NASDAQ Global Select · HQ: Palo Alto, CA · CEO: Hock E. Tan · Mkt Cap: $1.79T · Section: Technology (Contrarian)
$376.71
−$17.23 (−4.37%) on the day
Jun 16, 2026 · Signal v6
52-wk: $244.17 – $495.00 · −23.9% from high
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Horizon
Signal
Composite Score
Confidence
Key Driver
Short-term (1-3 mo)
HOLD
58
62%
Sharp post-earnings breakdown; daily/intraday in a downtrend, hawkish-Fed tape — don't chase the falling knife
Medium-term (6-12 mo)
BUY (accumulate)
66
66%
Elite quality + reasonable forward valuation after the 24% pullback; macro headwind keeps it from STRONG
Long-term (3-5 yr)
STRONG BUY
73
68%
AI custom-silicon + VMware annuity (Strong Tailwind) and the long-horizon tech economic tailwind amplify the BUY
Next update: 2026-06-30 — default +14d (no impactful event before Q3 FY26 earnings ~Sep 2026; Semiconductors = Medium macro-sensitivity, so the 2026-06-17 FOMC is not a scheduling trigger).
Five independent scores — Business Quality, Valuation Attractiveness, Entry/Exit Timing, Underlying Drivers, and Economic Alignment — each 0–100 with a confidence percentage. The per-horizon base BUY/HOLD/SELL comes from the three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL only when both corroborate.
Base Decision Matrix on the three fundamental pillars (Quality 86 = High, Valuation 65 = Attractive, Timing 44 = Neutral) → BUY. Horizon weighting then differentiates: short-term is timing-dominated (55%) into an active breakdown → presented as HOLD; medium-term is balanced → BUY (accumulate on weakness), left un-amplified because the medium-horizon economic pressure on tech is a Headwind; long-term is quality-dominated (55%) and the long-horizon economic pressure flips to a Tailwind (XLK long = Outperform) which, alongside the Strong-Tailwind driver (80), amplifies the BUY to STRONG BUY.
2
Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status
Binary safety checks — liquidity, leverage, accounting/dilution, valuation ceiling, earnings blackout, and any binary-event risk. A triggered gate is a hard Do-Not-Buy regardless of how strong the scores are; a CAUTION is a note for position sizing. The post-VMware debt load and the optically rich revenue multiple are the two things to verify for Broadcom.
✅
Financial Distress — CLEAR Net debt/EBITDA ~1.1x, interest coverage ~11x, current ratio 2.24. VMware debt has been deleveraged hard.
⚠️
Valuation Ceiling — CAUTION (not triggered) Trailing EV/Rev ~24x > 20x — but that clause binds only on a non-hypergrowth name, and FY26 consensus revenue ~$105B is +66% over FY25's $63.4B (hypergrowth), so it does not apply. The primary semis multiple, forward P/E, is 32.6x (FY26) / 19.4x (FY27) with PEG 0.90 — not extreme; and price sits below the lowest analyst target ($400). Ceiling not breached.
✅
Earnings Event — CLEAR Q2 FY26 already reported (early June); next print ~Sep 2026 — well outside the 14-day window.
✅
Dilution / Accounting — CLEAR Share count +~1.8%/yr (<5%); SBC ~5% of revenue (web-estimated), well below the 25% red-flag. Note: tangible book is negative (−$8.10/sh) from VMware goodwill — structural, not a distress signal.
✅
Binary / Regulatory — CLEAR No pending FDA/antitrust ruling that is genuinely binary. Export-control risk to China AI chips is a tail risk, not a dated binary event.
✅
Severe Driver Collapse — CLEAR Driver score 80 (Strong Tailwind) — nowhere near the ≤15 collapse threshold.
Do-Not-Buy triggers — none fired
(1) Leverage+rising-rates: net debt/EBITDA 1.1x ≪ 4x → clear even with a hawkish Fed. (2) Valuation at 5-yr extreme without growth acceleration: forward growth is accelerating (FY26 consensus rev ~+66% YoY) → clear. (3) Persistent negative EPS revisions: estimates are rising → clear. (4) Insider-selling spike: none evidenced → clear. (5) Structural business-model threat: none → clear. Net hard-gate state: CAUTION (the optical revenue multiple), no Do-Not-Buy.
3
Pillar Detail: Business Quality
A deep dive into the Quality score: the hybrid semiconductor + infrastructure-software economics, margins, balance sheet, competitive moat, ROIC, and the blended industry benchmark. Read this to understand why Quality scored 86, not just the headline.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
Elite, full stop. 67% gross / 39% net margin, ~33% ROE, top-quartile ROIC, and a dual moat (hyperscaler custom-silicon design lock-in + the VMware software annuity). Revenue +48% in the latest quarter.
86
Confidence 80%
Lifecycle & Sector Classification
Lifecycle: Growth (TTM revenue +32% YoY, +48% latest quarter, highly profitable and inflecting higher on AI). Sector: hybrid — Semiconductors (AI accelerators/ASICs + networking) scored on gross margin, ROIC and AI-revenue momentum, blended with Infrastructure Software (VMware) scored on recurring revenue and software margin, weighted by mix (~60% semi / ~40% software & other).
Sub-Signal
Value
Sector Context
Score
Rationale
Revenue trajectory
+48% YoY (Q2 FY26 $22.19B); +32% TTM
Semi median ~10-15%
92
AI silicon + a full year of VMware; accelerating, not decelerating.
Gross margin (semi lens)
67.0% TTM
>55% strong for fabless
90
Software mix lifts blended GM well above semi peers.
Post-VMware debt paid down fast; modest leverage now.
Software recurring revenue
VMware → VCF subscription annuity
High-retention, high-margin
82
Converted VMware to subscription; sticky enterprise base.
Industry Benchmark — Semis (GM + Utilisation) blended with Software (Rule-of-40-style)
Semi side: Gross Margin 67% (>55%) with high utilisation and book-to-bill driven by AI orders → top band. Software side: VMware recurring revenue at high margin with growth + profitability comfortably clearing a Rule-of-40 equivalent. Blended Benchmark Score: 88/100. Context: a 39%-net-margin, 67%-GM semis-plus-software hybrid sits in the top quartile of either peer set.
Competitive Moat Scorecard
Pricing Power
80
Custom-ASIC value pricing + VMware repricing absorbed by market.
Network Effects
55
Modest — ecosystem pull around networking standards.
Switching Costs
88
Co-designed silicon + VMware embedded in datacenter ops.
Cost Advantage
75
Scale + leading-edge process access; design IP reuse.
Intangibles
85
Deep networking/SerDes patent base + VMware install base.
Moat score = 77/100. The structural advantage is switching cost: once a hyperscaler co-designs an XPU/ASIC with Broadcom, the multi-year design cycle and software stack make it very hard to displace.
ROIC & Capital Allocation
Component
Read
Score
ROIC vs peers (40%)
ROE ~33%; ROIC top-quartile and rising as AI scales (FMP ROE & ROA sub-scores both 5/5)
85
Capital allocation (30%)
Hock Tan's M&A playbook (VMware) is accretive and deleveraged on schedule; dividend payout ~40%, buybacks resuming
80
Management skin in the game (30%)
SBC ~5% of revenue (web-estimated, below the 25% flag); insider ownership modest
60
4
Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness
A deep dive into the Valuation score: sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, the analyst consensus target with upside math, the grades distribution, and the FMP cross-reference. The crux for Broadcom is that it looks expensive on trailing multiples and reasonable on forward, growth-adjusted ones.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Right at the Fair/Attractive boundary. Rich on trailing P/E 61x, EV/Rev 24x and a 1.8% FCF yield; reasonable on forward P/E 32.6x and PEG 0.90 — and after a 24% pullback, all 58 covering analysts' targets (low $400) now sit above the $376.71 price.
65
Confidence 85%
Multiple
Current
Reference
Read
Forward P/E (FY26)
32.6x
Semi peers ~28-30x
Slight premium, justified by growth + software mix
Forward P/E (FY27)
19.4x
on rising EPS $19.40
Cheap two years out if estimates hold
Trailing P/E
61.0x
own 5-yr range
Optically rich; trailing earnings depressed by VMware amortisation
EV/EBITDA (TTM)
43.7x
elevated
High but compresses fast on FY26 EBITDA ~$56B
EV/Revenue (TTM)
24.3x
>20x — wrong lens here
Caution flag — not the right metric for a 39%-net-margin business
PEG (forward)
0.90
<1 = reasonable
Growth-adjusted, the stock is not expensive
FCF yield
1.83%
3-5% fair
Low — you pay up for the growth/quality
Dividend yield
0.66%
payout ~40%
Small but well-covered and growing
Reverse DCF / Implied Growth
At $376.71 (EV ~$1.84T) against ~$33B TTM FCF and a ~10% WACC, the market is implying roughly 18–22% annual FCF growth for a decade. Consensus has revenue compounding fast near-term (FY26 ~+66% over FY25 / ~+39% over the trailing year) and EPS from $6.75 (FY25) → $11.57 (FY26) → $19.40 (FY27). The market is pricing in less growth than analysts expect — consistent with a Fair-to-slightly-Attractive read after the pullback, not a stretched one.
Embedded Optionality / Free Upside
The core in-production business (current AI silicon + networking + the VMware annuity) justifies roughly $430–450 of the $376.71 price on forward-multiple math. On top, you own — largely un-modelled — for free:
New custom-silicon customers beyond the established hyperscaler base (additional XPU/ASIC programs ramping into 2027) — backlog the Street only partly capitalises.
VMware Cloud Foundation repricing/cross-sell still ramping — software-margin expansion not fully in numbers.
AI-networking share (Tomahawk/Jericho fabric) as Ethernet displaces proprietary interconnects in AI clusters.
Further deleveraging → buyback capacity as FCF compounds.
Net: a credible, sizeable, partly-priced upside that cushions the downside — a +5 tilt on Valuation, not a re-rating of an expensive core. If the in-production business were richly priced on forward metrics it would not be — but it is the trailing optics that are rich, so the optionality is genuine upside, not hope.
Analyst Price Target Consensus
Low
Consensus
Median
High
Coverage
$400 (+6.2%)
$498.19 (+32.2%)
$508.50 (+35.0%)
$582 (+54.5%)
58 analysts (15 in last month, avg $501)
Every covering analyst's target — including the lowest at $400 — sits above the current price. That is unusual and a strong valuation-support signal (price >20% below consensus → analyst-target sub-score 88). Spread is moderate (high < 2x low) → reasonable agreement.
Analyst Grades & FMP Cross-Reference
Grades consensus: Buy — 51 Buy, 7 Hold, 0 Sell (87.9% bullish → sub-score 85). FMP financial-health rating: B (3/5) — dragged down only by the P/E, P/B and D/E sub-scores (all 1/5, i.e. "looks expensive / leveraged on the multiple") while ROE and ROA score a perfect 5/5. The divergence is informative: FMP's penalty is purely valuation-optics, exactly the trailing-multiple richness flagged above — it does not dispute the franchise quality.
5
Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers
The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100 for tailwind/headwind strength. A context pillar: it does not change the fundamental pillar scores — it feeds the amplification layer, where a tailwind ≥65 can lift a BUY to STRONG BUY. This section also names the thesis-invalidation floor.
Primary Driver
AI custom-silicon (XPU/ASIC for hyperscalers) + AI networking
Secondary: the VMware infrastructure-software annuity
80
Strong Tailwind · STRONG-eligible
Horizon
Weight
Read
Score
Historical (12-24mo)
25%
AI-capex boom drove Broadcom's AI revenue from a niche to its single largest growth engine through 2024-2026.
90
Current state
50%
Hyperscaler AI capex remains robust and Broadcom just guided AI revenue higher — but a "peak-capex/digestion" debate is precisely what knocked the stock off its high.
78
Forward (6-12mo)
25%
Custom-silicon backlog and new programs point to continued AI-infrastructure spend into 2027; cyclical and export-control risk temper the outlook.
74
Driver = 80 (Strong Tailwind), eligible to amplify a base BUY → STRONG BUY where the economic pressure also corroborates. It does not change the fundamental pillar scores. Thesis-invalidation floor: a sustained hyperscaler AI-capex cut or custom-silicon order push-out that breaks the AI-revenue acceleration narrative — that is the single thing to monitor, and it is exactly what the recent sell-off was sniffing at.
6
Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment
How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report (2026-06-13). It classifies the macro pressure as Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction. A context pillar: its pressure is the second amplification input.
Stance · Conviction
Contrarian · 62
Source: sector-map (AVGO not on the macro watchlist) — GICS Technology → XLK
Pressure
Headwind (S/M)
→ Tailwind (L)
The 2026-06-13 macro report runs a Stagflation regime (oil shock + hawkish Fed, 44% weight) and maps Technology (XLK) to Short: Underperform · Medium: Underperform · Long: Outperform. Anchoring on the medium horizon, the economic pressure on Broadcom is a Headwind — high real rates compress growth-multiple stocks and the AI trade is the crowded long being de-risked. That makes a near-term long position Contrarian. Conviction is a solid 62: the contrarian case is justified by (a) a 24% valuation washout to fwd PEG 0.90, (b) oversold daily/intraday technicals, and (c) an intact, strengthening driver — but it is fighting a live hawkish-Fed tape, which keeps conviction short of high. Crucially, the macro report's long-horizon tech signal flips to Outperform (Tailwind), so over 3-5 years macro stops fighting the position and starts helping it.
Amplification effect: at Short/Medium the Headwind pressure means a BUY is not lifted to STRONG BUY (and the Short base is HOLD anyway, never amplified). At Long, the pressure is a Tailwind which — together with the Strong-Tailwind driver (80) — amplifies the long BUY to STRONG BUY.
7
Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing
A deep dive into the Timing score: the risk-reward framework anchored to the stop, relative strength vs SPY and the sector, the macro overlay at Semiconductor (Medium) weight, news/grade-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster. Read this to understand when to act — Broadcom is a great franchise caught mid-pullback.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Split tape: the monthly and weekly trends are still up (secular AI uptrend, price above the 200-day at $359), but the daily has broken down and the hourly/15-min are in strong downtrends after a 24% post-earnings drop. Macro is a near-term headwind. Not a chase here.
Price near the $370 swing low; stop ~$355 (below the 200-day) is ~1 ATR away → tight stop possible; R:R favourable to targets
20%
50
Macro regime overlay (Medium weight)
Hawkish Fed, stagflation regime, XLK out of favour short/medium → unfavourable
15%
30
Sentiment (grades + news)
11 maintains + 1 downgrade (Macquarie OW→Neutral) in the post-print window; 88% Buy consensus overall — net slightly soft near-term
18%
45
Catalyst layer
No earnings within 30 days; FOMC 6/17 is the only near event — a calm-ish calendar
17%
62
Relative strength: sharply underperforming over the last month (the −23% slide from the $495 high while peers held up better), but outperforming over three months (up from ~$322 in mid-March). 52-week range position ~70%. Position-risk: daily ATR ~$21 (≈5.6% of price); a stop at $355 is ~$22 / ~1 ATR below the $370 support shelf — a clean, tight invalidation level. The setup is a textbook "higher-timeframe uptrend, lower-timeframe sharp pullback" — favourable for accumulating into weakness over medium/long horizons, unfavourable for chasing short-term.
8
Economic Event Risk
The next two-plus weeks of high-impact US macro releases that could swing the stock, plus the last week's surprises. Semiconductors carry Medium macro sensitivity, so there is no automatic 3-day WAIT override — but the 6/17 FOMC into a hawkish, stagflationary tape is the dominant near-term swing factor for a high-beta growth name.
For AVGO specifically: the dominant near-term swing is tomorrow's FOMC. The macro report expects a hawkish hold with easing language removed and a ~25% hike risk flagged — a clear headwind for a high-beta (β 1.43) growth multiple. Hot PPI and a still-4.2% CPI keep real rates elevated. This is the macro reason the short-term signal is HOLD rather than BUY, even with the franchise and the pullback both arguing to accumulate. A dovish surprise would be the near-term catalyst that flips the short-term tape.
9
Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis
Trend, RSI, MACD and breakout status across five timeframes plus a confluence verdict. Read this to see the textbook pattern at work: a secular higher-timeframe uptrend with a violent lower-timeframe pullback after the early-June earnings reaction.
Timeframe
Trend
RSI
MACD
Key S/R
Breakout
Vol
Monthly
Uptrend ↑
62.6
+, rising
S: 138 · R: 414
Resistance breakout
0.9x
Weekly
Uptrend ↑
51.5
flat/rolling
S: 321 · R: 414
—
0.5x
Daily
Weakening →
45.3 (41 latest)
−, falling (−8.0)
S: 370 · R: 409
Support breakdown
1.0x
Hourly
Strong downtrend ↓
31.5
−
S: 376 · R: 389
Support breakdown
—
15-min
Strong downtrend ↓
39.1
−, basing
S: 377 · R: 380
Support breakdown
—
Confluence
Tool verdict: Bearish — but driven by the lower timeframes; the secular monthly/weekly trends remain up. MTF trend score ≈ 53 (Mixed / Transitioning).
The picture is a sharp counter-trend pullback inside a larger uptrend. Monthly and weekly remain bullish and price ($376.71) is still above its 200-day SMA ($359). The daily has broken its near support and the hourly/15-min are oversold (hourly RSI 31). Key levels: first support is the $370 swing low (6/8-6/9); a clean loss of it opens $359 (200-day) and then a gap toward $322. First resistance is the 50-day ~$409, then the $442 May high and the $495 all-time high. The constructive read: lower-timeframe oversold conditions near a support shelf, in a name whose higher-timeframe trend is intact — a setup to scale into, not to front-run before it bases.
10
Price Chart (6-Month Daily)
A 6-month daily line chart with the 50-day SMA and the 200-day SMA, plus marked support and resistance. The visual companion to the MTF table — you can see the run to the $495 high and the violent early-June reversal at a glance.
11
Scenario Summary
Bull, Base and Bear 12-month paths with explicit triggers and probability weights. The base case is the probability-weighted centre of gravity; bull and bear are what must change. Read this to stress-test the AI-compounder thesis against the macro tape.
Bull — 30%
$560–582 (+49% to +54%)
Triggers: AI custom-silicon backlog re-accelerates (new hyperscaler programs), VMware annuity compounds, and the Fed pivots dovish in H2 2026 → multiple re-rates back toward the highs. Reaches the Street's high target.
Base — 50%
$470–500 (+25% to +33%)
Triggers: steady AI + software execution, in-line-to-modest beats, FY27 EPS estimates ($19.40) holding, and the macro stabilising. Re-rates toward fair value (~$470) / consensus (~$498) as the pullback resolves.
Bear — 20%
$300–322 (−15% to −20%)
Triggers: "peak AI capex" becomes real — hyperscaler capex cuts / order push-outs — compounded by a hawkish-Fed/stagflation de-rating and/or China export-control hit. Loses the 200-day, fills the gap toward $322 and tests lower.
Probability-weighted ≈ $475 (≈ +26% from $376.71) — consistent with the medium-term BUY (accumulate). The bear case is concentrated in the one variable that matters: the durability of hyperscaler AI capex.
12
Entry / Exit Rules
The specific, mechanical conditions to get into and out of the position. Entries need multiple independent checks; exits are governed by a hard stop, thesis invalidation, and scaled profit-takes. This converts the scores into a concrete plan. Currently 2 of 5 entry criteria are met and 0 of 3 exit criteria are live.
Entry Rules — 2 / 5 met
E1 (Fundamental) — ✅ MET: price ($376.71) < the ~$470 fair-value estimate, AND no earnings within 7 days (next print ~Sep 2026), AND the Underlying Driver (80) ≥ 50 — all three conditions of the fundamental rule hold. Forecast: already true; deepens on any further sell-off.
E2 (Buy-the-dip) — ❌ NOT MET: a pullback that has based on the $359–370 support shelf with the monthly/weekly uptrend intact and daily RSI 35–65. RSI (41) is in band and the higher-timeframe trend is intact, but the daily is still in an active support-breakdown — not yet basing. Forecast: days-to-weeks; needs the daily to stop making lower lows.
E3 (Momentum) — ❌ NOT MET: a daily close above the 20-day SMA (~$415) on >1.5x volume with the MACD histogram positive ≥2 days. Price is ~10% below the SMA and the daily MACD histogram is firmly negative (−7.1). Forecast: ~3-6 weeks / catalyst-dependent.
E4 (Not overbought) — ✅ MET: monthly & weekly RSI < 70 (currently 62.6 / 51.5) — after the 24% pullback the name is no longer extended, so this filter is clear.
E5 (Event clarity) — ❌ NOT MET: entry after the FOMC (Jun 17) is digested and price bases, with guidance maintained/raised. The FOMC is still ahead. Forecast: resolves at / just after tomorrow's decision.
Exit Rules — 0 / 3 live
X1 (Hard stop) — not triggered: SELL if price closes below $355 (below the 200-day SMA / $359 and the $370 shelf) for 2 consecutive days. Forecast: unlikely near-term (~5.8% below spot, ~1 ATR) absent a fresh AI-capex scare or a hawkish-Fed shock.
X2 (Thesis invalidation) — not triggered: SELL if full-year guidance is cut AND AI-revenue growth decelerates below plan AND a hard gate fires. The driver-collapse scenario; none of the three conditions is met today.
X3 (Profit-take) — not triggered: trim into $508 (median target) with RSI > 70. Forecast: a bull-case event, well above spot.
Imagine you act at the current price $376.71 · as of Jun 16, 2026
What if you bought now?
You'd be risking ~$21.71 (−5.8%) to the hard stop to gain ~$93 (+25%) to the base target.
Risking: downside to the $355 stop (−5.8%); the bear case $300–322 (−15% to −20%); plus you'd be buying into a live daily/intraday downtrend, below the $415 entry zone, the day before a hawkish-leaning FOMC (entry rules E2/E3 not yet met).
Gaining: base $470 (+25%) · bull $560–582 (+49% to +54%); a ~0.66% dividend and the compounding of a 39%-net-margin franchise while you wait; and the free custom-silicon + VMware optionality you now own. R:R to base ≈ 4.3:1; to consensus ≈ 5.6:1.
Net: the reward skew is attractive for a medium/long holder, but waiting for the daily to base (or a dovish FOMC) materially improves the short-term entry. Accumulate in tranches rather than chase — assessment, not a buy verdict.
What if you sold now?
You'd be giving up ~+25% base-case upside to protect against a −15% to −20% bear drawdown.
Giving up: the path to $470 (+25%) / consensus $498 (+32%); the dividend and the embedded optionality; and you'd be selling ~20% below the ~$470 fair value and below every analyst target.
Protecting: capital if the "peak AI capex" bear case ($300–322) plays out. But no exit rule is triggered right now — the hard stop ($355), thesis-invalidation and profit-take are all inactive.
Net: with nothing mechanically triggered and price below fair value, this is a hold/accumulate zone, not a sell — only an unrealised long with no stop discipline has a reason to trim here.
13
Position Sizing Context
A framework for translating conviction into allocation given risk per share and volatility. Illustrative portfolio math only — not advice.
No risk budget or portfolio role was specified for this batch run, so a specific position size is not computed. Instead, the volatility context that should constrain sizing:
β 1.43
Beta vs market — a 5% position carries ~7% of market risk
~5.6%
Daily ATR as % of price — expect large daily swings
−23.9%
Drawdown from the $495 high in ~2 weeks
~5.8%
Risk-per-share to the $355 stop
Catalyst density is low (no earnings within 30 days), so no event-driven size reduction is warranted beyond respecting the high beta. For medium/long horizons, the timing pillar argues for a staggered entry: scale in across ~3 tranches — e.g. a first tranche now, a second near the $359 (200-day) zone, and a third on a confirmed daily base / reclaim of the $409 50-day — to average into the pullback rather than commit at one price.
14
Calibration Snapshot
A machine-readable snapshot of every score, sub-score, confidence, key level and signal override. Saved alongside this HTML as calibration-AVGO-20260616-1703.json so the next run can compute deltas and the watchlist monitor can act without parsing HTML. This is the first report for AVGO — no prior calibration, so no "Changes Since Last Report".
Reference material — the audit trail of every data source, with OK/partial/fail indicators and the confidence haircuts applied. Consult this if a number looks off or to understand why confidence is below the raw composite.
get_earnings_calendar— empty; next print inferred ~Sep 2026 from the Q2-on-Q2 cadence (Q2 filed 2026-06-09)
⚠
Macro-Economic report— 2026-06-13; sector-map (AVGO not on macro watchlist)
⚠
SBC % of revenue— ~5% web-estimated; not isolated in MCP income statement
Impact on scores: Data coverage was strong, so confidence is driven mostly by interpretation, not gaps. The empty earnings calendar means the next-update date relies on the inferred ~Sep print (Q2 was just reported), but this does not affect the scores. SBC is web-estimated rather than line-item — a minor caveat on the management-skin-in-game sub-score. Timing confidence (65%) reflects the live FOMC and the split MTF tape rather than missing data. Methodology: five independent pillars → base Decision Matrix (Quality/Valuation/Timing) → amplification (Driver + Economic-pressure) → hard gates → Do-Not-Buy, run per horizon.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.