TSX:PAAS Pan American Silver Corp.

ISIN: CA6979001089 · Dual-listed TSX:PAAS / NYSE:PAAS · reported in CAD (TSX listing)
Basic Materials Silver + Gold Producer (Senior) Analysis Status: Starting
NYSE / TSX · HQ: Vancouver, BC · CEO: Michael Steinmann · Mkt Cap: C$30.65B (US$21.9B) · ~421.9M shares
C$72.75
+C$1.40 (+1.96%) · Jun 16, 2026
Signal v6 · 17:03 ET · US$51.92 (≈C$/US$ 1.401)
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo) WAIT-FOR-EVENT 62 60% FOMC tomorrow (Jun 17) — silver/gold are real-yield sensitive; daily tape still below the 50-DMA after a ~30% pullback. Don't chase into the event.
Medium-term (6–12 mo) STRONG BUY 67 64% Cheap, net-cash senior on a 30% pullback (fwd P/E ~10×, ~1.3× P/NAV, 6.3% FCF yield, ~40% upside to consensus) into the strongest macro tailwind in the report. Base BUY amplified by driver + economy.
Long-term (3–5 yr) STRONG BUY 72 65% Quality + value + the structural silver/gold bull (de-dollarisation, CB buying, fiscal dominance, electrification). Juanicipio, La Colorada Skarn & Escobal are free options. Base BUY amplified.
Next update: 2026-06-18 — FOMC 2026-06-17 +1 trading day (silver/gold rate-sensitive, high-impact release inside the 3-day window).
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard 2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status 3Pillar Detail: Business Quality 4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness 5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers 6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment 7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing 8Economic Event Risk 9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis 10Price Chart (6-Month Daily) 11Scenario Summary 12Entry / Exit Rules 13Position Sizing Context 14Calibration Snapshot 15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — Business Quality, Valuation Attractiveness, Entry/Exit Timing, Underlying Drivers, and Economic Alignment — each 0–100 with confidence. The per-horizon base BUY/HOLD/SELL comes from the three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY when both corroborate. Quality/valuation figures use the US fundamental ticker (PAAS, USD); price-based levels are converted to CAD at the TSX listing (FX ≈ 1.401).

Business Quality

80
Net-cash senior; ~76% silver / ~59% gold AISC margin; FMP "A−". Cap: riskier LatAm jurisdictions
Confidence: 78%

Valuation Attractiveness

64
Fair, leaning attractive — ~1.3× P/NAV, fwd P/E ~10×, 6.3% FCF yield, ~40% to consensus; on peak-cycle metal
Confidence: 66%

Entry/Exit Timing

58
Higher-TF uptrend; daily reclaimed the 200-DMA (C$68) after a ~30% drop, still below the 50-DMA, into FOMC
Confidence: 62%

Underlying Drivers

84
Silver ~US$70 / gold ~US$4,350 vs ~US$17 / ~US$1,775 AISC — Strong Tailwind
Confidence: 68% · STRONG-eligible

Economic Alignment

80
Trend-Following · Tailwind
Confidence: 75% · Macro report 2026-06-13

Unusually, the pillars agree here: a high-quality, net-cash business, at a fair-to-attractive price, riding a top-decile driver and the report's single highest-conviction economy call — with only the tape (a recent ~30% pullback and a Fed meeting one day out) holding the short horizon back. That alignment is why medium and long are both STRONG BUY while the short horizon is overridden to WAIT. The thing that made the gold-only seniors (AEM, ABX) only a "fair-price BUY" — a premium P/NAV — is precisely where PAAS is cheaper (~1.3× vs ~2× for the gold seniors), which earns PAAS the medium-term amplification they were denied.

2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — liquidity, currency, accounting, debt, dilution, commodity floor, permitting, imminent-event blackout. Any triggered gate is a hard Do-Not-Buy regardless of the composite score; caution gates are notes for position sizing. For PAAS all gates are clear — the only amber notes are a near-term Fed event (drives the short-term WAIT) and the one-time, acquisition-driven share-count jump, which is explained below and does not trip the dilution gate.
Financial Distress — CLEAR
Net cash ~US$0.77B (cash US$1.61B vs debt US$0.85B); interest coverage 22.0×; current ratio 2.84. Among the strongest balance sheets in silver.
Earnings Event — CLEAR
Q1 reported May 6; next earnings est. ~Aug 12, 2026 (>14 days out). ⚠️ date from web (calendar API empty).
Valuation Ceiling — CLEAR
Price C$72.75 well below the highest analyst target (~C$132 / US$94); trailing P/E 16.4× is mid-range, not a 5-yr extreme.
Accounting / Dilution — CLEAR (note)
Shares rose ~363M→422M, but that is the one-time MAG Silver acquisition (60.2M shares, Sep 2025), not chronic dilution (gate needs >5%/yr for 2 yrs). Low SBC; ~17% payout; active NCIB buyback.
Regulatory / Binary — CLEAR
No pending binary regulatory event. Escobal (Guatemala) is on care & maintenance — dormant optionality, not a near-term binary. Diversified across 5 countries.
Severe Driver Collapse — CLEAR
Driver score 84 (silver/gold far above AISC). Nowhere near the ≤15 commodity-floor gate.

Do-Not-Buy triggers: none fired. Leverage+rising-rates (net cash) ✓ · Valuation extreme (P/E not top-decile) ✓ · Negative earnings revisions (estimates rising with metal; TD Cowen & Zacks upgrades) ✓ · Insider selling spike (none in last 60 days) ✓ · Structural threat (none) ✓. Hard-gate state: CLEAR (✓).

3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: mine economics, balance-sheet strength, the AISC-margin benchmark, competitive moat, ROIC and capital allocation. Sector profile: Mining / Materials (primary silver + gold); lifecycle: Mature senior producer with cash-cow cash generation and a growth pipeline. Metrics emphasise AISC margin, FCF yield, net debt/EBITDA and reserve durability (P/E and revenue growth are de-emphasised — both are metal-price-driven and cyclical).
Business Quality — Pillar Score
A strong senior precious-metals producer: ~76% silver / ~59% gold AISC margin, a net-cash balance sheet, 20.8% ROE and FMP's "A−" health rating. The caps are a price-taker on its output and a jurisdiction mix (Mexico, Peru, Argentina, Bolivia) riskier than the Tier-1 gold seniors.
80
Confidence 78% · base 80 → adj 80

Lifecycle & Sector Classification

Sector: Mining / Materials (Silver + Gold). Lifecycle: Mature producer — 2026 guidance 25–27 Moz silver and 700–750 koz gold, profitable and free-cash-generative, with a meaningful growth/optionality pipeline (Juanicipio, La Colorada Skarn, Timmins, Escobal). Scored on sector-appropriate metrics (AISC margin, FCF yield, net debt/EBITDA, reserve life), not on the optically huge but price-and-acquisition-driven +49% YoY revenue.

Sub-SignalValueSector BenchmarkScoreRationale
AISC margin (benchmark)Silver ~76% · Gold ~59% of price>40% of spot = 90–10092Silver ~US$70 vs 2026 AISC ~US$17; gold ~US$4,350 vs ~US$1,775. Huge margin of safety on both metals.
Profitability vs peersEBITDA 55.7% · net 31.7% · op ~48%Top-tier among silver seniors86Record Q1: net income US$457M (+170% YoY), EPS US$1.08; margins near cycle highs.
Cash generationFCF ~US$1.3B TTM (Q1 FCF US$488M)FCF yield >5% strong80FCF yield ~6.3% on EV; record cash balance; ~79% FCF/operating-cash conversion.
Balance-sheet healthNet cash ~US$0.77B · D/E 0.11 · cur. 2.84×Net debt/EBITDA <1× = strong90Effectively net-cash; interest coverage 22.0×. High survivability through a price cycle.
Reserve durabilityP&P ~452 Moz Ag · ~6.3 Moz Au (Jun-25)Reserve life >8 yrs = healthy78~15+ yr implied silver reserve life at guided output; large M&I/inferred upside. (PAAS does not disclose explicit RLI — estimated.)

INDUSTRY BENCHMARK: AISC Margin (Spot − AISC)

Silver ~US$70/oz − AISC ~US$17 ⇒ margin ~US$53/oz (~76% of price)  |  Gold ~US$4,350/oz − AISC ~US$1,775 ⇒ margin ~US$2,575/oz (~59%)
Rating: EXCEPTIONAL — both margins >40% of spot. Benchmark Score: 92/100.
Context: even a 30–40% silver correction (to ~US$45) would leave AISC margins firmly positive. 2025 silver-segment AISC came in at US$13.88/oz (below guidance); 2026 guidance steps up to US$15.75–18.25/oz mainly because metal-price-linked royalties/profit-sharing rise — a high-class problem. This is the single most important profitability metric for a producer, and PAAS sits at the favourable extreme.

Competitive Moat Scorecard

Pricing Power

50
Price-taker on silver/gold (neutral by default)

Network Effects

50
N/A for a miner — scored neutral

Switching Costs

50
N/A — commodity output

Cost Advantage

66
Low-cost via Juanicipio high-grade + by-product credits; not lowest in class

Intangible Assets

65
World-class silver reserves, permits, 30-yr operating expertise in LatAm

Moat average ≈ 56. A miner's durable edge is geological and operational, not commercial — PAAS's genuine advantages are its scarce, large, long-life silver reserve base (one of the largest among publicly traded primary silver producers) and its high-grade, low-cost 44% Juanicipio JV. It cannot raise the price of its product, so pricing power is (correctly) neutral; jurisdiction risk in Latin America is the offset versus the Canada/Finland-anchored gold seniors.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

Component (weight)ReadingScore
ROIC / returns (40%)ROE 20.8%, ROA 10.6%; FMP ROE & ROA sub-scores both 5/5. Top-quartile and rising with metal prices.80
Capital-allocation discipline (30%)MAG Silver acquisition (Sep 2025, ~US$2.1B) added the high-grade Juanicipio JV — margin-accretive. Record cash; ~US$1B shareholder-return target; conservative ~17% dividend payout + active NCIB buyback.76
Management skin-in-the-game (30%)Long-tenured team under CEO Steinmann; low SBC; delivered 2025 AISC below guidance. No recent insider buying; one ~25k-share insider sale in Jan 2026 (neutral).60

FMP financial-health rating: A− (4/5) — DCF 4, ROE 5, ROA 5, D/E 3, with the only drags being the valuation sub-scores (P/E 2, P/B 2). The independent rating confirms our high Quality read and previews the (mild) Valuation tension below — though PAAS's P/E and P/B are lower than the gold seniors'.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

A deep dive into the Valuation score: sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality (free upside), analyst consensus targets, grades distribution and the FMP cross-reference. The read: cheaper than the gold seniors on every lens (~1.3× P/NAV, fwd P/E ~10×, 6.3% FCF yield, ~40% upside to consensus), tempered by peak-cycle silver earnings and a rich P/B — landing at the Fair/Attractive boundary, with a genuine optionality tilt on top.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Fair, leaning attractive. ~1.3× P/NAV (vs ~2× for the gold seniors), forward P/E ~10× and a 6.3% FCF yield are genuinely reasonable, and consensus sits ~40% higher. The discipline: those forwards lean on record silver/gold, and P/B is ~3×. A sizeable embedded-optionality tilt nudges it to the Attractive line.
64
Confidence 66% · base 59 → +5 optionality → 64
MultipleCurrentReferenceRead
P/NAV (primary, mining)~1.3× (Edison est.)Seniors ~1.0–2.0× in a bullConservative-to-normal band — a discount to the ~2× gold seniors. Not pricing in sustained spot silver.
Forward P/E~10.3×2026E EPS ~US$4.38–5.06Optically cheap — but the "E" is peak silver/gold; analysts model EPS easing after 2028.
EV/EBITDA~9.5×Reasonable at spot, rich on mid-cycleFair today; normalises higher if metal mean-reverts.
Trailing P/E / P/B16.4× / 2.99×FMP P/E & P/B sub-scores 2/5P/B rich; the statistical-cheapness book screen fails, the cash-flow screens pass.
FCF yield (anchor)~6.3% on EV5–8% attractiveHonest cash yield in the attractive band — higher than the gold seniors (~5.3%).

Reverse DCF / Implied Growth

At C$72.75 with a net-cash balance sheet and ~US$1.3B TTM FCF, the market is roughly capitalising current free cash flow at a high-single-digit discount rate with little real growth — and at ~1.3× P/NAV it is not extrapolating record silver forever (that would demand a richer multiple). Consensus agrees near-term but not long: EPS is modelled ~US$2.24 (2025) → US$4.38 (2026E) → US$4.98 (2027E) → easing to US$4.83 (2028E) and lower into 2029–30 as analysts assume metal normalises. So the forward-P/E "cheapness" rests on peak earnings, but the conservative P/NAV means the downside is partly pre-priced. That combination — cheap on cash, modest on NAV — is why Valuation lands Fair-leaning-Attractive rather than richly priced.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside

The in-production business justifies the bulk of the ~C$72.75 price. On top, the buyer gets several large options the market is paying little for: Net: optionality is a +5 tilt (raising base 59 → 64) and a reason to accumulate on weakness — not a reason to call the core "cheap." Escobal alone is a genuinely large, ignored call option on the silver price.

Analyst Price-Target Consensus (USD primary feed; CAD ≈ ×1.401)

MetricUSD (NYSE:PAAS)CAD equiv.Upside vs C$72.75
Consensus / meanUS$74.40~C$104.3+43.3%
MedianUS$72.00~C$100.9+38.7%
High / LowUS$94 / US$54~C$131.7 / ~C$75.7spread 1.7× (moderate)
Coverage / recency13 all-time · last-qtr avg US$83Targets racing up (all-time avg only US$52; last-year US$64) as silver/gold re-rate. Grades: Buy 13 · Hold 10 · Sell 2.

Targets signal ~40% upside (Attractive on this sub-signal alone, ~10% of the pillar). The grades distribution (FMP): Buy 13 · Hold 10 · Sell 2 → 52% bullish ("Buy with >30% holds" → ~50) — a constructive but not euphoric Street, leaving room to run as holds convert. Recent grade actions skew positive: TD Cowen upgrade to Buy (May 12), RBC Outperform maintained (Apr 28), and a Zacks Rank upgrade to Buy (Jun 16). A thin, only-2-analyst Yahoo CAD feed shows a much higher ~C$101 mean — treated with caution given coverage depth. FMP health rating A−, dragged only by the P/E (2) and P/B (2) valuation sub-scores — independently corroborating "high quality, full on book, cheap on cash."

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force PAAS is tethered to — the silver price (primary), the gold price (large secondary, ~⅓ of output), with real interest rates as the contested macro overlay. A context pillar: it does not change the fundamental pillar scores, but a tailwind ≥65 makes the name eligible to amplify a base BUY to STRONG BUY. This section also names the thesis-invalidation floor.
Primary Driver: Silver + Gold Spot Price
Overlay (contested): 10-yr real yield (DFII10) ~2.2% — a textbook headwind that has decoupled, as central-bank buying, de-dollarisation and electrification demand dominate.
84
Strong Tailwind
Horizon (weight)ReadingScore
Historical (25%)Silver ran ~US$36 (Jun-25) → ~US$70 (+~90% YoY); gold ~US$3,420 → ~US$4,350 (+~27%). A generational precious-metals bull; PAAS +103% over 12 months.95
Current state (50%)Silver ~US$70 vs AISC ~US$17 (~76% margin); gold ~US$4,350 vs ~US$1,775 (~59%). About as favourable as it gets for a producer.92
Forward outlook (25%)Macro report rates GLD Strong Outperform & SLV Outperform across horizons (CB gold buying, de-dollar, fiscal debasement, electrification deficit). Tempered by record price levels, a +2.2% real yield that could bite on a hawkish Fed, and silver's higher volatility — the silver-miner ETF fell ~12% in a single session on Jun 5.60

Driver score = 95·0.25 + 92·0.50 + 60·0.25 ≈ 84 → Strong Tailwind, amplification-eligible (≥65). It does not change the base BUY/HOLD/SELL or the three fundamental pillar scores — it only enables a base BUY to become STRONG BUY when the economy also pushes the same way (it does, §6). The forward leg is deliberately the most cautious input: silver near a record, a positive real yield, and a fresh −12% ETF air-pocket are exactly the record-level/pullback risks that keep this from being a naive momentum chase. Thesis-invalidation floor: a sustained silver break below ~US$30/oz (with gold below ~US$2,500) would compress margins and invalidate the case; below ~US$22 silver the Severe-Driver-Collapse gate would arm. Both are far below spot. Confidence 68% (−15 for silver's inherent forward volatility; current state crystal-clear).

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to PAAS, read from the latest Macro-Economic report (2026-06-13, 3 days old — fresh). It classifies the macro pressure as Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with 0–100 conviction. The pressure is the second amplifier — a Tailwind enables STRONG BUY.
Economic Alignment — Stance & Conviction
Trend-Following · Pressure: Tailwind
80
Conviction

PAAS is not a named line in the macro report's Economic Watchlist Forecast (only MNO.TO, SOFI and DLO are), so the read comes from the Driver-Sector Impact Matrix: PAAS is Materials (XLB), and the report rates XLB Strong Outperform / Strong Outperform / Strong Outperform across Short/Medium/Long — the only sector that is SO on all three horizons — with capital flow IN / IN / IN. The matching assets are Gold (GLD) SO/SO/SO and Silver (SLV) Outperform with money flowing in on the electrification deficit and monetary-debasement bid. The dominant regime is Stagflation (oil shock + hawkish Fed), in which precious metals are the report's highest-conviction multi-year beneficiaries (de-dollarisation, CB accumulation ~244t in Q1, sovereign-debt/fiscal dominance, Iran/Hormuz risk premium).

Anchoring on the Medium horizon, the pressure is a clear Tailwind; going long rides the economic trend (Trend-Following), conviction 80. The one near-term cross-current the macro report itself flags is a fast-money USD bid and hawkish-Fed repricing (Jun 17 FOMC) that can drive a short, sharp metals pullback even as the structural tailwind persists — the same event the Timing pillar and §8 flag for the short horizon. Amplification effect: the Tailwind fired at both Medium and Long — combined with the driver (84 ≥65), it lifts the base BUY to STRONG BUY at both horizons. Unlike the premium-priced gold seniors (where the medium amplification was declined on valuation), PAAS's cheaper ~1.3× P/NAV leaves no valuation reason to withhold it. Source: sector-map; macro report 2026-06-13. Confidence 75%.

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

A deep dive into the Timing score: risk-reward anchored to the stop, relative strength vs the sector, macro overlay at High sector-weight (mining), sentiment from grade actions and news tone, and the catalyst cluster. The picture is mixed-constructive — a secular uptrend, a sharp ~30% pullback, a reclaimed 200-DMA, but still below the 50-DMA and a Fed event one day out.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Improving (just). Monthly/weekly trends are up; price has bounced ~18% off the C$61.23 swing low (Jun 10) and reclaimed its 200-DMA (C$68), but sits below the 50-DMA (~C$75.6). Calm catalyst calendar (no earnings <14d) is offset by a high-impact FOMC tomorrow.
58
Confidence 62% · MTF 63 · macro 65 · catalyst 75
Sub-signal (weight)ReadingScore
MTF trend (30%)Monthly & weekly uptrend (monthly resistance breakout); daily downtrend + support breakdown but price has reclaimed the 200-DMA (C$68.04); hourly/15-min bouncing.63
Risk-reward (20%)Price ~C$72.75, ~19% above the C$59 stop; ~7% above the C$61.23 swing low; daily ATR ~C$3.7 (5.1%). A constructive support test, but below the 50-DMA.55
Macro overlay (20%, High sensitivity)Materials rotation IN (XLB SO); VIX 16.2 (calm); yield curve +0.38 normal; but a hawkish Fed + silver's high beta are a near-term cross-current.65
Sentiment (15%)Grades net-positive (TD Cowen upgrade to Buy 5/12; RBC OP maintained; Zacks upgrade 6/16); news tone strongly positive ("most undervalued silver miner," Timmins expansion, investor day).66
Catalysts (15%)No earnings within 14 days (Q2 ~Aug 12); no clustered events. Calm — barring the macro FOMC overlay handled in §8.75

Relative strength & range: PAAS has crushed SPY over 12 months (+103%) on the silver bull, but gave back ~30% from its mid-May ~C$88 high into the early-June flush (low C$61.23). It now sits ~24% below the C$95.39 52-week high (range position ~57%, mid-to-upper). Position-risk: the C$61.23 swing low is the line in the sand; price has reclaimed the C$68 200-DMA and the daily EMA20 (~C$71), but not the ~C$75.6 50-DMA — a daily close back above it would confirm trend repair and meaningfully improve the entry.

8

Economic Event Risk

The next ~14 days of high-impact US macro releases that can swing a rate-sensitive precious-metals producer, plus last week's surprises. Mining is a High macro-sensitivity sector, so a high-impact release within 3 trading days triggers a WAIT-FOR-EVENT short-term override — which is exactly what the Jun 17 FOMC does here.
DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?
2026-06-17FOMC rate decision + projections + presserHighHold 3.75%3.75%✅ Critical — silver/gold are real-yield sensitive; any hawkish surprise lifts real yields & the USD
2026-06-17Retail Sales MoM (May)High+0.5%+0.5%⚠️ Indirect — growth/risk read
2026-06-25Core PCE MoM (May)High+0.2%+0.2%✅ Inflation → Fed path → real yields → metals
2026-06-30CB Consumer Confidence / JOLTsHigh93.1 / 7.62M⚠️ Medium
2026-07-01ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jun)High52.554.0⚠️ Medium — industrial-silver demand read
2026-07-02Non-Farm Payrolls / Unemployment (Jun)High+70K / 4.5%+172K / 4.3%✅ Labour softening → Fed path → metals

Recent surprises (last 7 days): CPI YoY (May) 4.2% (inline, up from 3.8% — sticky); Core CPI YoY 2.9%; PPI MoM hot at +1.1% (+57% surprise); Michigan sentiment beat (48.9). The tape is stagflationary — structurally supportive of precious metals as an inflation/debasement hedge, but also fuel for a hawkish Fed and higher real yields that can pressure silver/gold short-term. Override: because mining is High-sensitivity and a high-impact FOMC is <3 trading days out, the short-term signal is set to WAIT-FOR-EVENT regardless of composite, and the report's next-update is pinned to FOMC +1 day (2026-06-18).

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI, MACD and breakout status across monthly → 15-min (TSX:PAAS, CAD), plus a confluence read. The textbook pattern here is "higher-timeframe uptrend + lower-timeframe pullback" — with the constructive wrinkle that the daily has just reclaimed its 200-DMA even though it remains below the 50-DMA.
TimeframeTrendRSIMACDKey S/R (CAD)BreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑61.2+, risingR 95.39Resistance breakout0.47×
WeeklyUptrend ↑46.8−, fallingS 68.76 / 63.09 · R 82.98 / 88.92Resistance breakout0.93×
DailyDowntrend ↓42.0−, flatS 61.23 · MA50 75.6 / MA200 68.0Support breakdown1.32×
HourlyUptrend ↑68.6+, risingS 67.3 · R 73.8 / 75.3Resistance breakout1.15×
15-minUptrend ↑56.4flatS 71.1 · R 72.6 / 73.8Resistance breakout3.94×
Confluence: Mostly-bullish secular trend with a daily pullback — weighted MTF score ≈ 63 (tool flag: "strongly bullish," driven by the monthly breakout + lower-TF bounce).

Monthly and weekly structures remain in uptrends with the monthly at a fresh resistance breakout, but the daily rolled over below its 50-DMA with a support breakdown during the early-June flush — the signature of a correction within a larger bull. Price has since rebounded ~18% off the C$61.23 swing low and reclaimed the C$68 200-DMA on rising hourly/15-min momentum (15-min volume 3.94×). Net read: a constructive "buy-the-dip" zone, with the next confirmation being a daily close back above the ~C$75.6 50-DMA; until then the bounce is event-exposed (FOMC).

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

Six months of daily closes (TSX:PAAS, CAD) with a 50-day SMA and the key support/resistance levels marked. The visual companion to §9 — the run to the C$95.39 area (late Feb), the choppy descent and the sharp early-June flush to C$61.23, and the current rebound, are all visible at a glance.
11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths (CAD) with triggers and probability weights. The base case is the probability-weighted centre of gravity; bull and bear hinge mostly on the silver price and whether real yields spike. Analyst consensus (~C$104 mean) sits at the optimistic edge of our bull range.

Bull · 32% · C$105 (+44%)

Silver holds/extends above ~US$70 and gold above ~US$4,300; real yields ease on a dovish Fed pivot; H2-weighted production delivers and La Colorada Skarn / Escobal optionality re-rates. PAAS retests its highs toward the analyst mean (~C$104). Driver + economy fire on all cylinders.

Base · 45% · C$88 (+21%)

Silver/gold range-bound at a high level; PAAS reclaims the 50-DMA and re-rates toward fair value (~C$86) and the lower analyst band as record FCF and buybacks compound. Steady accumulation pays.

Bear · 23% · C$56 (−23%)

Hawkish Fed lifts real yields; risk-off USD strength triggers a 25–35% silver correction (to ~US$45). PAAS breaks the C$61.23 swing low; the multiple de-rates. Margins stay positive (no distress) — a valuation reset, not a solvency event.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Mechanical conditions for entry and exit with specific CAD levels: five independent entry checks, a hard stop, thesis invalidation, and scaled profit-takes. Converts the scores into an action plan. At C$72.75, 2 of 5 entry criteria are met and 0 of 3 exit criteria are live — consistent with "like it, accumulate on weakness, wait for trend confirmation and the Fed."

Entry Rules — 2 of 5 met

1 (Valuation): price ≤ fair value C$86 AND driver ≥50 → MET (C$72.75; driver 84).
2 (Support entry): price has reclaimed the 200-DMA (C$68) and sits within range of the C$61–68 support shelf → MET.
3 (Trend confirmation): daily close back above the SMA50 (~C$75.6) → NOT MET (price below the 50-DMA).
4 (Momentum): daily RSI 40–65 AND MACD histogram positive ≥2 days → NOT MET (RSI 42 ok, but daily MACD still negative).
5 (Event-clear): no high-impact macro/earnings event within 3 trading days → NOT MET (FOMC Jun 17).

Exit Rules — 0 of 3 live

1 (Hard stop): 2 consecutive daily closes below C$59 (under the C$61.23 swing low) → not triggered.
2 (Thesis invalidation): silver sustained below ~US$30/oz (gold below ~US$2,500) OR full-year guidance cut OR a hard gate trips → not triggered.
3 (Profit-take): price reaches C$100–105 (analyst band) AND RSI >70 → trim → not triggered.

Key levels (CAD): Stop C$59 · Support C$68 (200-DMA) / C$61.23 (swing low) / C$55 · Fair value ~C$86 · Resistance C$75.6 (50-DMA) / C$83 / C$88.9 / C$95.39 (52w high) · Analyst mean ~C$104.

Imagine you act at the current price C$72.75 · as of Jun 16, 2026 17:03 ET

What if you bought now?

You'd be risking ~C$14 / −19% to the hard stop to gain ~C$15 (+21%) to base / ~C$32 (+44%) to bull.
  • Risking: downside to stop C$59 (−19%); bear case C$56 (−23%); plus entry rules NOT yet met — buying below the ~C$75.6 50-DMA and one day ahead of a high-impact FOMC, into silver's high-beta tape.
  • Gaining: base C$88 (+21%) · bull C$105 (+44%); plus a ~1.2% dividend and ~6.3% FCF yield compounding while you wait, and the free Escobal / La Colorada Skarn / Timmins optionality you now own.
  • Net: risk-reward ≈ 1.1:1 to base, ~2.3:1 to bull. Acting now is defensible for medium/long capital, but waiting one day past the Fed (and for a daily 50-DMA reclaim) materially improves the entry — hence the short-term WAIT.

What if you sold now?

You'd be giving up +21% base-case upside to protect against a ~23% bear-case drawdown.
  • Giving up: upside to C$88 (+21%) / C$105 (+44%); income + FCF compounding; selling ~15% below fair value (C$86) and ~30% below the analyst mean.
  • Protecting: capital if the bear case (C$56) plays out on a hawkish Fed / silver correction. Exit rules currently triggered? None.
  • Net: no mechanical reason to sell — this is a hold/accumulate zone, not a distribution zone.
13

Position Sizing Context

A framework for translating conviction into allocation given risk per share and sector volatility. Illustrative only — not advice. No risk budget or portfolio role was supplied in this batch run, so an explicit % allocation is intentionally omitted.

Position sizing not computed — no portfolio allocation or role was specified for this batch analysis. Volatility context for when you do size: beta ~1.5 vs SPY (high market beta, and very high silver beta), daily ATR ~C$3.7 (~5.1% of price), and a demonstrated ~30% peak-to-trough drawdown in the last six weeks. Catalyst clustering is calm (score ~70) apart from the FOMC overlay, so no clustering-based size cut applies — but silver's single-session −12% ETF move on Jun 5 is a reminder to size for high volatility. For medium/long horizons, a staggered 3-tranche entry — e.g. after the FOMC clears, on a daily reclaim of ~C$75.6, and at a C$61–64 swing-low retest — would average in and reduce timing risk given the live event.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, confidence, key level and signal override, saved alongside the HTML as calibration-PAAS.TO-20260616-1703.json so the next run can compute deltas and the watchlist monitor can render the Hard-Gate / Entry / Exit cells without parsing HTML. This is the first report for PAAS.TO — no prior calibration, so no "Changes Since Last Report" box.
{
  "ticker": "PAAS.TO", "exchange_ticker": "TSX:PAAS", "isin": "CA6979001089",
  "company": "Pan American Silver Corp.", "date": "2026-06-16", "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "on-going", "finder_ticker": "PAAS", "finder_exchange": "🇨🇦 TSX · 🇺🇸 NYSE",
  "section": "Silver Miners", "lifecycle_stage": "mature",
  "price_at_rating_cad": 72.75, "price_at_rating_usd": 51.92, "fx_cad_per_usd": 1.401,
  "signal_short": "WAIT_FOR_EVENT", "signal_medium": "STRONG_BUY", "signal_long": "STRONG_BUY",
  "composite_short": 62, "composite_medium": 67, "composite_long": 72,
  "quality_score": 80, "valuation_score": 64, "timing_score": 58,
  "driver_score": 84, "driver_label": "Strong Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following", "economic_alignment_conviction": 80,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind", "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-06-13",
  "quality_detail": {"industry_benchmark_name": "AISC Margin", "industry_benchmark_value": 76,
    "industry_benchmark_score": 92, "moat_score": 56, "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 80,
    "capital_allocation": 76, "management_skin_in_game": 60, "fmp_rating": "A-", "fmp_overall_score": 4},
  "valuation_detail": {"fcf_yield": 6.3, "forward_pe": 10.3, "trailing_pe": 16.4, "ev_ebitda": 9.5, "pb": 2.99,
    "p_nav": 1.3, "analyst_consensus_target_usd": 74.40, "analyst_target_high_usd": 94, "analyst_target_low_usd": 54,
    "analyst_consensus_target_cad": 104.3, "analyst_target_upside_pct": 43.3, "analyst_grades_consensus": "Buy",
    "analyst_bullish_pct": 52, "analyst_coverage_count": 13, "recent_upgrades_30d": 1, "recent_downgrades_30d": 0},
  "timing_detail": {"mtf_confluence": 63, "risk_reward_score": 55, "catalyst_clustering_score": 70,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.20, "rel_strength_52w_pct": 57},
  "confidence": {"quality": 78, "valuation": 66, "timing": 62, "driver": 68, "economic": 75, "overall": 62},
  "hard_gate_state": "clear", "gates_triggered": [], "gates_caution": [], "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "amplification": {"short": "overridden_WAIT (FOMC <3d, High macro sensitivity)", "medium": "BUY->STRONG_BUY (driver 84 + Tailwind; cheap ~1.3x P/NAV)", "long": "BUY->STRONG_BUY (driver 84 + Tailwind)"},
  "fair_value_est_cad": 86, "stop_loss_cad": 59, "target_base_cad": 88, "target_bull_cad": 105, "target_bear_cad": 56,
  "entry_criteria_total": 5, "entry_criteria_met": 2, "exit_criteria_total": 3, "exit_criteria_met": 0,
  "next_update_date": "2026-06-18", "next_check_date": "2026-06-18",
  "next_update_basis": "FOMC 2026-06-17 +1d (silver/gold rate-sensitive, high-impact within 3-day window)"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Full audit trail of every data source used, with OK / partial / fail indicators and the confidence haircuts applied. Quality/valuation fundamentals were pulled on the US ticker (PAAS, USD); all price-based levels are reported on the TSX listing (PAAS.TO, CAD) — the data-basis rule for this dual-listed name (FX ≈ 1.401).
Data Source Status
get_yahoo_quote / get_yahoo_prices — PAAS.TO CAD price, 125 daily bars, targets
get_company_profile / get_financial_ratios — PAAS (USD) fundamentals
get_income_statement — 6 quarters; share count verified (~421.9M)
get_multi_timeframe_analysis — all 5 timeframes (PAAS.TO, CAD, yfinance)
get_price_target_consensus / _summary — US targets + CAD conversion
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades — 12 grade actions; TD Cowen upgrade
get_ratings_snapshot — FMP "A−" health rating
get_analyst_estimates — 2025–2030 EPS/revenue
get_economic_calendar / _indicators — FOMC, CPI, real yield, VIX 16.2
get_stock_news + web research — spot silver/gold, AISC, reserves, MAG, P/NAV
Macro-Economic report — 2026-06-13 (XLB / GLD / SLV signals)
get_earnings_calendar — returned empty; next earnings est. ~Aug 12 (web, unverified)
Impact on scores: Near-complete coverage. The only failure was the earnings-calendar (Q2 date estimated ~Aug 12 from web, flagged unverified in §8) — immaterial to scheduling because the FOMC drives the next-update. Valuation confidence held to 66% for the peak-cycle-metal uncertainty and the thin (2-analyst) Yahoo CAD target feed, not for a data gap. Silver/gold spot & AISC are sourced from PAAS disclosures + recent web research rather than a live commodity feed (Driver confidence 68%, also −15 for silver's forward volatility). Currency/share-count check: shares ~421.9M (Q1 weightedAverageShsOut) × C$72.75 = C$30.69B ≈ Yahoo's C$30.65B; FMP's US$21.9B cap reconciles at FX 1.401 (US$21.9B × 1.401 ≈ C$30.7B) — no stale-market-cap trap despite the usual small-cap .TO risk, and the +16% YoY share rise is the one-time MAG Silver acquisition, not chronic dilution.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.