NASDAQ:INTU Intuit Inc.

ISIN: US4612021034
Information TechnologySoftware — ApplicationAI-disruption watch
NASDAQ · Mountain View, CA · FY ends 31 Jul (seasonal — Q3 = US tax season) Analysis Status: Starting
$316.13
+0.2%
31 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
What changed since 16 Jul 2026 (prior ‘Starting’ report, $294.79): price +7.2% to $316.13 as the counter-trend recovery extended and the daily reclaimed its 50-DMA. Signals unchanged in substance — Short HOLD (technical still unconfirmed), Medium/Long a scale-in BUY. Scores steady (Quality 80, Valuation 76); Timing nudged 38→46 on the daily reclaim. Scenarios lifted modestly (Base $360→$400, Bull $470→$500) reflecting the higher price and continued QuickBooks/GBS strength; Bear held at $250 (retest of the low). Note: the folder already held a 16-Jul report, so this is a scheduled refresh, not a first-ever — status kept ‘Starting’ per the run brief.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Intuit Inc.

Intuit is the dominant financial-technology software company behind four franchises most North Americans already use: QuickBooks (the standard small-business accounting, payroll and payments platform), TurboTax (do-it-yourself and assisted consumer tax filing), Credit Karma (a free personal-finance and credit platform monetised through lending referrals) and Mailchimp (SMB marketing automation). Its core business is selling recurring, deeply-embedded software subscriptions to ~100 million consumers and small businesses, and it throws off ~$5.5–6bn of free cash flow a year at 81% gross margins. What sets it apart is scale and lock-in: QuickBooks is the default SMB accounting system in the US and TurboTax the default DIY tax product, giving Intuit two decades of proprietary financial data and an accountant-referral network rivals struggle to replicate. The open question — and the reason the shares have halved — is whether generative AI erodes that dominance in consumer tax and bookkeeping, or whether Intuit turns AI into its next growth engine.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD4655%counter-trend bounce; technical unconfirmed
Medium-term (6–12 mo)BUY6358%cheap + gaining share where it counts
Long-term (3–5 yr)BUY6860%high-quality compounder at a discount
Next update: 2026-08-14 — default +14d (Q4/FY26 earnings ~late Aug — est. from FY25's 3 Sep — falls beyond the window; restructuring charge + TurboTax outlook are the key catalysts then)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

80
high
conf 78%

Valuation Attractiveness

76
attractive
conf 72%

Entry/Exit Timing

46
neutral (weak)
conf 55%

Underlying Drivers

54
contested (AI)
conf 55%

Economic Alignment

55
Contrarian
conf 55%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
CLEAR — net-neutral leverage (debt $6.9bn ≈ cash $6.8bn), interest coverage 15.9×, current ratio 1.45. No distress.
Earnings Event Risk
CLEAR — Q4/FY26 earnings ~late Aug is beyond the 14-day window, so no binary-event cap on timing today (it becomes live at the next update).
Valuation Ceiling
CLEAR — the opposite of triggered: price is far below the high ($921) and mean ($456) analyst targets and the multiple sits in the BOTTOM decile of its 5-yr range.
⚠️
AI business-model disruption (sizing caution)
CAUTION (not a hard cap) — genuine, unresolved terminal-risk to consumer tax (IRS Direct File + free AI) and bookkeeping (AI agents). Informs the Half-Size conviction and the Bear case; it is a reason to scale in, not to avoid.
No hard gate is triggered. The only flag is a sizing CAUTION for AI business-model risk — it caps position size (Half), not the signal. Critically, the macro's ARMED AI-concentration tail does NOT fire here: that tail is about richly-valued AI momentum names de-rating, and INTU has already de-rated ~50% — it is not in the Expensive cohort.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
High-quality, cash-rich, dominant franchise
80
conf 78%

Intuit is a mature-growth software (application) compounder: ~$21.4bn of FY26 revenue growing 13–14%, GAAP operating margin ~27–30% (non-GAAP ~38%), 81% gross margin and ~$5.5–6bn of annual free cash flow. It sits in the Mature lifecycle bucket — profitable, self-funding, low-double-digit grower — so we value it on forward P/E, EV/EBITDA, FCF yield and the Rule of 40, not on revenue multiples. The business is a rare thing: a dominant, cash-gushing franchise that the market is currently pricing as if its moat is about to be dismantled by AI.

Sub-signalReadingScoreWhy
Revenue trajectory+13–14% FY26; QBO Accounting +22%, GBS +15%, TurboTax +7%80Global Business Solutions (QuickBooks + Mailchimp) is the growth engine and is accelerating; the consolidated rate is dragged only by the mature TurboTax/ProTax mix.
Profitability vs peers81% gross margin; ~38% non-GAAP op margin; net margin 22%85Top-decile software margins; margins are stable-to-expanding even through the restructuring.
Cash generationFCF ~$5.5–6bn; FCF/net income ~1.0×; capex trivial (~0.6/sh)86Capital-light; cash conversion near 100% of earnings. Harder to fake than the income statement.
Balance-sheet healthDebt $6.9bn vs cash $6.8bn (~net-neutral); interest coverage 15.9×; current ratio 1.4582Effectively no net leverage; distress is not a live risk. Dividend payout ~29% of earnings, comfortably covered.
SBC dilution (watch)Stock-based comp ~$2bn/yr, ~9–10% of revenue58Below the 20% software red-line but material — it is the main reason non-GAAP EPS ($23.82) sits well above GAAP (~$16.4). We anchor valuation on the clean GAAP number so this real cost is not assumed away.

Industry benchmark — Rule of 40

Revenue growth ~13% + FCF margin ~27% = ~40 (PASSES). On a non-GAAP operating-margin basis (38%) the score is ~51 — comfortably above the 40 line and near the “exceptional” 50 mark. Benchmark score: 72/100. A profitable low-double-digit grower throwing off ~28% FCF margins is exactly the kind of durable-compounder profile the Rule of 40 is built to reward; the debate is not about today's economics, it is about their durability (see Competitive Environment).

Competitive Moat (0–100)

Pricing power
72
Years of absorbed price increases across QuickBooks and TurboTax. Capped now by free/AI alternatives at the low end.
Network effects
55
Credit Karma data loop and the accountant-referral channel help, but this is not a strong two-sided network.
Switching costs
75
QuickBooks is deeply embedded in SMB workflows, payroll and the accountant relationship — genuinely sticky. Trimmed from a would-be 85 because Xero and AI-native bookkeepers are visibly attacking the edges (see below).
Cost advantage
70
Scale in tax/financial data plus preferential frontier-model access (Anthropic + OpenAI deals) is a real cost/quality edge in the AI build-out.
Intangible assets
82
TurboTax and QuickBooks are category-defining brands with dominant US share and two decades of proprietary financial data.

Moat average ~71 — a wide but not impregnable moat. The score is deliberately below the ~85 this franchise carried two years ago because the switching-cost and pricing-power walls are being tested for the first time by a credible new attack vector (generative AI), not because the current economics have weakened.

Competitive Environment

Who is attacking, and which way is share trending?

The moat scores above are derived from this read — a decaying wall cannot carry a static-high score. Share trajectory is mixed, threat level elevated: QuickBooks/GBS are still gaining, TurboTax is defending against a structural free/AI threat, and Mailchimp is losing ground.
ProductDirect rivalsShare trajectoryRead
QuickBooks (SMB accounting)Xero, Sage, FreshBooks, Wave (free), Zoho Books, BILL (AP/spend adjacency)Gaining (QBO Accounting +22% YoY)Still the US SMB standard and taking share overall — but Xero is pressing in the US and AI-native bookkeeping startups (and Xero's “Just Ask Xero” agent) target the same manual-entry work QuickBooks monetises.
TurboTax (consumer tax)H&R Block, FreeTaxUSA, Cash App Taxes (free), IRS Direct File (free, expanding), generative-AI tax assistantsDefending (rev +7%, but volumes contracting)The structural risk. Management flagged total IRS filings falling ~2m (steepest contraction since COVID) and cut the FY26 TurboTax outlook. Free government filing + AI that can explain deductions and prep answers erodes the “guided-software” premium at the low/mid end.
Credit Karma (personal finance)NerdWallet, Bankrate, Experian, Credit SesameCyclicalLead-gen economics tied to the lending cycle; recovers with credit-card/personal-loan origination, soft when lenders pull back.
Mailchimp (SMB marketing)Klaviyo, HubSpot, Constant Contact, BrevoLosingKlaviyo is winning e-commerce marketing; Mailchimp integration into the QuickBooks stack is the defence, but it is the weakest asset in the portfolio.

Net: the franchise is gaining share where it matters most economically (QuickBooks/GBS, ~70% of the growth) while facing a genuine, non-trivial disruption threat at the consumer-tax layer. That two-sided reality is exactly why the moat sits at ~71, not 85, and it feeds directly into the §11 Bear case and the §12 thesis-invalidation triggers.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

DimensionReadingScore
ROIC / ROEROE 22.5%, ROA 9.5%; capital-light, high returns on incremental capital80
Capital allocationConsistent buybacks + a growing dividend (~29% payout); the Credit Karma and Mailchimp deals are the debated M&A — Mailchimp has underwhelmed66
Skin in the game / SBCFounder-adjacent culture; SBC ~9–10% of revenue is the dilution watch item62

Business Quality = 80 (High). A genuinely high-quality, cash-rich, dominant franchise. The only reasons it is not an 85+ are the SBC drag and a moat that — for the first time — has a credible line of attack rather than an unassailable position. FMP's independent health rating is B+ (ROA score 5/5, ROE 4/5, DCF 4/5), corroborating the high-quality read.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Attractive/Fair edge (0.82 of warranted); cheap vs anchor, cash yield, history
76
conf 72%

The whole story is here. Intuit has fallen ~51% year-to-date and ~62% from its July-2025 peak of $813.70 — the worst performer in the S&P 500 for much of 2026 — on fears that AI commoditises tax prep and bookkeeping. That de-rating has turned a perennial 35–45× compounder into a name trading at a discount to the broad market. The task's “if it's Expensive” branch simply does not fire: on every lens INTU is now Attractive.

The anchor — Warranted-Multiple Valuation

InputValueSource
Risk-free (10-Y UST)4.50%Macro state 20-Jul-2026 (“10-Y near 4.5%+”)
Equity risk premium4.50%fixed constant
Risk add-on+0.0%Business Quality 80 (≥65)
Discount rate r9.0%sum
g_near (yrs 1–5)10.5%~14% consensus EPS growth × 0.75 haircut, under the 15% secular-tech cap
g_term (yr 6+)3.0%long-run nominal GDP cap
Warranted P/E~23.6×two-stage; IT guardrail 33× not binding

Actual clean (GAAP) trailing P/E = 19.3× (price $316.13 ÷ TTM GAAP EPS ~$16.4). Ratio = 19.3 ÷ 23.6 = 0.82 → Attractive/Fair edge (0.80–1.00 band). We deliberately anchor on the clean GAAP multiple, not company non-GAAP — the ~$2bn of SBC that separates the two is a real cost, so this is the conservative read. Stress it the other way and the case only strengthens: on forward non-GAAP the stock is at ~13.3× FY26 ($23.82 guide) and ~11.5× FY27 — ratios of ~0.56/0.49, deep in Attractive territory. Whichever basis you pick, INTU is cheap versus fundamentals, not just versus its own bubble-era history.

Earnings quality (7b) — no mega-cap gains trap here

Unlike the AI-stake holders, Intuit's earnings are clean: there are no mark-to-market markups on private-AI equity inflating net income. Q3 FY26 carried a small non-operating drag (−$97m ex-interest), so if anything GAAP net income is marginally understated, not flattered. The only GAAP↔non-GAAP gap is SBC and acquisition amortisation. nonop_pct_of_net_income ≈ −1%. This is why the 7b story for INTU is an SBC story, not an other-income story — and why we can trust the GAAP anchor.
LensReadingBand
Warranted-multiple anchor (40%)19.3× vs 23.6× warranted → 0.82Attractive/Fair edge
Sector median (20%)IT sector ~26–28× forward; INTU ~13× forward non-GAAPWell below — Attractive
Own 5-yr history decile (15%)Historically 35–45× fwd non-GAAP; now ~13× — bottom decile, near-unprecedentedAttractive (extreme)
PEG (10%)Trailing PEG 0.57; forward PEG ~1.4–1.5Fair-to-Attractive
Analyst consensus (15%)Price $316 vs mean target $456 (33 analysts), median $430Below — but targets falling fast

FCF yield — the universal anchor

FCF ~$5.5–6bn on an ~$86.5bn market cap → ~6.5–7% FCF yield (Attractive). Note a data-basis trap: FMP's per-share figure implies ~$7.7bn FCF (~8.9% yield), but Yahoo ($5.23bn), the FY25 actual (~$5.6bn) and press coverage (“~$6bn”) all point lower — we use the conservative ~$6bn. Even so, a business yielding ~7% of its price in genuine free cash, growing low-double-digits, is not expensive.

Embedded optionality / free upside

Framing: the core in-production franchise justifies most of the ~$316 price on its own; the AI-offence and mid-market options are close to free at today's multiple. This is a tilt (+a few points), and the reason to keep watching — not a reason the stock is cheap. It is already cheap on the core.

Analyst target caveat (important): the $456 mean is stale and decaying — last-quarter average $397, and the last-month average is just $337 (3 analysts), with TD Cowen cutting to Hold on 28 Jul. So the “44% upside to consensus” overstates the live signal; the fresh consensus is nearer $337 (~7% above spot). We weight the anchor and cash yield above the analyst target for exactly this reason.

Valuation = 76 (Attractive/Fair edge). Cheap on the anchor, the cash yield, the sector cross-read and its own history — but scored at the lower end of Attractive (not 85+) because the cheapness is earned: there is a real, unresolved reason (AI disruption of consumer tax) the market is demanding a discount. This is a margin-of-safety story, not a no-brainer.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
AI & Productivity Revolution (two-sided)
54
Contested — no amplification

Intuit's dominant external driver is the AI & Productivity Revolution (a Dominance-4/HIGH enduring driver in the 30-Jul macro) — and for INTU it is genuinely two-sided, which is why the driver score is deliberately mid-band rather than a “secular tailwind.”

HorizonDriver readSignal
Short (1–3 mo)AI narrative is a net overhang — every AI-tax or AI-bookkeeping headline pressures the stock; the offence case is unproven quarter-to-quarter.Neutral / mild headwind
Medium (6–12 mo)Balance tips on evidence: does Intuit Assist lift ARPU and retention, or does Direct File + free AI keep bleeding TurboTax? Restructuring re-tools the org around AI.Neutral (contested)
Long (3–5 yr)If Intuit becomes the AI-native financial “operating system” for SMBs and consumers, AI is a durable tailwind — but terminal disruption of the tax franchise is a real tail. Un-resolvable today.Contested tailwind

Amplification note: Driver score 54 — above the 50 threshold that keeps the Fundamental entry group open, but deliberately below 65, so it does not amplify the Long BUY to STRONG BUY. That is the correct call: you cannot back the truck up on a name whose single most important driver is a coin-flip between existential threat and secular tailwind. The driver is the reason to own it and the reason to size it at half.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Contrarian · Neutral → mild Headwind (medium)
55
conviction

Per the 30-Jul MacroDriver (regime: Stagflation-lite — energy re-armed, policy-tight, narrow/contested/tape-unconfirmed), Technology / XLK reads Neutral (short) / Underperform (medium) / Outperform (long). Net pressure is Neutral-to-mild-Headwind over the medium horizon (rate + concentration drag) turning to a secular AI/software tailwind long. Because the position leans into near-term sector weakness ahead of the long-horizon Outperform, we tag the stance Contrarian (buying a beaten-down quality name against a mild sector headwind), conviction 55.

Source: sector-map (XLK) · Macro report 2026-07-30

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Counter-trend bounce inside a secular downtrend; buy the confirmation
46
conf 55%

Timing is the weak pillar and the reason Short is a HOLD. The primary (monthly/weekly) trend is still down — price sits far below the daily SMA200 ($468) after a ~62% peak-to-trough collapse — while a tactical recovery is underway on the daily (reclaimed the 20/50-DMA, MACD turned positive). This is textbook “counter-trend bounce inside a secular downtrend”: constructive, but not yet a confirmed reversal.

ComponentReadingScore
MTF trend (30%)Monthly + weekly downtrend (RSI 33/39, oversold); daily recovering (RSI 59, above 20/50-DMA); hourly weakening~39
Risk-reward (20%)Price $316; support ~$302/$290 (~1.6 ATR); resistance $336 → $363 → $412. 52-wk range position ~12% (beaten down)~55
Macro overlay (10%)Tech = low macro sensitivity; XLK Neutral(S)/Underperform(M) is a mild headwind near-term~45
Sentiment (20%)TD Cowen downgrade (28 Jul); analyst targets cut hard ($563→$397→$337); but +18% 1-month recovery~35
Catalyst (20%)Q4/FY26 earnings ~late Aug (restructuring charge + TurboTax outlook) — near-term skew negative per Street~55

Relative strength: catastrophic on 3/6/12-month windows (down ~50% YTD, massively lagging SPY and XLK); improving only on the 1-month (+18% off the low). Position-risk: the stock is +25% off its $252.84 low — chasing here, below the 200-DMA and into an earnings catalyst with a negative near-term skew, is poor risk-reward for a Short entry. Timing = 46 (Neutral). The daily reclaim happened on only ~1.08× volume (below the 1.5× confirmation bar), so we treat the Technical entry group as not yet met — buy the confirmation (a >1.5×-volume daily close over ~$336, or a tested higher low off $290–$300), not the bounce.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
~2026-08-20 (est)INTU Q4/FY26 earningsHighNon-GAAP EPS $3.56–3.62; rev +11–12%Q4 FY25: $1.35 GAAP⚠ Beyond 14dThe dominant catalyst: FY27 guide, TurboTax/GBS trajectory, ~$300–340m restructuring charge lands in this quarter.
2026-07-31Core PCE (Jun)High⚠ MediumLow direct sensitivity (tech), but sets the rate/discount-rate backdrop for long-duration equities.
2026-08-01Tariff deadlineHigh· LowMacro-regime risk; little direct INTU exposure (domestic software).

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-07-28TD Cowen downgradeHold (from Buy)NegativeNear-term catalyst path seen skewing negative; capped the recovery.
2026-05-20Q3/FY26 print + 17% layoffBeat + raise, softer TurboTaxIn lineMixedBeat-and-raise but shares fell — the market focused on the TurboTax cut and AI narrative, not the headline beat.

Tech is a low-macro-sensitivity sector, so the swing factor is the idiosyncratic Q4/FY26 print (~late Aug), which sits just beyond the 14-day window — hence no earnings gate today, and the next scheduled update (14 Aug) precedes it. The Street's near-term skew is cautious (TD Cowen), so we prefer to enter on post-print confirmation rather than ahead of it.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyDowntrend ↓Bearish32.6−, deepS: $339 R: $675Support break1.7×
WeeklyDowntrend ↓Bearish38.6−, hist risingS: $253 R: $683Support break1.0×
DailyRecovering ↑Neutral-Bull58.9+, risingS: $302 R: $363Resist. breakout1.1×
HourlyWeakening →Neutral52.2~flatS: $307 R: $3180.4×
15-minRecovering ↑Neutral59.5+, smallS: $310 R: $317Resist. breakout0.1×
Confluence: Bearish (secular) with a live tactical recovery · MTF Score 39

Monthly and weekly remain in clear downtrends with oversold RSI (33/39) — the primary trend is still down and price is far below the 200-DMA ($468). The daily has turned constructive: price reclaimed the 20/50-DMA, MACD crossed positive, and a resistance breakout is flagged — but on only ~1.08× volume, below the 1.5× conviction bar. Read together: a genuine bounce off the $252.84 low that has not yet earned ‘trend reversal’ status. Key levels: support $302 / $290 (50-DMA); resistance $336 then $363. The Short stays HOLD until the daily confirms on volume or a higher low is tested.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

Six-month daily: the collapse to $252.84 (Jun) and the ~25% recovery to $316. The 50-DMA (orange) was reclaimed in July; $336 is the next resistance, $290/$252 the supports.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $500 (25%)

Intuit Assist / agentic ‘done-for-you’ features prove ARPU-accretive, TurboTax stabilises post-Direct-File-scare, and QuickBooks/GBS keeps compounding mid-teens. FY27 non-GAAP EPS ~$27+ re-rates from ~13× toward ~20–22× forward. ~+58% from spot. The market re-learns that AI is Intuit's offence, not just its threat.

Base $400 (55%)

AI fears stabilise without resolving; GBS/QuickBooks compound mid-teens, TurboTax holds roughly flat, and the multiple normalises modestly from ~13× to ~17× forward non-GAAP ($23.82 FY26 guide). ~$400 is ~+27% from spot — a re-rating toward ‘quality-compounder-with-an-asterisk,’ not back to the 35× bubble. Most-probable path.

Bear $250 (20%)

The disruption is real: IRS Direct File + free AI tax prep visibly erode TurboTax volumes and pricing, AI bookkeeping agents commoditise QuickBooks data-entry, and consolidated growth decelerates to high-single-digits. The multiple stays stuck near ~10× and the stock retests its $252.84 low. ~−21% from spot. This is the thesis-invalidation scenario — watch QBO Accounting growth and TurboTax volumes.

Probability-weighted fair value ≈ $395 (0.55×$400 + 0.25×$500 + 0.20×$250) — ~+25% above the $316.13 spot, with the Bear only ~21% below. That asymmetry (roughly 2.5:1 reward-to-risk into the weighted mean, with a Bear that merely retests a level already visited) is the core of the Medium/Long BUY. The Short stays HOLD purely on timing.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

Cheap on the anchor and cash yield, with a driver above the 50 threshold and no earnings in 7 days.
✅ Price $316 < fair value ~$395–400 (Attractive, 0.82 of warranted)
✅ FCF yield ~7%; clean GAAP P/E 19.3× vs 23.6× warranted
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (54)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (next ~late Aug)

Technical — not MET

Daily reclaimed the 50-DMA but on sub-1.5× volume, still below the 200-DMA in a bearish monthly/weekly confluence — not yet confirmed.
⛔ Daily close > ~$336 resistance on >1.5× volume
⛔ OR a tested higher low off $290–$300 support
✅ RSI 40–65 (daily 59)

Catalyst — not MET

The Q4/FY26 print is the catalyst but sits beyond the window with a cautious near-term Street skew.
· Post-earnings move >+5% with FY27 guide reassuring on TurboTax/AI
⛔ Evidence Intuit Assist is monetising (ARPU/retention up)

Forecast: Fundamental group is MET now — a valid Half-Size starter/scale-in for a 6–12mo+ horizon. The Technical group likely resolves around the ~late-Aug Q4/FY26 print: a >1.5×-volume daily close over ~$336 (or a confirmed higher low off $290–$300) opens a second path and would take conviction to Full-Size. Buy the confirmation for a Short entry; the Fundamental case is already open for Medium/Long.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below $250 (below the $252.84 swing low)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ QBO Accounting growth decelerates below ~10% YoY
⛔ OR TurboTax revenue AND volumes both decline as Direct File / free-AI take visible share
⛔ OR consolidated GBS growth falls below ~10%

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into the $400 base with RSI > 70

Forecast: No exit trigger is live; the stop ($250) sits ~21% below spot and would only arm on a full retest of the low. The first thing to break the thesis would be QuickBooks/GBS deceleration, not the tax noise — that is what to watch.

Imagine you act at the current price of $316.13 · as of 31 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

Risking ~21% (to the $250 stop) to gain ~27% (to the $400 base) — and the Bear only retests a level already seen. A Half-Size scale-in: cheap, dominant, but timing and AI-risk say don't go all-in.

What if you sold now?

Selling here locks in the ~50% drawdown and gives up a high-quality franchise at ~13× forward / ~7% FCF yield — a rich price to pay for avoiding an unresolved (not realised) disruption risk.
13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — no portfolio allocation or role was specified for this run. The Conviction Ladder reads Half-Size (one entry path open), which is the natural expression of ‘cheap and high-quality, but timing-unconfirmed with a live AI-disruption tail.’

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "INTU",
  "date": "2026-07-31",
  "version": "v6",
  "company": "Intuit Inc.",
  "currency": "USD",
  "brand": "",
  "exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:INTU",
  "isin": "US4612021034",
  "api_ticker": "INTU",
  "analysis_status": "starting",
  "finder_ticker": "INTU",
  "finder_exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "lifecycle_stage": "mature",
  "price_at_rating": 316.13,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "BUY",
  "signal_long": "BUY",
  "primary_signal": "BUY",
  "short_hold_reason": "technical_pending",
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "short_cap_reason": "Short base signal was BUY (cheap, High-Quality) but capped to HOLD: only the Fundamental entry group is met. Technical unmet (daily reclaimed 50-DMA on sub-1.5x volume, still below 200-DMA, monthly/weekly downtrend); Catalyst unmet (earnings beyond window, negative near-term skew). Buy on confirmation: >1.5x-volume daily close over ~$336, or a tested higher low off $290-300.",
  "quality_score": 80,
  "valuation_score": 76,
  "timing_score": 46,
  "driver_score": 54,
  "overall_confidence": 57,
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Contrarian",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 55,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Neutral-to-mild-Headwind (medium)",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-30",
  "warranted_multiple": 23.6,
  "actual_multiple": 19.3,
  "val_multiple_basis": "clean (GAAP) trailing P/E",
  "warranted_ratio": 0.82,
  "val_band": "attractive",
  "discount_rate_r": 0.09,
  "risk_free_10y": 0.045,
  "g_near": 0.105,
  "g_term": 0.03,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": -1,
  "clean_pe": 19.3,
  "clean_peg": 1.4,
  "fwd_pe_nongaap_fy26": 13.3,
  "fwd_pe_nongaap_fy27": 11.5,
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "mixed",
  "competitive_threat_level": "elevated",
  "rule_of_40": 40,
  "fcf_yield_pct": 7.0,
  "fair_value_est": 395,
  "stop_loss": 250,
  "target_price": 400,
  "scenario_base_target": 400,
  "scenario_bull_target": 500,
  "scenario_bear_target": 250,
  "scenario_base_prob": 55,
  "scenario_bull_prob": 25,
  "scenario_bear_prob": 20,
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "analyst_consensus_target": 456.47,
  "analyst_consensus_target_fresh_1m": 337.33,
  "analyst_target_high": 921.0,
  "analyst_target_low": 250.0,
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 67,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 33,
  "next_update_date": "2026-08-14",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (Q4/FY26 earnings ~late Aug beyond window; restructuring charge + TurboTax/FY27 guide the key catalysts then)"
}

Anchored on the clean GAAP trailing P/E for continuity with the 16-Jul report and to avoid non-GAAP flattery; the forward non-GAAP cross-check (~13×) only strengthens the Attractive read.

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_yahoo_quote / get_company_profile price $316.13, ISIN US4612021034, sector/industry, targets
get_income_statement (6 quarters) Q3 FY26 rev $8.56bn, GAAP dil EPS $11.09; clean earnings (no non-op gains)
get_financial_ratios / get_ratings_snapshot margins, ROE 22.5%, coverage; FMP health B+
get_multi_timeframe_analysis monthly/weekly downtrend, daily recovering
get_grades_consensus / get_price_target_summary Buy consensus 67% bullish; targets decaying $563→$337
get_analyst_estimates FY26 non-GAAP EPS ~$23.83, FY27 ~$27.38
get_earnings_calendar returned empty; earnings date ~late Aug estimated from FY25's 3-Sep print + web
Web (Q3 print, guidance, AI-disruption thesis, restructuring) Motley Fool, Forbes, company IR, CNBC, Zacks — FY26 guide $21.34–21.37bn / $23.80–23.85 non-GAAP EPS; 17% layoff
Impact on scores: High confidence on fundamentals and valuation (clean, well-covered). Main uncertainties: (1) exact Q4/FY26 earnings date (estimated ~late Aug); (2) FCF figure spans $5.2–7.7bn across sources — used the conservative ~$6bn; (3) the AI-disruption outcome is genuinely unknowable, which is a scenario/confidence issue, not a data gap. Overall confidence ~57% — the business is easy to score; its terminal moat is not.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.