NASDAQ:CELH Celsius Holdings, Inc.

ISIN: US15118V2079
Consumer StaplesBeverages — Non-AlcoholicPost-earnings gap-down
NASDAQ · Boca Raton, FL · Beverages (Functional/Energy) Analysis Status: On-Going
$23.77
−19.2% since last report
7 Aug 2026 · Signal v6

Changes Since Last Report — vs 20 Jul 2026 ($29.42)

Downgrade: HOLD / BUY / BUY → HOLD / HOLD / HOLD. Celsius missed Q2 (filed 6 Aug): revenue $817.9m, +10.6% YoY but ~$55m light of ~$870m consensus — the first miss in five quarters — and the flagship Celsius brand fell ~12%, with growth now carried by Alani Nu (+56%) and Rockstar. Gross margin compressed 51.5%→48.1% and operating income halved; the stock gapped −19.2% to $23.77, a 16-month low, on 4.4× volume. The medium- and long-term BUYs are withdrawn: the core engine has turned negative, so Quality drops High→Medium and the name is now a value-trap-risk HOLD despite a cheaper price.

DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

Celsius Holdings is a functional-beverage company built around fitness-and-health energy drinks. Its core business is developing and marketing branded, sugar-free energy drinks and powders — the flagship CELSIUS line plus the acquired Alani Nu and Rockstar brands — and getting them onto shelves through PepsiCo's US direct-store-delivery network and, internationally, through Suntory. What distinguishes it is a portfolio position as the clear US #2 in energy drinks (roughly a fifth of the category) skewed to younger, health-conscious consumers, and an asset-light model: it owns the brands and formulas but outsources bottling and distribution, which lets it run high gross margins and strong free-cash-flow conversion. For a reader, think of it as a brand-and-marketing company in a fast-moving consumer category, riding the shift from sugary sodas to functional drinks — now wrestling with a maturing flagship brand and intensifying competition.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD4055%Strong downtrend post-miss; no reversal confirmed
Medium-term (6–12 mo)HOLD5055%Cheap on forward earnings, but core brand shrinking + estimates being cut
Long-term (3–5 yr)HOLD5455%Value-trap risk: flagship in decline, moat moderate
Next update: 2026-08-21 — default +14d (Q2 earnings just reported 6 Aug; no impactful dated event in window)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

61
medium
conf 62%

Valuation Attractiveness

65
attractive (edge)
conf 58%

Entry/Exit Timing

36
weak
conf 55%

Underlying Drivers

50
neutral
conf 55%

Economic Alignment

50
Neutral
conf 50%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
Net-debt-neutral (cash ~$0.6bn ≈ total debt); interest coverage 4.4×; current ratio 1.8. No distress.
Earnings Event Risk
Q2 reported 6 Aug 2026 (the event has passed). Next print ~early Nov — no binary event in the near window.
Valuation Ceiling
Trailing GAAP P/E ~113× is a transition-year/trough-earnings artifact (deal + amortization costs). On forward adj. EPS the multiple is ~15×, below the ~18× warranted anchor — ceiling does NOT fire off trough GAAP.
⚠️
Accounting / Dilution
Share count +9% YoY from the Alani Nu stock consideration (one-time M&A issuance, not chronic). Q2 non-operating income was NEGATIVE (−$5.7m) — earnings are not inflated; adjusted EPS exceeds GAAP. Caution, not a trigger.
⚠️
Regulatory / Binary
Texas AG investigation into caffeine marketing to minors + Pomerantz securities investigation. Live reputational/legal overhang, but no dated binary >20% event pending. Caution.
Severe Driver Collapse
Consumer / category driver is Neutral, not collapsed.
No hard gate is triggered and no Do-Not-Buy trigger fires. Two cautions stand (acquisition dilution; Texas-AG / securities legal overhang) plus an elevated-to-high competitive threat — all sit in position-sizing and the bear case, not as hard blocks. Note that DNB Trigger 3 (negative earnings revisions) does not fire because the stock has already repriced hard (−19% in a day, −39% YTD) — the shoe has dropped.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
A cash-generative #2 brand — but the flagship is now shrinking
61
conf 62% — Medium (downgraded from High; core-brand decline is a genuine quality hit)

Lifecycle & sector: classified Consumer Staples (Beverages — Non-Alcoholic), but behaves like a decelerating growth beverage. Total Q2 revenue grew +10.6% YoY to $817.9m — but that is now acquisition-carried: the flagship Celsius brand fell ~12% YoY, offset by Alani Nu (+56% retail) and the completed Rockstar integration. Organic momentum in the core engine has turned negative — the single most important change this quarter and the reason Quality drops from High to Medium.

Sub-signalReadingScoreRationale
Revenue trajectoryTotal +10.6% YoY; core brand −12%; first revenue miss in 5 quarters (~$55m light vs ~$870m consensus)50Headline growth still positive but organic core shrinking — quality of growth deteriorating
Profitability / marginsGross margin 48.1% (was 51.5% a year ago, −340bps); operating margin 9.2% vs 19.3%; operating income halved to $75.3m48Material margin compression (mix, promo, integration costs)
Cash generationTTM FCF ~$0.53bn; FCF/EV ~8.7%; OCF/sales 19%78Genuine strength — asset-light model converts well (aided by D&A, SBC add-back and working-capital timing; conversion > net income)
Balance-sheet healthNet-debt-neutral (cash ~$0.6bn ≈ debt); interest coverage 4.4×; current ratio 1.8; D/E 0.5675Sound — the prior 'elevated leverage' caution is overstated on current data
Industry benchmark — Beverage composite (gross margin + volume/share). Gross margin 48% is healthy for the category, but volume/share of the flagship is now declining and margin is compressing. Benchmark score 58/100 (was 64) — the composite is deteriorating.
Pricing power
50
Category is promotional; Kirkland private label + prebiotic entrants cap pricing.
Network effects
50
N/A for a beverage (neutral).
Switching costs
30
Near-zero — consumers switch cans freely; core −12% is that decay showing.
Cost advantage
48
Asset-light + PEP DSD scale, but no structural input edge vs Monster/KDP.
Intangibles / brand
60
CELSIUS + Alani Nu are real brands with a health halo — the durable asset, but the flagship halo is fading.

Moat score 48/100 (was 52) — brand is the only real wall, and it is being tested.

Competitive Environment — the moat sub-scores above are derived from this read, not asserted. The energy/functional-drink category is structurally attractive but the competitive intensity is high and rising.
CompetitorThreat typeShare trajectory vs CELHMoat-erosion vector
Monster Beverage (MNST)Direct #1 US rival (~27% share)CELH core losing; Monster stableShelf/scale; Monster's own launches
Red Bull (private)Global #1Stable / holdingBrand + on-premise dominance
Keurig Dr Pepper / Ghost (KDP)Well-funded challenger brandGhost gainingKDP distribution muscle behind a youth brand
Costco Kirkland Signature energyLow-cost private label (launched Mar 2026)Taking value-seeking volumePrice undercut; pressures pricing power
Poppi / Olipop / PepsiCo prebioticsAdjacent 'functional/health' substitutionWinning 'health' occasionsSteals the wellness positioning CELSIUS relied on
GLP-1 weight-loss drugsStructural demand headwindCategory-wideLower appetite/consumption occasions (contested magnitude)

Net effect on the moat: Switching Costs trimmed to 30 and Cost Advantage to 48; the flagship's ~12% decline is direct evidence of share/relevance loss even as Alani Nu offsets it. Competitive threat level: HIGH (raised from elevated); combined US share roughly stable only because Alani is masking the core decline.

ROIC & capital allocation: ROIC is depressed by goodwill from the Alani/Rockstar deals; FMP scores ROE 3/5, ROA 2/5. Capital allocation is a swing factor — the acquisitions bought scale and offset a weakening core, but at the cost of dilution and integration margin drag. Management skin-in-the-game: founder-led (CEO John Fieldly), moderate insider alignment.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Cheaper after the crash — but the earnings denominator is under downward pressure
65
conf 58% — Attractive edge on forward earnings + 8% FCF yield; tempered by cuts to come and stale targets

The −19% gap-down did the valuation work: at $23.77 the stock trades at roughly 15× forward adjusted EPS (FY26 consensus ~$1.55–$1.65, which will be trimmed after the miss) and ~13× FY27 — versus the ~7,330%-run peak that once carried 100×+.

Warranted-Multiple Anchor. r = 10-Y (4.63%, FRED 5 Aug 2026) + 4.5% ERP + 1.0% risk add-on (Quality 40–64) = 10.1%. Disciplined g_near = 8% (still-double-digit topline, but decelerating and Staples-classified; consensus haircut 25%), g_term = 3%. Two-stage warranted P/E ≈ 17.8× (below the ~23× Staples guardrail line). Actual ~15× ÷ warranted 17.8× = 0.84 → Attractive/Fair edge. Implied-growth read: at $23.77 the market embeds only mid-single-digit long-run growth — less than even a haircut estimate, i.e. the price now discounts a fairly grim core outlook.
LensReadingInterpretation
Forward P/E (FY26 adj.)~15× (~13× FY27)Attractive for a 20%-share, 48%-GM brand — if estimates hold
FCF yield (FCF/EV)~8.7%Very attractive universal anchor
Trailing GAAP P/E~113×; P/B 5.0×; P/S 2.0×Expensive on trailing GAAP — trough/transition-year artifact; FMP P/E & P/B sub-scores both 1/5
Own-history decileBottom of its multi-year rangeCheapest it has traded as a public growth name
FMP health ratingB− (overall 2/5; DCF 5/5)Downgraded from 3/5; DCF still says undervalued on cash flows
Analyst targets — STALE, treat with caution (data trap). FMP consensus $47.67 (high $57 / low $26 / median $48) and Yahoo mean $53.06 (n=21) are almost entirely pre-6 Aug crash and will be cut — the freshest FMP last-month average is already lower at $42 (n=3). The implied 80–120% 'upside' is an artifact of stale targets, so this sub-factor is heavily haircut. The most relevant post-event anchors are the bears: Yahoo low $29.20 and FMP low $26. Grades (22 Buy / 1 Hold) are likewise all pre-crash 'maintain' actions — expect downgrades/target cuts in the next fortnight.
Embedded Optionality / Free Upside. (1) International — Suntory-led expansion (Europe/APAC) is small today and largely un-modelled. (2) Alani Nu still compounding +56% — the market is now paying little for its continuation. (3) PepsiCo takeout — PEP holds an ~8% stake and provides distribution; a strategic buyout is a real, if unquantified, floor on a depressed price. These are a modest tilt (+3–4), not a re-rating — the core-brand decline keeps this 'attractive-edge', not 'cheap-on-hope'.
5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
US discretionary consumption + energy/functional-drink category health
50
Neutral — no amplification

CELSIUS is a premium, impulse-purchase beverage, so its dominant external driver is consumer spending power and the growth of the functional-energy category, moderated by competitive intensity. The two pull in opposite directions right now.

HorizonReadDetail
Historical (12–24m)NeutralCategory grew mid-single digits; CELH rode it hard, then decelerated as competition and its own base caught up
CurrentNeutral/softConsumer cooling in a stagflation-lite regime (soft July payrolls, ~$90 Brent); category still growing but CELH core losing share — company execution is the binding constraint, not the category
Forward (6–12m)NeutralFunctional-beverage TAM ~8% CAGR is a tailwind; GLP-1 + private-label + prebiotic substitution are offsets

Driver score 50 (Neutral) → not eligible to amplify (needs ≥65 to lift a BUY or ≤35 to deepen a SELL). It leaves the base signal unchanged. Thesis-invalidation floor: the case breaks if the core Celsius brand decline accelerates beyond this quarter's −12% and combined US share slips — that is the dial to watch, and it is already amber.

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Neutral · Neutral
50
conviction

The latest MacroDriver report (30 Jul 2026, 'stagflation-lite — energy shock re-armed') scores Consumer Staples (XLP) Outperform short/medium, Neutral long — a mild sector tailwind. But CELH is a premium, discretionary-consumption growth beverage, not a defensive staple, so the staples signal does not cleanly transfer; a cooling consumer is a mild offset. Net pressure Neutral, conviction 50 — no amplification either way. The macro report's armed 'S&P 500 concentration / AI unwind' tail does NOT apply (CELH is not an AI-cohort name); it is not inherited into the bear case.

Source: sector-map (XLP) · Macro report 2026-07-30

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Strongly bearish tape — oversold, but no reversal confirmed
36
conf 55%

Multi-timeframe confluence is strongly bearish: monthly and weekly downtrends, daily strong downtrend, all below the 50- and 200-day. The Q2 miss produced a capitulation-type flush — −19% on 4.4× average volume to a 16-month low. Daily RSI 31, hourly 28 (oversold); the 15-min turned 'recovering', hinting at a dead-cat/relief bounce, but there is no confirmed reversal and no reclaim of the $29.5 50-day.

SignalReadingRead
Risk-rewardStop below $23.55; ATR(d) $1.71Oversold but knife-catch risk
Relative strength−39% YTD; deeply lagging SPY & XLPLaggard
Macro overlayFed on hold; VIX ~16; XLP in favourMildly supportive backdrop
SentimentNews tone strongly negative post-miss; grades pre-crash maintains (cuts pending)Negative
Catalyst densityBig event (earnings) just cleared; calendar calm 30dPath risk lower now

Timing 36 (Weak). A short-term BUY would require the Technical or Catalyst group to confirm — neither has; buy only on a confirmed reclaim of the 50-day or a tested higher-low off support.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-08-07Nonfarm Payrolls / Unemployment (Jul)High80k / 4.2%57k / 4.2%⚠ IndirectConsumer-health read for a discretionary beverage
2026-08-11NFIB / Existing Home SalesLow–MedNoNot CELH-specific
~2026-11CELH Q3 2026 earningsHigh✅ YesNext test of whether the core brand stabilises

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-08-06Challenger Job Cuts (Jul)33.4k59kbelow (fewer cuts)Mildly risk-on
2026-08-06Nonfarm Productivity (Q2)1.4%0.6%aboveDisinflationary, mildly supportive
2026-08-06Initial Jobless Claims199k202kbelowLabour still firm

CELH has low direct macro sensitivity — the dominant variable is company execution, not the calendar. The only relevant macro thread is the health of the discretionary consumer (July payrolls today); a sharply weaker consumer would compound the core-brand problem. No high-impact, CELH-specific dated event sits in the next fortnight now that Q2 has cleared.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyDowntrendBearish39−, fallingS 21.1 / R 40.8Support breakdown0.5x
WeeklyDowntrendBearish35−, fallingS 27.5 / R 47.7Support breakdown1.8x
DailyStrong downtrendBearish31−, fallingS 26.5 / R 29.6 (50d)Support breakdown4.4x
HourlyStrong downtrendBearish28−, base?S 23.6 / R 28.5Support breakdown
15-minRecoveringNeutral48+ turningS 23.6 / R 24.7Minor breakout0.2x
Confluence: Strongly Bearish · MTF Score 22

Every higher timeframe is in a confirmed downtrend and price broke support on huge post-earnings volume. The only green shoot is the 15-min 'recovering' with oversold daily/hourly RSI — setup for a relief bounce, not a trend change. The level that matters: a daily reclaim of the 50-day (~$29.6) on volume would be the first sign the bleeding has stopped; below $23.55 opens the door to the low-$20s / $21 monthly support.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

6-month daily close. The February ~$54 high gave way to a steady bleed through spring/summer; the 6 Aug earnings miss produced a −19% gap to a 16-month low at $23.77 on 4.4× volume.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull $36 (25%)

Core Celsius brand stabilises within a couple of quarters; Alani Nu (+56%) and international keep total growth low-double-digit; gross margin recovers toward 50%+ as integration costs roll off; estimates stop falling and the stock re-rates to ~19–20× forward. A PepsiCo takeout would land in this zone or above. ~+51% from $23.77.

Base $27 (50%)

Choppy stabilisation: total growth stays high-single/low-double-digit on acquisitions while the core brand remains soft; margins hold ~48%; consensus is trimmed modestly and the stock grinds at ~15–17× forward. The most probable centre of gravity — cheap but no catalyst to re-rate until the core turns. ~+14%.

Bear $18 (25%)

Competitive trigger: Costco Kirkland private label, KDP-Ghost and Monster take further share as the core Celsius decline accelerates beyond −12% and combined US share slips below ~18%; GLP-1 pressure and further margin compression drive another leg of estimate cuts; the multiple de-rates to ~11–12×, compounded by the Texas-AG / securities legal overhang. ~−24%.

Probability-weighted 12-month fair value ≈ $27 (0.25×$36 + 0.50×$27 + 0.25×$18), essentially at/just above spot — which is exactly why the signal is HOLD: the price is fair-to-slightly-cheap, but the risk is two-sided and the core-brand trend must turn before the reward skews up.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Half-Size1 of 3 groups met — one path open — starter / scale-in

Fundamental — MET

Trades below base fair value; category driver borderline-neutral.
✅ Price $23.77 < base fair value ~$27
✅ No earnings within 7 days (Q2 just cleared)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (50)

Technical — not MET

Strong downtrend; needs a reclaim of the 50-day OR a tested higher-low off support.
⛔ Daily close > 50-day ($29.6) on >1.5× volume
⛔ OR a tested bounce off $23.5–$24 support with a higher low
⛔ RSI 35–65 (31 — oversold, below range)

Catalyst — not MET

The earnings event was negative, not confirming.
⛔ Post-earnings move > +5% with guidance raised (was −19%)

Forecast: Fundamental group is already met (price below fair value) — which sets a HALF-SIZE ceiling on conviction, not permission to chase. Technical group: UNLIKELY in the next 4–6 weeks — a reclaim of the ~$29.6 50-day is ~24% above spot and the trend is down; a tested higher-low off $23.5–$24 support is the more reachable early trigger (watch for it on the relief bounce). Catalyst group: not until Q3 earnings (~Nov) shows whether the core brand stabilises — that is the real re-rating gate. Confidence: Moderate the fundamental cheapness persists; Low that the technical confirms soon.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below $23.55 (post-crash low)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ Another quarter of double-digit core-brand decline
⛔ OR combined US energy share falls below ~17% as Kirkland / KDP-Ghost / Monster gain
⛔ OR full-year guidance cut / a hard gate fires

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into ~$36 (bull) with RSI > 70 and no core-brand improvement

Forecast: Stop is ~1% below spot — a real near-term risk if the relief bounce fails; two closes under $23.55 would flip the action to EXIT. Thesis-invalidation is the one to watch at Q3: a second double-digit core decline confirms structural share loss and would be an exit regardless of price.

Imagine you act at the current price of $23.77 (16-month low, −19% on the Q2 miss; intraday ~$24.1) · as of 7 Aug 2026

What if you bought now?

You are risking a ~24% drawdown to the bear case (~$18) to gain a ~14% base / ~51% bull.

What you're risking: you would be catching a knife — every higher timeframe is in a downtrend, the Technical entry group is unmet, and estimates have not finished being cut. The hard stop sits just ~1% below at $23.55; a failed relief bounce puts $21 (monthly support) in play. The core brand is shrinking and the legal overhang is live.

What you're gaining: a genuinely cheaper entry — ~15× forward earnings and ~8.7% FCF yield on the US #2 energy brand, with Alani Nu still +56%, PepsiCo takeout optionality, and international un-modelled. You start collecting the base-case ~14% and own the free upside.

Read: waiting materially improves the deal — a tested higher-low off support (or Q3 evidence the core has stabilised) removes most of the knife-catch risk for little given-up upside. Half-size at most if acting; the entry edge is fundamental-only.

What if you sold now?

You are giving up ~14% base-case upside to protect against a further ~24% to the bear case.

What you're giving up: selling here locks in the loss near a 16-month low, at ~15× forward and below the ~$27 probability-weighted fair value — you would be crystallising the disappointment at the point of maximum pessimism, forfeiting the Alani/international optionality and any takeout.

What you're protecting: capital, if the core decline accelerates — and no exit rule is mechanically triggered right now (stop not hit, no profit target, thesis not yet 2-of-N broken).

Read: no mechanical reason to force a sale today; this is a HOLD/monitor zone. The decision rule is at Q3 — stabilising core = hold/accumulate; a second double-digit core drop = exit.

13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

Position sizing not computed — specify your portfolio allocation and role for sizing guidance.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "CELH",
  "date": "2026-08-07",
  "version": "v6",
  "company": "Celsius Holdings, Inc.",
  "brand": "Celsius",
  "currency": "USD",
  "exchange": "NASDAQ",
  "exchange_ticker": "NASDAQ:CELH",
  "isin": "US15118V2079",
  "api_ticker": "CELH",
  "analysis_status": "on-going",
  "lifecycle_stage": "growth-decelerating",
  "sector": "Consumer Staples",
  "gics_sector": "Consumer Staples",
  "country": "United States",
  "price_at_rating": 23.77,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "HOLD",
  "signal_long": "HOLD",
  "primary_signal": "HOLD",
  "short_hold_reason": "weak_timing",
  "quality_score": 61,
  "valuation_score": 65,
  "timing_score": 36,
  "driver_score": 50,
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 50,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Neutral",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-30",
  "overall_confidence": 55,
  "val_band": "attractive",
  "val_multiple_basis": "forward adjusted P/E (FY26 est ~$1.6)",
  "warranted_multiple": 17.8,
  "actual_multiple": 15.0,
  "warranted_ratio": 0.84,
  "discount_rate_r": 10.13,
  "risk_free_10y": 4.63,
  "g_near": 8,
  "g_term": 3,
  "clean_pe": 15.0,
  "clean_peg": 1.0,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": -8,
  "fcf_yield": 8.7,
  "fair_value_est": 27,
  "stop_loss": 23.55,
  "target_price": 27,
  "scenario_base_target": 27,
  "scenario_bull_target": 36,
  "scenario_bear_target": 18,
  "entry_groups_met": 1,
  "entry_conviction": "Half-Size",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "hard_gate_state": "caution",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "gates_caution": [
    "Acquisition share dilution +9% YoY (one-time Alani/Rockstar stock consideration)",
    "Texas-AG caffeine-marketing investigation + Pomerantz securities investigation (legal overhang)",
    "HIGH competitive threat (Monster, Red Bull, KDP-Ghost, Costco Kirkland private label, prebiotics, GLP-1)"
  ],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "short_entry_confirmed": false,
  "short_cap_reason": "Short base HOLD from Weak timing (strong downtrend, no 50-day reclaim); Technical & Catalyst entry groups both unmet. Quality-starter override does NOT fire (medium & long are HOLD, not BUY).",
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "stable",
  "competitive_threat_level": "high",
  "analyst_consensus_target": 47.67,
  "analyst_target_high": 57,
  "analyst_target_low": 26,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 100.5,
  "analyst_target_note": "STALE (pre-6 Aug crash); freshest last-month avg $42; expect cuts",
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "Buy",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 96,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 29,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": 0,
  "recent_downgrades_30d": 0,
  "fmp_rating": "B-",
  "fmp_overall_score": 2,
  "relative_strength_vs_spy": -39,
  "relative_strength_vs_sector": -35,
  "catalyst_clustering_score": 60,
  "mtf_confluence": 22,
  "industry_benchmark_name": "Beverage composite (gross margin + volume/share growth)",
  "industry_benchmark_value": "GM 48.1% + core brand volume -12%",
  "industry_benchmark_score": 58,
  "moat_score": 48,
  "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 45,
  "user_horizon": null,
  "user_allocation_pct": null,
  "portfolio_role": null,
  "next_update_date": "2026-08-21",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (Q2 earnings reported 6 Aug; no impactful dated event in window)",
  "ai_concentration_tail_inherited": false,
  "prior_report": "calibration-CELH-20260720-1900.json",
  "prior_primary": "BUY",
  "changes_note": "DOWNGRADE HOLD/BUY/BUY -> HOLD/HOLD/HOLD after Q2 miss (filed 6 Aug). Core Celsius brand sales -12% YoY; total rev +10.6% (first miss in 5 quarters, ~$55m light); GM 51.5%->48.1%, op income halved; stock -19.2% to $23.77 (16-mo low, 4.4x vol). Quality 66->61 (High->Medium, organic core turned negative). Valuation 65->65 (crash offsets estimate cuts; attractive-edge). Timing 46->36. Driver 54->50. Econ Trend-Following/55 -> Neutral/50. No new gates/DNB. Entry Half-Size unchanged."
}

Signal HOLD across all three horizons — a downgrade from HOLD / BUY / BUY. Quality falls High→Medium (61) on the core-brand −12% and margin compression; Valuation stays attractive-edge (65) as the −19% crash offsets estimate cuts; Timing weakens to 36 on the strong downtrend. No hard gate or DNB fires. Entry conviction Half-Size (Fundamental group only). This is a genuine thesis-damage downgrade, not a tape wobble: the flagship brand is shrinking and the reward will not skew up until the core stabilises — revisit at Q3.

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_stock_snapshot / get_company_profile Price $23.77, beta 0.925, mkt cap $6.08bn, Consumer Defensive / Beverages
get_income_statement (6q) Q2'26 filed 6 Aug: rev $817.9m, GM 48.1%, op inc $75.3m, EPS $0.14
get_financial_ratios FCF yield ~8.7%, interest cov 4.4×, D/E 0.56, trailing P/E 113×
get_multi_timeframe_analysis Strongly bearish; oversold RSI; 15-min recovering
get_price_target_consensus / get_yahoo_analyst_targets STALE — pre-6 Aug crash (cons $47.67 / Yahoo $53); freshest last-month avg $42; heavily haircut
get_stock_grades / get_grades_consensus 22 Buy / 1 Hold — all pre-crash 'maintain'; downgrades pending
get_analyst_estimates FY27 EPS $1.97 (n=15) pre-miss; no FY26 line returned — estimated ~$1.55–$1.65
get_ratings_snapshot B− overall 2/5 (was 3); DCF 5/5, P/E & P/B 1/5
get_polygon_news / get_stock_news Confirmed core brand −12%, revenue miss, −18% reaction, Texas-AG/Pomerantz overhang, Kirkland/Poppi/Ghost competition
get_stock_dividends No dividend (count 0) — confirmed
get_economic_series (DGS10, VIX) 10-Y 4.63% (5 Aug); VIX ~16
MacroDriver-state 2026-07-30 XLP Outperform short/med; AI-concentration tail armed but NOT applicable to CELH
Impact on scores: Valuation confidence is haircut (58%) because every analyst price target and grade predates the 6 Aug crash and will be revised down — the target-based sub-factor is deliberately down-weighted and flagged. Forward-EPS confidence is reduced (no FY26 consensus line returned; estimated from FY27 + actuals). All other pillars have full first-source coverage.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.