: Energy-shock stagflation, intensified — a Hormuz supply shock with Brent above $100 landing on core PCE stuck at 3.34 per cent, a labour market that is holding and a household that is not. Built from the Macro-Economic report of 9 September 2026 (same day — no staleness haircut applied).
Energy-Shock Stagflation
48%
Soft Landing
22%
Deflationary Bust
20%
Reacceleration
10%

Two thirds of the probability weight sits in the two paths that punish duration and broad equity: Stagflation at 48 per cent and Deflationary Bust at 20 per cent. Those punish equity by different routes — and note that a deflationary bust would normally see long Treasuries RALLY. They carry zero here anyway, because the macro rates them Strong Underperform on all three horizons and the macro signal governs. That is what drives every allocation below. The critical drivers:

The uncomfortable consequence, stated plainly. The macro rates long Treasuries SU, IG credit SU and high yield U across every horizon. There is nowhere safe in duration this run, so the bond allocation a textbook portfolio would hold has gone to cash, short Treasuries, gold and TIPS instead. The Conservative tier ends up 46 per cent in cash and yen. That is not caution for its own sake — it is what the signals leave standing.
And the defensives are not defensive this time. The usual trio is health care, staples and utilities. This macro rates Staples U (food and energy input costs compress margins exactly when the defensive bid should help) and Utilities U (a bond proxy competing with a 4.78 per cent ten-year). Only Health Care is non-negative, so the defensive sleeve is one sector deep. Where the template and the macro disagree, the macro wins.
2

How These Portfolios Are Built

The signal-to-weight engine, the three tiers, and the Trend versus Contrarian rule.

Every macro signal is converted to a numeric tilt — SO = +2, O = +1, N = 0, U = −1, SU = −2 — then blended across horizons favouring the core:

blended tilt = 0.25 × Short + 0.50 × Medium + 0.25 × Long

Each tier has a budget across five buckets, filled with the highest-tilt blocks. Nothing the macro rates U or SU carries an overweight. That rule was VERIFIED, not merely intended: after building, each tier was reparsed from the rendered page and checked to sum to 100, each bucket recomputed against the method’s budget, and every holding tested against its macro signal. Those checks are the author’s, run on this artifact — there is no portfolio build tool in the repository, and an earlier draft of this very report did breach the budget band before that check was applied. Every position is tagged exactly one of:

BucketAggressiveBalancedConservative
Real assets / inflation hedges28%30%32%
Cyclical growth (equity + energy commodity)40%22%8%
Defensive equity7%13%10%
Contrarian recovery20%11%4%
Cash / short-duration ballast5%24%46%
Total100%100%100%
3

Aggressive Portfolio

14 holdings · 80% Trend / 20% Contrarian · sums to 100%.
Asset ClassSectorBuilding blockWeightETFTagMacro S / M / LWhy
EquityEnergyEnergy15%XLETrendO O OThe direct beneficiary of the shock driving the whole regime, and 17.9% above its 200-day average. The largest equity line in Aggressive; stepped down as risk tolerance falls.
EquityMaterialsMaterials13%XLBTrendO O OGold and a softening dollar both push one way — the cleanest equity expression of this regime. Mining equities live here, NOT in the commodity sleeve above.
Commodity—Gold12%GLDTrendSO SO SOThe strongest signal in the macro book (SO across all three horizons). The bid is fiscal debasement and reserve diversification — it holds even as real rates rise, which is why it is the anchor rather than a hedge.
Commodity—Copper / Ind Metals9%CPERContrarianU N SOCONTRARIAN. U short, SO long — a three-notch gap, the widest in the book. Named in the macro divergences: real money sees physical tightness while fast money keeps it rate-suppressed. Bought BECAUSE it is currently out of favour.
Fixed income—Inflation-linked (TIPS)8%TIPTrendSO SO SOSO across all horizons. Core PCE is stuck at 3.34% with a live energy shock on top; TIPS do the job nominal Treasuries cannot in this regime.
Commodity—Oil8%USOTrendSO O USO short, but U long — deliberately a SHORT-HORIZON position. Brent above $100 on a supply constraint; the long call fades on demand destruction, so this is the one line sized to be trimmed rather than held.
EquityEM EquitiesEM Equities7%EEMContrarianU N OCONTRARIAN. U short, O long. A softening dollar and Chinese exports at +25% YoY against a synchronised tightening restart — the recovery is a later-horizon call, not a now call.
EquityHealth CareHealth Care7%XLVTrendN N NThe ONLY defensive sector this macro does not penalise — genuinely uncorrelated to the active drivers. Staples (U) are squeezed by input costs and Utilities (U) compete with a 4.78% ten-year, so the usual defensive trio is one name deep this run.
EquityIndustrialsAerospace & Defense4%XARTrendO O SOTREND. O / O / SO — positive on every horizon, which is the Trend definition. (It was briefly tagged Contrarian on the grounds that the tape has stopped paying, -11.7% on the month; that is a third criterion the method does not contain, and Agriculture has the identical O/O/SO profile and is Trend. Corrected.) Held on the structural procurement case: EU defence spend +8.6% in 2026, investment share 36.2% of budgets versus 24.8% in 2020.
Commodity—Agriculture4%DBATrendO O SOA >90% very-strong El Niño peaking Oct–Dec, compounded by energy feeding fertiliser and freight. Small but genuinely uncorrelated to the rest of the book.
Commodity—Silver4%SLVTrendO O OSixth consecutive annual supply deficit with ~75% arriving as a by-product, so supply cannot answer price. Sized below gold because it is the higher-beta expression.
EquityInformation TechnologyUS Tech4%QQQContrarianSU U NCONTRARIAN, and the weakest claim in the book — stated openly. SU / U / N: the long signal is LESS BAD, not positive, so unlike Copper (U→SO) and EM (U→O) it has no positive endpoint to recover to. The method's three worked examples all terminate positive, so this sits at the edge of the rule and is therefore held at TOKEN size only. SPY carries the identical -1.00 blended tilt and carries ZERO; the difference is that tech's penalty is shrinking across horizons and the index's is not.
Cash—Cash / Short Treasuries3%BILTrend—Long Treasuries are SU, IG credit SU and high yield U — there is nowhere safe in duration this run, so cash does the job bonds normally would. Deliberately thin in Aggressive and dominant in Conservative; see each tier's note.
FX—Japanese Yen2%FXYTrendSO O NSO short. The BoJ hike is 97% priced for 18 September and the carry unwind has already begun — a haven that is also a live catalyst.
Total100%
28%
40%
7%
20%
5%
Real assets / inflation hedges 28% Cyclical growth (equity + energy commodity) 40% Defensive equity 7% Contrarian recovery 20% Cash / short-duration ballast 5%

Worked example — $100,000

Building blockWeightAmount
Energy15%$15,000
Materials13%$13,000
Gold12%$12,000
Copper / Ind Metals9%$9,000
Inflation-linked (TIPS)8%$8,000
Oil8%$8,000
EM Equities7%$7,000
Health Care7%$7,000
Aerospace & Defense4%$4,000
Agriculture4%$4,000
Silver4%$4,000
US Tech4%$4,000
Cash / Short Treasuries3%$3,000
Japanese Yen2%$2,000
Total100%$100,000
What this tier does. Maximum growth for this regime — which is real assets and commodity-linked equity, not broad stocks. In the Stagflation base case (48%) it should do well; in a Deflationary Bust (20%) the energy and copper lines hurt and only gold, TIPS and the thin cash sleeve cushion it. This tier accepts that trade deliberately.
4

Balanced Portfolio

14 holdings · 89% Trend / 11% Contrarian · sums to 100%.
Asset ClassSectorBuilding blockWeightETFTagMacro S / M / LWhy
Cash—Cash / Short Treasuries16%BILTrend—Long Treasuries are SU, IG credit SU and high yield U — there is nowhere safe in duration this run, so cash does the job bonds normally would. Deliberately thin in Aggressive and dominant in Conservative; see each tier's note.
Commodity—Gold13%GLDTrendSO SO SOThe strongest signal in the macro book (SO across all three horizons). The bid is fiscal debasement and reserve diversification — it holds even as real rates rise, which is why it is the anchor rather than a hedge.
EquityHealth CareHealth Care13%XLVTrendN N NThe ONLY defensive sector this macro does not penalise — genuinely uncorrelated to the active drivers. Staples (U) are squeezed by input costs and Utilities (U) compete with a 4.78% ten-year, so the usual defensive trio is one name deep this run.
Fixed income—Inflation-linked (TIPS)10%TIPTrendSO SO SOSO across all horizons. Core PCE is stuck at 3.34% with a live energy shock on top; TIPS do the job nominal Treasuries cannot in this regime.
EquityEnergyEnergy9%XLETrendO O OThe direct beneficiary of the shock driving the whole regime, and 17.9% above its 200-day average. The largest equity line in Aggressive; stepped down as risk tolerance falls.
FX—Japanese Yen8%FXYTrendSO O NSO short. The BoJ hike is 97% priced for 18 September and the carry unwind has already begun — a haven that is also a live catalyst.
EquityMaterialsMaterials8%XLBTrendO O OGold and a softening dollar both push one way — the cleanest equity expression of this regime. Mining equities live here, NOT in the commodity sleeve above.
Commodity—Copper / Ind Metals5%CPERContrarianU N SOCONTRARIAN. U short, SO long — a three-notch gap, the widest in the book. Named in the macro divergences: real money sees physical tightness while fast money keeps it rate-suppressed. Bought BECAUSE it is currently out of favour.
Commodity—Agriculture4%DBATrendO O SOA >90% very-strong El Niño peaking Oct–Dec, compounded by energy feeding fertiliser and freight. Small but genuinely uncorrelated to the rest of the book.
EquityEM EquitiesEM Equities4%EEMContrarianU N OCONTRARIAN. U short, O long. A softening dollar and Chinese exports at +25% YoY against a synchronised tightening restart — the recovery is a later-horizon call, not a now call.
Commodity—Oil3%USOTrendSO O USO short, but U long — deliberately a SHORT-HORIZON position. Brent above $100 on a supply constraint; the long call fades on demand destruction, so this is the one line sized to be trimmed rather than held.
Commodity—Silver3%SLVTrendO O OSixth consecutive annual supply deficit with ~75% arriving as a by-product, so supply cannot answer price. Sized below gold because it is the higher-beta expression.
EquityIndustrialsAerospace & Defense2%XARTrendO O SOTREND. O / O / SO — positive on every horizon, which is the Trend definition. (It was briefly tagged Contrarian on the grounds that the tape has stopped paying, -11.7% on the month; that is a third criterion the method does not contain, and Agriculture has the identical O/O/SO profile and is Trend. Corrected.) Held on the structural procurement case: EU defence spend +8.6% in 2026, investment share 36.2% of budgets versus 24.8% in 2020.
EquityInformation TechnologyUS Tech2%QQQContrarianSU U NCONTRARIAN, and the weakest claim in the book — stated openly. SU / U / N: the long signal is LESS BAD, not positive, so unlike Copper (U→SO) and EM (U→O) it has no positive endpoint to recover to. The method's three worked examples all terminate positive, so this sits at the edge of the rule and is therefore held at TOKEN size only. SPY carries the identical -1.00 blended tilt and carries ZERO; the difference is that tech's penalty is shrinking across horizons and the index's is not.
Total100%
30%
22%
13%
11%
24%
Real assets / inflation hedges 30% Cyclical growth (equity + energy commodity) 22% Defensive equity 13% Contrarian recovery 11% Cash / short-duration ballast 24%

Worked example — $100,000

Building blockWeightAmount
Cash / Short Treasuries16%$16,000
Gold13%$13,000
Health Care13%$13,000
Inflation-linked (TIPS)10%$10,000
Energy9%$9,000
Japanese Yen8%$8,000
Materials8%$8,000
Copper / Ind Metals5%$5,000
Agriculture4%$4,000
EM Equities4%$4,000
Oil3%$3,000
Silver3%$3,000
Aerospace & Defense2%$2,000
US Tech2%$2,000
Total100%$100,000
What this tier does. Moderate growth with real ballast. The 24% in cash and yen is not timidity — it is where the bond allocation went, because the macro rates long Treasuries and IG credit Strong Underperform. Holds up across the Stagflation and Soft-Landing paths; gives up upside in a Reacceleration (10%).
5

Conservative Portfolio

11 holdings · 96% Trend / 4% Contrarian · sums to 100%.
Asset ClassSectorBuilding blockWeightETFTagMacro S / M / LWhy
Cash—Cash / Short Treasuries34%BILTrend—Long Treasuries are SU, IG credit SU and high yield U — there is nowhere safe in duration this run, so cash does the job bonds normally would. Deliberately thin in Aggressive and dominant in Conservative; see each tier's note.
Commodity—Gold14%GLDTrendSO SO SOThe strongest signal in the macro book (SO across all three horizons). The bid is fiscal debasement and reserve diversification — it holds even as real rates rise, which is why it is the anchor rather than a hedge.
Fixed income—Inflation-linked (TIPS)12%TIPTrendSO SO SOSO across all horizons. Core PCE is stuck at 3.34% with a live energy shock on top; TIPS do the job nominal Treasuries cannot in this regime.
FX—Japanese Yen12%FXYTrendSO O NSO short. The BoJ hike is 97% priced for 18 September and the carry unwind has already begun — a haven that is also a live catalyst.
EquityHealth CareHealth Care10%XLVTrendN N NThe ONLY defensive sector this macro does not penalise — genuinely uncorrelated to the active drivers. Staples (U) are squeezed by input costs and Utilities (U) compete with a 4.78% ten-year, so the usual defensive trio is one name deep this run.
EquityEnergyEnergy5%XLETrendO O OThe direct beneficiary of the shock driving the whole regime, and 17.9% above its 200-day average. The largest equity line in Aggressive; stepped down as risk tolerance falls.
Commodity—Agriculture4%DBATrendO O SOA >90% very-strong El Niño peaking Oct–Dec, compounded by energy feeding fertiliser and freight. Small but genuinely uncorrelated to the rest of the book.
EquityMaterialsMaterials3%XLBTrendO O OGold and a softening dollar both push one way — the cleanest equity expression of this regime. Mining equities live here, NOT in the commodity sleeve above.
Commodity—Copper / Ind Metals2%CPERContrarianU N SOCONTRARIAN. U short, SO long — a three-notch gap, the widest in the book. Named in the macro divergences: real money sees physical tightness while fast money keeps it rate-suppressed. Bought BECAUSE it is currently out of favour.
EquityEM EquitiesEM Equities2%EEMContrarianU N OCONTRARIAN. U short, O long. A softening dollar and Chinese exports at +25% YoY against a synchronised tightening restart — the recovery is a later-horizon call, not a now call.
Commodity—Silver2%SLVTrendO O OSixth consecutive annual supply deficit with ~75% arriving as a by-product, so supply cannot answer price. Sized below gold because it is the higher-beta expression.
Total100%
32%
8%
10%
4%
46%
Real assets / inflation hedges 32% Cyclical growth (equity + energy commodity) 8% Defensive equity 10% Contrarian recovery 4% Cash / short-duration ballast 46%

Worked example — $100,000

Building blockWeightAmount
Cash / Short Treasuries34%$34,000
Gold14%$14,000
Inflation-linked (TIPS)12%$12,000
Japanese Yen12%$12,000
Health Care10%$10,000
Energy5%$5,000
Agriculture4%$4,000
Materials3%$3,000
Copper / Ind Metals2%$2,000
EM Equities2%$2,000
Silver2%$2,000
Total100%$100,000
What this tier does. Capital preservation with inflation protection. 46% in cash and yen, 32% in real assets, and almost no cyclicality. It will look wrong in a Reacceleration and will feel slow in a Soft Landing — that is the price of being right in the two downside paths, which together carry 68% of the weight.
6

Trend vs Contrarian Breakdown

Where these portfolios ride the signal, and where they deliberately bet against it.
Aggressive
Trend 80% Contrarian 20%
Balanced
Trend 89% Contrarian 11%
Conservative
Trend 96% Contrarian 4%

The contrarian sleeve shrinks as risk tolerance falls — 20 per cent, 11 per cent, 4 per cent. Every one of these is uncomfortable to hold today, which is the point:

PositionAggBalConThesis
Copper / Ind Metals9%5%2%CONTRARIAN. U short, SO long — a three-notch gap, the widest in the book. Named in the macro divergences: real money sees physical tightness while fast money keeps it rate-suppressed. Bought BECAUSE it is currently out of favour.
EM Equities7%4%2%CONTRARIAN. U short, O long. A softening dollar and Chinese exports at +25% YoY against a synchronised tightening restart — the recovery is a later-horizon call, not a now call.
US Tech4%2%—CONTRARIAN, and the weakest claim in the book — stated openly. SU / U / N: the long signal is LESS BAD, not positive, so unlike Copper (U→SO) and EM (U→O) it has no positive endpoint to recover to. The method's three worked examples all terminate positive, so this sits at the edge of the rule and is therefore held at TOKEN size only. SPY carries the identical -1.00 blended tilt and carries ZERO; the difference is that tech's penalty is shrinking across horizons and the index's is not.
7

Risk Management & Rebalancing

Ballast, the catalyst cluster, and what would force a re-run.

Ballast. Gold, TIPS, cash, short Treasuries and the yen carry the downside work. Counting exactly those five lines: 25 per cent of Aggressive, 47 per cent of Balanced, 72 per cent of Conservative. Long bonds do none of it this run, by instruction of the macro signals.

Position caps. No single non-ballast line exceeds 15 per cent. The largest is Energy at 15 per cent in Aggressive, which is deliberate concentration in the one sector the shock directly funds.

The catalyst cluster is nine days wide and unusually dense. Five high-impact events between 10 and 18 September:

Three central banks decide inside those nine days — ECB on the 10th, the Fed on the 16th, the BoJ on the 18th. The cash sleeve is dry powder for exactly this — do not deploy it into the cluster.

What would force a re-run. A Fed hike on 16 September (the macro report calls a hold, at low confidence — if it is wrong, the duration and tech lines change first). Brent back below $85, which softens the whole thesis. Core PCE resuming its fall. Or a disorderly yen move on 18 September, which would hit the contrarian sleeve hardest. Any of those and these tiers are re-derived, not adjusted.
8

Calibration / State Snapshot

Machine-readable state for the next run's deltas and for the Stock-Finder's equity-only screen.
{
 "run_date": "2026-09-09",
 "macro_report_date": "2026-09-09",
 "macro_report": "MacroDriver_Weekly_20260909.html",
 "dominant_regime": "Energy-shock stagflation, intensified: a Hormuz supply shock with Brent above $100 landing on core PCE stuck at 3.34%, a labour market that is holding and a household that is not. The Fed debate is hike-vs-hold, and a hike would reverse a cutting cycle.",
 "scenario_weights": {
  "Energy-Shock Stagflation": 48,
  "Soft Landing": 22,
  "Deflationary Bust": 20,
  "Reacceleration": 10
 },
 "tiers": {
  "Aggressive": {
   "weights": {
    "Gold": {
     "pct": 12,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "GLD",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Inflation-linked (TIPS)": {
     "pct": 8,
     "asset_class": "fixed_income",
     "vehicle": "TIP",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Silver": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "SLV",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Agriculture": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "DBA",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Energy": {
     "pct": 15,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Energy",
     "vehicle": "XLE",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Materials": {
     "pct": 13,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Materials",
     "vehicle": "XLB",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Oil": {
     "pct": 8,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "USO",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Health Care": {
     "pct": 7,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Health Care",
     "vehicle": "XLV",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Copper / Ind Metals": {
     "pct": 9,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "CPER",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "EM Equities": {
     "pct": 7,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "EM Equities",
     "vehicle": "EEM",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "US Tech": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Information Technology",
     "vehicle": "QQQ",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "Aerospace & Defense": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Industrials",
     "vehicle": "XAR",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Cash / Short Treasuries": {
     "pct": 3,
     "asset_class": "cash",
     "vehicle": "BIL",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Japanese Yen": {
     "pct": 2,
     "asset_class": "fx",
     "vehicle": "FXY",
     "tag": "trend"
    }
   },
   "trend_pct": 80,
   "contrarian_pct": 20
  },
  "Balanced": {
   "weights": {
    "Gold": {
     "pct": 13,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "GLD",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Inflation-linked (TIPS)": {
     "pct": 10,
     "asset_class": "fixed_income",
     "vehicle": "TIP",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Silver": {
     "pct": 3,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "SLV",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Agriculture": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "DBA",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Energy": {
     "pct": 9,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Energy",
     "vehicle": "XLE",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Materials": {
     "pct": 8,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Materials",
     "vehicle": "XLB",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Oil": {
     "pct": 3,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "USO",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Health Care": {
     "pct": 13,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Health Care",
     "vehicle": "XLV",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Copper / Ind Metals": {
     "pct": 5,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "CPER",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "EM Equities": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "EM Equities",
     "vehicle": "EEM",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "US Tech": {
     "pct": 2,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Information Technology",
     "vehicle": "QQQ",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "Aerospace & Defense": {
     "pct": 2,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Industrials",
     "vehicle": "XAR",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Cash / Short Treasuries": {
     "pct": 16,
     "asset_class": "cash",
     "vehicle": "BIL",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Japanese Yen": {
     "pct": 8,
     "asset_class": "fx",
     "vehicle": "FXY",
     "tag": "trend"
    }
   },
   "trend_pct": 89,
   "contrarian_pct": 11
  },
  "Conservative": {
   "weights": {
    "Gold": {
     "pct": 14,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "GLD",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Inflation-linked (TIPS)": {
     "pct": 12,
     "asset_class": "fixed_income",
     "vehicle": "TIP",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Silver": {
     "pct": 2,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "SLV",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Agriculture": {
     "pct": 4,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "DBA",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Energy": {
     "pct": 5,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Energy",
     "vehicle": "XLE",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Materials": {
     "pct": 3,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Materials",
     "vehicle": "XLB",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Health Care": {
     "pct": 10,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "Health Care",
     "vehicle": "XLV",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Copper / Ind Metals": {
     "pct": 2,
     "asset_class": "commodity",
     "vehicle": "CPER",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "EM Equities": {
     "pct": 2,
     "asset_class": "equity",
     "gics_sector": "EM Equities",
     "vehicle": "EEM",
     "tag": "contra"
    },
    "Cash / Short Treasuries": {
     "pct": 34,
     "asset_class": "cash",
     "vehicle": "BIL",
     "tag": "trend"
    },
    "Japanese Yen": {
     "pct": 12,
     "asset_class": "fx",
     "vehicle": "FXY",
     "tag": "trend"
    }
   },
   "trend_pct": 96,
   "contrarian_pct": 4
  }
 },
 "note": "Defensive-equity budget was cut and moved to ballast because this macro rates Staples U and Utilities U; only Health Care is non-negative. Long duration carries zero weight in all three tiers (TLT SU, LQD SU, HYG U)."
}
9

Data Sources & Methodology

What this was built from, and the confidence attached to it.
Data Sources
●Macro-Economic reportMacroDriver_Weekly_20260909.html — published the same day. Sole data source: the 15 asset-class signals, 11 sector signals, scenario weights, driver dominances, divergences and calendar. No live prices were fetched for this report.
●Construction methodportfolio-construction.md — the tilt engine and the five-bucket tier budgets. Budgets were flexed within the permitted band for the defensive sleeve, and the reason is stated in section 1.
●Budget flexDefensive-equity budgets were flexed 5/20/18 → 7/13/10 and the difference moved to ballast, because only Health Care is non-negative among the defensives. Every bucket was recomputed after the build and sits inside the method’s ±8-point band — three of them exactly at the edge. One disclosure the method asks for: the Conservative cash line is 34 per cent, above the ~16 per cent single-ballast-line guide — forced by the 38 per cent bucket budget with nowhere in duration to put it. Concentration risk is low (T-bills), but it is a departure and is named here rather than left implicit.
●ConfidenceThe allocation is exactly as current as the macro report it consumes. That report calls a Fed HOLD on 16 September at LOW confidence against an economist consensus that has moved to a hike — if that call is wrong, the duration-sensitive and contrarian-tech lines are the first to need revisiting.
This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.