TSX:ATD Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

ISIN: CA01626P1484
Consumer StaplesConvenience Retail & Fuel
TSX · Laval, Québec · reports in USD, priced in CAD · ~149,000 employees Analysis Status: Starting
All prices, targets and scenarios below are in Canadian dollars (C$) — the listing currency. The company reports financials in US$; per-share figures here are the CAD-converted values (implied US$/C$ ≈ 1.42).
C$90.49
-2.63%
10 Jul 2026 · Signal v6
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.

Alimentation Couche-Tard is one of the world's largest operators of convenience stores and fuel forecourts, running roughly 17,000 sites across North America, Europe and Asia under the Circle K, Couche-Tard, Holiday and Ingo banners. Its core business is simple and cash-generative: sell high-margin merchandise (snacks, drinks, tobacco, fresh food) and road-transport fuel to millions of daily customers, and earn a spread on both. What sets it apart is scale and a 40-year record as a disciplined serial acquirer — it has repeatedly bought regional chains and lifted their margins onto its own operating template, compounding earnings faster than the industry. It reports in US dollars but is listed and priced in Canadian dollars on the TSX. For a reader, think of it as a defensive, high-return-on-equity retail compounder whose edge is buying and running convenience networks better than almost anyone.

HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo)HOLD5962%Overbought & extended — no entry edge
Medium-term (6–12 mo)HOLD6468%High quality + fair price, but no entry edge — watch for a pullback
Long-term (3–5 yr)BUY7070%Quality compounder dominates at this horizon
Next update: 2026-07-24 — default +14d (next earnings Q1 FY27 on 2026-09-08 is out of window)
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status3Pillar Detail: Business Quality4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing8Economic Event Risk9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis10Price Chart (6-Month Daily)11Scenario Summary12Entry / Exit Rules13Position Sizing Context14Calibration Snapshot15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — each 0–100 with its own confidence. The three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) set the base BUY/HOLD/SELL via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY or a SELL to STRONG SELL when both corroborate.

Business Quality

82
strong
conf 78%

Valuation Attractiveness

56
fair
conf 80%

Entry/Exit Timing

52
neutral — extended
conf 62%

Underlying Drivers

64
Neutral (top of band)
conf 62%

Economic Alignment

60
Trend-Following
conf 65%
2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — any TRIGGERED gate is a hard cap regardless of the scores above; CAUTION gates are sizing notes.
Financial Distress
Net debt/EBITDA ~1.9x, interest coverage healthy, current ratio 1.12. No distress.
Earnings Event Risk
Next earnings 2026-09-08 (Q1 FY27) — well outside the 14-day window.
Valuation Ceiling
Clean P/E 20.5x vs warranted 19.3x = 1.06x (Fair). Below the 23x staples guardrail. Not Expensive — gate does not fire.
Accounting / Dilution
Q4 carried a one-off interchange-litigation gain (~US$196M); FY26 non-operating income only ~6.5% of net income and we score off adjusted EPS. Buybacks reduce share count. Gate does not fire.
Regulatory / Binary Event
No pending binary regulatory decision.
Severe Driver Collapse
Fuel margins elevated, merchandise comps positive. Driver nowhere near collapse.
All hard gates clear; no Do-Not-Buy trigger fires. The valuation ceiling is the one to watch: on adjusted earnings the stock is Fair (1.06x warranted), not Expensive, so nothing caps the signal. The base BUY/HOLD stands on its own.
3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: business economics, moat, ROIC and the industry benchmark.
Business Quality — Pillar Score
A high-return, defensive convenience-retail compounder with a 40-year serial-acquisition record.
82
conf 78%

Lifecycle & sector: Consumer Staples — convenience retail + fuel. Lifecycle stage Cash Cow / mature compounder: single-digit organic revenue growth, high and stable profitability, capital returned via buybacks and a growing dividend, growth topped up by bolt-on M&A. We score it on ROE/ROIC, FCF, margin stability, same-store sales and capital-allocation discipline — the mature/cash-cow lens — not on hyper-growth metrics.

Sub-signalATD valueSector contextScoreRead
Return on Equity20.1%Staples-retail median ~15%88Excellent — top-quartile; FMP ROE sub-score 5/5
Return on Assets7.1%Retail median ~5-6%75Above peers — efficient asset use for a fuel/retail network
Same-store merchandise (US)+3.4%Healthy retail comp 3-5%78Positive US comps; Europe +1.1%, Canada -0.9% (soft spot)
Operating margin9.2%Convenience 8-12%70In-range; fuel-margin uplift this year flatters it
FCF generation~C$2.36BConsistent, funds M&A + buybacks78Strong cash conversion — the engine of the roll-up
Balance sheetNet debt/EBITDA ~1.9x<2.0x healthy for retail66Manageable but D/E 75.9% (FMP D/E sub-score 2/5 — the one drag), leaves M&A headroom
Industry benchmark — Same-store sales + turns: US merchandise comps +3.4% (healthy 3-5% band) with positive fuel-volume and a rising fuel margin. Rating: STRONG. Benchmark score 80/100. The Canada comp (-0.9%) and Europe (+1.1%) are softer, but the US — its largest market — is comping well.

Competitive Moat Scorecard

Pricing Power

62
Local pricing on fuel/merch; some pass-through, but competitive at the pump

Network Effects

50
N/A for retail — neutral 50

Switching Costs

55
Convenience = location & habit, not lock-in; loyalty apps help modestly

Cost Advantage

80
Scale in fuel procurement, distribution density, buying power — the real moat

Intangibles

62
Circle K brand + a 40-yr M&A integration playbook

Moat average ≈ 62. The durable edge is cost advantage / scale (fuel procurement + network density) and the integration playbook, not customer lock-in — convenience is a location-and-habit business, so switching costs are inherently modest, which is why the score is honest at 55 rather than inflated.

Competitive Environment — the moat sub-scores above are derived from this live read, not asserted.
RivalThreat typeShare trajectory (ATD vs rival)Moat-erosion vector
7-Eleven / Seven & iDirect #1 by US store count (~12,232 vs ATD/Circle K ~6,850)ATD stable / mildly pressuredPost-failed-bid, 7-Eleven plans ~1,300 large-format food-focused stores by 2030 — attacks ATD's fresh-food growth lane
Casey's (CASY)Fast-growing Midwest food-forward operator (~2,831 stores)ATD stable, Casey's gaining footprintAggressive new-store + prepared-food expansion in overlapping geographies
Murphy USA (MUSA)Low-cost, fuel-led, Walmart-adjacent (~1,800 stores)ATD stablePrice competition at the pump pressures fuel margin at the margin
ParklandCanadian fuel/convenience peerATD stableRegional Canadian competition; less of a US threat
Net effect on the moat: intensifying food-format competition (7-Eleven + Casey's) trims Switching Costs to 55 and caps Pricing Power at 62; scale keeps Cost Advantage at 80. Overall competitive threat: ELEVATED — real and rising in the fresh-food lane, but ATD's scale/cost edge holds share. This feeds the §11 Bear trigger and the §12 competitive thesis-invalidation.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

ROIC comfortably above cost of capital (ROE 20%, ROA 7% on a modestly-levered balance sheet) puts ATD in the top quartile of retail capital-efficiency. Capital allocation is the crown jewel: a 40-year record of accretive acquisitions (Circle K, Holiday, Statoil/Ingo, CST, Total's European sites) bought at reasonable multiples and integrated onto ATD's operating template, complemented by steady buybacks and a low-payout (17.5%) growing dividend. Management skin-in-the-game is solid (founder-influenced board, insider ownership). The one blemish is the Seven & i saga — an ambitious but ultimately withdrawn US$47B mega-bid (Jul 2025) that consumed management attention; the discipline to walk away rather than overpay is, on balance, a capital-allocation positive.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

Sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality, and the analyst-consensus cross-check.
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Fair on adjusted earnings — clean P/E 20.5x vs a 19.3x warranted multiple (1.06x). Not cheap, not expensive.
56
conf 80%

ATD is Fair — not cheap, not expensive. The warranted-multiple anchor is the arbiter; relative lenses order it within that band.

THE ANCHOR — Warranted-multiple valuation.
Discount rate r = 9.06% = 10-Y Treasury 4.56% (stamped 2026-07-08, from the macro report's rate input) + 4.5% equity risk premium + 0.0% risk add-on (Business Quality ≥ 65). Growth: g_near = 6% (Consumer-Staples sector-achievable cap — ATD compounds faster, but the anti-hype discipline holds the cap; feeding its true ~10% would falsely bless the price), g_term = 3%. Two-stage warranted P/E ≈ 19.34× (below the 23× staples guardrail, so the raw number stands).

Actual clean multiple ÷ warranted: clean (adjusted) P/E 20.54× ÷ 19.34× = 1.06× → FAIR band (1.00-1.20). On reported GAAP EPS the ratio is 0.98× (Attractive/Fair edge), but we anchor on the clean number per the earnings-quality step. Not Expensive — Gate 3 does not fire; not STRONG-BUY-eligible either (a Full/Expensive name isn't, but a Fair one at 1.06× is — the block is only above 1.20×).

Earnings-quality decomposition (step 7b): Q4 FY26 GAAP EPS was US$0.94 but included a ~US$196M one-off gain from US interchange (card-network) litigation; adjusted Q4 EPS was US$0.73. Across FY26, GAAP net income US$3.1B vs adjusted US$2.9B — the non-operating item is ~6.5% of FY net income (Q4 alone 22.7%). Below the 15% annual distortion threshold, but we still score off the adjusted figure: clean P/E 20.54× (US$3.10 → C$4.41), which is higher (less attractive) than the reported 18.89×. Scoring off the clean number is the conservative, honest choice.

MultipleATDContextRead
Clean P/E (adjusted)20.54×vs warranted 19.34×Fair (1.06×)
Reported P/E (TTM)18.89×flattered by the one-off gainAttractive/Fair edge
Forward P/E17.5×on C$5.17 fwd EPSBelow warranted — forward-attractive
EV/EBITDA14.1×quality-retail 12-15×Fair
PEG (clean)2.05on ~10% growthFull — quality premium
Price/Book3.6×high ROE justifies >1Fair for 20% ROE
FCF yield (universal anchor): FCF/EV ≈ 2.66% — in the "expensive" band (1-3%). This is the honest counterweight to the forward-P/E optics: on cash yield you are paying up for a quality compounder that reinvests heavily into M&A. It keeps Valuation at the lower end of Fair (56), not drifting toward Attractive.

Implied-growth read: at C$90.49 the market embeds roughly 8-9% long-run growth; management guides >10% organic EPS and consensus ~10%. So the price embeds slightly less growth than the fundamentals support — a modest positive, consistent with the Fair (not Expensive) verdict and the ~13% upside to the analyst mean.

Embedded optionality / free upside: (1) Accretive bolt-on M&A — with the Seven & i mega-deal off, ATD's balance-sheet firepower and integration playbook can be redeployed into regional chains at reasonable multiples; the market prices little of this pipeline. (2) Fresh-food / foodservice mix-shift — a structural gross-margin lever still early in rollout. (3) Fuel-margin durability — if today's elevated retail margins prove structurally higher (EV-era rationalisation of the forecourt), that is upside to the base. Net: the core business justifies roughly the current price on a Fair multiple; the M&A and foodservice options are largely free. A tilt (+4), not a re-rating — the core is fairly, not cheaply, priced.

Analyst consensus (CAD)Valuevs price C$90.49
Mean targetC$102.00+12.7%
Median targetC$102.65+13.4%
High / LowC$108.69 / C$89.74+20% / -0.8%
Coverage / grades18 analysts · 6 Strong Buy, 8 Buy, 5 Hold, 0 Sell74% bullish (consensus BUY, 1.84)
FMP health ratingB+ (overall 3/5)ROE 5/5, ROA 4/5, D/E 2/5 (the leverage drag)

Analyst target signal ~65 (meaningful ~13% upside to consensus); grades consensus ~72 (solid buy with some holds). Blended with the anchor's 40% weight, Valuation lands 56 — lower-half Fair.

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force the stock is tethered to, scored 0–100. A context pillar: it does not change the base signal — it feeds amplification (tailwind ≥65 can lift BUY→STRONG BUY; headwind ≤35 can push SELL→STRONG SELL).
Primary Driver
Merchandise demand + fuel margins + the M&A roll-up
64
Neutral (top of band — not amplification-eligible)

Primary driver — a composite of three forces: (1) merchandise/staples demand (defensive, steady — trade-down flows toward convenience in a soft consumer), (2) fuel margins (the near-term swing factor), and (3) the M&A roll-up strategy (the structural growth lever). We score the composite, weighting fuel margin and M&A as the movable parts.

HorizonReadDetail & source
Historical (25%)TailwindFuel margins expanded sharply in FY26 (US road-fuel margin 52.44¢/gal, +9.17¢ YoY); merchandise comps positive; 40-yr accretive-M&A record. (Q4/FY26 press release, 22 Jun 2026)
Current (50%)Tailwind — but elevated & mean-revertingRetail fuel margin is at a cyclically high level (a level, not a fresh uptrend), which flatters current earnings and is the main normalisation risk. Merchandise demand steady. M&A: the transformational leg took a real hit (Seven & i withdrawn 16 Jul 2025), leaving bolt-on as the path.
Forward (25%)Neutral-to-TailwindManagement reaffirmed >10% organic EPS growth for FY27 (trends similar to Q4). Offsets: fuel-margin normalisation risk + a contracting US consumer-credit read.
Composite driver score64

Fuel-retailer note (not a producer): ATD is a fuel retailer, so — unlike a miner or E&P — the commodity price-trend overlay works in reverse: falling wholesale crude typically expands retail fuel margin (the pump price lags the wholesale drop). So a soft oil tape is often a tailwind here, not a headwind. We therefore do not apply a producer-style downtrend cap.

Amplification role: the score is 64 — Neutral, at the very top of the band but below the 65 amplification bar. This is deliberate and honest: fuel margins are a genuine tailwind but sit at an elevated, mean-reverting level, and the transformational-M&A leg is impaired — a borderline composite, not a clean ≥65 tailwind. So the driver is not amplification-eligible; the base BUY/HOLD stands unamplified. It does not change the three fundamental pillar scores.

Thesis-invalidation floor: the case breaks if fuel margins normalise back to mid-cycle at the same time US merchandise comps roll negative — that removes both the earnings kicker and the defensive-demand floor together. That is the dial to watch (the Sep quarter is the first read), and it is a live risk, not a distant tail — today's elevated fuel margin is, by definition, the level that has the most room to fall.
6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to this stock, read from the latest Macro-Economic report. Classifies the macro pressure (Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind) — the second amplification input — and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with a 0–100 conviction.
Stance · Pressure
Trend-Following · Tailwind (mild)
60
conviction

The 9 Jul macro report reads a 'Higher-for-Longer / Stagflation-lite' regime and rates Consumer Staples (XLP) N / O / N — a mild medium-term Outperform as capital rotates defensive. ATD is a defensive staple with a fuel-margin kicker, so the pressure is a mild Tailwind (Trend-Following) medium-term and Neutral short-term. Because the pressure is only mild and the driver sits at 64 (below the 65 amplification bar), with the base signal a HOLD at short/medium (which never amplifies) and a BUY at long, the pressure leaves the base signals unchanged — no STRONG-BUY amplification.

Source: sector-map (Consumer Staples / XLP) · Macro report 2026-07-09

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

The risk-reward framework, relative strength vs SPY and the sector ETF, the macro overlay, news-derived sentiment, and the catalyst cluster.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Higher-timeframe uptrend intact, but daily RSI 70.7 is overbought and price sits ~5% under its 52-week high after an +11% earnings gap — a neutral, extended entry.
52
conf 62%

The timing pillar answers 'is now a good moment to act?' — separately from whether ATD is a good business (it is) or fairly priced (it is). The answer here: the trend is up but the entry is extended.

Risk-reward assessment (daily focus): price C$90.49 sits ~5% below the 52-week high (95.15) after a +11% earnings gap (22 Jun), with the daily RSI at 70.7 (overbought). The nearest logical stop is C$82 (below the 50-day and the gap base) — that is ~9% of downside to find out you're wrong, i.e. a wide stop from here. The favourable-entry shelf is C$82-85 (the 50-day + fair value), ~6-9% lower. So risk-reward from today's price is unfavourable for a fresh entry (score ~45), even though the higher-timeframe trend supports a hold.

Sub-signalReadScore
MTF trend (30%)Monthly/weekly/daily up; intraday pullback → confluence 6868
Risk-reward / position-risk (20%)Overbought, wide stop, near resistance not support45
Relative strengthOutperforming SPY & XLP over 1m/3m post-earnings (strong)78
Macro overlay (10%, low-sensitivity sector)Higher-for-longer neutral-to-mild-positive for a defensive staple58
SentimentConsensus BUY (74% bullish); post-beat tone positive — but firm-level grade dates unavailable (data gap)66
Catalyst layerNo catalyst in 30 days (next earnings 8 Sep) — calm calendar (clustering 70)70

Weighted timing ≈ 52 — Neutral. The tension is real and worth stating plainly: this is a great business in a strong uptrend that you'd rather buy 6-9% lower. The higher-timeframe strength supports the medium/long BUY; the overbought daily and wide stop are why the short-term signal is HOLD. Relative strength is a genuine positive — ATD is leading its sector — but relative strength near a 52-week high is momentum, not a value entry.

8

Economic Event Risk

High-impact macro releases in the next 14 days that could swing this stock, plus the last 7 days of surprises.

Upcoming events (next 30 days)

DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?Why
2026-07-14Core CPI YoY (Jun)Medium2.9%2.9%⚠️ MediumStaples: food-inflation & consumer-spending read; sticky core keeps the higher-for-longer tape
2026-07-16Retail Sales (Jun)Medium+0.3%⚠️ MediumConsumer-spending signal for merchandise comps
2026-07-17Michigan Sentiment (Jul)Low50.4— LowConfidence read; low direct impact on a defensive name
2026-09-08ATD Q1 FY27 earningsHigh✅ YesThe next company-specific catalyst — out of the 14-day window

Recent surprises (last 7 days)

DateEventActualForecastSurpriseImpact
2026-07-09Initial Jobless Claims215K218K-1.4% (below)Neutral: labour still firm, supports traffic
2026-07-08Consumer Credit (May)-0.18+17.1-101% (below)Mild negative: consumer credit contracting — watch discretionary spend, ATD is defensive
2026-07-09Existing Home Sales (Jun)4.09M4.2M-2.6% (below)Neutral for ATD (housing, not convenience)

ATD is a low-macro-sensitivity Consumer-Staples name, so no upcoming release is a hard trigger. The one to note is Jun CPI (14 Jul): sticky food inflation squeezes merchandise basket size but also lets ATD pass through price. Contracting consumer credit is a mild yellow flag for discretionary spend, but a convenience/fuel staple is where trade-down flows land, not away from. No high-impact, ATD-specific event inside 3 trading days, so no WAIT-for-event override.

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI and breakout status across monthly / weekly / daily / hourly / 15-minute, with a confluence verdict.
TimeframeTrendDirectionRSIMACDKey S/RBreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑Bullish63.0+, risingS: 63.3 R: 87.3Resistance breakout0.3x
WeeklyUptrend ↑Bullish64.0+, risingS: 72.0 R: 95.15Resistance breakout1.1x
DailyStrong Up ↑Bullish (overbought)70.7+, flatteningS: 82.7 R: 95.15Resistance breakout1.3x
HourlyDowntrend ↓Bearish36.4-, fallingS: 89.1 R: 93.9Support breakdown1.3x
15-minDowntrend ↓Bearish30.0-, basingS: 90.5 R: 93.6Support breakdown4.0x
Confluence: Bullish (higher-TF) with a short-term pullback · MTF Score 68

Monthly, weekly and daily trends are all up — ATD broke to a fresh high on the 22 Jun earnings gap and holds well above its rising 200-day (77.6) and 50-day (82.7) averages. The caveat is the daily RSI at 70.7 (overbought) and the intraday timeframes (hourly/15-min) rolling over, which is a textbook short-term pullback inside a larger uptrend. That is why the short-term signal is HOLD: the trend is your friend for the medium/long hold, but chasing at C$90+ into an overbought daily leaves you buying near resistance (95.15) rather than at the 82-85 support shelf.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

A 6-month daily close line with SMA50 and key support/resistance — the visual companion to the MTF table.

ATD.TO 6-month daily (C$). The 22 Jun earnings gap from ~82 to ~92 on 5x volume drives the current setup; price now consolidates just under the 95.15 high, well above the rising 50- and 200-day averages. Support shelf 82-85; fair value ~C$85.

11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths with triggers and probability weights.

Bull — C$115 (12m, 22%)

Fuel margins hold near current elevated levels (US 52c/gal) rather than normalising, US merchandise comps stay +3-4%, and ATD deploys its balance sheet into one or more accretive bolt-on acquisitions now that the Seven & i mega-deal is off the table. Multiple re-rates toward ~19x forward on renewed compounding confidence. ~C$115 is above the C$108.69 high analyst target — it needs both the margin and the M&A leg to fire.

Base — C$102 (12m, 55%)

The company delivers its guided >10% organic EPS growth, fuel margins ease modestly but stay healthy, merchandise comps stay positive, and the multiple holds around 17.5x forward. That lands ~C$102 — in line with the C$102 analyst mean/median. This is the probability-weighted centre of gravity: a quality compounder growing into a fair multiple.

Bear — C$76 (12m, 23%)

Fuel margins normalise back toward mid-cycle (a real risk from today's elevated ~52c/gal), the US consumer weakens further (contracting consumer credit), and share pressure builds as 7-Eleven rolls out ~1,300 large-format food stores by 2030 and Casey's keeps expanding. Merchandise comps stall, the multiple de-rates toward ~15x, and price retraces to the rising 200-day near C$77. Competitive/margin-normalisation is the live downside trigger.

Probability-weighted 12-month fair value ≈ C$99 (0.22×115 + 0.55×102 + 0.23×76). Skew is roughly symmetric around the current C$90.49 — modest positive expected value, consistent with a HOLD (short/medium) that is an accumulate-on-weakness rather than chase-now, and a BUY at the long horizon.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Three independent entry paths (Fundamental · Technical · Catalyst) and three exit triggers (Stop-Loss · Thesis · Profit-Target). Any one entry path is a valid entry — the more that agree, the larger the position the conviction ladder suggests. Exits are graded by severity, not count.

How to read this — the Conviction Ladder

The three entry groups are alternative paths to a buy, not a checklist. A group counts only when all its sub-conditions hold. How many groups are satisfied sets the suggested size — it does not gate whether you may enter: 1 group = Half-Size (a valid starter/scale-in), 2 = Full-Size, 3 = Over-Size (highest conviction); 0 = Wait (no path open yet). A strong overall signal can still read Wait here when the stock is well above its entry zones — that flags "good business, no entry edge right now," not a contradiction. Exits are graded by severity of what is live, not by a count: a hard stop is an Exit on its own.
Entry conviction: Wait0 of 3 groups met — no entry path open

Fundamental — not MET

Price is above our trailing-anchored fair value — no fundamental entry edge at C$90.49.
⛔ Price C$90.49 < fair value ~C$85 (warranted 19.3x × clean EPS C$4.41)
✅ No earnings within 7 days (next 8 Sep)
✅ Underlying-Driver score ≥ 50 (64)

Technical — not MET

Higher-TF trend is up, but the daily is overbought — the reachable entry is a pullback to the 82-85 support shelf, not a chase here.
⛔ Daily close > SMA50 (C$82.7) on >1.5x volume — price is already well above it, so no fresh reclaim signal
⛔ OR a tested bounce off the C$82-85 weekly support with a higher low
⛔ RSI 35-65 (currently 70.7 — overbought)
⛔ MACD histogram positive ≥ 2 days (daily flattening; intraday negative)

Catalyst — not MET

The +11% earnings catalyst was 22 Jun; the 24-hour confirmation window has closed.
· Post-earnings move within 24h > +5% (the 22 Jun gap has passed)
✅ Guidance raised or maintained (>10% organic EPS reaffirmed)
⛔ Volume > 2x the 20-day average right now

Forecast: Fundamental group: FORECAST ~ price needs to fall ~6% to C$85, OR one to two quarters of earnings growth to lift fair value to today's price — CONFIDENCE Moderate; a market pullback or a fuel-margin scare could open it faster. Technical group: FORECAST the overbought daily RSI (70.7, easing ~1-2 pts/week on a flat tape) would reach the ≤65 entry band in ~3-4 weeks, OR immediately on a pullback to the 82-85 shelf — CONFIDENCE Moderate. Catalyst group: catalyst-dependent — next window is the 8 Sep Q1 print. Net: no entry path is open today (Wait); the most likely first opening is a technical pullback into the 82-85 support shelf.

Exit action: Holdno exit trigger is live — hold the position

Stop-Loss — not LIVE

⛔ Two daily closes below C$82 (loss of the 50-day and the post-earnings gap base)

Thesis Invalidation — not LIVE

⛔ Fuel gross margin normalises AND US merchandise same-store sales turn negative for 2 quarters
⛔ OR 7-Eleven / Casey's take demonstrable convenience share and Circle K comps roll over (competitive invalidation)
⛔ OR full-year organic-EPS guidance cut below +10%

Profit-Target — not LIVE

⛔ Price into C$108-115 (high target / bull) with RSI > 70 and no quality upgrade to justify it

Forecast: Stop-loss (C$82): Unlikely in the next 4-6 weeks — price C$90.49 is ~9% above it and the 50/200-day are rising; would need a broad market selloff or a fuel-margin scare. Thesis invalidation: not live — comps positive, guidance reaffirmed; watch the Sep quarter for fuel-margin normalisation. Profit-target: not live — price below the C$108 zone and RSI would need to be >70 there too.

Imagine you act at the current price of C$90.49 · as of 10 Jul 2026

What if you bought now?

You're risking ~C$8.5 (~9%) down to the C$82 stop — and ~C$14 (~15%) in the bear case to C$76 — to gain ~C$11.5 (~13%) of base-case upside to C$102 and ~C$24 (~27%) to the bull C$115.

What you're risking: you'd be buying an overbought daily (RSI 70.7) ~5% below the 52-week high and ~6% above our C$85 fair value — none of the three entry groups is met. The nearest logical stop is C$82 (~9% down); the bear path is C$76 (~16% down) if fuel margins normalise and share pressure bites. You collect a slim ~1% dividend while you wait.

What you're gaining: immediate exposure to a high-ROE (20%) compounder guiding >10% organic EPS growth, with ~13% base-case upside to the C$102 analyst mean and ~27% to the bull case, plus the free optionality of accretive bolt-on M&A now that the mega-deal is off. Risk-reward from here is roughly 1.5:1 to base, better to bull.

Read: the business is a clear BUY-quality hold, but acting at C$90.49 is buying near resistance into an overbought tape. Waiting for the 82-85 support shelf materially improves the deal — this is an accumulate-on-weakness, not a chase-now.

What if you sold now?

Selling (or staying out) here protects you from the ~9% drop to the C$82 stop and the ~16% bear path — but you give up ~13% base-case upside to C$102 and the compounding of a 20%-ROE staple.

What you're giving up: the base-case run to C$102 (~13%), the bull optionality to C$115 (~27%), the guided >10% EPS growth compounding, and the M&A free option. At C$90.49 you'd be selling roughly at fair-plus (price is above our C$85 trailing fair value but below the C$102 forward analyst mean) — not obviously below fair value.

What you're protecting: capital against the C$76 bear (fuel-margin normalisation + competitive share loss) and the near-term overbought unwind. But no exit rule is actually triggered right now — the stop is 9% away, guidance is intact, comps are positive.

Read: there is no mechanical reason to sell. For a holder this is a hold; for a non-holder it is an accumulate-on-weakness zone, not a sell.

13

Position Sizing Context

Illustrative portfolio math (not advice) translating conviction into an allocation given risk-per-share and volatility.

No risk budget or portfolio role was specified for this run, so position sizing is not computed. For reference: the §12 Conviction Ladder reads Wait (0 of 3 entry groups met) — there is no entry edge at C$90.49, so the sizing guidance is 'wait for a path to open' rather than a percentage. The reachable first entry is a pullback into the C$82-85 support shelf. Volatility context: daily ATR ≈ C$2.06 (~2.3% of price), beta 0.73 (defensive, ~27% less volatile than the market), 52-week range C$67.9-95.15. Specify your allocation and role for sizing math.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, level and signal, saved alongside the HTML so the next run can compute deltas.
{
  "ticker": "ATD.TO",
  "company": "Alimentation Couche-Tard Inc.",
  "currency": "CAD",
  "date": "2026-07-10",
  "version": "v6",
  "exchange": "TSX",
  "exchange_ticker": "TSX:ATD",
  "isin": "CA01626P1484",
  "api_ticker": "ATD.TO",
  "price_at_rating": 90.49,
  "signal_short": "HOLD",
  "signal_medium": "HOLD",
  "signal_long": "BUY",
  "primary_signal": "HOLD",
  "quality_score": 82,
  "lifecycle_stage": "cash cow / mature compounder",
  "quality_detail": {
    "industry_benchmark_name": "Same-Store Sales + Inventory/Asset Turns (Retail)",
    "industry_benchmark_value": "US comps +3.4%",
    "industry_benchmark_score": 80,
    "moat_score": 70,
    "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 78,
    "capital_allocation": 82,
    "management_skin_in_game": 72
  },
  "valuation_score": 56,
  "valuation_detail": {
    "fcf_yield": 2.66,
    "implied_growth_rate": 8.5,
    "consensus_growth_rate": 10.0,
    "historical_valuation_decile": 6
  },
  "warranted_multiple": 19.34,
  "actual_multiple": 20.54,
  "val_multiple_basis": "clean (adjusted) P/E, CAD",
  "discount_rate_r": 0.0906,
  "risk_free_10y": 0.0456,
  "g_near": 0.06,
  "g_term": 0.03,
  "warranted_ratio": 1.06,
  "val_band": "fair",
  "timing_score": 52,
  "timing_detail": {
    "mtf_confluence": 68,
    "risk_reward_score": 45,
    "relative_strength_vs_spy": 8.0,
    "relative_strength_vs_sector": 6.0,
    "catalyst_clustering_score": 70,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.1
  },
  "driver_score": 64,
  "driver_commodity_trend": "N/A \u2014 fuel-retailer margin (not producer). Retail fuel margin elevated (US 52.44c/gal, +9.17c YoY); a falling wholesale crude typically EXPANDS retail margin, the opposite of a producer.",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following",
  "economic_alignment_conviction": 60,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-07-09",
  "overall_confidence": 62,
  "nonop_pct_of_net_income": 6.5,
  "clean_pe": 20.54,
  "clean_peg": 2.05,
  "competitive_share_trajectory": "stable",
  "competitive_threat_level": "elevated",
  "fair_value_est": 85.29,
  "stop_loss": 82.0,
  "target_price": 102.0,
  "analyst_consensus_target": 102.0,
  "analyst_target_high": 108.69,
  "analyst_target_low": 89.74,
  "analyst_target_upside_pct": 12.7,
  "analyst_grades_consensus": "buy",
  "analyst_bullish_pct": 74,
  "analyst_coverage_count": 18,
  "fmp_rating": "B+",
  "fmp_overall_score": 3,
  "recent_upgrades_30d": null,
  "recent_downgrades_30d": null,
  "scenario_base_target": 102,
  "scenario_bull_target": 115,
  "scenario_bear_target": 76,
  "entry_groups_met": 0,
  "entry_conviction": "Wait",
  "exit_groups_live": 0,
  "exit_action": "Hold",
  "hard_gate_state": "clear",
  "gates_triggered": [],
  "gates_caution": [],
  "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "user_horizon": null,
  "user_allocation_pct": null,
  "portfolio_role": null,
  "next_update_date": "2026-07-24",
  "next_update_basis": "default +14d (no impactful event; earnings 2026-09-08 out of window)",
  "analysis_status": "starting",
  "finder_ticker": "ATD.TO",
  "finder_exchange": "\ud83c\udde8\ud83c\udde6 TSX"
}

ATD.TO rated HOLD (Short) / HOLD (Medium) / BUY (Long) at C$90.49 on 10 Jul 2026 — a high-quality, fairly-priced convenience-retail compounder that is simply extended after its 22 Jun earnings gap. The base Decision Matrix puts High Quality + Fair Valuation + Neutral Timing on the HOLD row (watch for a valuation entry); only the long horizon, where Quality dominates, lifts to BUY. All hard gates clear, no Do-Not-Buy trigger. Entry conviction: Wait (0/3) — good business, no entry edge now. First report on the name (finder promotion, status 'Starting').

15

Data Sources & Methodology

Audit trail of every data source: fully available (✓), fallback (⚠), or failed (✗), plus provenance-based confidence haircuts.
Data Source Status
get_company_profile ISIN CA01626P1484, CAD listing, sector, description
get_yahoo_quote price C$90.49, share count/market cap C$83.1B verified (the .TO stale-cap trap), trailing P/E 18.89, ROE 20.1%, FCF C$2.36B
get_income_statement FMP fell back to yfinance quarterly; annual figures corroborated from the 22 Jun press release (FY26 EPS US$3.37 GAAP / US$3.10 adjusted)
get_financial_ratios EV/EBITDA 14.1x, D/E 75.9%, current 1.12, margins
get_multi_timeframe_analysis monthly→daily uptrend, intraday pullback, daily RSI 70.7
get_yahoo_analyst_targets mean C$102, high C$108.69, low C$89.74, 18 analysts, 6 SB/8 B/5 H
get_grades_consensus consensus 'buy' (1.84); 74% bullish
get_ratings_snapshot FMP B+, overall 3; ROE score 5 (excellent), D/E score 2 (the leverage drag)
get_economic_series (DGS10) 10-Y 4.56% (2026-07-08) — the warranted-multiple discount-rate input
get_economic_calendar no high-impact ATD-specific event inside 3 days; CPI 14 Jul the nearest relevant
get_stock_grades FMP 402 (premium) — substituted grades_consensus distribution; sentiment sub-signal confidence trimmed
get_earnings_calendar empty — next earnings date (8 Sep, Q1 FY27) confirmed via web
Web (press release, transcript, NACS/CSP) Q4/FY26 results, interchange gain, Seven & i withdrawal (16 Jul 2025), competitor store counts/share
Impact on scores: Coverage is strong. The two failures (get_stock_grades premium-blocked, get_earnings_calendar empty) were both backfilled — the grades distribution from get_grades_consensus and the earnings date from the company site — so the only material haircut is a modest one on the Timing sentiment sub-signal (no firm-level upgrade/downgrade dates). Income-statement annual figures came from the audited press release rather than the API, which is if anything a higher-quality source. Overall confidence is set by the weakest fundamental pillar (Timing, 62%).
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.