NASDAQ:INTC Intel Corporation

ISIN: US4581401001
TechnologySemiconductorsTurnaround
NASDAQ · HQ: Santa Clara, CA · CEO: Lip-Bu Tan · Mkt Cap ~$645B · Beta 2.2 Analysis Status: Starting
$128.32
−4.0% on the day · −9% from the $141.45 52-wk high
26 Jun 2026 · Signal v6
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)SELL3960%Expensive + parabolic (monthly RSI 87)
Medium-term (6–12 mo)SELL3555%Expensive valuation × can't-reach-High quality → SELL
Long-term (3–5 yr)SELL3555%Turnaround optionality already priced at 12x sales
Next update: 2026-07-10 — default +14d (Q2'26 earnings 23 Jul beyond window)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

40
weak franchise, sound liquidity
conf 55%

Valuation Attractiveness

18
extreme — P/S 12x, +40% over consensus
conf 65%

Entry/Exit Timing

48
strong trend, poor entry (RSI 87)
conf 60%

Underlying Drivers

52
Neutral — no amplification
conf 55%

Economic Alignment

50
Neutral (Pressure: Neutral)
conf 50%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Valuation Ceiling
P/S 12x & P/B 5.9x at/above the top of Intel's multi-year range; price ~40% above the $91.8 consensus target. Caps at HOLD (already SELL).
Dilution / Earnings-Quality
Share count +~19% over ~7 quarters (strategic capital), and Q3'25's lone profit was ~96% non-operating. Caps at HOLD.
⚠️
Financial Distress
Interest coverage −4.8x trips the <1.5x screen, BUT $32.8B cash, current ratio 2.31, modest debt, no going-concern — an operating-loss artifact, not solvency distress. Caution, not fired.
Earnings Event
Q2 earnings 23 Jul (~4 weeks out, >14 days). No blackout now.
Regulatory / Binary
No pending binary regulatory event.
Do-Not-Buy Triggers
None fired. Trigger 2 (valuation extreme) narrowly fails — forward growth (+10% FY26) modestly exceeds flat trailing; SELL + gates carry the message.
One principle ties the gates together: Intel is not in financial/solvency distress — $32.8B cash, current ratio 2.31, modest debt, no going-concern; the negative interest coverage is a turnaround operating-loss artifact and the share growth is strategic capital (US government / NVIDIA / SoftBank), not distress dilution. So the distress-cluster screens are caution, not fired, while the valuation-ceiling and share-count gates are triggered facts. None of this changes the headline SELL (gates only cap toward HOLD; the signal is already below).
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
Weak franchise (negative margins, losing share, GM 35%, C− health), floored above 'distressed' by genuine liquidity and strategic backing.
40
conf 55%

Intel is a Stage-6 Turnaround in the Semiconductors sector — revenue flat at ~$53.8B TTM, deeply lossmaking (operating margin −9.4% TTM), with the entire bull case resting on the Intel Foundry pivot rather than on current economics. We therefore score it on turnaround/semiconductor metrics: liquidity & balance-sheet survival, gross-margin trajectory, the foundry milestone ladder, and an eroding competitive moat — not on a normalised P/E it does not yet earn. Lifecycle drives everything: traditional profitability metrics are negative, so Quality is anchored on whether the franchise is stabilising (it is, on liquidity; it is not, on share and margin).

Quality Sub-Signals (vs semiconductor norms)

Sub-SignalValueBenchmarkStatusRationale
Gross margin (TTM / Q1'26)35.4% / 39.4%Healthy >50%, strong >60%RED FLAGCollapsed from Intel's historic ~55–60%; TSMC 47%, NVDA ~70%.
Operating margin (TTM)−9.4%>20% healthyRED FLAGNegative — foundry build-out + share loss; EBIT margin −1.4%.
Revenue trajectory (YoY)~flat ($53.8B)Sector cyclical-upWEAKNo participation in the AI-accelerator upcycle lifting peers.
FCF / FCF margin−$0.61/sh (neg.)>0RED FLAGNegative FCF; capex coverage 0.76x — investing ahead of cash.
Liquidity (current ratio / cash)2.31x / $32.8B>1.0 survivingOKThe bright spot — no solvency stress; cash/sh $6.45.
Leverage (D/E, debt/mktcap)0.40x / 0.07x<3x D/EBITDAOKModest debt; the risk is the P&L, not the balance sheet.
FMP financial-health ratingC− (1/5)A/B healthyPOORDCF 1, ROE 1, ROA 1, P/E 1 — independent confirmation of weak quality.

Industry Benchmark — Gross Margin & Capacity (Semiconductors)

Gross margin 35–39% sits below the <40% red-flag line for the sector (healthy >50%). Intel is simultaneously the highest-cost leading-edge manufacturer (node behind TSMC) and losing volume — the worst combination for a fab-heavy model where utilisation drives margin. Benchmark score: 28/100. Context: TSMC runs 47% net margin and 70% foundry share; Intel Foundry posted a ~$2.4B operating loss.

Competitive Moat Scorecard

Pricing Power

35
Ceding price to AMD & ARM

Network Effects

50
x86 ecosystem, slowly eroding

Switching Costs

48
x86 lock-in decaying vs ARM/Apple

Cost Advantage

30
Cost disadvantage vs TSMC

Intangibles

60
Brand/IP + US-strategic status

Moat average ≈ 45/100. The two competition-facing dimensions (Switching Costs, Cost Advantage) are derived from the Competitive Environment read below — both are pressured.

Competitive Environment

Intel is losing share across all three legacy franchises while its bull case (foundry) is still pre-revenue. The moat sub-scores above are derived from this read, not asserted: Switching Costs trimmed to 48 and Cost Advantage to 30 reflect a franchise under credible, simultaneous attack. Net competitive threat level: HIGH on the legacy business; the offset is government-backed foundry optionality, not a defended position.
CompetitorThreat typeShare trajectoryMoat-erosion vector
AMDDirect CPU rivalLosingAMD +38% rev, +95% net income, +57% data-centre, gaining server & client share — the clearest erosion of Intel's core.
NVIDIAAI-accelerator substitutionLosing (absent)Intel essentially non-participant in AI GPUs (Gaudi marginal). NVDA's $5B stake makes it a partner in x86/foundry, not a help in AI.
TSMCFoundry incumbentBehind70%+ foundry share, 90% of latest ASICs, 47% margin, raising prices. Intel Foundry is years behind on node and unprofitable.
ARM / Apple / QualcommPC architecture shiftLosingApple Silicon + ARM PCs erode the client x86 base and the switching-cost moat over time.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

ROIC is negative (NOPAT < 0; FMP ROE/ROA sub-scores both 1/5). Capital allocation is mid-turnaround: heavy capex into 18A/foundry, dividend suspended, and ~19% share-count growth (4.27B → 5.08B over ~7 quarters) — but that dilution is strategic capital (US government ~10% stake, NVIDIA $5B, SoftBank), not distress issuance. New CEO Lip-Bu Tan brings credibility. Net: capital allocation is a bet on a multi-year payoff that has not yet shown in returns. Quality = 40/100 — a weak franchise on margins/share/returns, floored above "distressed" by genuine liquidity and strategic backing.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Expensive-to-extreme on every lens — P/S 12x, P/B 5.9x, negative FCF, ~40% above consensus. This is the pillar driving the SELL.
18
conf 65%

On every lens Intel is expensive-to-extreme. The stock has re-rated ~3.5× YTD (≈$36 → $141, now $128) while earnings stayed negative, so the multiples are at or beyond the top of their multi-year range. This is the pillar that drives the SELL.

Multiple / AnchorValueReferenceRead
Price / Sales (TTM)12.0xIntel hist. ~2–4xTop of / above the multi-year range — unprecedented for Intel.
Price / Book5.9xIntel hist. ~1–2xP/TBV 6.4x. Extreme for a business earning negative ROE.
FCF yieldnegative>5% attractiveNo cash yield — valuation rests entirely on a future that hasn't arrived.
Forward P/E (FY26 / FY30 cons.)~118x / ~22.6xSemis ~20–30xEven on 2030 consensus EPS ($5.67) it is 22.6x — i.e. you pay today for a flawless 4-yr ramp.
Price vs analyst consensus+40% aboveat/below = fairPrice $128.32 vs consensus target $91.80 (median $90). Trades above all but the single $150 high.
Analyst grades consensusHOLD (37% bull)Buy = support0 strong-buy / 31 buy / 45 hold / 8 sell. The Street is not endorsing the price.

Reverse-DCF / Implied Growth

At an enterprise value of ~$673B with negative current FCF, the market is discounting the entire 2030 foundry vision — consensus models revenue rising $58.5B (2026) → $110.6B (2030) and net income to ~$27.5B — as a near-certainty, today. The implied growth/margin recovery sits well beyond what is de-risked (deals are signed but pre-revenue; volume not expected until mid-2027). The market is pricing in more execution than analysts have in their numbers, let alone what has been delivered.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside — but you are NOT getting it free

Intel does carry real call options: the US-government-backed "sovereign foundry" status, preliminary Apple M-series production, the NVIDIA $5B stake + custom-x86 co-development, Google TPU (3M units), and the SpaceX/Tesla "Terafab" framework. In a cheap stock these would be free upside. Here they are the whole thesis and already more than priced — at 12x sales the core in-production business cannot justify the price, so the optionality is the reason to keep watching, not evidence the stock is cheap. No upward valuation tilt is applied. Valuation = 18/100.

Analyst Targets & FMP Cross-Check

Consensus target $91.80 (high $150 / median $90 / low $45) across 32 recent analysts — price is ~40% above it; note targets have chased the move (last-month avg $120.5 vs last-year avg $70), a classic momentum-catch-up. FMP health rating C− (1/5) independently flags poor DCF/ROE/ROA/P/E. Every external cross-check agrees: rich.
5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Semiconductor cycle + Intel foundry-turnaround execution
52
Neutral (52) — no amplification

Intel's fortunes sit above its own execution on two linked forces: the semiconductor / AI capex cycle and, specific to Intel, foundry-turnaround execution + strategic/government backing. The broad cycle is roaring (SOXX +108% YTD, AI capex boom) — but it favours NVDA / TSMC / AMD, not Intel, which barely participates in AI accelerators and whose foundry is pre-revenue on external customers. The driver that actually moved the stock 3.5× is the turnaround narrative, a powerful sentiment tailwind that is now fully priced and facing a near-term wobble (today's OpenAI-IPO-delay AI jitters knocked chipmakers 3–4%).

HorizonReadAssessment
Historical (12–24m)Massive tailwind — government stake, NVDA/SoftBank, 18A validation drove a ~7x re-rating off the lows.Tailwind (spent)
CurrentNarrative intact but fully priced; semi cycle up yet Intel under-participates; AI trade rolling over near-term.Neutral
Forward (6–18m)Hinges on 18A yield + first external-customer revenue (mid-2027). Binary and unproven.Neutral, wide

Amplification role: driver score 52 → Neutral. It is neither a ≥65 tailwind nor a ≤35 headwind, so it does not amplify the base signal. The base SELL therefore stays SELL (not STRONG SELL) — correctly reflecting that real turnaround optionality exists; it is simply over-priced.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Neutral · Neutral
50
conviction

Intel maps to Technology (XLK), whose net signal in the 26 Jun macro report is Neutral on the medium horizon (Short Underperform on higher-for-longer + the mega-cap/AI-concentration rollover the report flags as an armed tail risk; Long Outperform on the AI capex secular). Net pressure on INTC is Neutral, with a short-term headwind — but Intel is not a direct AI-capex beneficiary, so the sector tailwind doesn't accrue to it. Pressure is non-determinative here anyway: amplification needs a ≤35 driver AND a Headwind, and the driver is 52, so the signal stays SELL regardless of the pressure label.

Source: sector-map (XLK Technology) · Macro report 2026-06-26

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Strong uptrend but a parabolic, overbought entry (monthly RSI 87) ~40% above consensus fair value — momentum up, entry poor.
48
conf 60%

Momentum is up but the entry is a parabola. Higher timeframes are in strong uptrends, but the monthly RSI is 87 — a multi-year extreme — and the stock just printed its 52-week high ($141.45) before reversing ~9% in three sessions. The risk-reward of initiating here is poor: the nearest meaningful support (~$104, near the daily SMA50 of $107) is ~20% below, so a sensible stop is far away.

Risk-Reward & Relative Strength

SignalReadingScore read
Risk-reward (entry quality)Price $128 vs support ~$104 (−20%); base-case fair value ~$95 is below spot. Stop ~2+ ATR away.Poor
Relative strengthMassively outperformed SPY/SOXX YTD (~+260%); 52-wk range position ~89% (near highs).Extended
Trend (MTF confluence)Monthly/weekly/daily uptrend (bullish) but hourly & 15-min broke down; today −4%.Bullish but rolling
Macro overlaySemis medium-sensitivity; higher-for-longer + AI-concentration rollover (today's chip selloff) = mild headwind.Unfavourable
Sentiment (grades + news)B of A upgrade (Jun 11) but consensus HOLD; news tone dominated by 'too late to buy / P/E 900' caution.Mixed
CatalystQ2 earnings 23 Jul (~4wk out); no event inside 14d. Path risk rises into the print.Moderate

Timing = 48/100 (Neutral). The trend is genuinely up, which keeps this out of the bearish band — but buying at RSI 87, ~40% above consensus fair value, with 20% to support, is chasing. Strong momentum, poor entry.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-06-30CB Consumer Confidence / JOLTSHigh94 / 7.6M93.1 / 7.62M⚠ MediumDemand & labour read for the cycle; semis = medium macro-sensitivity.
2026-07-01ISM Manufacturing PMIHigh53.654.0✅ YesDirect chip end-demand signal; a strong print = higher-for-longer.
2026-07-02Non-Farm Payrolls / UnemploymentHigh+90k / 4.5%+172k / 4.3%✅ YesSets the rate path that prices long-duration growth names like INTC.
2026-07-08FOMC MinutesHigh⚠ MediumHawkish tone pressures richly-valued tech multiples.
2026-07-14US CPI (Jun)High3.9% YoY4.2% YoY✅ YesHot inflation keeps real rates up — a headwind for zero-cashflow duration.

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-06-25US Q1 GDP+2.1%+1.6%+0.5pp beatRisk-on for cyclicals, but rate-supportive (hurts long-duration).
2026-06-25Core PCE MoM (YoY)+0.3% (3.4%)+0.2%Hot; YoY hottest since Oct-23Higher-for-longer confirmed — multiple headwind for INTC.
2026-06-26AI-trade jitters (OpenAI IPO delay)chips −3-4%NegativeSector-wide derating risk; INTC −4% on the day.

Intel is a medium-macro-sensitivity semi. The cluster that matters is the early-July growth/inflation tape (ISM 1 Jul, NFP 2 Jul, CPI 14 Jul): hot data keeps the Fed higher-for-longer, which compresses the multiples of richly-valued, zero-cashflow growth names like INTC. The immediate driver, though, is the AI-trade rollover flagged in the 2026-06-26 macro report — a sector derating would hit the most stretched names first.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑ (overbought)Bullish87.0+, risingS: $57 / R: extendedBreakout1.18x
WeeklyUptrend ↑Bullish70.0+, risingS: $110 / R: $132.8Breakout1.04x
DailyStrong Up ↑Bullish60.5+, flatS: $104 / R: $141.5Breakout0.90x
HourlyWeakening →Bearish40.8−, basingS: $125.4 / R: $136.2Breakdown
15-minDowntrend ↓Bearish45.8−, basingS: $125.5 / R: $131.2Breakdown
Confluence: Bullish but extended · MTF Score 63

The higher timeframes are in clean uptrends, but a monthly RSI of 87 is a multi-year overbought extreme rarely sustained, and the short timeframes have already broken down (today −4% off the $141 high). The pattern is a powerful trend hitting exhaustion: trend-followers stay long with a trailing stop, but it is a poor place to initiate. Key level to watch is the $104–107 daily support/SMA50 zone — a break there opens the gap toward the $90s base case.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

INTC 6-month daily. The whole chart is a parabola from ~$36 to the $141.45 high (21 Jun), now $128.32. The orange line is the 50-day SMA (~$107) — price sits ~20% above it; the yellow line marks the $91.8 analyst consensus target, ~40% below spot.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull ~$165 (25%)

18A yields hit volume and external-foundry revenue (Apple/NVDA/Google) starts landing ahead of schedule; the 'sovereign foundry' re-rating extends past the $150 Street high. Trigger: confirmed 18A yield + first material external revenue.

Base ~$95 (50%)

The turnaround grinds on but deals stay pre-revenue into 2027; momentum fades, dilution and a still-negative P&L weigh, and the stock mean-reverts toward the ~$92 analyst consensus. This base case sits BELOW today's $128 — the core of the SELL.

Bear ~$65 (25%)

The AI trade unwinds (the macro concentration tail + today's IPO-delay jitters), AND AMD keeps taking server/client share while a foundry milestone slips. A de-rating to ~2x forward sales. Trigger: AMD share gains + 18A slip + AI-trade rollover.

Probability-weighted ≈ $105 (0.25·$165 + 0.50·$95 + 0.25·$65) — ~18% below the current $128.32. The weighted centre of gravity sits below spot, which is the SELL in one number.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Wait0 of 3 groups met — no entry path open

Fundamental — not MET

Price is ~35% above any reasonable fair value — the cheapness path is firmly shut.
⛔ Price $128.32 < fair value ~$95 (analyst-consensus-anchored)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (Q2 on 23 Jul)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (52)

Technical — not MET

Extended and overbought — neither a fresh reclaim nor a support bounce; the pullback branch needs a drawdown first.
⛔ A tested bounce off $104–107 support with a higher low (currently ~20% above)
⛔ RSI in the 35–65 band (weekly 70 / monthly 87 — overbought)
✅ MACD histogram positive (daily)

Catalyst — not MET

No event in the window; the next is Q2 earnings on 23 Jul.
· Post-earnings move >+5% with guidance raised, volume >2x

Forecast: All three paths are far from triggering. Fundamental needs a ~25%+ pullback toward the ~$95 fair-value zone — Unlikely in 2–4 weeks absent a catalyst. Technical needs the weekly/monthly RSI to cool from 70/87 into 35–65 AND a tested support bounce — i.e. a meaningful drawdown first (Low confidence near-term). Catalyst can only open at Q2 earnings on 23 Jul. Net: 0 of 3 — Wait. Good business story, wrong price; no entry edge at $128.

Exit action: Trima soft trigger is live — take partial profits

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below ~$104 (recent swing support / near daily SMA50 $107)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ FY guidance cut
⛔ AMD continues taking server/client share OR 18A milestone slips materially (competitive invalidation)
⛔ [catastrophic] a financial-distress / going-concern gate fires — NOT live: $32.8B cash, current ratio 2.31

Profit-Target — LIVE

✅ Price ≥ median analyst target $90 (now $128, +43% above)
✅ RSI > 70 (weekly 70 / monthly 87)
✅ Quality has NOT improved to justify the re-rating (still negative margins, C− health)

Forecast: Stop-Loss is unlikely near-term (price ~19% above ~$104). The Profit-Target trigger is already live — for a holder up multi-fold the framework reads Trim into strength, not a full Exit, because solvency is intact and the turnaround optionality is real (just over-priced). It would flip to Exit only if a distress/going-concern gate fires or AMD/foundry milestones break the turnaround story.

Imagine you act at the current price of $128.32 · as of 26 Jun 2026

What if you bought now?

You are risking ~49% to gain ~29%.

Imagine you buy at $128.32 today. Risking: the bear path to ~$65 (−49%), and even the base case (~$95) is ~26% below you — you'd be underwater on the central scenario. You'd enter at monthly RSI 87, ~40% above the $91.80 consensus, ~20% above support, with 0 of 3 entry paths met — pure momentum chasing — and earn negative FCF (no carry) while you wait. Gaining: the ~29% to the ~$165 bull case if the foundry ramp accelerates. Read: poor risk-reward; the central outcome loses money from here.

What if you sold now?

You'd give up ~29% bull upside to protect against a ~49% drawdown.

Imagine you sell (or stay out) at $128.32. Giving up: the ~$165 bull case and the foundry optionality if 18A + external customers ramp early. Protecting: a ~49% bear drawdown, while locking in a ~7× move and selling ~40% above where the Street puts fair value ($90–92). The Profit-Target exit is genuinely live (target hit + RSI>70 + quality unimproved). Read: a defensible Trim-into-strength — not a thesis-break Exit, since the balance sheet is sound and the turnaround story is intact, just fully valued.

13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — no allocation/role was specified. For context only: the §12 Conviction Ladder reads Wait (0 of 3 entry paths), so the sizing math returns a 0% new-money allocation regardless of risk budget — the guidance is to wait for an entry path (a pullback into the ~$95–104 zone) rather than initiate. Beta is ~2.2 and daily ATR ~$10 (~8% of price), so this name carries roughly 2× market risk per dollar. For an existing holder, see the §12 exit ladder (Trim).

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "INTC",
  "date": "2026-06-26",
  "version": "v6",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:INTC",
  "isin": "US4581401001",
  "price_at_rating": 128.32,
  "signal_short": "SELL",
  "signal_medium": "SELL",
  "signal_long": "SELL",
  "primary_signal": "SELL",
  "quality_score": 40,
  "lifecycle_stage": "turnaround",
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "Gross Margin + Capacity (Semis)",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "GM 35-39%",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 28,
    "moat_score": 45,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": "negative",
    "management_skin_in_game": 45
  },
  "valuation_score": 18,
  "valuation_detail": {
    "fcf_yield": "negative",
    "price_to_sales": 12.0,
    "price_to_book": 5.9,
    "forward_pe_fy26": 118,
    "historical_valuation_decile": 10
  },
  "timing_score": 48,
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": 63,
    "risk_reward_score": 25,
    "relative_strength_vs_spy": "+260% YTD",
    "52wk_range_position": 89,
    "monthly_rsi": 87,
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 55,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.15
  },
  "driver_score": 52,
  "driver_label": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 50,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-06-26",
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": "~96% (Q3'25 +$3.9B non-op vs $4.06B net)",
  "clean_pe": "N/A (operating loss)",
  "clean_peg": "N/A",
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "losing",
  "competitive_threat_level": "high",
  "overall_confidence": 55,
  "fair_value_est": 95,
  "stop_loss": 104,
  "target_price": 95,
  "scenario_base_target": 95,
  "scenario_bull_target": 165,
  "analyst_consensus_target": 91.8,
  "analyst_target_high": 150,
  "analyst_target_low": 45,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": -28.4,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Hold",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 37,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 32,
  "fmp_rating": "C-",
  "fmp_overall_score": 1,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": 1,
  "recent_downgrades_30d": 0,
  "entry_groups_met": 0,
  "entry_conviction": "Wait",
  "exit_groups_live": 1,
  "exit_action": "Trim",
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "gates_triggered": [
    "Valuation Ceiling",
    "Dilution/Accounting (earnings-quality)"
  ],
  "gates_caution": [
    "Financial Distress (neg. interest coverage, offset by liquidity)"
  ],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "analysis_status": "on-going",
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-10",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (Q2'26 earnings 2026-07-23 beyond 14-day window)"
}

First Intel report (no prior calibration to diff). Signal SELL across all three horizons — matrix-stable: Expensive valuation turns to HOLD only with High (≥65) quality, which Intel cannot reach (negative margins/ROIC, GM 35%, C− health, losing CPU share), so any Medium-band quality × Expensive valuation → SELL regardless of timing (perturb ±10 and it holds). Aligns with the Street's own math: consensus target $91.8 is ~28% below spot.

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_company_profile / get_stock_snapshot — price, ISIN US4581401001 (verified), sector, beta 2.2
get_income_statement (8 qtrs) — revenue/margins; earnings-quality decomposition (Q3'25 non-op)
get_financial_ratios — P/S, P/B, FCF, coverage, liquidity
get_multi_timeframe_analysis — 5 timeframes incl. intraday
get_price_target_consensus / _summary — consensus $91.8, 32 analysts
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades — Hold consensus; 12 recent actions
get_ratings_snapshot — FMP C− (1/5)
get_analyst_estimates — FY26–FY30 revenue/EPS
get_polygon_news — 12 sentiment-scored articles
get_earnings_calendar — empty; Q2 date 23 Jul confirmed via web search
Impact on scores: Strong coverage — all five pillars scored on direct MCP data, cross-checked against analyst consensus and the FMP health rating, which independently corroborate the low Quality + Valuation. The only gap (earnings date) was filled by web search. No confidence haircut applied beyond the inherent turnaround-uncertainty discount on Quality.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.