NYSE:DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation

ISIN: US2435371073
Consumer DiscretionaryFootwear & Apparel
NYSE · Goleta, CA · premium footwear (HOKA / UGG) · fiscal year ends 31 Mar Analysis Status: On-Going
All figures in USD unless noted. Fiscal year ends 31 March (Q1 FY2027 ended 30 Jun 2026, reported 23 Jul 2026).
$96.04
-0.2% (day) · -7.7% since last report
25 Jul 2026 · Signal v6

What changed since 20 Jul 2026

Signals unchanged: Short HOLD · Medium BUY · Long BUY. The story is the earnings print and the tape, not the verdict.

DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Deckers Outdoor Corporation

Deckers Brands is a Goleta, California footwear house built around two billion-dollar brands: HOKA (premium performance running — the growth engine) and UGG (premium sheepskin comfort — the cash cow), alongside smaller labels Teva, Sanuk and Koolaburra. It designs and markets the shoes but outsources manufacturing, so the model is asset-light and cash-generative. It sells both wholesale (department stores, running specialty, national chains) and — increasingly — direct-to-consumer through its own stores and e-commerce, which carries higher margin and richer brand control. What sets Deckers apart is the combination of two genuinely coveted brands, elite margins and returns on capital, and a fortress balance sheet with net cash and no dividend — a rare pairing of brand heat and financial discipline in an otherwise fashion-cyclical industry. For a reader: think of it as a disciplined, cash-rich brand owner whose fortunes rise and fall with how hot HOKA and UGG are with consumers.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD5455%Cheap + quality, but capped — no technical/catalyst confirmation into a confirmed downtrend
Medium-term (6–12 mo)BUY6358%High quality at ~13.7× with a raised EPS guide — value + quality look through the growth scare
Long-term (3–5 yr)BUY7060%Two elite brands, net cash, top-decile ROIC — quality dominates over 3-5 years
Next update: 2026-08-10 — default +14d (rolled Sat 8-Aug → Mon 10-Aug; next earnings ~22 Oct 2026 outside the 14-day window)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

78
strong
conf 78%

Valuation Attractiveness

70
attractive
conf 72%

Entry/Exit Timing

38
weak (confirmed downtrend)
conf 60%

Underlying Drivers

50
Neutral
conf 55%

Economic Alignment

45
Neutral (mild headwind)
conf 55%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Gate 1 — Financial Distress
CLEAR. Net cash ~$1.13B ($1.60B cash / ST investments vs $472M debt), current ratio ~2.7×, interest coverage ~444×. Debt/equity ~0.21. No distress — one of the strongest balance sheets in the sector.
Gate 2 — Earnings Event Risk
CLEAR — the event has passed. Q1 FY2027 was reported after the close on 23 Jul 2026 (the 7/20 report's earnings-blackout caution is now resolved). Next earnings ~22 Oct 2026, well outside the 14-day window, so no timing-confidence cap now.
Gate 3 — Valuation Ceiling
CLEAR. Clean trailing P/E ~13.7× vs a warranted ~20× = 0.69× (ATTRACTIVE band), and far below the Consumer Discretionary guardrail line (24×). No ceiling — the opposite: the anchor says the name is cheap.
Gate 4 — Accounting / Dilution
CLEAR. Earnings are CLEAN — the only non-operating item is ~$13.7M of interest income earned on the cash pile (recurring, legitimate; no private-AI markup, no one-off gain). Share count is FALLING, not rising: diluted shares 149.6M (Q1 FY26) → 138.6M (Q1 FY27) as buybacks retire stock — anti-dilutive. No SBC red flag.
⚠️
Gate 5 — Regulatory / Binary Event
CAUTION (not triggered). No dated binary regulatory event, but footwear is imported, so the macro report's 1-Aug tariff escalation is a live gross-margin risk worth monitoring — a cost-side headwind, not a binary that caps the signal.
Severe Driver Collapse
CLEAR. The driver (consumer discretionary spending) is Neutral — softening at the margin, not collapsing.
No hard gate caps the signal, and no Do-Not-Buy trigger fires. The operative constraint is instead the Short-horizon technical-confirmation cap: the near-term tape is in a confirmed, multi-timeframe downtrend (daily RSI 35, price below every major moving average, a support breakdown on 2× volume after the print), and neither the Technical nor the Catalyst entry group is met. So even though the base Short signal is a BUY (high quality + attractive valuation), Short is capped at HOLD — "buy on confirmation". Medium and Long are untouched by the cap and remain BUY on value + quality. This is the DECK-specific discipline: the June 2026 premature short-BUY on fundamentals-only, into a rolling-over tape, was cut at a loss — this time the framework waits for the tape to turn.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
An elite, clean-earning brand owner — top-decile returns on capital, fortress balance sheet, two coveted brands — dented this quarter by a sharp deceleration in HOKA, the growth engine, and by the low structural switching costs of footwear.
78
conf 78%

Sector / lifecycle: Consumer Discretionary — premium footwear & apparel. We score it on the Retail/Discretionary profile at a growth-maturing stage: revenue is still growing (+5.7% YoY this quarter) but decelerating from the double-digit pace of prior years, and the company is highly profitable (TTM net margin ~18%). So the lens is comps/DTC momentum, inventory discipline, margin trend and brand equity — not pre-profit growth metrics.

Sub-signalReadingScore
Revenue trajectoryQ1 FY2027 revenue $1.02B, the first-ever $1B+ Q1, but only +5.7% YoY — a clear deceleration. HOKA +8% to $704M (down from 20%+ growth) — but management attributes the slowdown to planned international wholesale shipment-timing, not weak demand, and cites HOKA DTC +17% globally (vs +3% wholesale), record EMEA reorders and continued share gains in >$120 performance running. UGG +5% to $278M; total DTC +13%. FY2027 guide: high-single-digit revenue.62
Profitability vs peersTTM gross margin ~57.4%, operating margin ~22.6%, net margin ~18.4% — top-tier for footwear. BUT Q1 operating margin compressed to 15.2% (vs 17.1% a year ago) on higher SG&A and promotional pressure. Margin trend is the watch-item.80
Cash generationTTM FCF/share ~$8.5, price/FCF ~11×, FCF yield ~8.5%. Highly cash-generative; DTC mix lifts it further. Self-funds buybacks with room to spare.85
Balance sheet healthNet cash ~$1.13B, current ratio ~2.7×, near-zero leverage, interest coverage ~444×. Fortress.95
Inventory / capital efficiencyInventory turns ~2.9×, asset turnover ~1.4×, receivables turnover ~14.6× — clean working capital, no glut flagged. DTC +13% is quality organic growth.78
INDUSTRY BENCHMARK: Retail — comps + inventory turns. DTC +13% is a strong organic-growth read; inventory clean (no markdown overhang). Offsetting it: total revenue +5.7% is below the athletic-footwear category's ~+8.9% growth, and HOKA's deceleration is the crux. Rating: GOOD (softening). Benchmark score 72/100. Context: elite balance-sheet and margin quality, but the top-line momentum that used to justify a premium multiple is fading.
Pricing power
68
Real premium pricing on HOKA/UGG at full price, but Q1 margin compression + a more promotional environment show the pricing umbrella narrowing.
Network effects
50
None material (n/a — scored neutral).
Switching costs
35
Structurally low — footwear buyers switch brands freely; the only lock-in is brand affinity, and affinity is exactly what is cooling for HOKA as ON gains.
Cost advantage
55
Asset-light, scaled sourcing gives decent unit economics, but no durable structural cost edge over Nike/adidas.
Intangibles
85
The brands ARE the moat: UGG and HOKA are genuinely coveted, hard-to-replicate franchises with real equity — the strongest dimension by far.

Moat average ~59 — brand-driven, not structural. Two elite intangible assets (the brands) sit on top of low switching costs and no network effect; the moat is only as durable as brand heat, which is why HOKA's deceleration matters more than a one-quarter revenue miss.

ROIC & capital allocation ~82: ROE ~42.6%, ROA ~20.3% — top-decile returns on capital. Capital allocation is disciplined: no debt, no dilutive M&A, aggressive buybacks retiring ~7% of shares YoY (149.6M → 138.6M diluted), no dividend. Management skin-in-the-game is moderate (~60): professional management under CEO Stefano Caroti, modest insider ownership, no abnormal insider selling detected.
Competitive Environment (§7c — who is attacking, which way is share moving). Footwear is a low-switching-cost brand war, and the share map is moving against Deckers' growth engine:Net: Deckers still owns two coveted brands, but HOKA is now a challenged-but-contested incumbent in premium running (On gaining share, yet HOKA DTC still +17% and reorders at records), and UGG is mature. Because switching costs are structurally low, the Switching-Cost sub-score is capped at 35 and Pricing-Power trimmed to 68 — the brands carry the moat, and reported HOKA growth is cooling even if the underlying cause is contested. Share trajectory: stable-to-softening, with the direction of HOKA's brand heat — genuine share loss vs a shipment-timing artefact — the key unresolved variable.
4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Cheap on the anchor, the guardrail and its own history — a high-quality name at ~13.7× trailing earnings with net cash. The band is Attractive; the only reason the score isn't higher is that the growth that justified a premium is decelerating.
70
conf 72%

The valuation is genuinely attractive by the anchor — but this is a de-rated growth name, so the read is "cheap, with a reason": the market has marked the multiple down as HOKA's growth cooled. The question the anchor answers is whether it is too cheap for the quality — and it is.

THE ANCHOR — Warranted-Multiple Valuation (Consumer Discretionary, cyclical-growth bucket).
Discount rate r = 4.71% (UST10Y, macro 2026-07-20) + 4.5% ERP + 0.0% risk add-on (Business Quality ≥ 65) = ~9.2%.
Growth g_near = 7% (0.75 × ~9% haircut consensus growth, under the 10% cyclical cap); g_term = 3%.
Warranted P/E (two-stage) ≈ 20× — well under the Consumer Discretionary guardrail line (24×).
Actual clean trailing P/E = 96.04 / ~7.03 EPS = ~13.7× (forward on the $7.35-7.50 guide ~12.9×). Ratio = 13.7 / 20 = 0.69× → ATTRACTIVE.
val_multiple_basis = clean trailing P/E. Earnings verified clean (§7b) — no non-operating inflation to strip out; the only non-operating line is recurring interest income on the cash pile.
LensReadingScore
Warranted-multiple anchor (40%)0.69× warranted (trailing), ~0.65× (forward) — squarely Attractive, and below the 24× guardrail.85
Sector median (20%)~13.7× P/E sits below premium-growth footwear peers (ON ~40×+, Nike ~30×) and roughly in line with the value end (Crocs ~8×). Mid-of-band vs the cohort.62
Own-history decile (15%)Near the low end of its own multi-year P/E range (~decile 2) — DECK historically traded 15-25×; 13.7× is genuinely cheap for the franchise.80
PEG-style (10%)PEG ~1.2-1.7 on decelerating ~9% growth — fair, not a bargain on a growth-adjusted basis. This is the lens that keeps the score honest.52
Analyst consensus / grades (15%)Consensus target ~$118-121 (median $121), ~+23-26% upside from $96; but grades consensus is HOLD (1 SB / 24 B / 25 H / 6 S = ~45% bullish). Cheap on price targets, split on conviction.58
FCF yield (universal anchor): ~8.5% (FCF/price) — firmly in the "cheap" band for a profitable compounder, backed by real cash and no leverage. FMP ratings snapshot: overall A, with DCF, ROE and ROA sub-scores all 5 (best); only P/B scores low (1) because the shares carry a brand premium to book. An independent read that confirms the value.
Why 70, not 85: the anchor alone would put this in the high-70s/80s, but the relative cross-checks pull it back — PEG is only fair on decelerating growth, and the analyst herd is a HOLD. Cheap is not the same as a catalyst; the value is real but needs the growth scare to stabilise (or the tape to turn) to be realised.
5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Consumer discretionary spending (premium footwear demand)
50
Neutral — not amplification-eligible

Primary driver: consumer discretionary spending power and sentiment — specifically the willingness of consumers to pay full price for premium footwear. This sits above Deckers' own execution: however good the brands, a consumer pullback compresses full-price sell-through and forces promotion (visible this quarter in the margin compression).

HorizonAssessment
Historical (25%)The consumer has been resilient through 2025-26, but discretionary spend is cooling at the margin; DECK's own DTC +13% shows demand is still there, offset by HOKA's decel. Mixed. Score ~55.
Current (50%)The macro regime is "stagflation-lite" with an oil-price tax on the consumer (Iran/Hormuz), and XLY (Consumer Discretionary) is flagged Underperform short / Neutral medium-long with fast money flowing OUT. Premium footwear is somewhat insulated by brand, but the tape and the sector signal are a headwind. Score ~48.
Forward (25%)Q2 GDP (30 Jul) tests the consumer; a partial tariff wave adds a goods-cost/price risk. Deckers' international runway + DTC growth are offsets. Balanced. Score ~50.

Driver score ~50 (Neutral). A 36-64 driver leaves the base signal untouched — it is not amplification-eligible (that needs ≥65 Tailwind or ≤35 Headwind). So the Medium/Long BUYs stay BUY (no STRONG BUY), and the near-term consumer softness is noted as a caveat, not a downgrade. The driver does not change the three fundamental pillar scores.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Neutral · Headwind
45
conviction

Macro regime: Stagflation-lite (energy-supply-shock driven, Iran/Hormuz); UST10Y ~4.71%. XLY (Consumer Discretionary) signals Short U / Medium N / Long N, with the capital-flow map showing fast money OUT of XLY short-term. So the sector is a mild headwind, not a tailwind — buying DECK here is a contrarian value call against a neutral-to-soft sector backdrop. Economic Alignment is therefore Neutral with a Headwind pressure and low conviction (~45). Under the amplification rules a Headwind pressure cannot lift a BUY to STRONG BUY (that needs a Tailwind), so it does not change the Medium/Long BUY — it simply removes any upside amplification and reinforces the 'wait for confirmation' short-term stance.

Source: macro report 2026-07-20 (sector-map: Consumer Discretionary / XLY) · Macro report 2026-07-20

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
A confirmed, multi-timeframe downtrend that deepened through the print — price below every major moving average, daily RSI 35, a support breakdown on heavy volume, and clear negative relative strength. A poor place to initiate; the reason Short is capped at HOLD.
38
conf 60%

The tape is unambiguously weak. Price ($96.04) is below the 20-, 50- and 200-day moving averages (103.6 / 104.8 / 102.1), the daily RSI is 35 (oversold-ish but with no reversal signal), MACD is deeply negative and widening, and the stock broke support on ~2× average volume around the earnings print. Every higher timeframe is a downtrend; only the intraday frames show a tentative bounce.

TimeframeTrendRSIMACDRead
MonthlyDowntrend (support breakdown)44-, fallingRolling over
WeeklyDowntrend (support breakdown)43-, hist negBearish
DailyDowntrend (support breakdown)35-, hist -0.95Weak, oversold, no reversal
HourlyStrong downtrend46hist turning +Tentative bounce
15-minRecovering51flatNoise

Confluence: strongly bearish — MTF ~30. Relative strength is clearly negative: DECK sits at ~37% of its 52-week range ($78.91-$125.45), is down ~8% since the last report while the broad market held roughly flat, and has been a persistent laggard off its September 2025 high near $125. Daily ATR ~$4 (~4% of price). Nearest support: the $92.31 / $92.98 swing-low shelf, then the $79 area (the 52-week low). Overhead: the $103-105 moving-average band, then $110. The timing pillar scores 38 not because the business is weak but because initiating here means catching a falling knife — the Technical entry group is unmet and the Short signal is capped at HOLD until the tape confirms (a reclaim of ~$103, or a tested higher low off $92 support).

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-07-29FOMC Rate Decision (Warsh)HighHold 3.50-3.75%3.75%⚠️ MediumRate path sets the discount rate and consumer-credit backdrop; a hawkish hold pressures rate-sensitive discretionary demand.
2026-07-30US Q2 GDP (Advance)High~2.0% ann.⚠️ MediumThe direct test of whether the consumer is decelerating — the core question for a premium-footwear driver.
2026-08-01Tariff deadline / Section 122MediumPartial deal-wave⚠️ MediumFootwear is imported — a tariff snap-back is a gross-margin risk (Gate 5 caution).
2026-10-22DECK Q2 FY2027 earningsHigh$1.80 EPS / ~$1.51B rev✅ YesThe next binary for the name — the read on whether HOKA re-accelerates and margins stabilise. Outside today's 14-day window.

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-07-23DECK Q1 FY2027 earnings$0.94 EPS (beat $0.87); rev $1.02B (+5.7%, in-line)$0.87 / $1.02B+8% EPS beat; revenue in-lineMuted close-to-close reaction — the ~6% drop came on 23 Jul (earnings day, BEFORE the after-close print); the post-print 24 Jul session gapped to ~$92 intraday then recovered to a ~flat close (-0.2%). The HOKA decel drove the pre-print de-rating, not the after-hours reaction.
2026-07-23FY2027 guidanceEPS raised to $7.35-7.50; revenue $5.86-5.91B (high-single-digit)prior ~$7.30-7.45EPS guide +5cMixed — EPS raised, but the top-line/HOKA deceleration set the tape

The name's own binary (Q1 FY2027) has just passed and is fully in the price — a beat on EPS, and a muted close-to-close reaction (the de-rating largely PRECEDED the print, on 23 Jul; the post-print 24 Jul session recovered from a ~$92 intraday low to a ~flat close). The next stock-specific catalyst is Q2 FY2027 earnings ~22 Oct, outside the 14-day window. The clustered macro events (FOMC 29 Jul, GDP 30 Jul, Core PCE 31 Jul, tariff 1 Aug) are medium-relevant to the consumer driver but, per the scheduling rule, recurring macro releases do not pull a Consumer-Discretionary name's next-update date forward — so the +14d default stands.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyDowntrend ↓Bearish44-, fallingR: $122 / S: $94Support breakdown0.6×
WeeklyDowntrend ↓Bearish43-, hist negR: $117 / S: $92Support breakdown1.6×
DailyDowntrend ↓Bearish35-, hist -0.95R: $105 / S: $92Support breakdown2.1×
HourlyStrong down ↓Neutral46hist turning +R: $102 / S: $90Support breakdown
15-minRecoveringNeutral51flatR: $97 / S: $93Resist. breakout
Confluence: Strongly Bearish · MTF Score 30

Every higher timeframe is a confirmed downtrend with a support breakdown; the daily is oversold (RSI 35) but showing no reversal, and only the intraday frames hint at a bounce. This is a stock in a persistent decline that accelerated through the earnings print — consistent with a growth name being re-rated as its growth cools. For timing, the message is 'do not catch the knife': the reachable entry for the Medium/Long BUYs is a reclaim of the $103-105 moving-average band OR a tested higher low off the $92 support shelf, not a purchase at fresh lows.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

DECK daily closes, late May–late Jul 2026. The stock stepped down from ~$114 to ~$96, breaking the $103-105 support shelf on the Q1 print. Price now sits below our computed fair value (~$112) and just above the $92 swing-low support — cheap, but in a confirmed downtrend.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $132 (25%)

HOKA re-accelerates — international expansion and new franchises reignite growth back toward the mid-teens — margins stabilise or expand as promotion eases, and the consumer proves resilient through the oil-tax scare. The market re-rates the multiple from ~13.7× back toward 17-18× on a proven compounder with net cash, carrying the stock through the analyst median (~$121) toward the high targets (~$145). This requires the brand-heat concern to reverse, which is the whole debate.

Base $112 (55%)

The most probable path: management's read proves right — HOKA's soft +8% was largely planned international wholesale shipment-timing (with DTC +17% and record EMEA reorders underneath), not the start of real share loss — so the growth scare fades from panic to "merely decelerating," and a cheap, high-quality name with a RAISED EPS guide ($7.35-7.50) grinds back toward fair value. FY2027 delivers the high-single-digit revenue and $7.4-ish EPS; net cash and buybacks (retiring ~7% of shares a year) do the rest. A re-rate to ~15× on ~$7.45 EPS is ~$112 — modest upside (~+17%) earned by the multiple normalising, not by a growth surprise. This is why Medium/Long are BUY and Short is HOLD: the value is real but needs time or a tape-turn to be realised.

Bear $82 (20%)

The bear reads HOKA's +8% as the leading edge of genuine share loss to On and New Balance — discounting management's shipment-timing explanation — while the consumer rolls over under the stagflation-lite oil tax and an imported-footwear tariff hit compresses margins further. The $92 support shelf breaks and the stock retests the 52-week low (~$79-82). TRIGGER to watch: a SECOND quarter of HOKA growth below high-single-digits (which would refute the timing explanation and confirm share loss), a consumer-spending break in the GDP/retail data, or a tariff escalation on footwear. FALSIFICATION: HOKA DTC growth stays double-digit and total HOKA re-accelerates next quarter — confirming the timing read — in which case the value case dominates and the bear leg fades.

Probability-weighted fair value ≈ $111 (0.25×$132 + 0.55×$112 + 0.20×$82) — ~15% above today's $96.04. The distribution is skewed modestly to the upside because the entry multiple is cheap and the balance sheet is a floor, but the near-term tape and the consumer headwind cap how fast that value is realised — hence a Medium/Long BUY with a Half-Size starter and a Short capped at HOLD.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

The cheapness path is open — trades below fair value, no earnings in the window, driver not a headwind.
✅ Price $96.04 < fair value ~$112
✅ No earnings within 7 days (next ~22 Oct)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (50)

Technical — not MET

Confirmed downtrend — price below every major MA, MACD deeply negative, support just broke. No trend-turn or confirmed support bounce yet.
⛔ Daily close > SMA50 ($105) on > 1.5× volume
⛔ OR a tested bounce off $92 support with a higher low
✅ RSI 35-65 (35 daily — at the floor)
⛔ MACD histogram positive ≥ 2 days OR turning up off support

Catalyst — not MET

The Q1 print just fired; the close-to-close reaction was roughly flat (the post-print session recovered from a ~-5% intraday gap-down to ~flat), so it does not confirm to the upside.
⛔ Post-earnings move within 24h > +5% (close-to-close ~flat; recovered from a ~-5% intraday low)
✅ Guidance raised or maintained (EPS guide raised +5c)
✅ Volume > 2× the 20-day average (2.1×)

Forecast: ENTRY — Fundamental group: MET now (price $96 < ~$112 fair value; no earnings in window; driver ≥ 50). This is the one open path → Conviction Ladder reads Half-Size (a starter/scale-in on valuation for the Medium/Long BUYs). ENTRY — Technical group: needs a daily reclaim of the ~$103-105 MA band on volume OR a tested higher low off $92 support with MACD turning up → FORECAST: catalyst-/tape-dependent, roughly 2-4 weeks IF the $92 shelf holds and buyers step in; Unlikely while price keeps making lower lows. BASIS: price $96, 50-DMA $105 (~9% above) and falling; the faster path is the support-bounce branch, not a breakout. ENTRY — Catalyst group: the next earnings catalyst is ~22 Oct — a beat-and-guide-up with a >+5% move would fire it. CONFIDENCE: Moderate that $92 is tested/held in 1-2 months; the Short stays HOLD ("buy on confirmation") until the Technical OR Catalyst group turns — Medium/Long BUY can already be scaled at Half-Size on the Fundamental path.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ For an existing holder: two daily closes below $91 (loss of the $92.31 swing-low shelf)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ FY2027 guidance cut (currently RAISED)
⛔ Revenue growth decelerates further below the athletic-footwear category (~+8.9%) — a WATCH: Q1 total +5.7% is already below it
⛔ HOKA growth turns negative or the consumer driver flips to a clear headwind

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into $121 (median analyst target) with RSI > 70 and no quality re-rating

Forecast: For an existing holder: the stop at $91 is only ~5% below price — with the $92 shelf just underneath and the tape weak, a two-day break is a live near-term risk, so a holder should watch $92 closely. Thesis-invalidation is NOT live (guidance was raised, HOKA still growing), but the revenue-deceleration condition is a WATCH — a second soft quarter would arm it. Profit-target (~$121) is a distant ~26% away. Net: hold, but respect the $92 line.

Imagine you act at the current price of $96.04 · as of 25 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

Buying here risks ~5% to the $91 stop / ~15% to the bear ($82) to gain ~17% to base ($112) / ~37% to bull ($132) — a favourable risk-reward on a cheap, net-cash compounder, BUT the entry rules are only half-met: the Fundamental (cheap) path is open, while the Technical/Catalyst paths are not, so this is a Half-Size starter into a confirmed downtrend, not a full position. The Short stays HOLD until the tape confirms.

What if you sold now?

Selling here locks in the de-rating and gives up ~17% of base-case upside on a name trading below fair value with net cash and a raised EPS guide — defensible only if you need to sidestep the near-term downtrend; the exit rules are not triggered (no stop hit, thesis intact).
13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "DECK",
  "company": "Deckers Outdoor Corporation",
  "currency": "USD",
  "exchange": "NYSE",
  "exchange_ticker": "NYSE:DECK",
  "isin": "US2435371073",
  "api_ticker": "DECK",
  "date": "2026-07-25",
  "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "on-going",
  "lifecycle_stage": "growth",
  "sector": "Consumer Discretionary",
  "gics_sector": "Consumer Discretionary",
  "country": "United States",
  "finder_ticker": "DECK",
  "finder_exchange": "NYSE",
  "user_horizon": null,
  "user_allocation_pct": null,
  "portfolio_role": null,
  "price_at_rating": 96.04,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "BUY",
  "signal_long": "BUY",
  "primary_signal": "BUY",
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "short_cap_reason": "Base Short signal is BUY (High Quality + Attractive Valuation), but the Short technical-confirmation cap fires: Technical AND Catalyst entry groups both UNMET into a confirmed multi-timeframe downtrend (daily RSI 35, price below 20/50/200-DMA, support breakdown on 2x volume; the Q1 close-to-close reaction was ~flat, recovering from a ~-5% intraday gap-down, so it did not confirm to the upside). Cap signal_short at HOLD \u2014 'buy on confirmation' (reclaim ~$103-105 MA band OR a tested higher low off $92 support). Medium/Long unaffected. Directly applies the DECK-2026-06 lesson (premature short BUY on fundamentals-only into a rolling tape, cut at a loss).",
  "quality_score": 78,
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "Retail comps + inventory turns",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "DTC +13% / 2.9x turns; total rev +5.7%",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 72,
    "moat_score": 59,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 88,
    "capital_allocation": 82,
    "management_skin_in_game": 60
  },
  "valuation_score": 70,
  "valuation_detail": {
    "fcf_yield": 8.5,
    "implied_growth_rate": 4.5,
    "consensus_growth_rate": 9.0,
    "historical_valuation_decile": 2,
    "actual_multiple": 13.7,
    "warranted_multiple": 20,
    "warranted_ratio": 0.69,
    "val_multiple_basis": "clean trailing P/E",
    "discount_rate_r": 9.2,
    "risk_free_10y": 4.71,
    "g_near": 7.0,
    "g_term": 3.0,
    "val_band": "attractive"
  },
  "timing_score": 38,
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": 30,
    "risk_reward_score": 55,
    "relative_strength_vs_spy": "negative (laggard; ~37% of 52wk range, -8% vs flat market since last report)",
    "relative_strength_vs_sector": "negative",
    "range_position_52wk_pct": 37,
    "atr_pct_of_price": 4.2,
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 50,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.15
  },
  "driver_score": 50,
  "driver_name": "Consumer discretionary spending (premium footwear demand)",
  "driver_label": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Headwind",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 45,
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "econ_stance": "Neutral",
  "econ_pressure": "Headwind",
  "econ_conviction": 45,
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-20",
  "overall_confidence": 58,
  "val_band": "attractive",
  "warranted_multiple": 20,
  "actual_multiple": 13.7,
  "warranted_ratio": 0.69,
  "discount_rate_r": 9.2,
  "risk_free_10y": 4.71,
  "g_near": 7.0,
  "g_term": 3.0,
  "val_multiple_basis": "clean trailing P/E",
  "fcf_yield": 8.5,
  "implied_growth_rate": 4.5,
  "moat_score": 59,
  "clean_pe": 13.7,
  "clean_peg": 1.5,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": 8,
  "fair_value_est": 112,
  "stop_loss": 91,
  "target_price": 112,
  "scenario_base_target": 112,
  "scenario_bull_target": 132,
  "scenario_bear_target": 82,
  "scenario_base_prob": 55,
  "scenario_bull_prob": 25,
  "scenario_bear_prob": 20,
  "prob_weighted_fair_value": 111,
  "industry_benchmark_name": "Retail comps + inventory turns",
  "industry_benchmark_value": "DTC +13% / 2.9x turns; total rev +5.7%",
  "industry_benchmark_score": 72,
  "analyst_consensus_target": 118.0,
  "analyst_target_high": 145,
  "analyst_target_low": 85,
  "analyst_target_median": 121,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 26.0,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Hold",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 44.6,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 56,
  "fmp_rating": "A",
  "fmp_overall_score": 4,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": "Jefferies Hold->Buy (13 Jul)",
  "recent_downgrades_30d": null,
  "competitive_rivals": [
    "ONON",
    "NKE",
    "ADDYY",
    "New Balance",
    "Crocs",
    "Birkenstock"
  ],
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "stable-to-softening \u2014 HOKA the challenged incumbent in premium running (ON gaining), UGG mature",
  "competitive_threat_level": "moderate-high",
  "beta": 1.17,
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "gates_caution": [
    "Gate 5 \u2014 imported-footwear tariff / margin risk (1-Aug escalation); Timing \u2014 confirmed downtrend, Short needs technical confirmation"
  ],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "next_update_date": "2026-08-10",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (rolled Sat 8-Aug -> Mon 10-Aug; next earnings ~22 Oct outside window)",
  "next_check_date": "2026-08-10",
  "prior_report": "calibration-DECK-20260720-1930.json",
  "prior_primary": "BUY",
  "changes_note": "S/M/L HOLD/BUY/BUY unchanged. Q1 FY27 reported 23 Jul: record $1.02B rev (+5.7%), HOKA +8% (sharp decel), UGG +5%, DTC +13%, EPS $0.94 beat $0.87; FY27 EPS guide RAISED to $7.35-7.50. Stock -7.7% since last report to $96.04. Earnings blackout cleared -> entry Wait->Half-Size (Fundamental path now open at a lower price). Quality 80->78 (HOKA decel), Val 68->70 (cheaper, ~13.7x vs warranted 20), Timing 50->38 (confirmed downtrend post-print), Driver 54->50 (consumer/HOKA softness), Econ Neutral 50->45 Headwind (XLY U/N/N). Conf 40->58 (earnings clarity). Short cap still active (now on the confirmed downtrend, not the blackout). Scenarios reset lower: base 120->112, bull 142->132, bear 85->82."
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_yahoo_quote / get_company_profile Price $96.04, beta 1.17, market cap $13.3B on 138.3M shares (verified vs share count), ISIN US2435371073, net cash ~$1.13B.
get_income_statement (6 quarters) Q1 FY2027 (filed 23 Jul): rev $1,019.5M (+5.7%), operating income $155.3M (-6%, margin 15.2% vs 17.1%), net income $130.0M, EPS $0.94. Earnings CLEAN — only non-op item is ~$13.7M recurring interest income (§7b: no inflation).
get_financial_ratios TTM gross 57.4% / op 22.6% / net 18.4%; ROE 42.6%, ROA 20.3%; P/FCF ~11×, FCF yield ~8.5%; current ratio 2.7×.
get_analyst_estimates FY2027 EPS ~$7.51, FY2028 ~$8.35, FY2029 ~$9.55, FY2030 ~$12.64 — decelerating-but-durable low-teens growth.
get_price_target_consensus / _summary Median $121, consensus ~$118, high $145, low $85; ~+23-26% upside from $96.
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades Consensus HOLD: 1 SB / 24 B / 25 H / 6 S (~45% bullish); post-print maintains (Stifel/Truist/Needham Buy, Barclays OW, Baird Neutral); Jefferies upgraded Hold→Buy 13 Jul. No post-print downgrades.
get_multi_timeframe_analysis / get_technical_indicators Strongly bearish confluence; daily RSI 35, price below 20/50/200-DMA, support breakdown on 2× volume; ATR ~$4.
get_ratings_snapshot Overall A; DCF/ROE/ROA sub-scores 5 (best), P/B 1 (brand premium to book) — confirms quality + value.
get_earnings_calendar Next earnings 2026-10-22 (est $1.80 EPS / $1.51B rev).
Web research (earnings release, WWD, sell-side, footwear-market data) HOKA +8% to $704M (decel), UGG +5% to $278M, DTC +13%, FY guide; competitive share (ON/Nike/adidas/New Balance) — running +8.9% YoY category growth, Nike losing share, ON gaining.
Macro report 2026-07-20 UST10Y ~4.71%; XLY U/N/N with fast money OUT short; stagflation-lite regime, oil-tax consumer headwind; 1-Aug tariff risk (imported footwear).
Impact on scores: High confidence on the valuation and signal call — the multiple, guardrail, FCF yield and FMP rating all agree the name is cheap for its quality, and earnings verified clean. The signal rests on the Short technical-confirmation cap (well-supported by the strongly-bearish MTF) and a Neutral driver / mild-headwind economy that keep Medium/Long at plain BUY, not STRONG BUY. Main uncertainty is forward: whether HOKA's deceleration is a pause or a trend — the single variable that decides base vs bear.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.