NASDAQ:POWL Powell Industries, Inc.

ISIN: US7391281067
IndustrialsElectrical EquipmentDo Not Buy — Deep-Expensive (Trigger 2a)
NASDAQ · Houston, TX · Electrical Equipment Analysis Status: On-Going
$212.57
−3.3% (post-earnings)
4 Aug 2026 · Signal v6
Changes Since Last Report (31 Jul 2026, $213.66 · HOLD/HOLD/HOLD)
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Powell Industries, Inc.

Powell Industries designs, builds and services custom electrical distribution and control systems — switchgear, medium-voltage circuit breakers, bus duct, motor-control centres and integrated power-control rooms that route, regulate and monitor electrical energy from 480V up to 38,000V. Its customers are heavy-industry and infrastructure operators: oil & gas refining, petrochemicals, LNG terminals, pipelines, electric utilities, mining, data centres and light rail. What sets it apart is engineered, project-integrated, arc-resistant equipment and deep energy-sector relationships rather than commodity scale, backed by a fortress net-cash balance sheet (~$633m cash, effectively zero debt). Founded in 1947 and based in Houston, Powell is a focused niche specialist riding the electrification, data-centre and LNG build-out.

🚫 DO NOT BUY — Trigger 2(a): deep-expensive. Clean P/E ~43.9× is ≥ 1.5× the Industrials guardrail (1.5 × 23× = 34.5×) and ~2× the 22.2× warranted multiple — and the fresh Q3 FY26 EPS miss (−4.7%) with organic revenue growth decelerated to ~9% breaks the 'exceptional, proven, durable growth' carve-out. Obviously overpriced and risky at a 44× multiple where mean-reversion is a 40%+ move: downside dominates. Genuinely high-quality business — wrong price.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)DO NOT BUY5145%Deep-expensive + fresh miss — downside dominates
Medium-term (6–12 mo)DO NOT BUY5550%44× clean (2× warranted, >1.5× guardrail); growth no longer proven/durable
Long-term (3–5 yr)DO NOT BUY6255%Quality real, but the price prices a flawless future
Next update: 2026-08-18 — default +14d (Q3 reported; next earnings ~17 Nov beyond window)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

80
strong
conf 78%

Valuation Attractiveness

36
expensive
conf 70%

Entry/Exit Timing

48
neutral
conf 45%

Underlying Drivers

77
tailwind
conf 70%

Economic Alignment

68
Trend-Following
conf 68%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
Net cash ~$633m, zero debt, current ratio 1.97 — no distress.
Earnings Event Risk
Q3 FY26 reported 3-4 Aug; next earnings ~17 Nov (>14 days) — cleared.
Valuation Ceiling
Clean P/E ~43.9x ≥ 1.40× warranted (22.2x) AND reported 40.7x ≥ Industrials guardrail 23x → Expensive band. This is the entry-cap floor; it is superseded here by the harder Do-Not-Buy trigger below.
Do-Not-Buy · Trigger 2(a) — deep-expensive
Fires on EITHER bar: (i) clean multiple ≥ 2.0× warranted — 43.9 ÷ 22.2 = 1.98× (just under, NOT met); OR (ii) clean multiple ≥ 1.5× the per-sector guardrail line — 1.5 × 23 = 34.5x, and 43.9 ≥ 34.5 → BAR (ii) IS MET (43.9 is 1.27× the deep-expensive bar). The only escape is 'exceptional, proven, durable growth' — which FAILS: the 3-4 Aug Q3 FY26 EPS miss (−4.7%) and organic revenue growth decelerated to ~9% (the ~20% forward EPS consensus is margin-expansion-dependent, not proven durable volume growth) break 'proven/durable' in the present tense. → DO NOT BUY, all horizons.
Accounting / Dilution
Non-operating income ~9% of net income (interest on cash) — below the 30% flag; share count ~flat.
Regulatory / Binary
No pending binary regulatory/legal event.
🚫 DO-NOT-BUY · TRIGGER 2(a) — DEEP-EXPENSIVE. Even after a ~35% fall from $328, clean P/E ~43.9× sits at 1.27× the deep-expensive guardrail bar (1.5 × 23 = 34.5×) and ~2× the 22.2× warranted multiple. The 'exceptional, proven, durable growth' carve-out that would normally rescue a name at this multiple no longer applies: the 3-4 Aug Q3 miss (−4.7% EPS) and organic top-line growth cooling to ~9% mean the growth is not being proven right now, and the ~20% forward EPS depends on continued margin expansion the miss has called into question. At 44× the mean-reversion is a 40%+ move, not a wobble — obviously overpriced and risky. Signal → DO NOT BUY across all three horizons. (The earlier Valuation-Ceiling HOLD cap is the softer floor; Trigger 2(a) is the harder call and governs.)
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
High-quality, net-cash niche specialist; record backlog
80
conf 78%

Lifecycle: Established industrial in a demand up-cycle. Powell designs and builds custom electrical distribution and control apparatus — switchgear, circuit breakers, bus duct, motor-control and power-control rooms — for heavy industry: oil & gas refining, petrochemicals, LNG terminals, pipelines, electric utilities, mining, data centres and light-rail traction. It is a project-and-engineering business, not a commodity component maker, so quality shows up as backlog conversion, margin discipline and a fortress balance sheet rather than raw revenue growth.

INDUSTRY BENCHMARK: ROIC vs WACC + Backlog Growth (Industrials)
ROIC ~30%+ (ROE 28.3%, near-zero debt) vs a WACC ~9% — a wide, durable value-creation spread. Book-to-bill above 1.0x again this quarter; backlog reached a record ~$2.4bn (first time above $2bn in the company's 79-year history) on record Q3 order bookings across data centres, utilities, LNG and industrial markets.
Rating: STRONG — ROIC well above WACC, backlog at an all-time high. Benchmark Score: 88/100.
Sub-signalReadingScore
Revenue trajectoryQ3 FY26 rev $311.7m, +8.9% YoY (record quarter, but missed consensus −2%). Organic growth decelerating from the FY24-25 surge into high-single digits.68
Profitability vs peersGross margin 30.6%, operating margin 20.6%, net margin 16.5% — near cycle-high, well above the switchgear peer set.82
Cash generationFCF/share ~$6.70, OCF margin ~22%; $633m cash, zero total debt. Current ratio 1.97.88
Balance-sheet healthNet cash ~$633m, debt/equity ~0.003x, interest coverage effectively infinite.95
Competitive Environment — Powell is a focused niche specialist competing against far larger, diversified electrical majors. Its edge is engineered, arc-resistant, project-integrated switchgear and long-standing energy / utility relationships, not scale. It has been gaining share in its niches (LNG, data-centre power rooms) but sits structurally below the majors on cost and breadth.
Direct competitorThreat typeShare trajectoryMoat-erosion vector
Eaton (ETN)Scale / breadth / data-centre powerPowell holding, Eaton dominantBundled electrical + digital; pricing scale
Hubbell (HUBB)Utility / grid componentsStableUtility channel depth
ABBGlobal switchgear / automationPowell gaining in US LNG nichesAutomation integration, global footprint
Schneider ElectricDistribution / control breadthStableSoftware + energy-management ecosystem
nVent (NVT)Electrical enclosures / connectionAdjacent, limited overlapProduct-line adjacency
Siemens EnergyGrid / HV switchgearStable in overlapping HVGrid-scale scale + T&D reach

Net effect on moat: Switching Costs trimmed to ~60 (engineered spec-in + aftermarket, but re-competable), Cost Advantage held to ~45 (sub-scale vs Eaton/ABB/Schneider). Competitive threat: moderate; share trajectory: gaining in target niches. This feeds the §11 Bear (a larger rival under-cutting on data-centre / LNG bids) and the §12 thesis-invalidation.

Pricing power55
Network effects50
Switching costs60
Cost advantage45
Intangible assets55

Moat score 55 (moderate). ROIC percentile vs peers ~88; capital allocation ~78 (net-cash, disciplined, modest dividend + buyback capacity); management skin-in-the-game ~55. Quality pillar: 80/100.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Expensive — clean P/E ~44x vs warranted ~22x
36
conf 70%

THE ANCHOR — Warranted-Multiple Valuation. Discount rate r = 4.75% (10-Y UST) + 4.5% ERP + 0.0% (Quality ≥ 65) = 9.25%. Disciplined growth g_near = 10% (Industrials cyclical cap — consensus forward EPS growth is higher but haircut and capped), g_term = 3%. Two-stage warranted P/E ≈ 22.2x (below the Industrials guardrail line of 23x).

Actual ÷ Warranted = 43.9 ÷ 22.2 = 1.98 → EXPENSIVE (< 40).
Clean/operating trailing P/E ~43.9x (reported P/E 40.7x; the ~9% of net income that is interest on the $633m cash pile is stripped out — step 7b). Reported 40.7x also sits above the Industrials guardrail (23x) → Expensive on the floor alone, no growth exception. Even after a ~35% fall from the $328 high, the multiple is still nearly 2x what rates + disciplined growth warrant.
🚫 DEEP-EXPENSIVE → DO-NOT-BUY TRIGGER 2(a) — both bars adjudicated.
The deep-expensive DNB arm fires if the clean multiple is EITHER (i) ≥ 2.0× warranted — 43.9 ÷ 22.2 = 1.98×, just under the bar (NOT met) — OR (ii) ≥ 1.5× the per-sector guardrail line — 1.5 × 23 = 34.5×, and 43.9 ≥ 34.5 → BAR (ii) IS MET (43.9 is 1.27× the deep-expensive bar). The prior report tested only bar (i) and never adjudicated bar (ii). With bar (ii) met, the trigger fires unless there is exceptional, proven, durable growth. That carve-out fails now: the 3-4 Aug Q3 FY26 print was an EPS miss (−4.7%), and organic revenue growth has decelerated from the FY24 ~50%+ surge to ~9% (FY25 and FY26 consensus alike). The ~20% forward EPS consensus (FY26 $5.46 → FY27 $6.57) is margin-expansion-dependent, not proven durable volume growth, and the fresh miss is exactly the evidence that margin/timing conversion is under pressure. A fresh miss + decelerating organic growth at 44× clean / 2× warranted is not 'proven, durable' — it is 'obviously overpriced and risky.' → DO NOT BUY, all horizons.
LensReadingSignal
Warranted-multiple anchor (40%)Clean 43.9x vs warranted 22.2x = 1.98xExpensive
Sector median (20%)~40x vs Industrials cap-goods median high-20sRich
Own 5-yr decile (15%)~9th decile even post-drawdown (peaked ~65x)Rich
PEG (10%)Clean PEG ~2.2 on ~20% raw consensus near-term EPS growth (FY26 $5.46 → FY27 $6.57)Full
Analyst consensus (15%)Price $212.6 vs consensus ~$316 (median $326) — ~33% below; grades Hold (3 buy / 6 hold / 1 sell). FMP rating C-.Split: targets bullish, grades neutral

FCF yield ~3.1% (P/FCF ~32x) — fair-to-expensive for a quality grower. Implied-growth read: at $212.6 the market embeds ~15-16% five-year earnings growth; our disciplined estimate is ~10% → the price still embeds more growth than the fundamentals conservatively support.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside. The record $2.4bn backlog is largely in the numbers already, but (a) data-centre + LNG order momentum could extend the up-cycle beyond the current book, and (b) the net-cash balance sheet is un-levered optionality (buybacks / bolt-on M&A) the multiple ignores. Real but modest — a reason to keep watching, not a reason the core is cheap. Tilt: +3 within the Expensive band, not a re-rate.

Valuation pillar: 36/100 (Expensive). The huge analyst-target gap lifts the score within the band but cannot override the anchor + guardrail floor — and this run the multiple clears the deep-expensive Do-Not-Buy guardrail bar (≥1.5× guardrail) with the growth carve-out broken, so the signal is DO NOT BUY, not merely a capped HOLD.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Electrification / data-centre / LNG capex cycle
77
Tailwind

Primary driver: the electrification + data-centre / LNG / petrochemical capex cycle (secondary: oil & gas capex). Powell's order book is a direct read on grid, LNG and hyperscale-power build-out. This is a capex-cycle driver, not a commodity price, so no commodity-trend overlay applies.

HorizonReadScore
Historical (25%)Revenue roughly doubled 2023→2025 on the LNG + electrification wave85
Current (50%)Record Q3 order bookings; backlog at an all-time-high ~$2.4bn; book-to-bill >1. Demand broad across data centres, utilities, LNG, petrochem — confirmed on the Q3 call.78
Forward (25%)Multi-year grid + data-centre + LNG capex pipeline; risk is a cyclical capex pause / project timing.70

Driver score: 77 — Tailwind. Eligible to amplify a base BUY to STRONG BUY (with a supportive economy), but the signal is DO NOT BUY (deep-expensive, Trigger 2a), and a Do-Not-Buy trigger overrides even a STRONG BUY — so the tailwind cannot amplify anything here. The driver does not change the three fundamental pillar scores.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind
68
conviction

GICS Industrials. The latest macro report (30 Jul 2026) signals XLI Outperform / Outperform / Strong-Outperform across Short/Medium/Long — a firm, all-horizon tailwind, reinforced by a strong ISM Manufacturing print (55.6, new orders 56.7). Stance Trend-Following, pressure Tailwind, conviction 68. Cohort note: the macro report's armed S&P-500-concentration / AI-earnings-quality unwind tail does NOT apply to POWL — it sells equipment into data centres but is not a top-index AI mega-cap and its earnings are clean operating earnings (no non-operating mark-to-market inflation), so the cohort de-rating leg is not inherited into the bear.

Source: sector-map (GICS Industrials → XLI) · Macro report 2026-07-30

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Neutral, unconfirmed — daily broke down post-earnings, holding 200-DMA
48
conf 45%

POWL is ~35% below its $328 52-week high and, critically, broke down on the earnings print — the daily chart is weakening with a support breakdown, price is well below the 50-day (~$263) though holding above the 200-day (~$191). The Q3 report (after the close 3 Aug) triggered a ~14% intraday flush to ~$188, then a recovery to ~$212 — a volatile, unconfirmed bottoming attempt at the 200-DMA, not a clean turn.

Sub-signalReadingScore
MTF trend confluenceMonthly uptrend (secular), weekly rolling, daily weakening / support breakdown, hourly recovering off $18852
Risk-rewardAt 200-DMA / recent-low support (~$184-191); stop ~$183; upside capped by expensive multiple. ATR ~$17 (elevated).42
Relative strengthDeep laggard: ~−20% vs SPY, ~−15% vs XLI over 3m; near 52-wk range lows25
Macro overlay (wt 0.15)ISM Manufacturing 55.6 (expanding), XLI Outperform — sector wind at back68
Sentiment (wt 0.18)Earnings miss (−4.7% EPS), grades Hold, news tone mixed (record backlog offsets miss)40
Catalyst (wt 0.17)Earnings now behind us; next print ~17 Nov → clear 30-day calendar68

Timing pillar: 48/100 (Neutral, tilting weak). The tape has not confirmed a bottom; a Neutral score, not a green light. A daily reclaim of the 50-day, or a tested higher-low off $188-191 on volume, is the confirmation to watch.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-08-05ISM Services PMI (Jul)High54.554.0MinorBroad growth read; low direct POWL impact
2026-11-17POWL Q4 FY26 earningsHighEPS ~$1.57$1.42 (Q3)YesNext binary company event — drives the next update

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-08-03ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jul)55.654.0+3.0% (above)Positive — industrial demand expanding
2026-08-03POWL Q3 FY26 earningsEPS $1.42$1.49−4.7% (miss)Negative EPS/rev miss; offset by record orders/backlog

No high-impact company catalyst inside the two-week window now that Q3 is out; the macro backdrop (ISM expanding, XLI outperform) is supportive. Next binary event is the ~17 Nov Q4 print.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Bullish64+, risingS: $158 R: $328Breakout (secular)0.2x
WeeklyRolling over →Neutral46−, fallingS: $158 R: $253None0.8x
DailyWeakening ↓Bearish44−, fallingS: $184-191 R: $263Support breakdown1.8x
HourlyRecovering ↑Neutral59+, turning upS: $188 R: $223Bounce off $1880.5x
15-minUptrend ↑Bullish61flatS: $188 R: $215Intraday reclaim0.1x
Confluence: Mixed — secular up, near-term broken · MTF Score 52

The monthly chart is still a secular uptrend, but the near-term picture is broken: the daily weakened into a support breakdown on the earnings print, price is far below the 50-day (~$263) and testing the 200-DMA / recent low (~$188-191). The intraday recovery off $188 is a bounce, not a confirmed higher-low. Confirmation to watch: a daily close back above the 50-day on volume, or a tested higher-low off $188-191.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

POWL daily closes, mid-May → 4 Aug 2026. Peaked ~$310 in June, fell ~35% to a $186 low, and is chopping around the 200-DMA (~$191) after the Q3 print.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $300 (15%)

Data-centre + LNG order momentum extends the up-cycle; backlog re-accelerates, the Q3 miss proves a one-off timing slip and organic growth re-rates back toward 15%+. Multiple holds elevated and the stock retraces toward its prior highs (~$300). (Probability trimmed from 20% — the fresh miss lowers the odds of a clean re-acceleration.)

Base $235 (40%)

The record $2.4bn backlog converts steadily; EPS compounds mid-teens while the multiple slowly compresses from ~40x. Net: a grind back to ~$235 over 12 months as earnings grow into the valuation.

Bear $155 (45%)

Organic growth keeps decelerating (the Q3 miss is the first of more), industrial/oil-&-gas capex pauses, and the deep-expensive ~44x multiple de-rates toward the ~22x warranted level — a move to ~$150-160. This is the DNB downside: from 44x, mean-reversion is a 40%+ move, not a wobble. Competitive trigger: a larger rival (Eaton/ABB/Schneider) under-cuts on data-centre / LNG bids, compressing margin; amplified by any broad risk-off from the armed concentration tail. (Probability lifted from 30% — the fresh miss + decelerating organic growth raise the de-rating odds.)

Probability-weighted 12-month fair value ≈ 0.15×$300 + 0.40×$235 + 0.45×$155 = ~$209below the current $212.6, i.e. risk-reward is negative at a 44x multiple with the growth carve-out broken. Consistent with the Do-Not-Buy call: the asymmetric de-rating risk from a deep-expensive multiple after a fresh miss dominates the modest base-case upside.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Wait0 of 3 groups met — no entry path open

Fundamental — not MET

Price is above fair value and earnings were within 7 days — not a fundamental entry.
⛔ Price $212.6 < fair value ~$190
⛔ No earnings within 7 calendar days (Q3 reported 3 Aug)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (77)

Technical — not MET

Daily broke down and sits below the 50-day; the reachable entry is a confirmed higher-low off $188-191 or a 50-day reclaim.
⛔ Daily close > 50-day (~$263) on >1.5x volume, OR a tested bounce off $188-191 support with a higher low
✅ RSI 35-65 (daily 43.8)
⛔ MACD histogram positive ≥2 days OR turning up off support

Catalyst — not MET

The Q3 print was a miss / negative reaction — no bullish catalyst confirmation.
⛔ Post-earnings move within 24h > +5%
⛔ Guidance raised or maintained (backlog record, but EPS/rev missed)
✅ Volume > 2x the 20-day average

Forecast: Fundamental: unlikely without a further ~12% fall toward ~$190 fair value (or an earnings re-rating higher). Technical: a 50-day reclaim is ~24% above spot — weeks-to-months away; the reachable trigger is a tested higher-low off $188-191 confirming in the next 1-3 weeks. Catalyst: next earnings ~17 Nov. Net: no entry group is likely to fire in the next two weeks — and even a technical trigger would be overridden by the live Do-Not-Buy (Trigger 2a) until the multiple compresses or the growth carve-out is re-proven. Avoid.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below $183 (below the 3-4 Aug ~$188 swing low / 200-DMA)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ Book-to-bill falls below 1.0 for two consecutive quarters / backlog rolls over
⛔ Data-centre / LNG / electrification capex driver turns to a headwind
⛔ Competitive: a named rival (Eaton / ABB / Schneider) takes visible share in data-centre or LNG switchgear with margin compression

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into the ~$316 analyst consensus with RSI > 70 and no quality re-rating

Forecast: Stop ($183) is ~14% below spot and just under the 200-DMA — a breach needs a fresh leg down (another risk-off wave or a capex-cycle wobble). Thesis-invalidation levers (backlog/book-to-bill, capex driver, competitive share) are all currently intact.

Imagine you act at the current price of $212.57 · as of 4 Aug 2026

What if you bought now?

Do Not Buy. Paying ~44x clean earnings (2× warranted, above the deep-expensive guardrail bar) for a name whose growth just stopped being proven — a fresh Q3 miss with organic growth cooling to ~9%. Trigger 2(a) is a hard prohibition, not a capped-HOLD: probability-weighted risk-reward is now negative (~$209 vs $212.6 spot), and mean-reversion from 44x is a 40%+ move.

What if you sold now?

The business itself is not broken — high-quality, net-cash, record backlog, sector tailwind. Do-Not-Buy governs new capital; an existing holder is not forced to dump into the ~$188 low, but should not add and should respect the stop. The re-entry bar is a cheaper price (toward the ~$190 fair value / ~$155 warranted level) or proof the miss was a one-off — not the current 44x.
13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "POWL",
  "date": "2026-08-04",
  "version": "v6",
  "brand": "",
  "company": "Powell Industries, Inc.",
  "currency": "USD",
  "exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:POWL",
  "isin": "US7391281067",
  "api_ticker": "POWL",
  "finder_ticker": "POWL",
  "finder_exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "analysis_status": "on-going",
  "sector": "Industrials",
  "lifecycle_stage": "established",
  "user_horizon": null,
  "user_allocation_pct": null,
  "portfolio_role": null,
  "price_at_rating": 212.57,
  "signal_short": "DO NOT BUY",
  "signal_medium": "DO NOT BUY",
  "signal_long": "DO NOT BUY",
  "primary_signal": "DO NOT BUY",
  "short_hold_reason": "do_not_buy_deep_expensive",
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "short_cap_reason": "Do-Not-Buy Trigger 2(a) governs: clean 43.9x \u2265 1.5\u00d7 Industrials guardrail (34.5x) and ~2\u00d7 warranted (22.2x), and the exceptional/proven/durable-growth carve-out fails on the fresh Q3 miss + decelerated ~9% organic growth. A DNB trigger overrides even a technical entry; no starter/BUY possible.",
  "short_signal": "DO NOT BUY",
  "quality_score": 80,
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "ROIC vs WACC + Backlog Growth",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "ROIC ~30%+ vs WACC ~9%; record ~$2.4bn backlog, book-to-bill >1",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 88,
    "moat_score": 55,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 88,
    "capital_allocation": 78,
    "management_skin_in_game": 55
  },
  "valuation_score": 36,
  "valuation_detail": {
    "fcf_yield": 3.1,
    "implied_growth_rate": 15.5,
    "consensus_growth_rate": 20.2,
    "historical_valuation_decile": 9
  },
  "warranted_multiple": 22.2,
  "actual_multiple": 43.9,
  "val_multiple_basis": "clean/operating P/E (reported P/E 40.7x)",
  "discount_rate_r": 9.25,
  "risk_free_10y": 4.75,
  "g_near": 0.1,
  "g_term": 0.03,
  "warranted_ratio": 1.98,
  "guardrail_line": 23,
  "deep_expensive_guardrail_bar": 34.5,
  "clean_multiple_vs_guardrail_bar": 1.27,
  "val_band": "expensive",
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": 9,
  "clean_pe": 43.9,
  "clean_peg": 2.2,
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "gaining",
  "competitive_threat_level": "moderate",
  "timing_score": 48,
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": 52,
    "risk_reward_score": 42,
    "relative_strength_vs_spy": -20,
    "relative_strength_vs_sector": -15,
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 68,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.15
  },
  "driver_score": 77,
  "driver_label": "Tailwind",
  "driver_commodity_trend": "n/a (capex-cycle driver, not commodity price)",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 68,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map (GICS Industrials \u2192 XLI O/O/SO)",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-30",
  "overall_confidence": 42,
  "fair_value_est": 190,
  "stop_loss": 183,
  "target_price": 235,
  "scenario_base_target": 235,
  "scenario_bull_target": 300,
  "scenario_bear_target": 155,
  "analyst_consensus_target": 316,
  "analyst_target_high": 360,
  "analyst_target_low": 252,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 49,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Hold",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 30,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 4,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": 0,
  "recent_downgrades_30d": 0,
  "fmp_rating": "C-",
  "fmp_overall_score": 1,
  "entry_groups_met": 0,
  "entry_conviction": "Avoid",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "hard_gate_state": "do_not_buy",
  "gates_triggered": [
    "Valuation Ceiling",
    "Do-Not-Buy Trigger 2(a)"
  ],
  "gates_caution": [],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [
    "Trigger 2(a) deep-expensive: clean P/E 43.9x \u2265 1.5\u00d7 Industrials guardrail (1.5 \u00d7 23 = 34.5x; 43.9 \u2265 34.5, bar met at 1.27\u00d7) and ~2\u00d7 warranted (22.2x); the exceptional/proven/durable-growth carve-out fails on the 3-4 Aug Q3 FY26 EPS miss (\u22124.7%) plus organic revenue growth decelerated to ~9% (the ~20% forward EPS consensus is margin-expansion-dependent, not proven durable volume growth). Obviously overpriced AND risky \u2192 DO NOT BUY all horizons."
  ],
  "next_update_date": "2026-08-18",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (Q3 FY26 earnings reported 3-4 Aug; next earnings ~17 Nov beyond window)",
  "next_check_date": "2026-08-18"
}

DO NOT BUY across all three horizons (Trigger 2a — deep-expensive): a genuinely high-quality, net-cash industrial with a record ~$2.4bn backlog and a real electrification/data-centre/LNG tailwind, but the price is wrong. Clean P/E ~43.9x is ~2x the 22.2x warranted AND 1.27x the deep-expensive guardrail bar (1.5 × 23 = 34.5x; 43.9 ≥ 34.5 → met). The 'exceptional, proven, durable growth' carve-out that would normally rescue the name fails: the 3-4 Aug Q3 FY26 EPS miss (−4.7%) and organic revenue growth decelerated to ~9% mean the ~20% forward EPS is margin-dependent, not proven durable volume growth. Probability-weighted 12-mo fair value ~$209 is below the $212.6 spot — risk-reward is negative. This is the framework's 'obviously overpriced AND risky' catch. Re-entry bar: multiple compression toward ~$155-190, or proof the miss was a one-off.

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_income_statement Q3 FY26 (Jun) + 7 prior quarters; TTM EPS $5.22, operating $227.7m
get_financial_ratios P/E 40.7x, ROE 28.3%, current 1.97x, ~zero debt
get_multi_timeframe_analysis daily support breakdown, below 50-DMA, at 200-DMA
get_price_target_consensus / summary thin coverage (4-5 analysts); mean ~$316, one recent $333
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades Hold (3 buy / 6 hold / 1 sell); no 30-day actions
get_ratings_snapshot FMP C- (score 1) — driven by rich P/E, P/B (valuation, not health)
get_stock_news Q3 miss + record $2.4bn backlog; −14% intraday reaction
MacroDriver-state-20260730 XLI O/O/SO; AI-concentration tail armed (not applied to POWL)
Impact on scores: Full data coverage. Warranted-multiple anchor computed on clean/operating earnings; 10-Y = 4.75%.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.