Intuitive Machines is a Houston-based space-exploration company that builds and flies robotic Moon landers and sells the services that go with them. Its work is organised in four arms: Lunar Access Services (the Nova-C class landers that carry NASA and commercial payloads to the lunar surface under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services, or CLPS, program), Orbital Services, Lunar Data Services (a near-space communications and navigation network, anchored by a NASA Near Space Network contract worth up to $4.82B over ten years), and Space Products & Infrastructure. What sets it apart is that it is the only commercial company to have soft-landed on the Moon — twice (IM-1 in Feb 2024, IM-2 in Mar 2025), both of which reached the surface but tipped onto their side — and it holds the deepest CLPS task-order book of any private lunar contractor plus the lunar data-relay franchise. For a reader: think of it as an early-revenue, government-anchored 'lunar infrastructure' contractor, still unprofitable and burning cash, whose value rests on converting a fast-growing NASA/defense backlog into recurring revenue while proving it can land upright.
Lifecycle — high-growth, early-revenue (Stage 2). Intuitive Machines is scaling contract revenue fast but is not yet profitable, so it is scored on growth, backlog quality, moat and runway rather than P/E or ROE. Q1-2026 revenue was a record $186.7M (vs ~$50M/qtr through 2025), lifting TTM revenue to ~$334M; the jump is largely the Lanteris acquisition plus a fifth CLPS task order, so revenue is lumpy and partly bought, not purely organic. Consensus models ~$943M for FY26 rising to ~$1.39B by FY28 (~88% projected CAGR), with the first positive net-income year expected ~2027-28.
| Sub-signal | Reading | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue trajectory / backlog | Backlog $1.1B (record; +$842M vs YE25, ~tripled YoY) — >1x forward-year revenue already contracted | 78 |
| Profitability | Gross margin ~26% TTM; operating margin -35%; adj. EBITDA turned positive in Q1-26 but GAAP still deeply negative | 32 |
| Cash generation | Negative FCF; funded by equity. ~$500M raised Jun-26 extends runway to guided FCF+ (2027-28) | 35 |
| Balance-sheet health | Net-cash (debt ~9% of mcap), current ratio 1.22, quick 1.08 — adequate post-raise; equity distorted by warrants | 58 |
| ROIC | Negative (pre-profit) — not yet earning its cost of capital | 30 |
| Management / dilution | Founder-led (Altemus/Crain), meaningful insider stake; but share count more than doubled in ~15 months | 50 |
| Dimension | Assessment | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing power | Government fixed-price/CLPS contracts — limited pricing power, but incumbency and few qualified bidders help | 52 |
| Network effects | Modest — the Near Space Network relay gains value as more lunar assets need comms/nav | 42 |
| Switching costs | High for NASA: deep integration, flight heritage, control of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera — but trimmed by credible rivals now landing | 58 |
| Cost advantage | First-mover scale and Houston vertical integration; replicable over time | 55 |
| Intangibles | Only commercial two-time lunar lander, security clearances, the $4.82B NSN relay franchise, deepest CLPS book | 65 |
Moat average ≈ 54. Real but narrow, and dynamic — the switching-cost and cost-advantage scores are trimmed directly by the competitive read below.
| Rival | Threat | Share trajectory | Moat-erosion vector |
|---|---|---|---|
| Firefly Aerospace (Blue Ghost) | Direct lander | Gaining | Landed fully upright (2025) — a milestone LUNR has not matched; dilutes the 'only one who can land' story |
| Astrobotic (now Voyager / VOYG) | Direct lander | Gaining | Griffin lander + $323M NASA + possible VIPER; Voyager balance-sheet backing |
| Rocket Lab (RKLB) | Adjacent / full-stack | Gaining scale | Vertically integrating launch + spacecraft; broader, better-capitalised platform |
| Redwire (RDW), ispace | Picks-and-shovels / lander | Stable / mixed | ispace has repeatedly failed; RDW supplies structures rather than lands |
| SpaceX (Starship HLS) | Disintermediation (long-run) | Dominant in launch | Starship lunar cargo could bypass small CLPS landers over time |
FMP health cross-check: rating C (2/5) — dragged by DCF/ROA/D-E/P-E/P-B sub-scores of 1 (all a function of being pre-profit), with ROE the lone bright spot (distorted by negative equity). Consistent with our 'developing' quality read: a promising franchise that has not yet earned its cost of capital.
| Lens | Reading | Signal |
|---|---|---|
| EV/Revenue (TTM) | EV ~$3.32B / TTM rev ~$334M = ~9.9x | rich on trailing |
| EV/Revenue (fwd FY26) | / ~$943M consensus = ~3.5x; FY27 ~2.9x; FY28 ~2.4x | cheap on forward |
| vs space peers | SpaceX (SPCX) ~114-117x sales; RKLB/ASTS/RDW premium multiples; LUNR one of the cheapest high-growth space names (news: '<3x FY28 revenue') | attractive |
| Backlog coverage | $1.1B backlog > 1x FY26 revenue already contracted | supportive |
| FCF yield | Negative — N/A; weight other lenses | n/a |
| Analyst targets | Price $19.58 vs consensus $42 / median $37.5 / low $27 / high $75 — ~53% below consensus, below even the lowest target | strong support |
| Grades consensus | 9 Buy / 1 Hold / 1 Sell — 'Buy' | bullish |
Implied-growth read (narrative colour). At ~3.5x forward revenue for a business consensus expects to compound ~50-88% for several years, the market is not pricing in the full ramp — the multiple embeds meaningfully less growth than the contracted backlog and NSN franchise imply. The catch: 'cheap' here is conditional on the revenue actually converting and the losses actually narrowing; a pre-profit name that stumbles can see the forward multiple stay high because the denominator disappoints. That conditionality — not a rich price — is why Valuation sits at 67 (attractive) rather than 80+.
Intuitive Machines' fortunes sit above its own execution on one dominant external force: the US government's lunar and space budget — specifically NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program and the Artemis campaign cadence — supplemented by commercial and defense space demand (Space Development Agency, near-space data relay). This is not a commodity-priced driver; it is policy- and budget-driven, and it is currently favourable and broadening.
| Horizon | Driver state | Read |
|---|---|---|
| Short (0-3m) | Mixed — post-SpaceX-IPO capital rotated out of small space names; sector sentiment choppy | neutral-positive |
| Medium (6-12m) | CLPS task orders flowing (6 awards), $180.4M lunar payload, LRO camera control; NSN relay funding ramps | tailwind |
| Long (3-5y) | Structural lunar-economy build-out + Space Force budget growth + NATO/allied space spend — durable secular demand | strong tailwind |
Risks to the driver: NASA budget politics and Artemis schedule slips can defer task orders; a VIPER-style cancellation shows program risk is real; and SpaceX's Starship HLS could, long-run, disintermediate small CLPS landers. On balance the driver is clearly favourable (score 68, ≥ 65) and amplification-eligible.
Aerospace & Defense sits inside XLI (Industrials), which the 2026-07-03 macro report rates O / O / SO (Short Outperform / Medium Outperform / LONG Strong-Outperform) — pressure Tailwind, stance Trend-Following, conviction moderate-to-high and STRENGTHENING at the Long horizon. Regime is Contested (Soft-Landing / Stagflation co-lead 30/30, Reaccel 27, DefBust 13; confidence Low-Med), but the backdrop is risk-on (UST10Y 4.48%, VIX 16.6, unemployment 4.2), and A&D carries an extra NATO-rearmament / government-space-budget structural tailwind on top of the XLI signal. This is the best economic alignment in the current batch — buying LUNR leans with the macro wind, not against it.
Source: sector-map · Macro report 2026-07-03
Timing is the weak leg. LUNR went parabolic into late May (peaked $46.75 on 27 May on the SpaceX-IPO halo), then round-tripped almost the entire move as the SpaceX IPO 'sucked the oxygen out of the room' and a ~$500M raise landed. Price $19.58 now sits below the 20/50-day averages but is holding just above the 200-DMA (~$18.78) and recent swing support (~$17.9).
| Timeframe | Trend | RSI | MACD | Key S/R | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly | Uptrend | 48 | + (hist +) | S 7.78 / R 24.9 | secular structure still up |
| Weekly | Uptrend (fading) | 45 | - (hist -) | S 14.5 / R 23.3 | below weekly 20-MA |
| Daily | Weakening — support breakdown | 36 | - (hist -) | S 17.9 / R 28.8 (50-DMA) | below 50-DMA, above 200-DMA |
| Hourly | Strong downtrend | 39 | - | S 19.1 / R 21.9 | momentum still down |
| 15-min | Strong downtrend | 48 | flat | S 19.1 / R 20.7 | trying to base |
Confluence: bearish (MTF trend ~49). This is the classic 'higher-TF up + lower-TF pullback' map — potentially a buy setup — but the daily support breakdown and strong intraday downtrends say the knife is still falling. RSI 36 is near-but-not-oversold; there is no positive-divergence reversal signal yet.
| Date | Event | Impact | Forecast | Previous | Relevant? | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-15 | US CPI (YoY) | High | — | — | ⚠️ Medium | Growth-stock discount-rate sensitivity; not company-specific |
| 2026-07-29 | FOMC Rate Decision | High | Hold | Hold | ⚠️ Medium | Risk-appetite / long-duration valuation; Industrials medium macro sensitivity |
| 2026-08-06 | LUNR Q2 2026 earnings | High | EPS ~ -0.34 (FY) | — | ✅ Yes | Revenue-ramp & backlog conversion check; cash-burn / runway update |
| 2026-H2 | IM-3 lunar landing (Reiner Gamma) | High | — | — | ✅ Yes | Binary event — third landing after two tip-overs |
| Date | Event | Actual | Forecast | Surprise | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-27 | Insider sale (CTO, 10b5-1) | 150k sh / $3.3M | — | pre-planned | Neutral — scheduled disposition, not a confidence signal |
| 2026-06-12 | SpaceX IPO (SPCX) | $75B raise | — | sector capital vacuum | Negative near-term — rotated capital out of small space names |
No high-impact, company-specific event falls inside the next 14 days. The recurring macro prints (CPI 15 Jul, FOMC 29 Jul) are medium-relevance only (Industrials is medium macro-sensitivity) and are NOT used as scheduling triggers. The two dated catalysts that matter — Q2 earnings (6 Aug) and the IM-3 landing (H2) — both sit beyond the window, so this report refreshes on the default +14-day cadence.
| Timeframe | Trend | Direction | RSI | MACD | Key S/R | Breakout | Vol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly | Uptrend ↑ | Bullish | 48 | + rising | S 7.78 / R 24.9 | Resistance breakout | 0.1x |
| Weekly | Uptrend (fading) → | Neutral | 45 | - falling | S 14.5 / R 23.3 | None | 0.7x |
| Daily | Weakening ↓ | Bearish | 36 | - falling | S 17.9 / R 28.8 | Support breakdown | 0.7x |
| Hourly | Strong downtrend ↓ | Bearish | 39 | - flat | S 19.1 / R 21.9 | Support breakdown | 0.03x |
| 15-min | Strong downtrend ↓ | Bearish | 48 | flat | S 19.1 / R 20.7 | None | 0.06x |
| Confluence: Bearish · MTF Score MTF trend ~49 | |||||||
Monthly and weekly structure remain constructive, but the daily and both intraday timeframes have turned bearish with a daily support breakdown — a short-term pullback (arguably capitulation from a parabola) inside a still-intact larger uptrend. The level that matters is the 200-DMA / swing support at ~$17.9-18.8: hold it and the higher-TF uptrend stays alive; lose it on volume and the bear path toward the $11 zone opens.
Weekly closes, Jan-Jul 2026 (orange) vs ~50-day trend (grey). The May parabola to $46.75 and the ~58% June unwind to $19.58 are the whole story; price now tests 200-DMA/swing support ~$17.9-18.8. Levels: green = support/stop, red = overhead resistance / analyst median target.
Backlog converts on schedule, IM-3 lands (or partially succeeds and is spun constructively), losses narrow toward the guided 2027-28 FCF inflection, and the sector re-rates modestly off washed-out sentiment. ~12-month fair value ~$30 (~+53%), anchored on ~4x FY26 EV/Revenue — deliberately below the $37.5 median / $42 consensus to haircut execution and dilution risk.
IM-3 lands fully upright (the first clean IM landing), NSN relay deployments ramp into recurring revenue, defense/SDA wins land, and the space complex re-rates — price returns toward the prior high (~$46, +135%). This is the option-value case: paying ~3.5x forward revenue for a franchise that proves it can execute.
IM-3 fails or tips over a third time (a real possibility given IM-1/IM-2), the revenue ramp disappoints, another dilutive raise is needed, and Firefly / Voyager-Astrobotic / SpaceX Starship visibly take share — the forward multiple that looked cheap stops working as the denominator misses. Price retraces toward the $8-11 zone (~-44%), near the 52-week low. This leg carries the binary-mission risk and the elevated competitive threat explicitly.
Probability-weighted fair value ≈ 0.50×$30 + 0.25×$46 + 0.25×$11 = ~$29.3, ~+50% above the $19.58 price — a positively-skewed distribution, but with a fat 25% bear tail that is event-driven (one landing) rather than gradual. That asymmetry is why this reads HOLD short/medium (watch for entry) with a Long-horizon STRONG BUY — a Half-Size, accumulate-on-a-confirmed-bounce stance, not back-up-the-truck.
Forecast: Fundamental group is already MET → a value-based starter (Half-Size) is available now. The Technical group is the one to watch: a confirmed higher-low bounce off the $17.9-18.8 support zone is the nearer path (days-to-weeks, catalyst/tape-dependent) — a clean 50-DMA reclaim (~$28.8, ~47% away) is unlikely inside 4-6 weeks without a positive catalyst. The Catalyst group is dated: Q2 earnings (~6 Aug) then IM-3 (H2). Adding a second group (Technical or Catalyst) would upgrade the size to Full-Size; today it is one path open.
Forecast: Stop-Loss unlikely in the next 4-6 weeks absent a new negative catalyst — price is ~16% above the $16.5 stop and holding the 200-DMA — but the ~15%/day ATR means a single bad session can approach it, so the stop is live risk, not remote. The most probable exit trigger over the coming quarters is Thesis Invalidation via the IM-3 landing (H2 2026): a third tip-over would be treated as a confirmed thesis dent and exit, not hold-and-hope. Profit-Target ($37.5 + RSI>70) is a multi-month bull-case event.
You are buying a beaten-down, government-anchored lunar-infrastructure franchise at ~3.5x forward revenue and ~53% below consensus — with an explicit 25% chance of a ~-44% drawdown if the IM-3 landing fails. A Half-Size (value-starter) entry that you can add to on a confirmed technical bounce or a clean Q2 print matches the positive-but-lumpy skew.
You give up a positively-skewed setup (weighted fair value ~$29, +50%) with strong analyst support and the best sector-macro alignment in the batch — but you also avoid a name that has round-tripped a parabola, is still burning cash, and whose next big catalyst can go either way. Reasonable for a risk-averse book; the framework rates it HOLD short-term for exactly this reason.
Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.
{
"ticker": "LUNR",
"date": "2026-07-03",
"version": "v6",
"analysis_status": "donatien-pick",
"exchange": "NASDAQ",
"exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:LUNR",
"isin": "US46125A1007",
"api_ticker": "LUNR",
"finder_ticker": "LUNR",
"finder_exchange": "NASDAQ",
"user_context": {
"horizon": null,
"allocation_pct": null,
"portfolio_role": null
},
"price_at_rating": 19.58,
"signal_short": "HOLD",
"signal_medium": "HOLD",
"signal_long": "STRONG_BUY",
"primary_signal": "HOLD",
"quality_score": 57,
"lifecycle_stage": "high-growth (early-revenue)",
"quality_detail": {
"industry_benchmark_name": "ROIC vs WACC + Backlog Growth (Industrials)",
"industry_benchmark_value": "neg ROIC / backlog +$842M (~tripled YoY)",
"industry_benchmark_score": 55,
"moat_score": 54,
"roic_percentile_vs_peers": 30,
"capital_allocation": 52,
"management_skin_in_game": 55
},
"valuation_score": 67,
"valuation_detail": {
"fcf_yield": "N/A (negative)",
"ev_rev_ttm": 9.9,
"ev_rev_fwd_2026": 3.5,
"ev_rev_fwd_2028": 2.4,
"price_vs_consensus_pct": -53,
"historical_valuation_decile": "n/a (<2yr as space pure-play)"
},
"warranted_multiple": "na",
"actual_multiple": 3.5,
"val_multiple_basis": "EV/Revenue fwd FY26 (warranted-P/E anchor N/A \u2014 pre-profit)",
"discount_rate_r": null,
"risk_free_10y": 4.48,
"g_near": null,
"g_term": null,
"warranted_ratio": "na",
"val_band": "attractive",
"timing_score": 45,
"timing_detail": {
"mtf_confluence": "bearish",
"mtf_trend_score": 49,
"risk_reward_score": 47,
"relative_strength_vs_sector": "lagging (worst mover in post-IPO bounce)",
"catalyst_clustering_score": 55,
"dynamic_macro_weight": 0.15,
"atr_pct_of_price": 14.6,
"range_position_52w_pct": 30
},
"driver_score": 68,
"driver_name": "US gov space budget / NASA CLPS / Artemis cadence",
"economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
"economic_alignment_conviction": 72,
"economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
"economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
"macro_report_date": "2026-07-03",
"competitive_share_trajectory": "stable",
"competitive_threat_level": "elevated",
"nonop_pct_of_net_income": "variable \u2014 warrant/earnout MTM swings distort GAAP net income (read operating)",
"clean_pe": "N/A (pre-profit)",
"clean_peg": "N/A (pre-profit)",
"overall_confidence": 55,
"fair_value_est": 30,
"stop_loss": 16.5,
"target_price": 30,
"scenario_base_target": 30,
"scenario_bull_target": 46,
"scenario_bear_target": 11,
"entry_groups_met": 1,
"entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
"exit_groups_live": 0,
"exit_action": "Hold",
"hard_gate_state": "caution",
"gates_triggered": [],
"gates_caution": [
"Financial/interest-coverage (pre-profit cash burn)",
"Dilution (share count >2x in ~15mo)",
"Binary mission (IM-3 H2-2026)"
],
"do_not_buy_triggers": [],
"next_update_date": "2026-07-17",
"next_update_basis": "default +14d (Q2 earnings 2026-08-06 and IM-3 H2-2026 both beyond the 14d window)",
"next_check_date": "2026-07-17"
}