NYSE:DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation

ISIN: US2435371073
Consumer DiscretionaryFootwear & ApparelBrand / fashion-cyclical
NYSE · HQ: Goleta, CA · CEO: Stefano Caroti · Mkt Cap: ~$15.2B · Beta 1.15 Analysis Status: Starting
$109.11
+$3.39 (+3.21%)
20 Jun 2026 · Signal v6
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)BUY6865%Reclaim of SMA50 on volume; strongly-bullish MTF; cheap vs own history
Medium-term (6–12 mo)BUY7168%High quality + attractive valuation; XLY sector tailwind
Long-term (3–5 yr)BUY7470%Elite economics (57% GM, 41% ROE, net cash) dominate at this horizon
Next update: 2026-07-06 — default +14d (no impactful event; FY27-Q1 earnings ~late Jul)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

80
Elite economics, moderate moat
Confidence 82%

Valuation Attractiveness

70
Attractive vs own history & growth peers
Confidence 78%

Entry/Exit Timing

62
Uptrend intact, near-term extended
Confidence 65%

Underlying Drivers

62
Consumer discretionary demand — Neutral, no amplification
Confidence 60% · no amplification

Economic Alignment

66
Trend-Following · Tailwind
Confidence 68% · Macro report 2026-06-20
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
Net cash (~$1.5B); interest coverage 336x; current ratio 3.5. No distress.
Earnings Event Risk
Next earnings (FY27-Q1) ~late Jul — outside the 14-day window. No timing cap.
Valuation Ceiling
Price $109 below high target $145; P/E 15.5 near the LOW of its 5-yr range. Not stretched.
Accounting / Dilution
SBC modest; share count FALLING (153M→~139M via buybacks); earnings clean (7b).
Regulatory / Binary Event
No pending binary regulatory event.
Severe Driver Collapse
Consumer-discretionary driver Neutral (62), far above the ≤15 viability floor.
Do-Not-Buy triggers: none fired. Leverage low & estimates rising (not falling), valuation near the low of its range with growth still positive, no insider-selling spike, and brand-fashion cyclicality is a monitored risk — not an existential structural threat. Hard-gate state: CLEAR.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
Top-decile economics (57% GM, 41% ROE, net cash); brand-led moat and slowing growth temper it.
80
Confidence 82% · Growth-stage retail/brand profile

Lifecycle & sector: Consumer Discretionary · Apparel/Footwear & Accessories · lifecycle Growth (rev +~10% with high, stable profitability). Metric focus: DTC/comp growth, gross-margin trend, inventory turns, operating margin, ROIC — the retail profile, adjusted for a brand operator with no debt.

Deckers is, on the numbers, a top-decile consumer business: TTM gross margin 57.3% (vs Nike ~43%, mass footwear 35-45%), operating margin 23.0%, net margin 18.7%, ROE ~41%, ~100% FCF conversion and a net-cash balance sheet. The one blemish is growth deceleration — FY26 revenue $5.47B was +9.7% vs FY25 $4.99B, down from the mid-teens of prior years — and a moat that is brand-led rather than structurally locked-in (footwear has low switching costs and real fashion cyclicality, especially at UGG).

Sub-signalValueSector contextScore
Revenue trajectory+9.7% FY26Solid but decelerating from mid-teens60
Profitability vs peersGM 57% / OM 23%Elite for footwear (Nike GM ~43%)88
Cash generationFCF margin ~21%; ~100% conversionBest-in-class86
Balance-sheet healthNet cash ~$1.5B; D/E 0.15; cov 336xPristine95
Industry benchmark (retail)Positive DTC comps; inv turns 4.8xAbove-peer capital efficiency82

Industry Benchmark: Same-Store/DTC growth + Inventory turns

DTC growth positive (HOKA-led), inventory turnover 4.8x (healthy for footwear), asset turnover 1.48x. Benchmark score 82/100 — organic growth and capital efficiency both above the peer median; the only drag is the slowing top-line comp.

Competitive Moat

Pricing Power

76
UGG/HOKA sell at full price; premium pricing held

Network Effects

50
N/A for footwear (neutral)

Switching Costs

38
Low — consumers swap brands freely; On attacking HOKA

Cost Advantage

55
Asset-light scale, but Nike/Adidas dwarf its sourcing scale

Intangible Assets

78
UGG iconic; HOKA a genuinely hot brand

Moat average = 59 (76+50+38+55+78)/5. The walls are brand, not lock-in — strong intangibles and pricing power, weak switching costs. The Switching-Cost (38) and Cost-Advantage (55) sub-scores are derived from the Competitive Environment below, not asserted.

Competitive Environment

Deckers competes on two fronts: performance running (HOKA) and casual/fashion (UGG). The dynamic is "gaining share overall, but the runway is narrowing and rivals are organising against both brands." This read is the direct input to the Switching-Cost and Cost-Advantage moat sub-scores above and to the §11 Bear case / §12 thesis-invalidation.
RivalFront / threat typeDECK share trajectoryMoat-erosion vector
On Holding (ONON)Premium performance running — direct HOKA rivalGaining, but On growing faster off a smaller baseSwitching-cost decay — runners rotate brands every cycle
NikeScale incumbent across running & lifestyleStable vs a recovering NikeCost/scale advantage — Nike's sourcing scale dwarfs DECK's
AdidasGlobal scale; Samba/Gazelle fashion cycle hotStable; competes for the same fashion walletPricing/fashion — rival fashion cycles pull casual demand
Crocs / casualLow-cost casual substitution for UGGStable — different price tierPricing pressure at the low end of UGG's range

Net effect on moat: → Switching Costs trimmed to 38, Cost Advantage to 55 from the share dynamic (On attacking HOKA; Nike/Adidas scale). Competitive threat level: MODERATE. Not existential — HOKA is still taking category share — but enough that the Bear case and exit rules carry an explicit competitive trigger.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

ComponentReadScore
ROIC (40%)Very high — asset-light, net cash, ROE ~41%, ROA top-quartile (FMP 5/5)90
Capital allocation (30%)Disciplined buybacks shrinking share count (153M→~139M); no dividend; no leverage80
Mgmt skin-in-game (30%)New CEO (Caroti, 2025); modest SBC; insider ownership moderate62

ROIC/capital-allocation sub-score = 84. FMP financial-health rating A- (4/5), with ROE 5/5 and ROA 5/5, independently confirms the quality read.

Quality = 80 (weighted: revenue 60, profitability 88, cash 86, balance sheet 95, benchmark 82, moat 59, ROIC 84). Elite economics pull it up; the moderate moat and decelerating growth keep it out of the high-80s. Confidence 82%.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Cheap vs own 5-yr range and growth-brand peers; ~8.5% FCF yield; reverse-DCF implies less growth than consensus.
70
Confidence 78%

Deckers screens as cheap for the quality — not on an absolute multiple but against its own history and its growth-brand peers. The stock de-rated hard from its 2024-25 highs (monthly resistance still sits at ~$224 pre-context) to ~$109, so today's multiples sit near the bottom of its 5-year range.

MultipleDECKReferenceReadScore
Forward P/E (FY27)~14.6xNike ~30x, On ~45x+, Adidas ~28x, Crocs ~7xWell below growth-brand peers72
P/E own 5-yr decile15.5x TTMNear LOW end of its own rangeDecile 2-3 — attractive80
PEG1.43vs ~8-11% fwd growthFair, not screaming-cheap55
EV/EBITDA9.7xFootwear ~12-15xBelow sector74

FCF Yield (universal anchor): ~8.5% on EV

FCF/share $8.38 on $109.11 = 7.7% on price; ~$1.16B FCF on ~$13.6B EV = 8.5% on EV. That is squarely in the "very attractive" band for a profitable, net-cash compounder.

Reverse DCF — implied growth

At $109.11, ~$13.6B EV against ~$1.16B FCF and a ~9% WACC, the market is pricing in only low-single-digit (~3-5%) perpetual FCF growth. Consensus expects ~8-11% revenue growth near-term. The market is implying LESS growth than analysts expect — the classic set-up for an Attractive valuation score (78).

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside

Core business roughly justifies the ~$109 price on its own; the HOKA optionality and net cash are the cushion. Tilt: +4 to Valuation (credible, sizable, partly un-priced) — not a re-rating.

Analyst consensusValue
Consensus target$118.73 (+8.8%)
Median$117 (+7.2%)
High / Low$145 / $90
CoverageDeep (38 in last yr; 12 last quarter; last-month avg $124.71)

Price is 8.8% below consensus — just inside the "fairly valued, slight upside" band (target sub-score 62). Grades distribution (1 strong-buy / 24 buy / 25 hold / 6 sell) is a Hold consensus, 44.6% bullish — the Street is divided, which caps the grades sub-score at 35 and tempers momentum. FMP rating A- (4/5): high ROE/ROA scores, but P/B score 1 (the asset-light, high-ROE business carries a structurally high P/B of 6.2x — not a red flag here).

Earnings quality (step 7b) — CLEAN

Below-operating-line income (essentially interest on the cash pile) was ~$69M of FY26 pre-tax income — only ~7% of net income, well under the 15% distortion threshold. No mark-to-market / private-stake markups. Clean P/E ~16.3 vs reported 15.5; clean PEG ~1.5. No normalisation needed; no Gate-4 trigger.

Valuation = 70 (sector 72, own-history decile 80, PEG 55, reverse-DCF 78, analyst target 62, grades 35; +4 optionality tilt netted in). Attractive — cheap vs its own history and its growth-brand peers, fairly-priced only against the divided Street. Confidence 78%.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Consumer discretionary spending (premium footwear)
62
Neutral — no amplification

Primary driver: US/global consumer discretionary spending (premium-footwear demand), with the running/athleisure category cycle as the secondary lens. Deckers can execute flawlessly and still miss if the discretionary consumer pulls back — UGG is a want, not a need, and premium running shoes are a deferrable purchase.

HorizonReadWeight
Historical (25%)Consumer resilient through 2025-26; real wages positive; labor market firm~64
Current (50%)Jobless claims low (226k, in-line), Philly Fed activity expanding, but discretionary spend softening at the margin; premium footwear demand OK not hot~62
Forward (25%)Fed on hold; PMIs in expansion; consensus expects steady (not accelerating) spend~60

Driver score = 62 · Neutral. This is the deliberate read: the external consumer backdrop is supportive-but-not-a-tailwind, which is why the signal is BUY and not STRONG BUY. Amplification fires only at ≥65 (tailwind) or ≤35 (headwind); at 62 the driver is in the 36-64 band, so it leaves the base signal unchanged. Thesis-invalidation floor: a genuine discretionary-spend contraction (rising unemployment + falling real wages) that pulls premium footwear volumes down.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind
66
conviction

The latest Macro-Economic report scores Consumer Discretionary (XLY) Outperform short / Outperform medium / Neutral long. Buying DECK rides that sector tailwind — hence Trend-Following with Tailwind pressure (anchored on the medium horizon; the long is Neutral). However, amplification to STRONG BUY needs BOTH a Tailwind economy AND a driver ≥65; the driver is 62, so the economy alone does not amplify — the base BUY stands across all three horizons.

Source: GICS-sector map — Consumer Discretionary (XLY) · Macro report 2026-06-20

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Strongly-bullish MTF and a volume-backed SMA50 reclaim, but near-term extended and the Street is divided.
62
Confidence 65% · medium macro-sensitivity sector

Timing is constructive but near-term extended. The multi-timeframe picture is strongly bullish (monthly/weekly uptrend, daily strong-uptrend with price > SMA50 > SMA200), and the daily just reclaimed the 50-day on 1.68x volume (+3.2% on the session). The caveat: the hourly has rolled over (short-term pullback) and the daily MACD histogram is still slightly negative, so the very-near-term momentum has not fully confirmed.

ComponentReadWeightScore
MTF trendStrongly bullish confluence; price > SMA50 > SMA20030%72
Risk-rewardMid-range (63% of 52-wk); stop below ~$96 is >2.5 ATR away — wide20%55
Macro overlayXLY in favour (rotation in); Fed on hold; VIX moderate15%65
Sentiment (grades+news)Grades mixed (2 up / 2 down last 30d); no DECK-specific news in feed18%45
CatalystsEarnings ~late Jul (>30d); clear near-term calendar17%70

Relative strength: DECK has rallied ~38% off the March/May ~$79-94 lows back to $109, outpacing the broad tape over 1-3 months — a recovering leader. (No direct SPY/XLY return series was pulled this run; RS read is qualitative — minor confidence haircut.)

Sentiment detail: last 30 days saw upgrades from Piper Sandler (to Neutral) and Bernstein (to Market Perform) against downgrades from Wells Fargo (to Underweight) and KGI (to Neutral), with UBS/Needham/Truist/Barclays maintaining Buy/Overweight — net neutral, no clear directional push.

Timing = 62 (Improving, ≥55). Confidence 65% (−5 no ETF RS series, −5 no DECK-specific news in the feed).

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-06-23S&P Global Composite PMI (Jun)Medium50.851.5⚠ MediumActivity/demand signal for discretionary spend
2026-06-24New Home Sales (May)Medium+2.9%−6.2%⚠ MediumHousing wealth-effect on discretionary purchases
2026-06-24Current Account (Q1)Medium−$225B−$190.7B· NoLittle direct relevance to footwear demand
~2026-07-24DECK FY27-Q1 earnings (est.)High✅ YesThe next stock-specific catalyst — outside the update window

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-06-18Initial Jobless Claims226K225K+0.4% (in-line)Neutral — firm labor supports the consumer
2026-06-17FOMC decision (held)HoldHoldNeutral — rates on hold steadies discretionary multiples
2026-06-18Philly Fed Business Conditions50.2ImprovingPositive — activity expanding

Consumer Discretionary is a medium macro-sensitivity sector, so no WAIT override applies. Nothing high-impact and stock-specific lands inside the 14-day window; the June FOMC (held) is already behind us and the next real catalyst is FY27-Q1 earnings in late July. Backdrop is neutral-to-supportive: firm labor, expanding activity, rates on hold.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Bullish48.4−, fallingS: $93.7 R: $122.3Resist. breakout0.43x
WeeklyUptrend ↑Bullish52.1+, risingS: $96.1 R: $119.7Resist. breakout0.92x
DailyStrong up ↑Bullish51.7+, hist −S: $97.5 R: $111.0Resist. breakout1.68x
HourlyDowntrend ↓Bearish46.1−, hist +S: $105.4 R: $110.6Support b'down0.12x
15-minRecovering →Neutral50.8−, flatS: $108.4 R: $110.6Resist. breakout0.34x
Confluence: Strongly Bullish · MTF Score 72

Monthly, weekly and daily all point up, with the daily in a strong uptrend (price $109 > SMA50 $106 > SMA200 $103) and a volume-backed resistance breakout. The hourly downtrend and the slightly-negative daily MACD histogram say the immediate momentum is pausing — a textbook pullback-within-an-uptrend. The reachable early entry is a hold above the reclaimed SMA50 (~$106) or a pullback into the $97-100 support shelf; key resistance is $111 then $116.5.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

DECK 6-month daily close with SMA50 (orange). Green = $97 support shelf; yellow = SMA200 ($103); red = $116.5 resistance; purple = $117 median analyst target. The March/May $79-94 washout has recovered to $109, reclaiming both moving averages.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull · 25% · $145 (+33%)

HOKA reaccelerates (international + apparel) and the multiple re-rates toward ~18-20x FY27 EPS. Matches the Street high target. Buybacks amplify per-share gains.

Base · 50% · $122 (+12%)

Steady ~8-11% growth, margins held, a modest re-rating to ~16x FY27 EPS — roughly the consensus zone ($117-124). The probability-weighted centre of gravity.

Bear · 25% · $88 (−19%)

Discretionary spend contracts and/or the brand cycle turns — On reclaims premium-running share and UGG fashion demand fades (the named competitive trigger), pulling growth below the sector and compressing the multiple back toward the $90 low target.

Probability-weighted 12-month fair value ≈ $119 (0.25×145 + 0.50×122 + 0.25×88), ~9% above the current $109 — consistent with the BUY/Attractive read and the +8.8% consensus upside.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

Cheap vs fair value with a non-negative driver and no imminent earnings.
✅ Price $109.11 < fair value ~$122 (base / consensus)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (next ~late Jul)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (62)

Technical — not MET

SMA50 reclaimed on volume, but the daily MACD histogram is still negative — confirmation pending. Preferred entry is a sustained hold above $106 OR a pullback into $97-100.
✅ Daily close > SMA50 ($106) on >1.5x volume (reclaim is 1 day — needs to hold)
✅ RSI 35-65 (51.7)
⛔ Daily MACD histogram positive ≥2 days OR turning up off support

Catalyst — not MET

No event in the window.
· Post-earnings move >+5% with guidance raised (no earnings until ~late Jul)

Forecast: Fundamental group already MET — a cheap, net-cash compounder is a valid starter today (Half-Size). Technical group flips to MET in ~1-2 weeks (Moderate confidence) if the daily holds above the reclaimed SMA50 ($106) and the MACD histogram turns positive — that would upgrade conviction to Full-Size; a pullback into $97-100 also opens the technical path. Catalyst group is catalyst-dependent on FY27-Q1 earnings (~late Jul). Net: scale in now on the Fundamental path; add on technical confirmation.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below ~$96 (under the $97 shelf and SMA200)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ FY guidance cut OR revenue growth falls below the discretionary-sector median
⛔ Competitive: On Holding/Nike visibly reclaims premium-running share AND UGG fashion demand fades (named-rival trigger)
⛔ Consumer-discretionary driver turns to a headwind (rising unemployment + falling real wages)

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into $120-125 (base/consensus) with RSI > 70 and no quality upgrade to justify it

Forecast: Stop-loss UNLIKELY in the next 4-6 weeks — $96 is ~12% below price and below both the SMA50 and SMA200; it would take an earnings miss or a discretionary-demand shock. Profit-trim (~$120-125) is plausible on a continued grind higher (Moderate). Thesis invalidation is the one to watch over quarters: the competitive/driver conditions, not price.

Imagine you act at the current price of $109.11 · as of 20 Jun 2026

What if you bought now?

You'd be risking ~$13 / 12% to the stop ($96) to gain ~$13 / 12% (base $122) to $36 / 33% (bull $145).
  • Risking: downside to stop $96 (−12%); bear case $88 (−19%); plus the Technical entry path is NOT yet confirmed (buying a 1-day SMA50 reclaim, hourly still soft).
  • Gaining: base $122 (+12%) · bull $145 (+33%); a ~7.7% FCF yield and ongoing buybacks compounding per-share value while you hold; plus HOKA-international optionality you own for free.
  • Net: risk-reward ≈ 1:1 to base, ~2.8:1 to bull. Acting now buys a cheap quality compounder early on the Fundamental path; waiting for the daily to hold $106 (or a dip to $97-100) materially improves the entry.

What if you sold now?

You'd be giving up ~12% base-case upside to protect against a ~19% bear-case drawdown.
  • Giving up: base-case upside to $122 (+12%); the ~7.7% FCF yield and buyback compounding; selling slightly below the ~$119 probability-weighted fair value.
  • Protecting: capital if the bear case ($88) plays out on a discretionary slowdown or competitive share loss. Exit rules triggered right now? None — no stop, no profit-target, no thesis break is live.
  • Net: no mechanical reason to sell — this is a hold/accumulate zone, not an exit.
13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — no risk budget or portfolio role was specified for this name. The §12 Conviction Ladder reads Half-Size (1 of 3 entry paths met): a valid starter / scale-in. Volatility context for sizing: beta ~1.15, daily ATR ~$4.0 (~3.7% of price), 52-week range $78.91-$126.50. A logical hard stop near $96 is ~12% / ~3.2 ATR away, so a tight-stop entry is better taken on a pullback into the $97-100 shelf. Specify an allocation and role for a portfolio-percentage figure.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "DECK",
  "exchange": "NYSE",
  "exchange_ticker": "NYSE:DECK",
  "isin": "US2435371073",
  "api_ticker": "DECK",
  "date": "2026-06-20",
  "version": "v6",
  "company": "Deckers Outdoor Corporation",
  "finder_ticker": "DECK",
  "finder_exchange": "NYSE",
  "analysis_status": "on-going",
  "user_horizon": null,
  "user_allocation_pct": null,
  "portfolio_role": null,
  "lifecycle_stage": "growth",
  "price_at_rating": 109.11,
  "signal_short": "BUY",
  "signal_medium": "BUY",
  "signal_long": "BUY",
  "primary_signal": "BUY",
  "quality_score": 80,
  "valuation_score": 70,
  "timing_score": 62,
  "driver_score": 62,
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 66,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-06-20",
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "Retail comps + inventory turns",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "DTC+ / 4.8x turns",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 82,
    "moat_score": 59,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 90,
    "capital_allocation": 80,
    "management_skin_in_game": 62
  },
  "valuation_detail": {
    "fcf_yield": 8.5,
    "implied_growth_rate": 4.0,
    "consensus_growth_rate": 9.0,
    "historical_valuation_decile": 2
  },
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": 72,
    "risk_reward_score": 55,
    "relative_strength_vs_spy": null,
    "relative_strength_vs_sector": null,
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 70,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.15
  },
  "overall_confidence": 65,
  "fcf_yield": 8.5,
  "implied_growth_rate": 4.0,
  "moat_score": 59,
  "fair_value_est": 122,
  "stop_loss": 96,
  "target_price": 122,
  "scenario_base_target": 122,
  "scenario_bull_target": 145,
  "industry_benchmark_name": "Retail comps + inventory turns",
  "industry_benchmark_value": "DTC+ / 4.8x",
  "industry_benchmark_score": 82,
  "analyst_consensus_target": 118.73,
  "analyst_target_high": 145,
  "analyst_target_low": 90,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 8.8,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Hold",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 44.6,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 38,
  "fmp_rating": "A-",
  "fmp_overall_score": 4,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": 2,
  "recent_downgrades_30d": 2,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": 7,
  "clean_pe": 16.3,
  "clean_peg": 1.5,
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "gaining",
  "competitive_threat_level": "moderate",
  "hard_gate_state": "clear",
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "gates_caution": [],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-06",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (no impactful event; FY27-Q1 earnings ~late Jul)",
  "next_check_date": "2026-07-06"
}

First report for DECK (Starting). BUY across all three horizons; hard-gate CLEAR; entry conviction Half-Size (Fundamental path met, Technical pending confirmation). No prior calibration, so no Changes box.

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_company_profile profile, price, ISIN, beta, mkt cap
get_financial_ratios margins, ROE, FCF, leverage (TTM)
get_income_statement 8 quarters — revenue, EPS, earnings-quality decomposition
get_multi_timeframe_analysis 5 timeframes, strongly-bullish confluence
get_stock_prices 6-month daily for the chart + SMA50
get_analyst_estimates FY26-FY30 revenue/EPS
get_price_target_consensus / _summary consensus $118.73; coverage depth
get_stock_grades / get_grades_consensus Hold consensus; recent actions
get_ratings_snapshot FMP A- (4/5)
get_economic_calendar 30-day macro calendar
get_earnings_calendar empty for DECK — next date estimated from filing history (~late Jul)
get_stock_news feed returned off-topic articles — no DECK-specific news; sentiment leaned on analyst grades
Relative strength vs SPY/XLY no ETF return series pulled — RS read qualitative
Impact on scores: Timing confidence reduced to 65% (−5 no ETF RS series, −5 no DECK-specific news). Next-earnings date estimated from filing cadence, not a calendar feed — immaterial to scoring (it is outside the update window either way). All quality/valuation inputs are from direct MCP data.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.