NASDAQ:INTU Intuit Inc.

ISIN: US4612021034
Information TechnologyApplication SoftwareSMB / Consumer Fintech SaaS
NASDAQ · Mountain View, CA · SMB & consumer fintech software · Fiscal year ends 31 Jul Analysis Status: Starting
$294.79
+5.1%
16 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Intuit Inc.

Intuit is the dominant software company behind small-business and consumer finance in North America. Its two engines are QuickBooks (accounting, payroll, payments and lending for millions of small and mid-market businesses, bundled with Mailchimp marketing) and TurboTax (do-it-yourself and assisted tax filing); it also owns Credit Karma, a consumer credit and lending marketplace, and a professional-tax arm (Lacerte/ProSeries). What sets it apart is depth of entrenchment: QuickBooks sits at the centre of a small business's books, so switching away means re-plumbing an entire company's financial records — a very high switching cost that has let Intuit compound revenue and cash for years. The near-term wobble is on the consumer side — TurboTax lost price-sensitive DIY filers this tax season to price competition and the industry-wide shrinkage in low-end (sub-$50k) DIY filing (management said flatly "we lost on price" on the 20 May 2026 FY26 Q3 call), with AI-assisted filing tools an emerging worry — which is what has taken the stock down roughly 60% from its high. (Note: the free IRS Direct File program was killed for the 2026 filing season — it operated with zero users this year — so it was NOT the cause of the FY26 leak; its possible political revival is a future policy tail, not a current share-taker.) Think of it as a cash-machine SaaS franchise whose stickiest, largest business (QuickBooks) is intact while its most contested business (consumer tax) is being re-priced by the market.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD5655%Cheap but tape still in a downtrend — buy on confirmation
Medium-term (6–12 mo)BUY (accumulate)6655%High quality + attractive valuation offset weak timing
Long-term (3–5 yr)BUY (accumulate)7355%Durable QuickBooks franchise dominates at this horizon
Next update: 2026-07-30 — default +14d (no impactful event in window; FY26 Q4 earnings 2026-08-20 is beyond it)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

80
strong
conf 80%

Valuation Attractiveness

76
attractive
conf 68%

Entry/Exit Timing

38
weak
conf 55%

Underlying Drivers

58
neutral
conf 60%

Economic Alignment

60
Contrarian
conf 60%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Gate 1 · Financial Distress
No distress. Net debt is negligible (debt/equity 0.33, debt/market-cap 0.08), interest coverage ~16×, current ratio 1.45, and free cash flow is strongly positive (~$7.7B TTM). Nowhere near the leverage/liquidity triggers.
Gate 2 · Earnings Event Risk
FY26 Q4 earnings land 2026-08-20 — 35 days out, beyond the 14-day binary-event window. No earnings-timing cap applies to this report.
Gate 3 · Valuation Ceiling
Does NOT fire. Trailing clean (GAAP) P/E 17.9× sits at 0.76× the warranted 23.6× (Attractive band), well below the 1.40× ceiling and far below the IT guardrail line of 33×. Price is ~33% below the median analyst target. This is the opposite of the rich-multiple trap the gate exists to catch.
Gate 4 · Accounting / Dilution
Stock-based comp runs ~11-12% of revenue (below the 25% tech flag) and the diluted share count is flat-to-falling (284M → 276M over two years — net buybacks). GAAP-vs-non-GAAP gap is large but fully explained by SBC + acquired-intangible amortisation (Credit Karma/Mailchimp), not an aggressive add-back. Earnings-quality is clean (see §4).
⚠️
Gate 5 · Regulatory / Binary Event
Not a hard trigger, but flagged: securities-fraud lawsuits tied to TurboTax pricing disclosures are pending. IRS Direct File / free-file is NOT a live binary ruling — the program was killed for the 2026 filing season (shuttered 5 Nov 2025, zero users this year) and Free File was dropped, so it is a resolved-for-now overhang whose only remaining risk is a possible future political revival (a policy tail). Neither the lawsuits nor a Direct File revival is a single dated binary event that would move the stock >20% on a known date, so no cap — but the pricing lawsuits and the low-end pricing/DIY/AI pressure feed the Bear case (§11) and the thesis-invalidation floor (§12).
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
High-quality cash compounder; moat sticky on QuickBooks, contested on consumer tax
80
conf 80%

Lifecycle: Mature / cash-cow software compounder. Intuit grows revenue ~11-13% a year (Q3 FY26 revenue +10.4% YoY) at very high margins, so the relevant lens is the SaaS Rule of 40, cash generation, ROIC and net-revenue durability — not hyper-growth unit economics. Note the extreme seasonality: fiscal Q3 (the Feb-Apr tax season) is the profit engine — $8.56B of revenue and $4.02B of operating income in that one quarter versus ~$3.9-4.7B revenue in the others — so any single quarter must be read against the same quarter a year prior, never sequentially.

Sub-signalReadingScore
Revenue trajectoryTTM revenue ~$20.9B, +~12% YoY; Q3 FY26 +10.4%. Durable double-digit growth, though the tax-season print disappointed on TurboTax mix.["72","metric-good"]
Profitability vs peersGross margin 81%, operating margin 27.5% (TTM). Elite for application software.["85","metric-good"]
Cash generationFCF ~$7.7B TTM, FCF margin ~37%, FCF/operating-cash-flow 0.98. Cash earnings comfortably exceed GAAP net income.["90","metric-good"]
Balance-sheet healthDebt/equity 0.33, interest coverage ~16×, current ratio 1.45, cash/share ~$24.6. Fortress.["85","metric-good"]
Capital allocationNet buybacks (share count 284M→276M), growing dividend ($4.80/yr, payout ~29%), disciplined bolt-ons. FMP health rating A- (4/5).["78","metric-good"]

Industry Benchmark — Rule of 40

Revenue growth ~12% + operating margin ~27.5% = ~40 (on the more conservative operating-margin basis; ~49 using the seasonally-flattered FCF margin). PASSES the ≥40 bar — growth and profitability in healthy balance, top-half of the software peer set. Benchmark score: 74/100.

Moat (sub-scores derived from the Competitive Environment read below, not asserted):

Pricing Power

60
TurboTax just PROVED its consumer pricing power is limited — lost price-sensitive DIY filers. QuickBooks pricing still holds.

Network Effects

45
Modest — Credit Karma data/marketplace and the accountant channel, but no strong two-sided loop.

Switching Costs

78
Very high on QuickBooks (an SMB's whole ledger); trimmed from ~90 because price competition and AI-assisted filing lower the switching cost of consumer tax (with free-file/Direct File a dormant policy tail).

Cost Advantage

62
Scale in data + distribution; replicable at the edges by well-funded rivals.

Intangibles

75
QuickBooks and TurboTax are category-defining brands; brand premium on the SMB side is intact.

Moat average ≈ 64 — a genuine wide moat around QuickBooks/GBS, a narrowing one around consumer tax.

Competitive Environment

The moat is static; competition is dynamic. Intuit's decline is a competitive story, not a balance-sheet one — so the named rivals below directly set the Switching-Cost, Cost-Advantage and Pricing-Power sub-scores, and they carry into the Bear case (§11) and thesis-invalidation (§12).
Rival / threatVs which productShare trajectoryMoat-erosion vector
Price competition + low-end DIY contractionTurboTax (Consumer)["Intuit losing","metric-bad"]The demonstrated FY26 leak — management said "we lost on price" (20 May 2026 FY26 Q3 call); the sub-$50k DIY filer pool is shrinking industry-wide, and cheaper/free rivals capture price-sensitive filers. This is where the live share pressure is.
H&R BlockTurboTax["stable / competitive","metric-neutral"]Price competition on assisted + DIY tax; caps TurboTax pricing power. (H&R Block also opted out of Free File for FS2026, alongside Intuit.)
IRS Direct File / free-file (policy tail)TurboTax (Consumer)["dormant — killed for FS2026","metric-neutral"]Direct File was shuttered 5 Nov 2025 and ran with zero users this season (vs ~296k prior); Free File was also dropped. NOT a current share-taker — the live threat is a possible future political revival, a policy tail only.
AI-assisted filing (ChatGPT-style, fintech apps)TurboTax["emerging threat","metric-bad"]LLMs commoditise the guided-interview value TurboTax charged for; the disruptive-entrant risk.
Xero & SageQuickBooks (GBS)["Intuit stable / leading","metric-neutral"]Credible SMB-accounting rivals, but QuickBooks' installed-base lock-in holds; erosion is slow, not acute.
HubSpot / Constant ContactMailchimp["Intuit losing modestly","metric-bad"]Mailchimp growth cited by analysts as a soft spot — SMB marketing is contested.

Net effect on the moat: Switching Costs trimmed to 78 (from a ~90 QuickBooks-only read) and Pricing Power held at 60 to reflect the proven consumer-tax leak. Competitive threat level: elevated — concentrated on the Consumer/TurboTax and Mailchimp segments; QuickBooks/GBS (the larger, stickier, cash engine) is stable. That split is the whole investment case: the market is re-pricing the whole company for a threat that primarily hits part of it.

ROIC & capital allocation: High and durable ROIC (FMP ROE score 4/5, ROA 5/5, DCF 5/5), consistent buybacks below the recent peak, a covered and rising dividend. Management (CEO Sasan Goodarzi) has leaned the company hard into an AI platform (Intuit Assist / GenOS) and cut headcount in May 2026 to fund it — execution on that pivot is the swing factor for the medium-term thesis.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Attractive on the warranted-multiple anchor — priced for ~4% growth against a disciplined ~10% estimate
76
conf 68%

Read the two P/E bases carefully — they are not the same number. Intuit reports on both GAAP and non-GAAP, and consensus estimates are quoted non-GAAP (ex-SBC, ex-acquired-intangible amortisation from Credit Karma/Mailchimp). The gap is large: FY26 Q4 guidance is GAAP EPS $0.73-0.79 versus non-GAAP $3.56-3.62. So mixing bases would flatter the multiple. This report anchors on the conservative GAAP number.

Step 7b — Earnings-quality decomposition (mandatory)

Intuit's earnings are clean. Below operating income the non-operating lines are a small net drag, not an inflator: non-operating income (ex-interest) was negative each of the last four quarters (−$97M, −$188M, −$85M, −$86M), and "other income" is a trivial +$27M. Operating income ($5.75B TTM) actually exceeds net income ($4.58B). So nonop % of net income ≈ −1% (negligible), clean P/E ≈ reported GAAP P/E ≈ 17.9×, clean PEG ≈ 1.3. There is NO mark-to-market/AI-stake distortion here — which is exactly why the AI-concentration systemic tail does NOT apply to this name (see §11).

THE ANCHOR — Warranted-Multiple Valuation

Discount rate r4.5% (10-Y UST, macro 2026-07-14) + 4.5% ERP + 0 (Quality ≥ 65) = 9.0%
g_near (yrs 1-5)min(0.75 × ~14% consensus, 15% IT cap) = 10.5% — the 25% haircut binds below the secular cap
g_term3.0%
Warranted P/E (two-stage)23.6× (below the 33× IT guardrail, so no cap binds)
Actual clean (GAAP) P/E17.9×
Actual ÷ warranted0.76 → ATTRACTIVE band (≤0.80)

Implied-growth read: at 17.9× the market is pricing INTU as if it grows ~4% in perpetuity (from the same DCF machinery). Our disciplined estimate is ~10.5%. The price embeds materially LESS growth than the fundamentals support — the classic contrarian setup. The catch, stated plainly: the entire Attractive call rests on Intuit beating ~4% growth. The Bear case (§11) is precisely that price competition + the low-end DIY contraction + AI-assisted filing (the proven TurboTax pricing leak) drag growth toward that floor — with a future IRS Direct File revival a secondary policy tail, not a current driver.

Relative cross-checks (they order within the band, never override it): analyst consensus is Buy (32 Buy / 9 Hold / 4 Sell), median price target $411 (~40% above spot), consensus $442. But note the disagreement: targets have fallen hard and fast (all-time avg $618 → last-quarter $400 → last-month just 2 analysts at $262.50), and the high/low spread is wide ($720 / $250, >2×) — hence the confidence haircut. FMP's own P/E and P/B sub-scores are 2/5, reflecting that INTU is only "cheap" relative to its own history, not to the market — the warranted anchor is what confirms it is genuinely, not just relatively, attractive.

Embedded optionality / free upside

At $294 you are paying almost nothing for: (a) Intuit Assist / GenOS AI monetisation — if the AI layer lifts attach rates or ARPU across QuickBooks, that is upside the ~4% implied-growth price ignores entirely; (b) Credit Karma / GBS money-movement (payments, lending, checking) scaling on the small-business base; (c) buyback accretion at a depressed multiple. None is in the base case — they are the reason to keep accumulating, not the reason it is cheap.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
SMB & consumer software/fintech spend + AI monetisation
58
Neutral

Primary driver: small-business and consumer software/fintech spend — the health of SMB formation and spending (QuickBooks/GBS), consumer financial activity (Credit Karma), and the annual tax-filing cycle (TurboTax), with AI monetisation (Intuit Assist) as the emerging swing factor. Secondary: SMB employment / small-business health. This is a secular software-demand driver, not a commodity price, so no price-trend (Step 2b) overlay applies.

HorizonReadLabel
Historical (12-24mo)Steady SMB software adoption and double-digit QuickBooks growth; a tailwind until the FY26 tax-season stumble.["Tailwind","metric-good"]
CurrentMixed. QuickBooks/GBS demand resilient; consumer tax demand DISAPPOINTED (TurboTax lost price-sensitive filers); Mailchimp/Credit Karma growth soft. Net: neutral.["Neutral","metric-neutral"]
Forward (6-12mo)SMB spend expected stable; the AI-monetisation payoff (Intuit Assist) is real optionality but unproven, and price competition / low-end DIY contraction / AI-assisted filing is a headwind to the consumer leg (free-file/Direct File a dormant policy tail after its FS2026 shutdown).["Neutral","metric-neutral"]

Driver score 58 → Neutral (36-64 band): NOT eligible for amplification. The base BUY/HOLD/SELL from the Decision Matrix stands unchanged — there is no STRONG BUY here, because the driver is not a clear tailwind. The tax-prep leg of the driver has just weakened, which is the honest reason to withhold amplification even though the equity is cheap.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Contrarian · Neutral
60
conviction

GICS Information Technology → XLK carries Short N / Medium O / Long O in the 2026-07-14 macro report — a neutral near term and a medium/long tailwind for the sector. But INTU itself is in a monthly/weekly/daily downtrend, so a BUY here is buying AGAINST the stock's own tape while the sector's structural signal is supportive — a Contrarian stance (conviction 60). Because the SHORT sector pressure is Neutral, there is NO short-horizon amplification; the medium/long sector Outperform would only amplify a base BUY into STRONG BUY if the Underlying Driver were also a Tailwind (≥65), which it is not (58, Neutral). So Economic Alignment is displayed but does not lift any signal this run.

Source: sector-map · Macro report 2026-07-14

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Weak — higher timeframes in a downtrend; oversold and attempting to base, but not confirmed
38
conf 55%

The multi-timeframe picture is bearish confluence: the secular (monthly), intermediate (weekly) and tactical (daily) trends are all down after a ~60% decline from the 52-week high. The only green is intraday (hourly/15-min strong uptrend) on today's +5.1% bounce — a basing attempt, not a trend change. Monthly RSI 31 and daily MACD histogram turning up flag oversold mean-reversion potential, which is why timing is 38 (weak) rather than sub-30.

TimeframeTrendDirRSIMACDKey S/RBreakout
MonthlyDowntrendBearish31.3−, below signalS: 339 / R: 474Support breakdown
WeeklyDowntrendBearish33.5−, hist turning upS: 253 / R: 349Support breakdown
DailyStrong downtrendBearish46.9−, hist +5.1 (up)S: 253 / R: 363-404Basing at lows
HourlyStrong uptrendBullish66.0+, risingS: 277 / R: 298Resistance breakout
15-minStrong uptrendBullish55.7flatS: 283 / R: 298Resistance breakout

Relative strength: deeply negative — INTU has massively underperformed both the S&P 500 and XLK over 1m/3m/12m, and sits at ~15% of its 52-week range (near the lows). That is either value or a falling knife; the fundamentals (§4) say the former, but the tape has not confirmed it. Sentiment is net-negative on grades (Goldman → Sell 2 Jun, Stifel → Hold 18 Jun, target $375→$275; a Freedom Broker downgrade), partly offset by a Zacks upgrade to Buy (15 Jul) and value commentary (Trefis, Seeking Alpha "deep value"). Catalysts: next earnings 2026-08-20 (outside the window); no clustered near-term events — clustering score ~65 (calm).

Dynamic macro weight: Low (0.10) — defensive software; the Fed/rates barely move this stock relative to its own execution and the TurboTax/AI narrative.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.
9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

INTU has fallen ~60% from its high to near the 52-week low ($252.84), then bounced +5% on 16 Jul. Price is below a falling 50-day SMA — the timing pillar is weak until the tape turns.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $470 (22%)

The TurboTax leak proves a one-off pricing miscalibration that is fixed next season; QuickBooks/GBS keeps compounding double digits; Intuit Assist monetises and re-accelerates growth. The multiple re-rates back toward the mid-point of the analyst range (median target $411, consensus $442) and beyond. This is the 'the whole company was punished for a Consumer-segment problem' snap-back.

Base $360 (50%)

Growth scare fades but does not reverse: QuickBooks/GBS resilient, consumer tax stabilises at a lower pricing tier, Mailchimp/Credit Karma stay soft. FY27 non-GAAP EPS ~$27 supports a modest re-rate from a distressed ~12× forward toward the mid-teens — roughly $360, ~22% above spot over 12 months. Cash generation and buybacks do the heavy lifting while the AI story is proven or disproven.

Bear $215 (28%)

COMPETITIVE bear (the propagated §3/§7c trigger): price competition, the industry-wide low-end (sub-$50k) DIY-filer contraction, and AI-assisted filing keep eroding the Consumer/TurboTax segment, H&R Block pressures pricing, and Mailchimp keeps losing to HubSpot/Constant Contact — so consumer/marketing growth stalls and group growth compresses toward the ~4% the price already implies. A future revival of IRS Direct File (killed for FS2026, zero users this year) is a secondary policy tail on top, not the primary driver. The securities-fraud overhang lingers. The multiple stays ~13× GAAP-ish and the stock revisits the $215-253 zone. This is a LIVE risk, not a tail — the tape is already in a downtrend and the pricing-power failure has been demonstrated ("we lost on price"), not hypothesised. (Note: NO AI-concentration/index-unwind leg is added — INTU's earnings are clean operating cash, not non-operating-inflated, and it is not a top-weight AI index mega-cap, so it is NOT in that cohort; the macro tail is armed but does not apply here.)

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

Trades well below fair value on the warranted anchor; no earnings in the 7-day window; driver ≥ 50.
✅ Price $294.79 < warranted fair value (~$360-390 on the anchor, well above spot)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (next 2026-08-20)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (58)

Technical — not MET

Higher timeframes still in a downtrend; the reachable early entry is a daily reclaim of the 50-DMA OR a tested bounce off the $253 low with a higher low.
⛔ Daily close > 50-day SMA (~$314) on >1.5× the 20-day average volume
⛔ OR a tested bounce off $253 (52-wk low) support with a confirmed higher low
✅ RSI 35-65 (daily 46.9 — in range)
✅ MACD histogram positive ≥2 consecutive days OR turning up off support (daily hist turning up)

Catalyst — not MET

No event inside the window; the next confirmation point is the 20 Aug print.
· Post-earnings move within 24h > +5% with guidance raised/maintained on >2× volume

Forecast: Fundamental group is MET now → the ladder reads Half-Size (1 of 3): a starter/scale-in is supported today on cheapness alone. Technical group is the near-term swing factor: a daily reclaim of the ~$314 50-DMA is ~7% above spot and, at the current basing pace, plausibly 2-4 weeks out IF the bounce holds — confidence Low-Moderate (higher timeframes are still down, so a failed bounce resets the clock). The cleaner high-conviction add is the 20 Aug earnings print confirming QuickBooks/GBS resilience and a TurboTax stabilisation — Catalyst-dependent, not time-projectable.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below $250 (beneath the 52-week low / weekly support)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ COMPETITIVE: QuickBooks/GBS growth decelerates below the software-sector median (the sticky core cracks) OR a named rival (Xero/Sage on QuickBooks) takes visible share
⛔ Low-end DIY share loss to price / free / AI-filing alternatives accelerates (with a future IRS Direct File revival a tail on top) AND management guides Consumer down materially
⛔ Full-year guidance cut, or a hard gate (distress/dilution) trips

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into ~$411 (median analyst target) with RSI > 70 and no quality re-rating to justify it

Forecast: Stop-Loss ($250) is ~15% below spot and unlikely absent a fresh negative catalyst in the next 4-6 weeks, though proximity to the 52-week low means a failed bounce could reach it fast. Thesis-invalidation is the one to watch: the 20 Aug print is the read on whether the QuickBooks/GBS core is intact — that is the pillar the whole BUY rests on.

Imagine you act at the current price of $294.79 · as of 16 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

Buying a starter here: risking ~15% to the $250 stop to gain ~22% to the $360 base (and ~60% to the $470 bull) — a favourable skew, but on weak timing, so scale in rather than go full-size.

What if you sold now?

Standing aside: you avoid the downtrend and the 20 Aug binary, but give up a franchise trading at ~18× GAAP / ~12× forward with a 9% FCF yield — rare for a business of this quality.
13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "INTU",
  "exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:INTU",
  "isin": "US4612021034",
  "company": "Intuit Inc.",
  "currency": "USD",
  "api_ticker": "INTU",
  "date": "2026-07-16",
  "version": "v6",
  "lifecycle_stage": "mature",
  "price_at_rating": 294.79,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "BUY_ACCUMULATE",
  "signal_long": "BUY_ACCUMULATE",
  "primary_signal": "BUY_ACCUMULATE",
  "quality_score": 80,
  "valuation_score": 76,
  "timing_score": 38,
  "driver_score": 58,
  "overall_confidence": 55,
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Contrarian",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 60,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-14",
  "warranted_multiple": 23.6,
  "actual_multiple": 17.9,
  "warranted_ratio": 0.76,
  "val_band": "attractive",
  "val_multiple_basis": "clean (GAAP) trailing P/E",
  "discount_rate_r": 0.09,
  "risk_free_10y": 0.045,
  "g_near": 0.105,
  "g_term": 0.03,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": -1,
  "clean_pe": 17.9,
  "clean_peg": 1.3,
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "losing",
  "competitive_threat_level": "elevated",
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "short_cap_reason": "Short base signal was BUY (accumulate) but both Technical and Catalyst entry groups are UNMET \u2014 fires on the Fundamental group alone (cheap, but monthly/weekly/daily downtrend, no 50-DMA reclaim, no bounce confirmation, no catalyst in window). Capped to HOLD: buy on confirmation (daily reclaim of ~$314 or a confirmed higher low off $253).",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "fair_value_est": 360,
  "stop_loss": 250,
  "target_price": 360,
  "scenario_base_target": 360,
  "scenario_bull_target": 470,
  "scenario_bear_target": 215,
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-30",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (no impactful event in window; FY26 Q4 earnings 2026-08-20 beyond it)",
  "analysis_status": "starting",
  "finder_ticker": "INTU",
  "finder_exchange": "\ud83c\uddfa\ud83c\uddf8 NASDAQ"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_company_profile / get_stock_snapshot Price $294.79, market cap $80.6B, ISIN US4612021034, sector/industry, 52-wk range 252.84-813.70 (the $813 high is treated with mild caution — possibly split/adjustment-quirked — but the ~60% decline is independently corroborated by the falling target series and dated downgrades).
get_income_statement (8q) TTM revenue $20.9B, operating income $5.75B, net income $4.58B, GAAP dil EPS ~$16.50. Confirms clean earnings (non-op is a drag).
get_financial_ratios Gross 81%, op margin 27.5%, FCF/sales 37%, interest coverage 16×, D/E 0.33, dividend $4.80. FMP health A- (4/5).
get_multi_timeframe_analysis Bearish confluence; monthly/weekly/daily downtrend, intraday bounce. Drove the timing pillar.
get_analyst_estimates FY26 non-GAAP EPS $23.83, FY27 $27.40 — identified as non-GAAP; used only as forward colour, anchor uses GAAP.
get_price_target_consensus / _summary Median $411, consensus $442, high $720 / low $250 (wide spread → confidence haircut); last-month only 2 analysts at $262.50 (recency haircut).
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades Buy consensus (32B/9H/4S); recent actions net-negative (Goldman Sell, Stifel Hold).
get_ratings_snapshot A- overall; DCF 5, ROA 5, ROE 4; P/E and P/B sub-scores 2 (rich vs own history).
get_earnings_calendar + web FY26 Q4 earnings 2026-08-20; guidance GAAP EPS $0.73-0.79 vs non-GAAP $3.56-3.62 — confirms the GAAP/non-GAAP gap.
get_stock_news / WebSearch Cause of decline: weak tax-season, TurboTax pricing leak, workforce cuts, securities-fraud suits, Mailchimp/Credit Karma growth concerns. Fed the §3/§7c competitive read and the Bear case.
MacroDriver-state-20260714.json XLK Short N / Med O / Long O; 10-Y 4.5% (anchor r); AI-concentration tail armed (assessed NOT applicable to INTU).
Impact on scores: All core data OK; no web-fallback haircut needed. The only figure carried with caution is the 52-week HIGH ($813) from FMP, which does not affect any score (the decline magnitude is corroborated independently).
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.