TSX:MNO Meridian Mining Plc

ISIN: GB00BVPND783
MaterialsCopper-Gold DeveloperPre-RevenuePre-revenue developer · thin volume · Donatien Pick
TSX · LSE (dual-listed) · Cabaçal Cu-Au-Ag, Mato Grosso, Brazil · HQ United Kingdom Analysis Status: Donatien Pick
All prices in CAD unless marked US$. Project economics (NPV/capex/AISC) are reported in US$.
C$1.48
−9.2% vs last report (C$1.63, 27 Jun)
16 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
What changed since 27 Jun (C$1.63 → C$1.48, −9.2%)
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Meridian Mining Plc

Meridian Mining Plc is a copper-gold development company advancing its flagship Cabaçal project in Mato Grosso, Brazil — a low-cost, open-pit copper-gold-silver deposit in one of South America's most prospective copper-gold belts. It is pre-revenue: there is no producing mine yet, so the company's value rests on the economics of the project on paper rather than on earnings. Its March-2025 Pre-Feasibility Study defines a 10-year, 141,000 gold-equivalent-ounce-per-year operation with a very low all-in sustaining cost of about US$742/oz and a modest US$248M build cost — the low capex, low operating cost and high-return economics are what set it apart from most single-asset juniors. Meridian holds more than 55km of contiguous tenements around Cabaçal, giving it substantial exploration upside beyond the current reserve, and is dual-listed on the TSX and (since May 2026) the London Stock Exchange. The company is now working through permitting (Installation Licence filed May 2026) and a Definitive Feasibility Study due Q4 2026, ahead of a construction decision.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD5545%Buy on confirmation — tape in a clean downtrend
Medium-term (6–12 mo)STRONG BUY6652%Cheaper on the drop + firm copper tailwind
Long-term (3–5 yr)STRONG BUY7055%PFS-grade economics, multi-year copper case
Next update: 2026-07-30 — default +14d (IL decision undated; DFS not due until Q4 2026; no scheduled earnings — 29 Jul FOMC not used as a scheduling trigger)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

HOLD short (buy on confirmation) · STRONG BUY medium & long — unchanged vs 27 Jun

Business Quality

74
strong (PFS-grade, low-cost)
conf 60%

Valuation Attractiveness

68
attractive (P/NAV ~0.51x base)
conf 55%

Entry/Exit Timing

44
weak (downtrend, support breakdown)
conf 45%

Underlying Drivers

83
Strong Tailwind (copper firm)
conf 60%

Economic Alignment

74
Trend-Following · Tailwind
conf 62%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
Zero debt, ~C$74.4M cash, no going-concern language. A developer burns cash by design (FCF −C$11.6M ttm) but is funded through the DFS and permitting phase; no distress.
Earnings Event Risk
No scheduled earnings inside 14 days — a pre-revenue developer reports project milestones, not quarterly EPS.
Valuation Ceiling
Warranted-multiple anchor N/A for a pre-revenue developer; P/NAV ~0.51x base / ~0.78x risk-adjusted is a discount to NAV, not a ceiling. Price sits ~52% below the C$3.06 analyst consensus.
⚠️
Dilution / Accounting
The US$248M construction build will require an equity raise at FID (late 2026 / early 2027) — real, dated-to-a-window dilution, not imminent. The LSE listing + GBP25M placing is DONE (1 May 2026), not a pending overhang. No accounting red flags.
⚠️
Regulatory / Binary Event
Installation Licence (Licença de Instalação) filed 19 May 2026 with SEMA Mato Grosso, decision pending and undated. This is the 2nd of 3 permits (Preliminary Licence already granted); an approval is expected on track but is a genuine binary the market is waiting on. Held as a caution — consistent with the prior report; the milestone status has not changed, so no new gate fires.
Gate state: CAUTION (no hard cap). Two live cautions — construction-stage dilution (US$248M at FID) and the pending Installation Licence — but neither caps the signal. They are the reasons this stays a developer-risk name, not a producer.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
A genuinely high-quality single-asset developer: PFS-grade, low-cost, unlevered.
74
conf 60% — pre-revenue penalty applied; economics rest on the March-2025 PFS

Lifecycle: pre-revenue development (Materials / copper-gold developer). Traditional profitability metrics (P/E, ROE, FCF margin) are meaningless here — the company has no production. Quality is scored on the project's economics, balance-sheet resilience, and the development ladder. Cabaçal sits at the PFS → DFS stage: a completed NI 43-101 Pre-Feasibility Study (31 Mar 2025), a Definitive Feasibility Study ~50% complete and on track for Q4 2026, and permitting advancing (Preliminary Licence granted, Installation Licence filed May 2026).

Sub-signalReadingScore
Project economics (PFS)NPV5 US$984M after-tax @ base deck; IRR 61.2%; spot-case NPV US$1.41B / 79.5% IRR85
Cost position (AISC)US$742/oz AuEq — bottom-quartile; a very wide margin to spot88
Balance sheetZero debt · ~C$74.4M cash · funded through DFS + permitting78
Capital intensityUS$248M initial capex — low for a 141koz AuEq/yr operation; ~17-month payback80
Development / execution riskPre-construction, single asset, first-time builder; permit + financing still ahead50
INDUSTRY BENCHMARK — AISC Margin (developer proxy). AISC US$742/oz AuEq against an AuEq basket well above US$2,000/oz implies an AISC margin comfortably >40% of realised price — top-band on the mining benchmark. On paper Cabaçal is a low-cost operation; the risk is entirely in getting it built. Benchmark score: 85/100.
Pricing power50 — price-taker on copper/gold (neutral, n/a)
Network effects50 — n/a for a miner
Switching costs50 — n/a
Cost advantage78 — durable, low-AISC orebody in low-cost Brazil
Intangibles57 — 55km+ contiguous tenement package, permits in hand/progressing

moat_score = 57 — the moat that matters for a miner is the cost curve, and Cabaçal's is real; the rest is n/a-neutral.

Competitive Environment. Meridian competes for development capital and takeout interest, not customers — a metal is fungible. Peer set: single-asset copper-gold developers advancing toward construction — Foran Mining (McIlvenna Bay), Marimaca Copper, Los Andes Copper, and larger Brazil-focused copper names (Ero Copper, Lundin Mining as strategic acquirers). Cabaçal's low capex and low AISC make it stand out on economics-per-dollar-of-build. Share trajectory: stable; competitive threat: low — the risk is execution and permitting, not a rival taking its market.

PeerPosition vs MNO
Foran MiningLarger build, Canadian jurisdiction, further financed — a more de-risked comparator
Marimaca / Los Andes CopperChilean copper developers; higher capex, lower gold credit
Ero Copper / LundinEstablished Brazil/LatAm copper producers — potential strategic acquirers of a permitted, low-cost asset

ROIC / capital allocation: not yet meaningful (no invested capital returning yet). Management has a clean record so far — the oversubscribed GBP25M LSE placing and disciplined single-asset focus are positives; the test comes at the construction financing.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

P/NAV ~0.51x base — cheaper after the 9% drop
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Cheaper after the 9% drop — a widening discount to NAV and to consensus.
68
conf 55% — P/NAV rests on the PFS NPV and the verified ~485.5M share count

Method: P/NAV on the PFS base-case NPV, with a construction-risk haircut. The warranted-multiple anchor is N/A for a pre-revenue developer (no clean earnings multiple resolves), so we fall back to P/NAV plus the analyst-consensus cross-check — per the mining pre-production rules.

InputValue
Market capC$718.6M (1.48 × 485.5M sh — share count verified vs stale FMP)
Base NAV (PFS NPV5, +net cash)≈ C$1,420M
P/NAV (base)≈ 0.51x (was 0.60x at C$791M cap on 27 Jun)
P/NAV (35% construction-risk haircut)≈ 0.78x — still a discount
Spot-case NAV (US$1.41B NPV)P/NAV ≈ 0.42x — deep discount (upside, not the base)
Analyst consensus targetC$3.06 (9 analysts; high 3.50 / low 2.75) — ~107% above spot
Grades consensusStrong Buy (100% bullish)

The −9% move since 27 Jun is a valuation tailwind: NAV is unchanged (no negative project news), price fell, so the discount to NAV widened and the gap to the C$3.06 consensus grew to ~52%. On the analyst-target lens (price >20% below consensus) this scores in the 85+ band; blended against the P/NAV read and a construction-risk haircut, Valuation lands at 68 (Attractive), up from 66. Implied-growth colour: at C$1.48 the market is paying roughly half of the risked base-case NAV and none of the spot-case or exploration upside — it is pricing in meaningful execution/permitting/financing risk, which is fair for a pre-construction single-asset name.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside. At C$1.48 the buyer gets, largely for free: (1) spot-case upside — the base NAV assumes US$4.16/lb copper vs ~US$6.34/lb spot, so the spot-case NPV (US$1.41B) is ~43% above base and sits outside the score; (2) resource growth across 55km+ of contiguous tenements and satellite targets not in the reserve; (3) takeout optionality — a permitted, low-AISC, low-capex asset is exactly what a mid-cap copper producer would bolt on. Tilt only (already reflected in the 68), not a re-rating.
5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Copper price (+ gold/silver by-product credits)
83
Strong Tailwind

Cabaçal is a geared bet on copper, sweetened by gold and silver credits. The driver is scored on the metal's level AND its trend (Step 2b).

Level: copper spot ~US$6.34/lb (16 Jul) sits far above the PFS base-case deck of US$4.16/lb — a very favourable level for the project economics. Trend: the copper ETF (CPER ~38.6) is trading around a flat-to-rising 50-DMA (~38.3) and above its 200-DMA; copper closed up ~0.8% on the day. Copper is NOT in a downtrend — so, unlike the AU case that prompted the Step-2b rule, there is no live commodity downtrend to cap short-term amplification. MNO's own slide is idiosyncratic, kept inside the Timing pillar.

HorizonDriver readScore
Short (0–4w)Copper firm but macro Short = Neutral (N); no fresh momentum72
Medium (6–12m)Copper/Ind Metals Outperform (O); spot well above base deck85
Long (3–5yr)Strong Outperform (SO) — electrification/supply-deficit supercycle88

Amplification role: driver 83 ≥ 65 → eligible to lift a base BUY to STRONG BUY at Medium and Long, where Economic pressure is also a Tailwind. It does not change the base signal or the fundamental pillar scores.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind
74
conviction

The 14 Jul macro report (regime: Stagflation-lite, narrow lead; Soft Landing closing) maps Copper/Industrial Metals to Outperform (Medium) and Strong Outperform (Long), and Materials (XLB) to Outperform (Medium) / Strong Outperform (Long) — a multi-year electrification/supply-deficit case. Short-horizon copper is Neutral. Net pressure is a Tailwind at the horizons that matter for this developer, which is what makes Medium/Long amplification-eligible. Trend-Following stance: buying alongside the macro's positive copper signal, not against it.

Source: asset-class map (Copper/Ind Metals S:N / M:O / L:SO; Materials XLB M:O / L:SO) · Macro report 2026-07-14

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
The tape has turned down — a clean equity-specific downtrend into support.
44
conf 45% — thin volume; strongly-bearish MTF confluence

The stock is in a clear short-term downtrend, sliding from the ~C$2.13 May peak to C$1.48 — lower highs and lower lows, and crucially it is lagging copper badly (copper is firm near the highs while MNO makes new local lows). That is a relative-strength/idiosyncratic-equity problem — thin volume, developer patience-fatigue between catalysts — not a commodity signal. Daily RSI 36.9 (approaching oversold), price below the 20/50-DMA, a support breakdown flagged. The one positive: the monthly chart is still an uptrend, and price is now into the weekly support shelf at C$1.44–1.47.

Sub-signalReadingScore
MTF confluenceStrongly bearish — weekly/daily/hourly all downtrend, monthly still up34
Risk-reward (position)Into weekly support C$1.44–1.47; tight stop possible — favourable IF it holds50
Relative strength vs copperUnderperforming the metal materially — a red flag near-term28
Macro overlay (Materials)XLB Med O / Long SO — supportive regime62
Catalyst densityNo dated near-term catalyst (IL undated, DFS Q4) — calm but no spark55

Cross-timeframe pattern: higher-TF (monthly) uptrend + lower-TF breakdown = a pullback within a larger uptrend — but the pullback is not yet showing a reversal (no higher low, no volume reclaim). Key level: a daily close back above the C$1.66 20/50-DMA on volume, OR a tested higher-low bounce off C$1.44–1.47, is what turns the tape.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-07-16US Retail Sales (Jun)Medium⚠️ MediumConsumer read tests the disinflation-vs-reacceleration split; indirect for copper demand
2026-07-29FOMC Rate DecisionHighHoldHold⚠️ MediumRate path drives USD/real rates → copper & gold; not used as a scheduling trigger
Q4 2026Cabaçal DFSHighPFS 61% IRR✅ YesDefinitive Feasibility Study — the key company re-rating catalyst; ~50% complete, on track
UndatedInstallation Licence decisionHighApprovalPL granted✅ Yes2nd of 3 permits (SEMA Mato Grosso); binary, decision pending since 19 May filing

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-05-01LSE Main Market admission + GBP25M placingDoneOversubscribedPositive — funded through DFS/permitting; removes a near-term funding overhang
2026-05-19Installation Licence application filedDoneNeutral — starts the IL clock; approval still pending

No dated company catalyst inside the next 14 days — the IL decision is undated and the DFS is a Q4 event. Macro (Retail Sales, 29 Jul FOMC) is only indirectly relevant and is not used to schedule the next update. The next update is the default +14d refresh.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Bullish60.7+, risingS: 1.34 R: 2.05/2.16Resistance breakout (stale)0.3x
WeeklyDowntrend ↓Bearish43.5−, fallingS: 1.44 R: 1.69/1.76None0.4x
DailyDowntrend ↓Bearish36.9−, fallingS: 1.57/1.65 R: 1.85/1.90Support breakdown0.3x
HourlyDowntrend ↓Bearish31.3−, fallingS: 1.47 R: 1.60/1.63Support breakdown0.7x
15-minDowntrend ↓Bearish36.6−, turningS: 1.47 R: 1.60Support breakdown1.5x
Confluence: Strongly Bearish · MTF Score 34

The monthly trend is still up, but every lower timeframe has rolled over — a pullback within a larger uptrend that has not yet found a floor. Volume is thin (a double-edged sword: no capitulation, but no accumulation either). The level to watch is the weekly support shelf at C$1.44–1.47; a tested higher-low bounce there, or a volume reclaim of the C$1.66 20/50-DMA, is the timing trigger that would confirm a short-term entry. Until then the near-term tape is a headwind.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

MNO.TO daily close (mid-May → 16 Jul), C$. A clean downtrend from the C$2.13 peak into the C$1.44–1.47 weekly support shelf; price below a declining short-term MA. Copper, by contrast, is firm — the weakness is equity-specific.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull C$3.00 (30%)

IL approved and the DFS (Q4) confirms or improves the PFS at spot-strong copper; construction financing lands without heavy dilution and/or a strategic bid emerges. Re-rates toward the analyst-target range (C$2.75–3.50) as the risk discount collapses. Spot-case NAV (US$1.41B) and exploration upside come into view.

Base C$2.10 (50%)

The project advances on schedule — IL granted, DFS delivered Q4 2026 — but the market keeps a construction/financing risk discount, so the stock closes part (not all) of the P/NAV gap. Copper holds around current levels. Fair value ~C$2.10, roughly the risked-NAV midpoint and ~0.6–0.7x P/NAV. Most probable.

Bear C$1.15 (20%)

Permitting slips or the DFS disappoints (capex inflation, lower recoveries), copper rolls over from its highs, and the FID equity raise prices at a steep discount. The current downtrend extends; developer patience-fatigue deepens on thin volume. Downside to ~C$1.15, back toward the pre-2026 base.

Probability-weighted fair value ≈ C$2.14 (0.30×3.00 + 0.50×2.10 + 0.20×1.15). The risk-reward is now more skewed to the upside than on 27 Jun — the −9% drop lowered the entry while the base/bull cases are unchanged — which is consistent with the Medium/Long STRONG BUY. Stated honestly: that upside skew coexists with a bearish short-term tape, which is exactly why the Short is capped at HOLD, not BUY.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

Cheap vs NAV and consensus, with a firm driver — the value path is open.
✅ Price C$1.48 < fair value ~C$2.10 (and ~52% below C$3.06 consensus)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (pre-revenue — no quarterly print)
✅ Underlying-Driver score 83 ≥ 50 (copper firm)

Technical — not MET

Tape in a downtrend — no reclaim, no confirmed higher low yet.
⛔ Daily close above the C$1.66 20/50-DMA on volume >1.5× avg, OR a tested higher-low bounce off C$1.44–1.47
⛔ RSI 35–65 (daily 36.9 — at the low edge, still falling)
⛔ MACD histogram positive ≥2 days or turning up off support

Catalyst — not MET

No dated near-term catalyst; IL undated, DFS is Q4.
⛔ A positive project-milestone print (IL approval / DFS beat) with >5% move
⛔ Volume >2× the 20-day average on the news
· No dated catalyst inside the window

Forecast: Fundamental group is MET now (Half-Size open on the value path). The Technical group is the swing factor: at the current ~C$0.04–0.05/day slide, a reclaim of the C$1.66 20/50-DMA is ~2–4 weeks away and needs a volume reversal — Low-to-Moderate confidence; a bounce off C$1.44–1.47 could trigger it sooner. The Catalyst group is event-dependent (IL decision undated; DFS Q4 2026) — flag as catalyst-dependent, most likely the DFS window unless the IL lands first.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below C$1.32 (below the weekly support shelf, ~1.8 ATR)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ IL denied or the DFS materially worse than the PFS (capex blowout / lower recoveries)
⛔ Copper turns into a sustained downtrend (below a falling 50-DMA) — the driver flips to a headwind
⛔ A dilutive financing far below NAV, or going-concern language

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into ~C$2.10 (base) with RSI > 70 and no fresh NAV-accretive news

Forecast: Stop (C$1.32) is ~11% below spot — within reach if the downtrend extends through the weekly support shelf, so it is a live near-term risk (unlike a name in an uptrend). Thesis-invalidation is not live: copper is firm and no negative project news has landed. Watch the IL decision and the DFS as the binary swing points.

Imagine you act at the current price of C$1.48 · as of 16 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

Risking ~11% to the C$1.32 stop to play a re-rating toward the C$2.10 base (~+42%) — an asymmetric setup, but only once the tape confirms.

The value path (Fundamental) is open now at Half-Size; the tape (Technical) is not. A patient buyer scales in on a hold of C$1.44–1.47 or a reclaim of C$1.66.

What if you sold now?

No exit trigger is live — Hold. A break of C$1.32 on two closes, or an IL denial / DFS disappointment, would flip this to Exit.

13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — no allocation or portfolio role was specified for this batch refresh. The §12 Conviction Ladder reads Half-Size (1 of 3 entry paths met — Fundamental only). For a speculative developer this is a starter/scale-in tier, not a full position; add on a confirmed timing trigger. This is context, not advice.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "MNO.TO",
  "exchange_ticker": "TSX:MNO",
  "isin": "GB00BVPND783",
  "company": "Meridian Mining Plc",
  "date": "2026-07-16",
  "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "donatien-pick",
  "lifecycle_stage": "pre_revenue_development",
  "price_at_rating": 1.48,
  "currency": "CAD",
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "STRONG BUY",
  "signal_long": "STRONG BUY",
  "quality_score": 74,
  "valuation_score": 68,
  "timing_score": 44,
  "driver_score": 83,
  "driver_label": "Strong Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 74,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-14",
  "moat_score": 57,
  "p_nav": 0.51,
  "val_band": "na",
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "fair_value_est": 2.1,
  "stop_loss": 1.32,
  "scenario_bull_target": 3.0,
  "scenario_base_target": 2.1,
  "scenario_bear_target": 1.15,
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-30",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (no dated company catalyst; IL undated, DFS Q4)"
}

Signals HOLD / STRONG BUY / STRONG BUY — unchanged from 27 Jun. The story is a rebalanced scorecard, not a downgrade: the −9% drop lifted Valuation (66→68, P/NAV 0.60→~0.51x) and hurt Timing (54→44, clean downtrend), roughly offsetting at the fundamentals-weighted Medium/Long horizons where the copper Driver (83) and a Tailwind economy keep the base BUY amplified to STRONG BUY. The Short stays HOLD via the technical-confirmation cap (short_entry_confirmed=false). analysis_status preserved as donatien-pick (operator permanent hold).

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_yahoo_quote (MNO.TO) Price C$1.48, 485.5M sh, C$718.6M cap (share count verified — no stale-FMP trap), C$74.4M cash, zero debt, consensus C$3.06 / Strong Buy / 9 analysts
get_multi_timeframe_analysis (MNO.TO) Strongly-bearish confluence; monthly up, weekly/daily/hourly down; daily RSI 36.9, support breakdown
get_stock_prices (MNO.TO, CPER) MNO downtrend from C$2.13 peak; CPER ~38.6 vs flat/rising 50-DMA — copper NOT in a downtrend
Web — PFS economics STUDY FOUND: NI 43-101 PFS dated 31 Mar 2025 — NPV5 US$984M after-tax @ base deck (US$2,119 Au / US$4.16 Cu / US$26.89 Ag), IRR 61.2%; spot-case NPV US$1.41B / 79.5% IRR; capex US$248M; AISC US$742/oz AuEq; 10yr LOM; 141koz AuEq/yr. Sources: stocktitan/accessnewswire/juniorminingnetwork PFS releases + meridianmining.co/cabacal
Web — permitting / DFS / LSE IL filed 19 May 2026 (SEMA Mato Grosso), pending; PL granted; DFS ~50% done, Q4 2026 (Ausenco); LSE Main Market admission + GBP25M @92p COMPLETED 1 May 2026. Sources: investingnews.com, newsfilecorp, investegate
Macro / Portfolio state (14 Jul) Regime Stagflation-lite; Copper/Ind Metals S:N/M:O/L:SO; Materials XLB M:O/L:SO; 10Y ~4.5%; Materials sleeve funded 3–6% across tiers
FMP fundamentals / analyst grades Thin coverage for a TSX micro-cap; earnings/ratios n/a for pre-revenue — leaned on web + yahoo. No new analyst grade actions in 30d surfaced
Impact on scores: Confidence is low-moderate (52%): pre-revenue developer + thin trading volume + P/NAV rests on the PFS NPV and the verified share count. The economic-study check is satisfied (PFS found and used); the main uncertainties are execution/permitting/financing, which are structural to the stage, not data gaps.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.