TSX:AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited

ISIN: CA0084741085 · Dual-listed TSX:AEM / NYSE:AEM · reported in CAD (TSX listing)
Basic Materials Gold Miner (Senior Producer) Analysis Status: Starting
NYSE / TSX · HQ: Toronto, ON · CEO: Ammar Al-Joundi · Mkt Cap: C$123.2B (US$87.9B) · 500.2M shares
C$246.41
+C$6.17 (+2.57%) · Jun 16, 2026
Signal v6 · 17:03 ET · US$175.82 (≈C$/US$ 1.402)
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.
HorizonSignalComposite ScoreConfidenceKey Driver
Short-term (1–3 mo) WAIT-FOR-EVENT 60 62% FOMC tomorrow (Jun 17) — gold is rate-sensitive; daily tape below the 200-DMA. Don't chase into the event.
Medium-term (6–12 mo) BUY 65 65% High-quality, low-cost producer on a 29% pullback; strong gold tailwind. Borderline base — accumulate on weakness (STRONG amplification declined on Fair valuation).
Long-term (3–5 yr) STRONG BUY 71 65% Quality dominates; structural gold bull (de-dollarisation, CB buying, fiscal dominance) — the macro report's highest-conviction multi-year call. Base BUY amplified by driver + economy.
Next update: 2026-06-18 — FOMC 2026-06-17 +1 trading day (gold rate-sensitive, high-impact release inside the 3-day window).
Table of Contents
1Five-Pillar Scorecard 2Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status 3Pillar Detail: Business Quality 4Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness 5Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers 6Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment 7Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing 8Economic Event Risk 9Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis 10Price Chart (6-Month Daily) 11Scenario Summary 12Entry / Exit Rules 13Position Sizing Context 14Calibration Snapshot 15Data Sources & Methodology
1

Five-Pillar Scorecard

Five independent scores — Business Quality, Valuation Attractiveness, Entry/Exit Timing, Underlying Drivers, and Economic Alignment — each 0–100 with confidence. The per-horizon base BUY/HOLD/SELL comes from the three fundamental pillars (Quality / Valuation / Timing) via the Decision Matrix; the two context pillars (Underlying Drivers, Economic Alignment) then amplify a BUY to STRONG BUY when both corroborate. Quality figures use the US fundamental ticker (AEM, USD); price-based levels are converted to CAD at the TSX listing.

Business Quality

84
Best-in-class senior: net-cash balance sheet, ~70% AISC margin, Tier-1 jurisdictions
Confidence: 80%

Valuation Attractiveness

55
Fair, not cheap — ~40% upside to consensus, but premium P/NAV on peak-cycle earnings
Confidence: 68%

Entry/Exit Timing

54
Higher-TF uptrend, daily pullback below 200-DMA; bouncing off the C$212 swing low into FOMC
Confidence: 65%

Underlying Drivers

88
Gold ~US$4,800/oz vs ~US$1,475 AISC — Strong Tailwind
Confidence: 70% · STRONG-eligible

Economic Alignment

82
Trend-Following · Tailwind
Confidence: 75% · Macro report 2026-06-13

The pillars conflict in a useful way: a top-decile business riding a top-decile driver and a friendly economy, but at only a fair price and in a mixed tape. That is exactly why the three horizons diverge — Quality/driver/economy dominate the long horizon (STRONG BUY), the fair valuation and sub-200-DMA pullback keep the medium horizon a disciplined BUY/accumulate, and a high-impact Fed meeting one day out overrides the short horizon to WAIT.

2

Hard Gates & Do-Not-Buy Status

Binary safety checks — liquidity, currency, accounting, debt, dilution, commodity floor, permitting, imminent-event blackout. Any triggered gate is a hard Do-Not-Buy regardless of the composite score; caution gates are notes for position sizing. For AEM all gates are clear — the only amber note is a near-term Fed event that drives the short-term WAIT (a timing caution, not a structural one).
Financial Distress — CLEAR
Net cash ~US$2.8B; interest coverage 90.7×; current ratio 3.15. Among the strongest balance sheets in the sector.
Earnings Event — CLEAR
Q1 reported Apr 30; next earnings est. ~late-July 2026 (>14 days out). ⚠️ date unverified (calendar API empty).
Valuation Ceiling — CLEAR
Price C$246 well below the highest analyst target (C$430); trailing P/E 16.6× is mid-range, not a 5-yr extreme.
Accounting / Dilution — CLEAR
Share count stable/declining (~500–502M); low SBC; dividend payout only ~14%. No earnings-quality flags.
Regulatory / Binary — CLEAR
No pending binary regulatory event. Diversified across Tier-1 jurisdictions (Canada, Finland, Mexico, Australia).
Severe Driver Collapse — CLEAR
Driver score 88 (gold far above AISC). Nowhere near the ≤15 commodity-floor gate.

Do-Not-Buy triggers: none fired. Leverage+rising-rates (no debt) ✓ · Valuation extreme (P/E not top-decile) ✓ · Negative earnings revisions (estimates rising with gold) ✓ · Insider selling spike (none observed) ✓ · Structural threat (none) ✓. Hard-gate state: CLEAR (✓).

3

Pillar Detail: Business Quality

A deep dive into the Quality score: mine economics, balance-sheet strength, the AISC-margin benchmark, competitive moat, ROIC and capital allocation. Sector profile: Mining / Materials; lifecycle: Mature senior producer with cash-cow cash generation and a growth pipeline. Metrics emphasise AISC margin, FCF yield, net debt/EBITDA and reserve durability (P/E and revenue growth are de-emphasised — both are gold-price-driven and cyclical).
Business Quality — Pillar Score
A best-in-class senior gold producer: ~70% AISC margin, a near-debt-free balance sheet, 22% ROE and FMP's "A" health rating. The cap is a commodity business with no pricing power on its output.
84
Confidence 80% · base 84 → adj 84

Lifecycle & Sector Classification

Sector: Mining / Materials (Gold). Lifecycle: Mature producer — 2026 guidance 3.3–3.5M oz, profitable and free-cash-generative, with a 20–30% production-growth pipeline (Detour Lake/Canadian Malartic underground, Hope Bay, Upper Beaver). Scored on sector-appropriate metrics (AISC margin, FCF yield, net debt/EBITDA), not on the optically huge but price-driven +66% YoY revenue.

Sub-SignalValueSector BenchmarkScoreRationale
AISC margin (benchmark)~US$3,350/oz (≈70% of price)>40% of spot = 90–10095Realized gold US$4,861/oz (Q1) vs AISC ~US$1,400–1,550. Enormous margin of safety.
Profitability vs peersEBITDA 72% · net 39.5% · op 56.9%Top-tier among seniors90Record quarterly operating margins; net income +108% YoY in Q1.
Cash generationFCF ~US$4.5B TTM · ~33% FCF marginFCF yield >5% strong82FCF yield ~5.3% on EV; converts ~64% of operating cash flow after heavy growth capex.
Balance-sheet healthNet cash ~US$2.8B · D/E 1.2% · cur. 3.15×Net debt/EBITDA <1× = strong95Effectively debt-free; interest coverage 90.7×. Best-in-class survivability.
Revenue trajectory+66% YoY (price-driven)Volume growth 20–30% pipeline68Top line is mostly gold-price beta; underlying volume growth is solid but modest.

INDUSTRY BENCHMARK: AISC Margin (Spot − AISC)

Realized gold ~US$4,861/oz  |  AISC ~US$1,475/oz  |  Margin ~US$3,386/oz (~70% of price)
Rating: EXCEPTIONAL — margin >40% of spot. Benchmark Score: 95/100.
Context: even a 30–35% gold correction would leave AISC margins firmly positive. This is the single most important profitability metric for a producer, and AEM sits at the favourable extreme.

Competitive Moat Scorecard

Pricing Power

50
Price-taker on gold (neutral by default)

Network Effects

50
N/A for a miner — scored neutral

Switching Costs

50
N/A — commodity output

Cost Advantage

80
Low AISC, scale, hydro-powered Quebec mines

Intangible Assets

72
Tier-1 jurisdiction reserves, permits, operating expertise

Moat average ≈ 60. A gold miner's durable edge is geological and operational, not commercial — AEM's genuine advantages are its low-cost, long-life Tier-1-jurisdiction asset base and renewable-powered operations that insulate it from fuel-cost shocks. It cannot raise the price of its product, so pricing power is (correctly) neutral.

ROIC & Capital Allocation

Component (weight)ReadingScore
ROIC / returns (40%)ROE 22.3%, ROA 15.5%; FMP ROE & ROA sub-scores both 5/5. Top-quartile, rising with gold.85
Capital-allocation discipline (30%)Bolt-on M&A and strategic stakes building the pipeline (Aurion/Finland closed Jun 15 at C$2.60; ~19.9% of Wallbridge/Fenelon; Cascadia/Yukon). Dividend payout only ~14% — conservative, room to grow + buybacks.80
Management skin-in-the-game (30%)Long-tenured, well-regarded team; low SBC dilution; record results delivered against guidance.72

FMP financial-health rating: A (4/5) — DCF 5, ROE 5, ROA 5, D/E 3, with the only drags being the valuation sub-scores (P/E 2, P/B 2). The independent rating confirms our high Quality read and previews the Valuation tension below.

4

Pillar Detail: Valuation Attractiveness

A deep dive into the Valuation score: sector-appropriate multiples, FCF yield, reverse-DCF implied growth, embedded optionality (free upside), analyst consensus targets, grades distribution and the FMP cross-reference. The central tension: analysts see ~40% upside to consensus, yet AEM trades at a premium P/NAV to peers on earnings inflated by record gold — so the score lands squarely in "Fair, not cheap."
Valuation Attractiveness — Pillar Score
Fair. Forward P/E ~12× and a 5.3% FCF yield look reasonable, and consensus targets sit ~40% higher — but those forwards rest on peak-cycle gold (consensus EPS declines after 2027), and AEM carries the richest P/NAV among the seniors. A small embedded-optionality tilt nudges it up.
55
Confidence 68% · base 51 → +4 optionality → 55
MultipleCurrentReferenceRead
P/NAV (primary, mining)~2.0–2.3× (est.)Seniors ~1.4–2.0×Premium to peers — AEM is the most expensive senior on NAV, the quality/jurisdiction tax.
EV/EBITDA8.74×Reasonable at spot, rich on mid-cycleLooks fair today but normalises higher if gold mean-reverts.
Forward P/E~12.2×2026E EPS ~US$13.65Optically cheap — but the "E" is peak-gold; analysts model EPS easing 2028→2030.
Trailing P/E / P/B16.6× / 3.36×FMP P/E & P/B sub-scores 2/5P/B rich; the statistical-cheapness screens fail.
FCF yield (anchor)~5.3% on EV5–8% attractiveHonest cash yield in the attractive band, after heavy growth capex.

Reverse DCF / Implied Growth

At C$246 with a net-cash balance sheet and ~US$4.5B TTM FCF, the market is roughly capitalising current free cash flow as a perpetuity at a high-single-digit discount rate with little real growth — i.e. it is pricing in sustained near-record gold. Consensus agrees in the near term but not the long: EPS is modelled at ~US$13.65 (2026E) → US$14.41 (2027E) → then easing to US$12.99 (2028E), US$11.04 (2029E), US$10.81 (2030E) as analysts assume gold normalises. So the forward-P/E "cheapness" is an artefact of peak earnings; on mid-cycle gold the multiple is full. That is the core reason Valuation is Fair rather than Attractive despite the headline upside.

Embedded Optionality / Free Upside

Core in-production business justifies the bulk of the ~C$246 price. On top, the buyer gets several options the market is paying little for: Net: optionality is a +4 tilt (raising base 51 → 55) and a reason to keep accumulating on weakness — not a reason to call an already-full core "cheap."

Analyst Price-Target Consensus (TSX, CAD — primary listing)

MetricCAD (TSX:AEM)Upside vs C$246.41Cross-check (NYSE, USD)
Consensus / meanC$340.95+38.4%US$248.17 (+41% on US$175.82)
MedianC$356.47+44.7%US$238
High / LowC$429.85 / C$134.02spread 3.2× (very wide)US$310 / US$210
Coverage / rec.11 analysts · "Buy" (1.91)Recent 1-mo avg target US$261.5 — targets racing up to chase gold (all-time avg only US$179).

Targets signal ~40% upside (Attractive on this sub-signal alone, ~10% of the pillar), but the 3.2× high/low spread (a deep-bear outlier at C$134) and the fact targets have been chasing the gold price down a -10% confidence haircut. Grades consensus (FMP): Buy 20 · Hold 10 · Sell 1 → 64.5% bullish ("Buy with >30% holds" → ~58). Recent actions are almost all maintains (CIBC Outperform 5/26, JPM Neutral 5/4, Scotia Sector Outperform) — sentiment steady, not accelerating. FMP health rating A, dragged only by the P/E (2) and P/B (2) valuation sub-scores — independently corroborating "high quality, full price."

5

Pillar Detail: Underlying Drivers

The dominant external force AEM is tethered to — the gold price (with real interest rates as the contested secondary). A context pillar: it does not change the fundamental pillar scores, but a tailwind ≥65 makes the name eligible to amplify a base BUY to STRONG BUY. This section also names the thesis-invalidation floor.
Primary Driver: Gold Spot Price
Secondary (contested): 10-yr real yield (DFII10) at 2.15% — a textbook headwind that has decoupled as central-bank buying and de-dollarisation dominate.
88
Strong Tailwind
Horizon (weight)ReadingScore
Historical (25%)Gold ran from ~US$1,800/oz (2022) to ~US$4,800–4,900/oz (2026) — a generational secular uptrend; AEM earnings tripled.95
Current state (50%)Spot ~US$4,800–4,900 vs AISC ~US$1,475 → ~70% margin. As favourable as it gets for a producer.92
Forward outlook (25%)Macro report rates GLD Strong Outperform across all horizons (de-dollar CB bid, stagflation hedge, Iran/Hormuz premium). Tempered by record price levels and a positive 2.15% real yield that could bite on a hawkish Fed.75

Driver score = 95·0.25 + 92·0.50 + 75·0.25 ≈ 88 → Strong Tailwind, amplification-eligible (≥65). It does not change the base BUY/HOLD/SELL or the three fundamental pillar scores — it only enables a base BUY to become STRONG BUY when the economy also pushes the same way (it does, §6). Thesis-invalidation floor: a sustained gold break below ~US$2,500/oz would compress (not erase) AISC margins and invalidate the premium multiple; below ~US$1,600 the Severe-Driver-Collapse gate would arm. Both are far from spot. Confidence 70% (−10 for gold's inherent forward volatility; current state crystal-clear).

6

Pillar Detail: Economic Alignment

How the current economic climate sits relative to AEM, read from the latest Macro-Economic report (2026-06-13, 3 days old — fresh). It classifies the macro pressure as Tailwind / Neutral / Headwind and frames a long entry as Trend-Following or Contrarian with 0–100 conviction. The pressure is the second amplifier — a Tailwind enables STRONG BUY.
Economic Alignment — Stance & Conviction
Trend-Following · Pressure: Tailwind
82
Conviction

AEM is not a named line in the macro report's Economic Watchlist Forecast, so the read comes from the Driver-Sector Impact Matrix: AEM is Materials (XLB), and the report rates XLB Strong Outperform / Strong Outperform / Strong Outperform across Short/Medium/Long — the only sector that is SO on all three horizons — with capital flow IN / IN / IN. The matching asset class GLD is likewise SO/SO/SO. The dominant regime is Stagflation (oil shock + hawkish Fed), in which gold is the report's highest-conviction multi-year beneficiary (de-dollarisation, sovereign-debt/fiscal dominance, Iran/Hormuz, central-bank accumulation).

Anchoring on the Medium horizon, the pressure is a clear Tailwind; going long rides the economic trend (Trend-Following), conviction 82. The one near-term cross-current is the same one the Timing pillar flags: a hawkish Fed (Warsh's first FOMC, Jun 17) could lift real yields and produce a short, sharp gold pullback even as the structural tailwind persists. Amplification effect: the Tailwind did fire at the Long horizon — combined with the driver (88), it lifts the base BUY to STRONG BUY. At Medium the base is a borderline BUY and we deliberately decline the STRONG amplification (see §1 / Decision logic) on valuation grounds; the Tailwind is noted but not applied. Source: sector-map; macro report 2026-06-13. Confidence 75%.

7

Pillar Detail: Entry/Exit Timing

A deep dive into the Timing score: risk-reward anchored to the stop, relative strength vs the sector, macro overlay at High sector-weight (mining), sentiment from grade actions and news tone, and the catalyst cluster. The picture is genuinely mixed — a secular uptrend, a sharp 29% pullback to a swing low, a daily break below the 200-DMA, and a Fed event one day out.
Entry/Exit Timing — Pillar Score
Neutral. Monthly/weekly trends are still up, but price sits below the daily 50- and 200-DMA after a 29% correction, bouncing off the C$212 swing low. Calm catalyst calendar (no earnings <14d) is offset by a high-impact FOMC tomorrow.
54
Confidence 65% · MTF 60 · macro 68 · catalyst 75
Sub-signal (weight)ReadingScore
MTF trend (30%)Monthly & weekly uptrend; daily downtrend + support breakdown (below SMA50 ~C$265 and SMA200 ~C$259); hourly/15-min bouncing.60
Risk-reward (20%)Price at the weekly-50 support shelf (~C$246), ~16% above the C$210 stop; daily ATR ~C$11 (4.6%). Mixed — a support test, but below the trend MAs.52
Macro overlay (20%, High sensitivity)Materials in-favour (rotation IN); VIX 16.2 (calm); yield curve +0.38 normal; but a hawkish Fed is a near-term gold cross-current.68
Sentiment (15%)Grades mostly maintain last 30–60d (CIBC OP, JPM Neutral, Scotia SO); news tone strongly positive ("record margins," "smart mining stock to add," top fund holding).56
Catalysts (15%)No earnings within 14 days; no clustered events. Calm — barring the macro FOMC overlay handled in §8.75

Relative strength & range: AEM has strongly outperformed SPY over 12 months on the gold bull, but lagged over the last 1–3 months during the pullback (52-week range position ~47%, i.e. mid-range, −29% off the C$348.94 high). Position-risk: the C$212.41 swing low (Jun 10) is the line in the sand; price has reclaimed the C$240 daily EMA20 but not the C$259–265 daily MA cluster — confirmation of trend repair would meaningfully improve the entry.

8

Economic Event Risk

The next ~14 days of high-impact US macro releases that can swing a rate-sensitive gold miner, plus last week's surprises. Mining is a High macro-sensitivity sector, so a high-impact release within 3 trading days triggers a WAIT-FOR-EVENT short-term override — which is exactly what the Jun 17 FOMC does here.
DateEventImpactForecastPreviousRelevant?
2026-06-17FOMC rate decision + projections + presser (Warsh's first)HighHold 3.75%3.75%✅ Critical — gold is rate/real-yield sensitive; macro flags ~25% hike risk & removal of easing language
2026-06-17Retail Sales MoM (May)High+0.5%+0.5%⚠️ Indirect — growth/risk read
2026-06-25Core PCE MoM (May)High+0.2%+0.2%✅ Inflation → Fed path → real yields → gold
2026-06-30CB Consumer Confidence / JOLTsHigh93.1 / 7.62M⚠️ Medium
2026-07-01ISM Manufacturing PMI (Jun)High52.554.0⚠️ Medium — materials demand read
2026-07-02Non-Farm Payrolls / Unemployment (Jun)High+70K / 4.5%+172K / 4.3%✅ Labour softening → Fed path → gold

Recent surprises (last 7 days): CPI YoY (May) 4.2% (inline, up from 3.8% — sticky); Core CPI YoY 2.9%; PPI MoM hot at +1.1% (+57% surprise); Michigan sentiment beat (48.9). The tape is stagflationary — supportive of gold as an inflation/debasement hedge, but also fuel for a hawkish Fed and higher real yields that can pressure gold short-term. Override: because mining is High-sensitivity and a high-impact FOMC is <3 trading days out, the short-term signal is set to WAIT-FOR-EVENT regardless of composite, and the report's next-update is pinned to FOMC +1 day (2026-06-18).

9

Multi-Timeframe Technical Analysis

Trend, RSI, MACD and breakout status across monthly → 15-min (Polygon, US-listing prices in USD; CAD equivalents ≈ ×1.402), plus a confluence read. The textbook pattern here is "higher-timeframe uptrend + lower-timeframe pullback" — with the caveat that the daily has slipped below its 200-DMA.
TimeframeTrendRSIMACDKey S/R (USD)BreakoutVol
MonthlyUptrend ↑60.1+, risingR 187.5 / 255.2Resistance breakout0.66×
WeeklyUptrend ↑47.0−, fallingS 175.6 / 160.2 · R 187.5Resistance breakout0.52×
DailyDowntrend ↓47.5−, flatS 150.7 · MA50 189 / MA200 184Support breakdown1.39×
HourlyUptrend ↑61.0+, fadingS 170.9 · R 177.2Resistance breakout
15-minStrong up ↑49.2flatS 173.3 · R 177.2Resistance breakout
Confluence: Mostly bullish secular trend with a daily pullback — weighted MTF score ≈ 60 (tool flag: "strongly bullish," driven by the monthly breakout).

Monthly and weekly structures remain in uptrends and the monthly just broke to new resistance, but the daily has rolled over below both its 50- and 200-day moving averages with a support breakdown — the signature of a correction within a larger bull. Price is now rebounding off the C$212 (US$150-area) swing low on the hourly/15-min, with elevated daily volume (1.39×). Net read: a constructive "buy-the-dip" zone once the daily reclaims the ~C$259–265 (US$184–189) MA cluster; until then the lower-timeframe bounce is unconfirmed and event-exposed.

10

Price Chart (6-Month Daily)

Six months of daily closes (TSX:AEM, CAD) with a 50-day SMA and the key support/resistance levels marked. The visual companion to §9 — the parabolic run to C$348.94 (Mar 2), the −29% correction to C$212.41 (Jun 10), and the current rebound are all visible at a glance.
11

Scenario Summary

Bull / Base / Bear 12-month price paths (CAD) with triggers and probability weights. The base case is the probability-weighted centre of gravity; bull and bear hinge mostly on the gold price and whether real yields spike. Analyst consensus (~C$341 mean) sits at the optimistic edge of our base/bull range.

Bull · 30% · C$345 (+40%)

Gold holds/extends above US$4,800; real yields ease on a dovish Fed pivot; production beats and the growth pipeline de-risks. AEM retests the C$348.94 high and pushes toward the analyst median (C$356). Driver + economy fire on all cylinders.

Base · 45% · C$288 (+17%)

Gold range-bound at a high level; AEM recovers the daily MA cluster and re-rates toward fair value (~C$272) and into the lower analyst band as record FCF compounds. Steady accumulation pays.

Bear · 25% · C$208 (−16%)

Hawkish Fed lifts real yields; risk-off USD strength triggers a 15–20% gold correction. AEM breaks the C$212 swing low; multiple de-rates from its premium. Margins stay positive (no distress) — a valuation reset, not a solvency event.

12

Entry / Exit Rules

Mechanical conditions for entry and exit with specific CAD levels: five independent entry checks, a hard stop, thesis invalidation, and scaled profit-takes. Converts the scores into an action plan. At C$246.41, 2 of 5 entry criteria are met and 0 of 3 exit criteria are live — consistent with "like it, accumulate on weakness, wait for trend confirmation."

Entry Rules — 2 of 5 met

1 (Valuation): price ≤ fair value C$272 AND driver ≥50 → MET (C$246.41; driver 88).
2 (Support entry): price within ~3% of the weekly-50 / swing support shelf (C$240–246) → MET (at the shelf).
3 (Trend confirmation): daily close back above the SMA50 (~C$265) → NOT MET (price below the MA cluster).
4 (Momentum): daily RSI 40–65 AND MACD histogram positive ≥2 days → NOT MET (RSI 47.5 ok, but daily MACD still slightly negative).
5 (Event-clear): no high-impact macro/earnings event within 3 trading days → NOT MET (FOMC Jun 17).

Exit Rules — 0 of 3 live

1 (Hard stop): 2 consecutive daily closes below C$210 (under the C$212.41 swing low) → not triggered.
2 (Thesis invalidation): gold sustained below ~US$2,500/oz OR full-year guidance cut OR a hard gate trips → not triggered.
3 (Profit-take): price reaches C$330–356 (analyst band) AND RSI >70 → trim → not triggered.

Key levels (CAD): Stop C$210 · Support C$226 / C$212 (swing low) / C$205 · Fair value ~C$272 · Resistance C$254 / C$270 / C$302 / C$337 / C$348.94 (high) · Analyst mean C$341.

Imagine you act at the current price C$246.41 · as of Jun 16, 2026 17:03 ET

What if you bought now?

You'd be risking ~C$36 / −15% to the hard stop to gain ~C$42 (+17%) to base / ~C$99 (+40%) to bull.
  • Risking: downside to stop C$210 (−15%); bear case C$208 (−16%); plus entry rules NOT yet met — buying below the C$259–265 trend MAs and one day ahead of a high-impact FOMC.
  • Gaining: base C$288 (+17%) · bull C$345 (+40%); plus a ~1.0% dividend and ~5.3% FCF yield compounding while you wait, and the free exploration/expansion optionality you now own.
  • Net: risk-reward ≈ 1.1:1 to base, ~2.7:1 to bull. Acting now is defensible for medium/long capital, but waiting one day past the Fed (and for a daily MA reclaim) materially improves the entry — hence the short-term WAIT.

What if you sold now?

You'd be giving up +17% base-case upside to protect against a ~16% bear-case drawdown.
  • Giving up: upside to C$288 (+17%) / C$345 (+40%); income + FCF compounding; selling ~10% below fair value (C$272) and ~30% below the analyst mean.
  • Protecting: capital if the bear case (C$208) plays out on a hawkish Fed / gold correction. Exit rules currently triggered? None.
  • Net: no mechanical reason to sell — this is a hold/accumulate zone, not a distribution zone.
13

Position Sizing Context

A framework for translating conviction into allocation given risk per share and sector volatility. Illustrative only — not advice. No risk budget or portfolio role was supplied in this batch run, so an explicit % allocation is intentionally omitted.

Position sizing not computed — no portfolio allocation or role was specified for this batch analysis. Volatility context for when you do size: beta ~0.57 vs SPY (low market beta, but high gold beta), daily ATR ~C$11 (~4.6% of price), and a demonstrated ~29% peak-to-trough drawdown in the last quarter. Catalyst clustering is calm (score ~75) apart from the FOMC overlay, so no clustering-based size cut applies. For medium/long horizons, a staggered 3-tranche entry — e.g. at the C$240–246 shelf, on a daily reclaim of ~C$265, and at the C$212 swing-low retest — would average in and reduce timing risk given the live event.

14

Calibration Snapshot

Machine-readable snapshot of every score, confidence, key level and signal override, saved alongside the HTML as calibration-AEM.TO-20260616-1703.json so the next run can compute deltas and the watchlist monitor can render the Hard-Gate / Entry / Exit cells without parsing HTML. This is the first report for AEM.TO — no prior calibration, so no "Changes Since Last Report" box.
{
  "ticker": "AEM.TO", "exchange_ticker": "TSX:AEM", "isin": "CA0084741085",
  "company": "Agnico Eagle Mines Limited", "date": "2026-06-16", "version": "v6",
  "analysis_status": "on-going", "finder_ticker": "AEM", "finder_exchange": "🇨🇦 TSX · 🇺🇸 NYSE",
  "section": "Gold Miners", "lifecycle_stage": "mature",
  "price_at_rating_cad": 246.41, "price_at_rating_usd": 175.82, "fx_cad_per_usd": 1.402,
  "signal_short": "WAIT_FOR_EVENT", "signal_medium": "BUY", "signal_long": "STRONG_BUY",
  "composite_short": 60, "composite_medium": 65, "composite_long": 71,
  "quality_score": 84, "valuation_score": 55, "timing_score": 54,
  "driver_score": 88, "driver_label": "Strong Tailwind",
  "economic_alignment_stance": "Trend-Following", "economic_alignment_conviction": 82,
  "economic_alignment_pressure": "Tailwind", "economic_alignment_source": "sector-map",
  "macro_report_date": "2026-06-13",
  "quality_detail": {"industry_benchmark_name": "AISC Margin", "industry_benchmark_value": 70,
    "industry_benchmark_score": 95, "moat_score": 60, "roic_percentile_vs_peers": 85,
    "capital_allocation": 80, "management_skin_in_game": 72, "fmp_rating": "A", "fmp_overall_score": 4},
  "valuation_detail": {"fcf_yield": 5.3, "forward_pe": 12.2, "ev_ebitda": 8.74, "pb": 3.36,
    "analyst_consensus_target_cad": 340.95, "analyst_target_high_cad": 429.85, "analyst_target_low_cad": 134.02,
    "analyst_target_upside_pct": 38.4, "analyst_grades_consensus": "Buy", "analyst_bullish_pct": 64.5,
    "analyst_coverage_count": 11, "recent_upgrades_30d": 0, "recent_downgrades_30d": 0},
  "timing_detail": {"mtf_confluence": 60, "risk_reward_score": 52, "catalyst_clustering_score": 75,
    "dynamic_macro_weight": 0.20, "rel_strength_52w_pct": 47},
  "confidence": {"quality": 80, "valuation": 68, "timing": 65, "driver": 70, "economic": 75, "overall": 65},
  "hard_gate_state": "clear", "gates_triggered": [], "gates_caution": [], "do_not_buy_triggers": [],
  "amplification": {"short": "overridden_WAIT (FOMC <3d)", "medium": "BUY (STRONG declined, valuation)", "long": "BUY->STRONG_BUY (driver 88 + Tailwind)"},
  "fair_value_est_cad": 272, "stop_loss_cad": 210, "target_base_cad": 288, "target_bull_cad": 345, "target_bear_cad": 208,
  "entry_criteria_total": 5, "entry_criteria_met": 2, "exit_criteria_total": 3, "exit_criteria_met": 0,
  "next_update_date": "2026-06-18", "next_check_date": "2026-06-18",
  "next_update_basis": "FOMC 2026-06-17 +1d (gold rate-sensitive, high-impact within 3-day window)"
}
15

Data Sources & Methodology

Full audit trail of every data source used, with OK / partial / fail indicators and the confidence haircuts applied. Quality/valuation fundamentals were pulled on the US ticker (AEM, USD); all price-based levels are reported on the TSX listing (AEM.TO, CAD) — the data-basis rule for this dual-listed name.
Data Source Status
get_yahoo_quote / get_yahoo_prices — AEM.TO CAD price, 125 daily bars, targets
get_company_profile / get_financial_ratios — AEM (USD) fundamentals
get_income_statement — 6 quarters; share count verified (500.2M)
get_multi_timeframe_analysis — all 5 timeframes (Polygon)
get_price_target_consensus / _summary — US + CAD targets
get_grades_consensus / get_stock_grades — 12 grade actions
get_ratings_snapshot — FMP "A" health rating
get_analyst_estimates — 2025–2030 EPS/revenue
get_economic_calendar / _series / _indicators — FOMC, CPI, DFII10 real yield, VIX
get_polygon_news — 12 articles incl. realized gold price & AISC
Macro-Economic report — 2026-06-13 (XLB / GLD signals)
get_earnings_calendar — returned empty; next earnings est. ~late-July (unverified)
Impact on scores: Near-complete coverage. The only failure was the earnings-calendar (Q2 date estimated ~late-July, flagged unverified in §8) — immaterial to scheduling because the FOMC drives the next-update. Valuation confidence was held to 68% for the wide (3.2×) target spread and the peak-cycle-earnings uncertainty, not for any data gap. Gold spot/AISC are sourced from Q1 disclosures + recent news rather than a live commodity feed (Driver confidence 70%). Market cap independently verified (500.2M shares × C$246.41 = C$123.3B ≈ Yahoo's C$123.2B), so no stale-market-cap trap.
DISCLAIMER: This is a quantitative framework for educational purposes only. It is not financial advice. Always do your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making investment decisions.