NASDAQ:LUNR Intuitive Machines, Inc.

ISIN: US46125A1007
IndustrialsAerospace & DefenseSpacePre-profit · binary mission risk
NASDAQ · Houston, TX · Aerospace & Defense (Space) · ~$3.1B mcap · beta 1.69 Analysis Status: Starting
$19.58
-3.1%
3 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Intuitive Machines, Inc.

Intuitive Machines is a Houston-based space-exploration company that builds and flies robotic Moon landers and sells the services that go with them. Its work is organised in four arms: Lunar Access Services (the Nova-C class landers that carry NASA and commercial payloads to the lunar surface under NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services, or CLPS, program), Orbital Services, Lunar Data Services (a near-space communications and navigation network, anchored by a NASA Near Space Network contract worth up to $4.82B over ten years), and Space Products & Infrastructure. What sets it apart is that it is the only commercial company to have soft-landed on the Moon — twice (IM-1 in Feb 2024, IM-2 in Mar 2025), both of which reached the surface but tipped onto their side — and it holds the deepest CLPS task-order book of any private lunar contractor plus the lunar data-relay franchise. For a reader: think of it as an early-revenue, government-anchored 'lunar infrastructure' contractor, still unprofitable and burning cash, whose value rests on converting a fast-growing NASA/defense backlog into recurring revenue while proving it can land upright.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD5055%bearish tape — support breakdown, oversold, no reversal yet
Medium-term (6–12 mo)HOLD5555%value-play setup, but a fresh daily breakdown + the binary IM-3 landing inside the 6-12mo window → watch for entry
Long-term (3–5 yr)STRONG BUY6660%quality + structural lunar-economy growth; XLI long = Strong-Outperform
Next update: 2026-07-17 — default +14d (Q2 earnings 2026-08-06 and IM-3 H2-2026 both beyond the 14d window)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

57
developing
conf 55%

Valuation Attractiveness

67
attractive (exec-contingent)
conf 58%

Entry/Exit Timing

45
weak / neutral
conf 60%

Underlying Drivers

68
Tailwind
conf 65%

Economic Alignment

72
Trend-Following
conf 70%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
⚠️
Gate 1 · Financial Distress / Interest Coverage
Pre-profit: interest coverage is negative (-13x) and FCF has been negative for 4+ quarters. NOT distress-level, however — the balance sheet is net-cash (debt only ~9% of market cap), and a ~$500M equity raise in June 2026 (priced near the ~$46 highs) funds operations to management's guided positive-FCF inflection in 2027-28. Flagged, not triggered — does not cap the signal.
Gate 2 · Earnings Event Risk
Q2 2026 earnings due ~6 Aug 2026 — beyond the 14-day window, so no timing cap now. It becomes the scheduling trigger for a later refresh.
Gate 3 · Valuation Ceiling
Price $19.58 sits ~53% below consensus target ($42) and well below the lowest analyst target ($27). Warranted-multiple anchor is N/A (unprofitable) — no expensive-band trip. Clear.
⚠️
Gate 4 · Dilution / Accounting
Real dilution: weighted shares 61M (Q4-24) → 148M (Q1-26), and the June raise lifts the count further — well above the >5%/yr rule. Treated as a CAUTION rather than a hard HOLD-cap: the dilution is structural growth funding for an early-revenue name, the June raise was struck near the highs (accretive timing) and buys a funded runway. Reported net income is also periodically distorted by warrant/earnout mark-to-market swings — read operating results, not the bottom line. Watch for further raises.
⚠️
Gate 5 · Binary Mission Event
IM-3 (Nova-C to the Reiner Gamma lunar swirl) is slated for H2 2026 — not imminent (no confirmed near-term date), so it does not cap the signal today, but it is a genuine binary event: IM-1 and IM-2 both tipped over on landing, and a third failed/tipped landing would be a material de-rating catalyst. Carried explicitly in the §11 Bear leg and the §12 thesis-invalidation.
No hard gate is triggered — the signal is not capped — but three cautions (pre-profit cash burn, heavy dilution, and the binary IM-3 landing) define the risk profile of this name. Size accordingly; this is a speculative, execution-and-event-driven position.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
A one-of-a-kind franchise (only commercial Moon lander + the lunar data-relay contract) with an explosive backlog — but unprofitable, negative ROIC, heavily diluting, and execution-unproven (two tip-overs).
57
conf 55% · lifecycle: high-growth / early-revenue

Lifecycle — high-growth, early-revenue (Stage 2). Intuitive Machines is scaling contract revenue fast but is not yet profitable, so it is scored on growth, backlog quality, moat and runway rather than P/E or ROE. Q1-2026 revenue was a record $186.7M (vs ~$50M/qtr through 2025), lifting TTM revenue to ~$334M; the jump is largely the Lanteris acquisition plus a fifth CLPS task order, so revenue is lumpy and partly bought, not purely organic. Consensus models ~$943M for FY26 rising to ~$1.39B by FY28 (~88% projected CAGR), with the first positive net-income year expected ~2027-28.

Sub-signalReadingScore
Revenue trajectory / backlogBacklog $1.1B (record; +$842M vs YE25, ~tripled YoY) — >1x forward-year revenue already contracted78
ProfitabilityGross margin ~26% TTM; operating margin -35%; adj. EBITDA turned positive in Q1-26 but GAAP still deeply negative32
Cash generationNegative FCF; funded by equity. ~$500M raised Jun-26 extends runway to guided FCF+ (2027-28)35
Balance-sheet healthNet-cash (debt ~9% of mcap), current ratio 1.22, quick 1.08 — adequate post-raise; equity distorted by warrants58
ROICNegative (pre-profit) — not yet earning its cost of capital30
Management / dilutionFounder-led (Altemus/Crain), meaningful insider stake; but share count more than doubled in ~15 months50
Industry benchmark — ROIC vs WACC + backlog growth (Industrials). ROIC is below WACC (negative), which fails the value-creation half of the benchmark; but backlog growth is exceptional (+$842M, ~tripled). Mixed composite → 55/100. The bull read is that an early-revenue contractor is supposed to score low on ROIC while it builds franchise value; the bear read is that value-creation is still unproven.

Competitive Moat

DimensionAssessmentScore
Pricing powerGovernment fixed-price/CLPS contracts — limited pricing power, but incumbency and few qualified bidders help52
Network effectsModest — the Near Space Network relay gains value as more lunar assets need comms/nav42
Switching costsHigh for NASA: deep integration, flight heritage, control of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera — but trimmed by credible rivals now landing58
Cost advantageFirst-mover scale and Houston vertical integration; replicable over time55
IntangiblesOnly commercial two-time lunar lander, security clearances, the $4.82B NSN relay franchise, deepest CLPS book65

Moat average ≈ 54. Real but narrow, and dynamic — the switching-cost and cost-advantage scores are trimmed directly by the competitive read below.

Competitive Environment

The lunar-lander field is no longer a monopoly. Score the moat against who is attacking and which way share is trending.
RivalThreatShare trajectoryMoat-erosion vector
Firefly Aerospace (Blue Ghost)Direct landerGainingLanded fully upright (2025) — a milestone LUNR has not matched; dilutes the 'only one who can land' story
Astrobotic (now Voyager / VOYG)Direct landerGainingGriffin lander + $323M NASA + possible VIPER; Voyager balance-sheet backing
Rocket Lab (RKLB)Adjacent / full-stackGaining scaleVertically integrating launch + spacecraft; broader, better-capitalised platform
Redwire (RDW), ispacePicks-and-shovels / landerStable / mixedispace has repeatedly failed; RDW supplies structures rather than lands
SpaceX (Starship HLS)Disintermediation (long-run)Dominant in launchStarship lunar cargo could bypass small CLPS landers over time
Net effect: LUNR keeps the incumbent lead (deepest CLPS book, sole NSN relay, two surface deliveries) but Firefly's clean landing is a real ding to the intangibles/switching-cost edge → Switching Costs trimmed to 58, Cost Advantage to 55. Overall competitive threat: elevated. Propagates to the §11 Bear leg (rivals + Starship take share) and the §12 thesis-invalidation.

FMP health cross-check: rating C (2/5) — dragged by DCF/ROA/D-E/P-E/P-B sub-scores of 1 (all a function of being pre-profit), with ROE the lone bright spot (distorted by negative equity). Consistent with our 'developing' quality read: a promising franchise that has not yet earned its cost of capital.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Cheap for the growth — IF the ramp lands. ~3.5x FY26 EV/Revenue and ~53% below consensus target; but the discount is the market pricing execution and dilution risk, not a free lunch.
67
conf 58% · warranted-multiple anchor N/A (pre-profit)
Warranted-multiple anchor: N/A. Intuitive Machines is unprofitable, so no clean P/E resolves and the two-stage warranted-P/E anchor is skipped by design (SKILL Pillar-2 graceful-degradation). Valuation is judged on forward EV/Revenue vs space peers, backlog coverage, cash runway, and the discount to hard analyst targets — with a confidence haircut for the missing anchor. No P/E is fabricated.
LensReadingSignal
EV/Revenue (TTM)EV ~$3.32B / TTM rev ~$334M = ~9.9xrich on trailing
EV/Revenue (fwd FY26)/ ~$943M consensus = ~3.5x; FY27 ~2.9x; FY28 ~2.4xcheap on forward
vs space peersSpaceX (SPCX) ~114-117x sales; RKLB/ASTS/RDW premium multiples; LUNR one of the cheapest high-growth space names (news: '<3x FY28 revenue')attractive
Backlog coverage$1.1B backlog > 1x FY26 revenue already contractedsupportive
FCF yieldNegative — N/A; weight other lensesn/a
Analyst targetsPrice $19.58 vs consensus $42 / median $37.5 / low $27 / high $75 — ~53% below consensus, below even the lowest targetstrong support
Grades consensus9 Buy / 1 Hold / 1 Sell — 'Buy'bullish

Implied-growth read (narrative colour). At ~3.5x forward revenue for a business consensus expects to compound ~50-88% for several years, the market is not pricing in the full ramp — the multiple embeds meaningfully less growth than the contracted backlog and NSN franchise imply. The catch: 'cheap' here is conditional on the revenue actually converting and the losses actually narrowing; a pre-profit name that stumbles can see the forward multiple stay high because the denominator disappoints. That conditionality — not a rich price — is why Valuation sits at 67 (attractive) rather than 80+.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside

Core vs free upside: the contracted CLPS + landed-mission business plausibly justifies much of today's ~$3.1B market cap; the NSN relay and defense optionality are the roughly-free upside — the reason to keep watching, not a reason to ignore the execution risk. Net effect: a modest +3-5 tilt to Valuation, not a re-rating.
5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
US government space budget · NASA CLPS / Artemis cadence (secondary: commercial & defense space — SDA, near-space relay)
68
Tailwind (amplification-eligible)

Intuitive Machines' fortunes sit above its own execution on one dominant external force: the US government's lunar and space budget — specifically NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program and the Artemis campaign cadence — supplemented by commercial and defense space demand (Space Development Agency, near-space data relay). This is not a commodity-priced driver; it is policy- and budget-driven, and it is currently favourable and broadening.

HorizonDriver stateRead
Short (0-3m)Mixed — post-SpaceX-IPO capital rotated out of small space names; sector sentiment choppyneutral-positive
Medium (6-12m)CLPS task orders flowing (6 awards), $180.4M lunar payload, LRO camera control; NSN relay funding rampstailwind
Long (3-5y)Structural lunar-economy build-out + Space Force budget growth + NATO/allied space spend — durable secular demandstrong tailwind

Risks to the driver: NASA budget politics and Artemis schedule slips can defer task orders; a VIPER-style cancellation shows program risk is real; and SpaceX's Starship HLS could, long-run, disintermediate small CLPS landers. On balance the driver is clearly favourable (score 68, ≥ 65) and amplification-eligible.

Amplification note. Driver 68 (Tailwind) + Economic-Alignment pressure Tailwind both corroborate — mechanically eligible to intensify a BUY to STRONG BUY. This fires only where the base signal is BUY: at the Long horizon (Quality 55% / Valuation 30% / Timing 15%) the value-play base is BUY, so it amplifies cleanly to STRONG BUY (driver strengthening, single-mission risk diversifies across years). At the Medium horizon Timing carries 30% weight, and with a fresh daily support-breakdown plus the binary IM-3 landing falling inside the 6-12mo window, the base tips to HOLD (value-trap risk / watch for entry) — and HOLD never amplifies. Short is also HOLD (broken tape). Amplification is not withheld by hand at medium; the base simply isn't a BUY there.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind
72
conviction

Aerospace & Defense sits inside XLI (Industrials), which the 2026-07-03 macro report rates O / O / SO (Short Outperform / Medium Outperform / LONG Strong-Outperform) — pressure Tailwind, stance Trend-Following, conviction moderate-to-high and STRENGTHENING at the Long horizon. Regime is Contested (Soft-Landing / Stagflation co-lead 30/30, Reaccel 27, DefBust 13; confidence Low-Med), but the backdrop is risk-on (UST10Y 4.48%, VIX 16.6, unemployment 4.2), and A&D carries an extra NATO-rearmament / government-space-budget structural tailwind on top of the XLI signal. This is the best economic alignment in the current batch — buying LUNR leans with the macro wind, not against it.

Source: sector-map · Macro report 2026-07-03

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Higher-timeframe uptrend intact but the daily/intraday tape has broken down — a parabola to $46.75 (27 May) unwound ~58% to $19.58. Oversold near 200-DMA support, but no confirmed reversal.
45
conf 60% · confluence bearish

Timing is the weak leg. LUNR went parabolic into late May (peaked $46.75 on 27 May on the SpaceX-IPO halo), then round-tripped almost the entire move as the SpaceX IPO 'sucked the oxygen out of the room' and a ~$500M raise landed. Price $19.58 now sits below the 20/50-day averages but is holding just above the 200-DMA (~$18.78) and recent swing support (~$17.9).

TimeframeTrendRSIMACDKey S/RNote
MonthlyUptrend48+ (hist +)S 7.78 / R 24.9secular structure still up
WeeklyUptrend (fading)45- (hist -)S 14.5 / R 23.3below weekly 20-MA
DailyWeakening — support breakdown36- (hist -)S 17.9 / R 28.8 (50-DMA)below 50-DMA, above 200-DMA
HourlyStrong downtrend39-S 19.1 / R 21.9momentum still down
15-minStrong downtrend48flatS 19.1 / R 20.7trying to base

Confluence: bearish (MTF trend ~49). This is the classic 'higher-TF up + lower-TF pullback' map — potentially a buy setup — but the daily support breakdown and strong intraday downtrends say the knife is still falling. RSI 36 is near-but-not-oversold; there is no positive-divergence reversal signal yet.

Risk-reward & relative strength. Price sits at ~30% of its 52-week range (7.78-46.75) — beaten down, which is either value or a falling knife. ATR ~$2.86 (~15%/day) makes this a high-volatility vehicle (beta 1.69). Nearest logical stop (~$16.5, below the 200-DMA and swing low) is ~1.1 ATR away — a relatively tight, definable risk. On relative strength LUNR has badly lagged its space peers over the last month (it was the 'quietest mover' in the sector's post-IPO bounce). Net: a definable-risk entry zone near support, but momentum and RS argue for waiting for stabilisation rather than chasing.
8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-07-15US CPI (YoY)High⚠️ MediumGrowth-stock discount-rate sensitivity; not company-specific
2026-07-29FOMC Rate DecisionHighHoldHold⚠️ MediumRisk-appetite / long-duration valuation; Industrials medium macro sensitivity
2026-08-06LUNR Q2 2026 earningsHighEPS ~ -0.34 (FY)✅ YesRevenue-ramp & backlog conversion check; cash-burn / runway update
2026-H2IM-3 lunar landing (Reiner Gamma)High✅ YesBinary event — third landing after two tip-overs

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-06-27Insider sale (CTO, 10b5-1)150k sh / $3.3Mpre-plannedNeutral — scheduled disposition, not a confidence signal
2026-06-12SpaceX IPO (SPCX)$75B raisesector capital vacuumNegative near-term — rotated capital out of small space names

No high-impact, company-specific event falls inside the next 14 days. The recurring macro prints (CPI 15 Jul, FOMC 29 Jul) are medium-relevance only (Industrials is medium macro-sensitivity) and are NOT used as scheduling triggers. The two dated catalysts that matter — Q2 earnings (6 Aug) and the IM-3 landing (H2) — both sit beyond the window, so this report refreshes on the default +14-day cadence.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Bullish48+ risingS 7.78 / R 24.9Resistance breakout0.1x
WeeklyUptrend (fading) →Neutral45- fallingS 14.5 / R 23.3None0.7x
DailyWeakening ↓Bearish36- fallingS 17.9 / R 28.8Support breakdown0.7x
HourlyStrong downtrend ↓Bearish39- flatS 19.1 / R 21.9Support breakdown0.03x
15-minStrong downtrend ↓Bearish48flatS 19.1 / R 20.7None0.06x
Confluence: Bearish · MTF Score MTF trend ~49

Monthly and weekly structure remain constructive, but the daily and both intraday timeframes have turned bearish with a daily support breakdown — a short-term pullback (arguably capitulation from a parabola) inside a still-intact larger uptrend. The level that matters is the 200-DMA / swing support at ~$17.9-18.8: hold it and the higher-TF uptrend stays alive; lose it on volume and the bear path toward the $11 zone opens.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

Weekly closes, Jan-Jul 2026 (orange) vs ~50-day trend (grey). The May parabola to $46.75 and the ~58% June unwind to $19.58 are the whole story; price now tests 200-DMA/swing support ~$17.9-18.8. Levels: green = support/stop, red = overhead resistance / analyst median target.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Base $30 (50%)

Backlog converts on schedule, IM-3 lands (or partially succeeds and is spun constructively), losses narrow toward the guided 2027-28 FCF inflection, and the sector re-rates modestly off washed-out sentiment. ~12-month fair value ~$30 (~+53%), anchored on ~4x FY26 EV/Revenue — deliberately below the $37.5 median / $42 consensus to haircut execution and dilution risk.

Bull $46 (25%)

IM-3 lands fully upright (the first clean IM landing), NSN relay deployments ramp into recurring revenue, defense/SDA wins land, and the space complex re-rates — price returns toward the prior high (~$46, +135%). This is the option-value case: paying ~3.5x forward revenue for a franchise that proves it can execute.

Bear $11 (25%)

IM-3 fails or tips over a third time (a real possibility given IM-1/IM-2), the revenue ramp disappoints, another dilutive raise is needed, and Firefly / Voyager-Astrobotic / SpaceX Starship visibly take share — the forward multiple that looked cheap stops working as the denominator misses. Price retraces toward the $8-11 zone (~-44%), near the 52-week low. This leg carries the binary-mission risk and the elevated competitive threat explicitly.

Probability-weighted fair value ≈ 0.50×$30 + 0.25×$46 + 0.25×$11 = ~$29.3, ~+50% above the $19.58 price — a positively-skewed distribution, but with a fat 25% bear tail that is event-driven (one landing) rather than gradual. That asymmetry is why this reads HOLD short/medium (watch for entry) with a Long-horizon STRONG BUY — a Half-Size, accumulate-on-a-confirmed-bounce stance, not back-up-the-truck.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

Trades well below fair value with a live gov-space driver tailwind and no near-term earnings.
✅ Price $19.58 < fair-value estimate ~$30 (and ~53% below consensus $42)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (Q2 due ~6 Aug)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (68)

Technical — not MET

Daily has broken down; preferred entry is a reclaim of the 50-DMA OR a confirmed higher-low bounce off the 200-DMA / $17.9 support.
⛔ Daily close > 50-DMA (~$28.8) on > 1.5x volume
⛔ OR a tested bounce off $17.9-18.8 (200-DMA/swing) with a higher low
✅ RSI 35-65 (36) — in range but at the low end

Catalyst — not MET

No event inside the window; the next catalysts (Q2 earnings, IM-3) are weeks-to-months out.
· Post-earnings move > +5% within 24h with guidance raised/maintained
· Volume > 2x the 20-day average on the confirming print

Forecast: Fundamental group is already MET → a value-based starter (Half-Size) is available now. The Technical group is the one to watch: a confirmed higher-low bounce off the $17.9-18.8 support zone is the nearer path (days-to-weeks, catalyst/tape-dependent) — a clean 50-DMA reclaim (~$28.8, ~47% away) is unlikely inside 4-6 weeks without a positive catalyst. The Catalyst group is dated: Q2 earnings (~6 Aug) then IM-3 (H2). Adding a second group (Technical or Catalyst) would upgrade the size to Full-Size; today it is one path open.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two consecutive daily closes below ~$16.5 (below the 200-DMA and June swing low)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ IM-3 fails / tips over AND backlog conversion stalls (revenue guide cut)
⛔ The gov-space driver turns to a headwind (CLPS/Artemis budget cut or major task-order cancellation)
⛔ A materially dilutive raise at a depressed price OR a hard financial-distress gate trips

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into the $37.5 median target with RSI > 70 and no fresh quality upgrade to justify it

Forecast: Stop-Loss unlikely in the next 4-6 weeks absent a new negative catalyst — price is ~16% above the $16.5 stop and holding the 200-DMA — but the ~15%/day ATR means a single bad session can approach it, so the stop is live risk, not remote. The most probable exit trigger over the coming quarters is Thesis Invalidation via the IM-3 landing (H2 2026): a third tip-over would be treated as a confirmed thesis dent and exit, not hold-and-hope. Profit-Target ($37.5 + RSI>70) is a multi-month bull-case event.

Imagine you act at the current price of $19.58 · as of 3 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

Risking ~16% to a ~$16.5 stop to play a base case of ~$30 (+53%) and a bull case of ~$46 (+135%).

You are buying a beaten-down, government-anchored lunar-infrastructure franchise at ~3.5x forward revenue and ~53% below consensus — with an explicit 25% chance of a ~-44% drawdown if the IM-3 landing fails. A Half-Size (value-starter) entry that you can add to on a confirmed technical bounce or a clean Q2 print matches the positive-but-lumpy skew.

What if you sold now?

Selling / avoiding sidesteps the binary IM-3 landing and the dilution overhang.

You give up a positively-skewed setup (weighted fair value ~$29, +50%) with strong analyst support and the best sector-macro alignment in the batch — but you also avoid a name that has round-tripped a parabola, is still burning cash, and whose next big catalyst can go either way. Reasonable for a risk-averse book; the framework rates it HOLD short-term for exactly this reason.

13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "LUNR",
  "date": "2026-07-03",
  "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "donatien-pick",
  "exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:LUNR",
  "isin": "US46125A1007",
  "api_ticker": "LUNR",
  "finder_ticker": "LUNR",
  "finder_exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "user_context": {
    "horizon": null,
    "allocation_pct": null,
    "portfolio_role": null
  },
  "price_at_rating": 19.58,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "HOLD",
  "signal_long": "STRONG_BUY",
  "primary_signal": "HOLD",
  "quality_score": 57,
  "lifecycle_stage": "high-growth (early-revenue)",
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "ROIC vs WACC + Backlog Growth (Industrials)",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "neg ROIC / backlog +$842M (~tripled YoY)",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 55,
    "moat_score": 54,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 30,
    "capital_allocation": 52,
    "management_skin_in_game": 55
  },
  "valuation_score": 67,
  "valuation_detail": {
    "fcf_yield": "N/A (negative)",
    "ev_rev_ttm": 9.9,
    "ev_rev_fwd_2026": 3.5,
    "ev_rev_fwd_2028": 2.4,
    "price_vs_consensus_pct": -53,
    "historical_valuation_decile": "n/a (<2yr as space pure-play)"
  },
  "warranted_multiple": "na",
  "actual_multiple": 3.5,
  "val_multiple_basis": "EV/Revenue fwd FY26 (warranted-P/E anchor N/A \u2014 pre-profit)",
  "discount_rate_r": null,
  "risk_free_10y": 4.48,
  "g_near": null,
  "g_term": null,
  "warranted_ratio": "na",
  "val_band": "attractive",
  "timing_score": 45,
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": "bearish",
    "mtf_trend_score": 49,
    "risk_reward_score": 47,
    "relative_strength_vs_sector": "lagging (worst mover in post-IPO bounce)",
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 55,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.15,
    "atr_pct_of_price": 14.6,
    "range_position_52w_pct": 30
  },
  "driver_score": 68,
  "driver_name": "US gov space budget / NASA CLPS / Artemis cadence",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 72,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-03",
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "stable",
  "competitive_threat_level": "elevated",
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": "variable \u2014 warrant/earnout MTM swings distort GAAP net income (read operating)",
  "clean_pe": "N/A (pre-profit)",
  "clean_peg": "N/A (pre-profit)",
  "overall_confidence": 55,
  "fair_value_est": 30,
  "stop_loss": 16.5,
  "target_price": 30,
  "scenario_base_target": 30,
  "scenario_bull_target": 46,
  "scenario_bear_target": 11,
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "gates_caution": [
    "Financial/interest-coverage (pre-profit cash burn)",
    "Dilution (share count >2x in ~15mo)",
    "Binary mission (IM-3 H2-2026)"
  ],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-17",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (Q2 earnings 2026-08-06 and IM-3 H2-2026 both beyond the 14d window)",
  "next_check_date": "2026-07-17"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_company_profile / get_financial_ratios identity (ISIN US46125A1007), sector, mcap $3.12B, beta 1.69, ratios (P/S 9.34, EV $3.32B, current 1.22)
get_income_statement (6q) Q1-26 rev $186.7M record; TTM ~$334M; margins negative; warrant/earnout distortions on net income noted
get_multi_timeframe_analysis / get_stock_prices full daily series Jan-Jul 2026; confluence bearish; 200-DMA 18.78, 50-DMA 28.79
get_price_target_consensus / get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades targets 27/37.5/42/75; 9 Buy-1 Hold-1 Sell; recent grades all 'maintain'
get_analyst_estimates FY26 rev ~$943M → FY28 ~$1.39B; EPS crosses positive ~2027-28 (thin coverage, 1-6 analysts on out-years)
get_ratings_snapshot FMP C (2/5), pre-profit sub-scores
get_earnings_calendar returned empty; Q2 date (~6 Aug 2026) sourced via web
web (Wikipedia/NASA/Spaceflight Now/SEC/Motley Fool/Benzinga) IM-3 slated H2 2026 (Reiner Gamma); IM-1 & IM-2 both tipped over; backlog $1.1B (+$842M, Lanteris + 5th CLPS); NSN contract up to $4.82B/10yr; 6th CLPS $148.3M; ~$500M raise Jun-26; CTO 10b5-1 sale $3.3M
get_stock_snapshot intraday fields zero (after-hours); prev-day close $19.58 used
Impact on scores: Data coverage is good for a pre-profit micro/small-cap: FMP/Polygon give clean financials, technicals and analyst data, and web fills the mission/contract/cash facts the numbers can't. Main confidence haircut is structural — no clean valuation anchor (pre-profit), thin out-year estimate coverage, and a binary event (IM-3) that no dataset can price. Overall confidence 55%; treat as a speculative, execution-driven position.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.